NYT - Trump seeks to end affirmative action - YAY

Affirmative-action is a racist cowardly actā€¦ Fact
What you know about AA can fit on the head of a pin.
You don't know it's origin nor why it's been continued.
Racists dumbasses like you only see that it's keeping the black man down.... and that thrills you.



The only thing the Democrats/Liberals have done for black folks is to ban and be horrified at the expression of one particular word.


While talking a great game, it is well known by all except liberals in general, and the Black community specifically, that the Democrat Party claims to be concerned with support of blacks, their record with respect to black politicians tells a different storyā€¦

Here's a "Democrat Dozen"

1. In 2005, the Democrats did not name Donna Brazile to head the Democratic National Committee. They chose Howard Dean.


2. ā€œGov. David A. Paterson defiantly vowed to run for election next year despite the White Houseā€˜s urging that he withdraw from the New York governorā€™s race.ā€ Obama Asks Paterson to Quit New York Governorā€™s Race

3. President Barack Obama has kept mum on the fate of Rep. Charles Rangel (D-NY) for days -- but he tells CBS News that it's time for the embattled 80-year-old former Ways and Means Chairman to end his career "with dignity."

"I think Charlie Rangel served a very long time and served-- his constituents very well. But these-- allegations are very troubling," Obama told Harry Smith in an interview to be aired on the "Early Show." and first broadcast on the CBS Evening News with Katie Couric. Obama: Time for Rangel to end career "with dignity"

4 Harold Ford told not to run for Senator from New York:

ā€œFrom the start, Mr. Fordā€™s potential candidacy angered national Democratic Party leaders by disrupting plans for what was planned as a seamless Gillibrand nomination. Harry Reid of Nevada, the Senate majority leader, called Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg to discourage him from supporting Mr. Ford, and Senator Charles E. Schumer of New York met personally with Mr. Ford to argue against his candidacy.ā€ Harold Ford Jr. Says He Wonā€™t Challenge Senator Gillibrand - NYTimes.com


5. ā€œAs state comptroller, [Carl] McCall earned the distinction of being the first African American ever elected to a statewide office in New York. Four years later voters overwhelmingly supported McCall over Republican Bruce Blakeman 64.75 to 32.1%. McCall's reelection in 1998 may have given him the confidence he needed in order to pursue the governor's mansionā€¦.The McCall campaign had the support of the Democratic Party; whether or not McCall had the party's full support has been the subject of much debateā€¦.Still one wonders just how committed the party was to McCall's campaignā€¦.shunned by some of the state's most respected Democratsā€¦McCall blamed his money woes on the national Democratic Party, claiming that the party had abandoned his campaignā€¦.ā€ H. Carl McCall for Governor: a lesson to all black high-profile statewide office seekers. - Free Online Library


6. And, most telling, Bill Clintonā€™s remarks about the black candidate for the presidency:

ā€œ[A]s Hillary bungled Caroline, Billā€™s handling of Ted was even worse. The day after Iowa, he phoned Kennedy and pressed for an endorsement, making the case for his wife. But Bill then went on, belittling Obama in a manner that deeply offended Kennedy. Recounting the conversation later to a friend, Teddy fumed that Clinton had said, A few years ago, this guy would have been getting us coffee.ā€

Teddy's anger


7. Three staffers working for embattled Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) were asked by security officers to leave an event in downtown Washington on Thursday after they tried to display large campaign signs just as House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) was about to speak. .. Waters told The Hill afterward that the staffers had been displaying the signs at the annual legislative conference for the Congressional Black Caucus Foundation, which was held at the Washington convention center a few blocks away. ā€œIt ainā€™t about Nancy. Itā€™s about black people,ā€ Waters said. Waters aides expelled from Pelosi event


8. And what Governor of Arkansas made the Saturday before Easter "Confederate Flag Day"?
The Arkansas Code, Section 1-5-107. Confederate Flag Day.
(a) The Saturday immediately preceding Easter Sunday of each year is designated as "Confederate Flag Day" in this state.
No person, firm, or corporation shall display any Confederate flag or replica thereof in connection with any advertisement of any commercial enterprise, or in any manner for any purpose except to honor the Confederate States of America.
Any person, firm, or corporation violating the provisions of this section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction shall be fined not less than one hundred dollars ($100) nor more than one thousand dollars ($1,000).

