Nunes about to be KO'ed.....

I am sorry lewdog, I was not clear. I was referring to the lead article where is claims, that "sources familiar with this case told the NYT and Washington post... either somebody who actually had access to the supporting documents revealed that data. So, it would appear that somebody disclosed, ratted or snitched, what was probably classified info. The supported documents have not been released. If you have copies please post them. Just joking..

It's so funny how everything from the left comes from anonymous sources, sources familiar, but never any names.

Oh, that's right, we have to protect their identity. It couldn't be that they are full of shit.

THEY CANT NAME NAMES.

DDDUUUHHHH

the dem memo hasnt been released or declassified, and they wont leak it.

Sure they can. A news source can name anybody they like............unless they really have no names to begin with.
 
trumptards should get out of the dumbo echo chamber and get some fresh air once in a while... if they ever found some facts that would certainly be refreshing!


The Post first reported on the warrant (known as a FISA warrant, short for Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act) in April. That report included this bit of information:

Three years before Page became an adviser to the Trump campaign, he came to the attention of FBI counterintelligence agents, who learned that Russian spy suspects had sought to use Page as a source for information.
 
Last edited:
Did this loser author the Democratic memo?
DVT3TwcW0AU6Drn.jpg
Adam Schiff: Russians love our 2nd Amendment they want us to kill each other (VIDEO)
There are college students all across the nation who will now miss that question on their constitutional law exam. They will now have firmly implanted in the neural pathways of their brains the fact that the Russians gave us the Second Amendment. Before today many of them still thought it was part of the actual constitution ratified on December 15th, 1791 after 15 years of careful thought and debate. Glad Mr Shiff has clear that up for them.
 
The implication is apparently that partisan information was used to request surveillance of a Trump campaign aide when it shouldn’t have been. This argument — assuming it’s the argument made by the memo! — is contingent on a lot of shaky assumptions, several of which were parsed by Orin Kerr at Lawfare. For example: Steele’s background made him a credible source to the FBI, and judges are used to considering motivation when determining whether to grant a warrant.

Assuming, that is, that it’s fair to consider Steele a biased source. There’s no indication that Steele knew who the client was for whom he was indirectly working. In his testimony before the Senate last year, Fusion GPS’s Glenn Simpson said that Steele was told only to “see if you can find out what Donald Trump’s been doing on these trips to Russia.”


But the broader question that’s important to answer is if there was other evidence, besides what Steele provided, that might have prompted the FBI to seek a warrant to surveil Page’s activities. After all, if there were 40 pieces of evidence cited, one of which came from Steele, even if Steele’s evidence were somehow inappropriate to include (again, not necessarily a fair assumption) there would still be 39 other reasons that a warrant might be justified.

Analysis | What we know about the warrant to surveil Carter Page
 
If Nunes' allegation that the FBI LIED to the FISC judges was the "central" accusation..........the Trump stooge, Nunes should have read the footnotes...LOL

  • The Nunes memo's claim that the FBI and Department of Justice misled a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court when seeking to wiretap Trump campaign adviser Carter Page may have been quashed.
  • Officials familiar with the matter told The Washington Post and The New York Times that the DOJ made it clear to the court that information contained in a dossier they submitted as part of a FISA application to surveil Page was politically motivated.
  • The revelation undercuts the most important claim in Nunes' memo as he seeks to characterize the FBI and the DOJ as corrupt and biased against President Donald Trump.
The central argument in the Nunes memo may have just been debunked
Another turd post by the failure known as Nat.

Not disclosed... Hillary and the DNC paid for a document that was sourced from Russian intelligence and then used in the application process.
Nat put up a smile. Clearly hates successful people.
 
There are college students all across the nation who will now miss that question on their constitutional law exam. They will now have firmly implanted in the neural pathways of their brains the fact that the Russians gave us the Second Amendment. Before today many of them still thought it was part of the actual constitution ratified on December 15th, 1791 after 15 years of careful thought and debate. Glad Mr Shiff has clear that up for them.

so because the 2nd amendment (however insanely right-wingers interpret it) is part of our constitution, it's ok that Russia funneled money through the NRA to get to Donald in order to get around laws prohibiting foreign money in our elections"?

hmmmm? we'll wait...

and while we're waiting you can tell us how your head would spin if anyone funneled money to a dem candidate from a foreign entity to, oh I don't know, say planned parenthood.
 
There are college students all across the nation who will now miss that question on their constitutional law exam. They will now have firmly implanted in the neural pathways of their brains the fact that the Russians gave us the Second Amendment. Before today many of them still thought it was part of the actual constitution ratified on December 15th, 1791 after 15 years of careful thought and debate. Glad Mr Shiff has clear that up for them.

only if they're stupid and incapable of critical thinking.

in which case they deserve to fail, don't you think?
 
There are college students all across the nation who will now miss that question on their constitutional law exam. They will now have firmly implanted in the neural pathways of their brains the fact that the Russians gave us the Second Amendment. Before today many of them still thought it was part of the actual constitution ratified on December 15th, 1791 after 15 years of careful thought and debate. Glad Mr Shiff has clear that up for them.

only if they're stupid and incapable of critical thinking.

in which case they deserve to fail, don't you think?

Nope, they just become Republicans.
 
I am sorry lewdog, I was not clear. I was referring to the lead article where is claims, that "sources familiar with this case told the NYT and Washington post... either somebody who actually had access to the supporting documents revealed that data. So, it would appear that somebody disclosed, ratted or snitched, what was probably classified info. The supported documents have not been released. If you have copies please post them. Just joking..