"In April 1985, Governor Bill Clinton signed Act 985 into law...'
Mark R. Levin on Trent Lott & Moral Outrage on National Review Online


9. Do Democrats in Congress support blacks by practicing affirmative action in their hiringā€¦and of course this would be our of moral convictions, as they are legally exempt from affirmative action requirements. More than passing interesting, the ā€˜National Journal,ā€™ a survey of congressional staffers revealed that Democrats hired black employees at the same rate as Republicans: 2 percent. ā€œThe Racial Breakdown of Congressional Staffs,ā€ National Journal, June 21, 2005

a. Schweitzer, ā€œDo As I Say,ā€ p. 9


10. Clinton pushed black candidate to drop out of Florida race:

ā€œBill Clinton sought to persuade Rep. Kendrick Meek to drop out of the race for Senate during a trip to Florida last week ā€” and nearly succeededā€¦Clinton did not dangle a job in front of Meek, who gave up a safe House seat to run for the Senate, but instead made the case that the move would advance the congressmanā€™s future prospects, said a third Democrat familiar with the conversations. Clinton campaigned with Meek in Florida on Oct. 19 and 20, and thought he had won Meek over. But as the week wore on, Meek lost his enthusiasm for the arrangement, spurred in part, a third Democratic source said, by his wifeā€™s belief that he could still win the race. Clinton spoke with Meek again at weekā€™s end, three Democrats said, and again Meek said he would drop out.ā€

Read more: Clinton pushed Meek to quit Fla. race


By some strange coincidence, the Democrats, again, force a black to the back:

11. ā€œUnder an arrangement reached two days ago, Steny Hoyer of Maryland, the current majority leader, would get the No. 2 job of minority whip come January. Clyburn, now majority whip, would hold the post of assistant leader, newly created for the purpose of heading off a contest for the whip position.ā€ http://www.businessweek.com/news/20...dership-as-clyburn-settles-for-no-3-post.html


12. For a peek into the unspoken view that Democrats have of blacks, look at how Biden finds Obama as different from all the rest of blacks:

Feb 9, 2007 - Biden called Obama first "clean" African-American candidate ā€¢ Biden ... "I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy," Biden said. "I mean ... He's smart.
 
Now the media cartels will call trump racist for trying to end the extremely racist liberal policy of giving special treatment to black college students and thereby discriminating against whites!!!

Justice Dept. to Take On Affirmative Action in College Admissions

aug 1 2017 WASHINGTON ā€” The Trump administration is preparing to redirect resources of the Justice Departmentā€™s civil rights division toward investigating and suing universities over affirmative action admissions policies deemed to discriminate against white applicants, according to a document obtained by The New York Times.

The document, an internal announcement to the civil rights division, seeks current lawyers interested in working for a new project on ā€œinvestigations and possible litigation related to intentional race-based discrimination in college and university admissions.ā€

The announcement suggests that the project will be run out of the divisionā€™s front office, where the Trump administrationā€™s political appointees work, rather than its Educational Opportunities Section, which is run by career civil servants and normally handles work involving schools and universities.

The document does not explicitly identify whom the Justice Department considers at risk of discrimination because of affirmative action admissions policies. But the phrasing it uses, ā€œintentional race-based discrimination,ā€ cuts to the heart of programs designed to bring more minority students to university campuses.

I see nothing wrong with bringing more minority students on campus. It seems that Trump is looking for a solution to a problem that does not exist. The Supreme Court decision in the Bakke case was a sound decision. If Trump is so worried about preferences, why not go after all preferences. This is a alt-right move.

1. "I see nothing wrong with bringing more minority students on campus."
That's because you're a fool.....and a racist.

"To put it another way: Asians need SAT scores 140 points higher than whites, 270 points higher than Hispanics, and an incredible 450 points higher than blacks (out of 1,600 points) to get into these schools. An Asian applicant with an SAT score of 1,500, that is, has the same chance of being accepted as a white student with a 1,360, a Latino with a 1,230, or an African-American with a 1,050. Among candidates in the highest (1,400ā€“1,600) SAT range, 77 percent of blacks, 48 percent of Hispanics, 40 percent of whites, and only 30 percent of Asians are admitted."
Fewer Asians Need Apply



2. "The Supreme Court decision in the Bakke case was a sound decision."
Gads, you're an imbecile.

When white student Allan Bakke was rejected from medical student because the university chose a different, less qualified student based on skin color, Patrick Chavis.....this was the result:

NEWS
Liposuction Doctor Has License Revoked
August 26, 1998 | JULIE MARQUIS, TIMES STAFF WRITER
The Medical Board of California revoked the license of a Lynwood obstetrician on Tuesday, calling him grossly negligent in his care of seven liposuction patients--including one who bled to death after he abandoned her bedside. Dr. Patrick Chavis' license should be pulled "to protect the public," according to a 28-page decision accusing the physician of violations ranging from botching procedures to allowing his nurse to practice medicine.
ARTICLES BY DATE

Articles about Patrick Chavis - latimes


CALIFORNIA | LOCAL
Doctor in Landmark Anti-Bias Case Slain
August 13, 2002 | ERIC MALNIC, TIMES STAFF WRITER
To proponents of affirmative action, Patrick Chavis was viewed six years ago as a hero. Sen. Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.) called the personable black doctor the perfect example of how the controversial college admissions program could help minorities and disadvantaged communities. To opponents of the program, Chavis was seen four years ago as one of its failures.
 
Affirmative-action is a racist cowardly actā€¦ Fact
What you know about AA can fit on the head of a pin.
You don't know it's origin nor why it's been continued.
Racists dumbasses like you only see that it's keeping the black man down.... and that thrills you.
Well, I happened to be a minority(American Indian). I don't believe in affirmative action whatsoever I think it makes people weak and useless.



....but accrues Democrat votes.
 
Two years ago trump was on Meet the Press or some such show and he said he supported AA. That disappointed me but perhaps he didn't mean it and said it just to keep the idiot press happy.
You don't know your own prez. He always contradicts himself sometimes in the same paragraph. He has the attention span of a flea.



Bet you voted for the guy who won the 'Lie of the Year" award, huh?
 
"To put it another way: Asians need SAT scores 140 points higher than whites, 270 points higher than Hispanics, and an incredible 450 points higher than blacks (out of 1,600 points) to get into these schools.

It's even worse that that since it's highly likely the College Board uses affirmative action scoring to help blacks on the SAT.

AA grading is standard in our schools and likely also used on standardized tests.
 
"To put it another way: Asians need SAT scores 140 points higher than whites, 270 points higher than Hispanics, and an incredible 450 points higher than blacks (out of 1,600 points) to get into these schools.

It's even worse that that since it's highly likely the College Board uses affirmative action scoring to help blacks on the SAT.

AA grading is standard in our schools and likely also used on standardized tests.


I firmly believe that the addition of 800 points in essays...subjectively graded...was designed for exactly the purpose you've suggested..
 
It's even worse that that since it's highly likely the College Board uses affirmative action scoring to help blacks on the SAT.

AA grading is standard in our schools and likely also used on standardized tests.


I firmly believe that the addition of 800 points in essays...subjectively graded...was designed for exactly the purpose you've suggested..

Lots of people think that's why the essay section was created. The hope was the graders would detect the author was black and give them bonus points. Hasn't worked out way and the essay section is being dropped.
 
Oh, is nepotism restricted to white people now? Wow we sure are all just born evil, huh. We have monopolies on imperialism, racism, and even nepotism now.

Racism is not always a purposeful nefarious act . There's institutional racism .

For example these schools have been all white since forever . These schools also allow for legacy admissions . Because they always been all white , the legacy really benefits mostly all white kids . While the legacy process wasn't intended to be racist, the result is that it has a racist affect .
 
Now the media cartels will call trump racist for trying to end the extremely racist liberal policy of giving special treatment to black college students and thereby discriminating against whites!!!

Justice Dept. to Take On Affirmative Action in College Admissions

aug 1 2017 WASHINGTON ā€” The Trump administration is preparing to redirect resources of the Justice Departmentā€™s civil rights division toward investigating and suing universities over affirmative action admissions policies deemed to discriminate against white applicants, according to a document obtained by The New York Times.

The document, an internal announcement to the civil rights division, seeks current lawyers interested in working for a new project on ā€œinvestigations and possible litigation related to intentional race-based discrimination in college and university admissions.ā€

The announcement suggests that the project will be run out of the divisionā€™s front office, where the Trump administrationā€™s political appointees work, rather than its Educational Opportunities Section, which is run by career civil servants and normally handles work involving schools and universities.

The document does not explicitly identify whom the Justice Department considers at risk of discrimination because of affirmative action admissions policies. But the phrasing it uses, ā€œintentional race-based discrimination,ā€ cuts to the heart of programs designed to bring more minority students to university campuses.

I see nothing wrong with bringing more minority students on campus. It seems that Trump is looking for a solution to a problem that does not exist. The Supreme Court decision in the Bakke case was a sound decision. If Trump is so worried about preferences, why not go after all preferences. This is a alt-right move.