It's so funny how everything from the left comes from anonymous sources, sources familiar, but never any names.

Oh, that's right, we have to protect their identity. It couldn't be that they are full of shit.

THEY CANT NAME NAMES.

DDDUUUHHHH

the dem memo hasnt been released or declassified, and they wont leak it.

Sure they can. A news source can name anybody they like............unless they really have no names to begin with.

ok, you dont believe your eyes

que (((((((((((((((( TWILIGHT ZONE MUSIC )))))))))))))))

THEN CALL THE ASYLUM :cuckoo:


Papadufus was NEVER there

e88d84a83ff377744a74342fcf7efe9b.cf.webp


thats not him sitting at the table with Trump, aka the GOP CANDIDATE.
 
Last edited:
WHERE oh where is the evidence that the FBI acted inappropriately??



"the controversial Nunes memo, which allegedly proves that F.B.I. and D.O.J. officials sought to conceal the extent to which their surveillance of Page was influenced by the infamous Steele dossier"


nothingburger-cartoon-598.jpg

I read the Nunes memo. There’s not a single damning thing in it.


:laugh2:




Republican leaders are acknowledging that the FBI disclosed the political origins of a private dossier the bureau cited in an application to surveil former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page, undermining a controversial GOP memo released Friday...

Republicans concede key FBI 'footnote' in Carter Page warrant
 
There are college students all across the nation who will now miss that question on their constitutional law exam. They will now have firmly implanted in the neural pathways of their brains the fact that the Russians gave us the Second Amendment. Before today many of them still thought it was part of the actual constitution ratified on December 15th, 1791 after 15 years of careful thought and debate. Glad Mr Shiff has clear that up for them.

only if they're stupid and incapable of critical thinking.

in which case they deserve to fail, don't you think?
That is exactly what the universities are spitting out. Emasculated entitled babies programed to reject common sense.
 
WHERE oh where is the evidence that the FBI acted inappropriately??



"the controversial Nunes memo, which allegedly proves that F.B.I. and D.O.J. officials sought to conceal the extent to which their surveillance of Page was influenced by the infamous Steele dossier"


nothingburger-cartoon-598.jpg

I read the Nunes memo. There’s not a single damning thing in it.


:laugh2:




Republican leaders are acknowledging that the FBI disclosed the political origins of a private dossier the bureau cited in an application to surveil former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page, undermining a controversial GOP memo released Friday...

Republicans concede key FBI 'footnote' in Carter Page warrant
Shouldn't that be a Democrat in that cartoon? They are the ones that had a fit. What is with Democrats and this projection bullshit?
 
WHERE oh where is the evidence that the FBI acted inappropriately??



"the controversial Nunes memo, which allegedly proves that F.B.I. and D.O.J. officials sought to conceal the extent to which their surveillance of Page was influenced by the infamous Steele dossier"


nothingburger-cartoon-598.jpg

I read the Nunes memo. There’s not a single damning thing in it.


:laugh2:




Republican leaders are acknowledging that the FBI disclosed the political origins of a private dossier the bureau cited in an application to surveil former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page, undermining a controversial GOP memo released Friday...

Republicans concede key FBI 'footnote' in Carter Page warrant

crawl to kiss Trumps ass because he said there was, where else ?
 
Report Suggests President Trump Told Michael Flynn to Lie to the FBI

In December 2016, Flynn sat at the center of hidden diplomacy between the Trump transition team and Russia. The departing Obama administration was putting into place sanctions to punish Russia for its criminal theft of emails.

The Trump team was quietly telling Russia not to retaliate because it would reverse or undermine those sanctions. Flynn conveyed this message to Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak in December. The next month he denied doing so to FBI agents.

Two days after that, Sally Yates, the acting attorney general, met with White House counsel Don McGahn and told him about Flynn’s lie, which she had learned of through FBI surveillance of Russia. The danger of the lie was extreme.

Since the Russians were privy to the conversation Flynn had denied ever having, they knew he was lying, and thus had powerful blackmail leverage over him.

And yet, despite having been informed that the incoming national security adviser was an extreme security risk, the White House responded with strange lethargy. Flynn remained on the job for 18 more days...





GOOD THING the FBI was surveilling these lying weasels! :eusa_clap:
 
The sanctions bill passed the House of Representatives Tuesday by a lopsided margin of 419-3, and the Senate could be voting on it as early as this week as well.

The Trump administration has given mixed signals about whether it would sign the bill into law, but that may not matter. The Senate passed a similar piece of legislation earlier this summer by a margin of 98-2, so it’s very likely that the bill’s supporters will have veto-proof majorities in both chambers of Congress.
 
There are college students all across the nation who will now miss that question on their constitutional law exam. They will now have firmly implanted in the neural pathways of their brains the fact that the Russians gave us the Second Amendment. Before today many of them still thought it was part of the actual constitution ratified on December 15th, 1791 after 15 years of careful thought and debate. Glad Mr Shiff has clear that up for them.

so because the 2nd amendment (however insanely right-wingers interpret it) is part of our constitution, it's ok that Russia funneled money through the NRA to get to Donald in order to get around laws prohibiting foreign money in our elections"?

hmmmm? we'll wait...

and while we're waiting you can tell us how your head would spin if anyone funneled money to a dem candidate from a foreign entity to, oh I don't know, say planned parenthood.
 

Forum List

Back
Top