1. "I see nothing wrong with bringing more minority students on campus."
That's because you're a fool.....and a racist.

"To put it another way: Asians need SAT scores 140 points higher than whites, 270 points higher than Hispanics, and an incredible 450 points higher than blacks (out of 1,600 points) to get into these schools. An Asian applicant with an SAT score of 1,500, that is, has the same chance of being accepted as a white student with a 1,360, a Latino with a 1,230, or an African-American with a 1,050. Among candidates in the highest (1,400ā€“1,600) SAT range, 77 percent of blacks, 48 percent of Hispanics, 40 percent of whites, and only 30 percent of Asians are admitted."
Fewer Asians Need Apply



2. "The Supreme Court decision in the Bakke case was a sound decision."
Gads, you're an imbecile.

When white student Allan Bakke was rejected from medical student because the university chose a different, less qualified student based on skin color, Patrick Chavis.....this was the result:

NEWS
Liposuction Doctor Has License Revoked
August 26, 1998 | JULIE MARQUIS, TIMES STAFF WRITER
The Medical Board of California revoked the license of a Lynwood obstetrician on Tuesday, calling him grossly negligent in his care of seven liposuction patients--including one who bled to death after he abandoned her bedside. Dr. Patrick Chavis' license should be pulled "to protect the public," according to a 28-page decision accusing the physician of violations ranging from botching procedures to allowing his nurse to practice medicine.
ARTICLES BY DATE

Articles about Patrick Chavis - latimes


CALIFORNIA | LOCAL
Doctor in Landmark Anti-Bias Case Slain
August 13, 2002 | ERIC MALNIC, TIMES STAFF WRITER
To proponents of affirmative action, Patrick Chavis was viewed six years ago as a hero. Sen. Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.) called the personable black doctor the perfect example of how the controversial college admissions program could help minorities and disadvantaged communities. To opponents of the program, Chavis was seen four years ago as one of its failures.

You are the fool and racist. I do believe colleges should seek out diversity however I don't believe in quotas. And why not go after all preferences. Why just racial? That shows the racism that is involved here.
 
Now the media cartels will call trump racist for trying to end the extremely racist liberal policy of giving special treatment to black college students and thereby discriminating against whites!!!

Justice Dept. to Take On Affirmative Action in College Admissions

aug 1 2017 WASHINGTON ā€” The Trump administration is preparing to redirect resources of the Justice Departmentā€™s civil rights division toward investigating and suing universities over affirmative action admissions policies deemed to discriminate against white applicants, according to a document obtained by The New York Times.

The document, an internal announcement to the civil rights division, seeks current lawyers interested in working for a new project on ā€œinvestigations and possible litigation related to intentional race-based discrimination in college and university admissions.ā€

The announcement suggests that the project will be run out of the divisionā€™s front office, where the Trump administrationā€™s political appointees work, rather than its Educational Opportunities Section, which is run by career civil servants and normally handles work involving schools and universities.

The document does not explicitly identify whom the Justice Department considers at risk of discrimination because of affirmative action admissions policies. But the phrasing it uses, ā€œintentional race-based discrimination,ā€ cuts to the heart of programs designed to bring more minority students to university campuses.

I see nothing wrong with bringing more minority students on campus. It seems that Trump is looking for a solution to a problem that does not exist. The Supreme Court decision in the Bakke case was a sound decision. If Trump is so worried about preferences, why not go after all preferences. This is a alt-right move.

1. "I see nothing wrong with bringing more minority students on campus."
That's because you're a fool.....and a racist.

"To put it another way: Asians need SAT scores 140 points higher than whites, 270 points higher than Hispanics, and an incredible 450 points higher than blacks (out of 1,600 points) to get into these schools. An Asian applicant with an SAT score of 1,500, that is, has the same chance of being accepted as a white student with a 1,360, a Latino with a 1,230, or an African-American with a 1,050. Among candidates in the highest (1,400ā€“1,600) SAT range, 77 percent of blacks, 48 percent of Hispanics, 40 percent of whites, and only 30 percent of Asians are admitted."
Fewer Asians Need Apply



2. "The Supreme Court decision in the Bakke case was a sound decision."
Gads, you're an imbecile.

When white student Allan Bakke was rejected from medical student because the university chose a different, less qualified student based on skin color, Patrick Chavis.....this was the result:

NEWS
Liposuction Doctor Has License Revoked
August 26, 1998 | JULIE MARQUIS, TIMES STAFF WRITER
The Medical Board of California revoked the license of a Lynwood obstetrician on Tuesday, calling him grossly negligent in his care of seven liposuction patients--including one who bled to death after he abandoned her bedside. Dr. Patrick Chavis' license should be pulled "to protect the public," according to a 28-page decision accusing the physician of violations ranging from botching procedures to allowing his nurse to practice medicine.
ARTICLES BY DATE

Articles about Patrick Chavis - latimes


CALIFORNIA | LOCAL
Doctor in Landmark Anti-Bias Case Slain
August 13, 2002 | ERIC MALNIC, TIMES STAFF WRITER
To proponents of affirmative action, Patrick Chavis was viewed six years ago as a hero. Sen. Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.) called the personable black doctor the perfect example of how the controversial college admissions program could help minorities and disadvantaged communities. To opponents of the program, Chavis was seen four years ago as one of its failures.

You are the fool and racist. I do believe colleges should seek out diversity however I don't believe in quotas. And why not go after all preferences. Why just racial? That shows the racism that is involved here.


"I don't believe in quotas."

Unbelievable what a fool you are!!!
How do you find your way back to that split level porta-potty you call home???
Shiny pebbles? Bread crumbs???/





1. "I see nothing wrong with bringing more minority students on campus."
That's because you're a fool.....and a racist.

"To put it another way: Asians need SAT scores 140 points higher than whites, 270 points higher than Hispanics, and an incredible 450 points higher than blacks (out of 1,600 points) to get into these schools. An Asian applicant with an SAT score of 1,500, that is, has the same chance of being accepted as a white student with a 1,360, a Latino with a 1,230, or an African-American with a 1,050. Among candidates in the highest (1,400ā€“1,600) SAT range, 77 percent of blacks, 48 percent of Hispanics, 40 percent of whites, and only 30 percent of Asians are admitted."
Fewer Asians Need Apply



Those are quotas, you imbecile!!!!
 
I always thought it was interesting how lefties go, "skin color shouldn't matter, we're all the same," blah-de-blah, but then they are the staunchest supporters of programs predicated upon the assumption that we are NOT AT ALL the same, and that some groups need more help than others.

But AA, even though it isn't very impactful in real life, hurts Asians the most, which includes Indians.

What is also interesting is that the AA supporters that don't have a problem with race being used to benefit certain groups justify its existence because they claim it's to offset race having been used to benefit in the past. What's hypocritical is they while they don't have a problem using race to benefit, if race is used to deny, suddenly using race is wrong.
 
Now the media cartels will call trump racist for trying to end the extremely racist liberal policy of giving special treatment to black college students and thereby discriminating against whites!!!

Justice Dept. to Take On Affirmative Action in College Admissions

aug 1 2017 WASHINGTON ā€” The Trump administration is preparing to redirect resources of the Justice Departmentā€™s civil rights division toward investigating and suing universities over affirmative action admissions policies deemed to discriminate against white applicants, according to a document obtained by The New York Times.

The document, an internal announcement to the civil rights division, seeks current lawyers interested in working for a new project on ā€œinvestigations and possible litigation related to intentional race-based discrimination in college and university admissions.ā€

The announcement suggests that the project will be run out of the divisionā€™s front office, where the Trump administrationā€™s political appointees work, rather than its Educational Opportunities Section, which is run by career civil servants and normally handles work involving schools and universities.

The document does not explicitly identify whom the Justice Department considers at risk of discrimination because of affirmative action admissions policies. But the phrasing it uses, ā€œintentional race-based discrimination,ā€ cuts to the heart of programs designed to bring more minority students to university campuses.

I see nothing wrong with bringing more minority students on campus. It seems that Trump is looking for a solution to a problem that does not exist. The Supreme Court decision in the Bakke case was a sound decision. If Trump is so worried about preferences, why not go after all preferences. This is a alt-right move.

1. "I see nothing wrong with bringing more minority students on campus."
That's because you're a fool.....and a racist.

"To put it another way: Asians need SAT scores 140 points higher than whites, 270 points higher than Hispanics, and an incredible 450 points higher than blacks (out of 1,600 points) to get into these schools. An Asian applicant with an SAT score of 1,500, that is, has the same chance of being accepted as a white student with a 1,360, a Latino with a 1,230, or an African-American with a 1,050. Among candidates in the highest (1,400ā€“1,600) SAT range, 77 percent of blacks, 48 percent of Hispanics, 40 percent of whites, and only 30 percent of Asians are admitted."
Fewer Asians Need Apply



2. "The Supreme Court decision in the Bakke case was a sound decision."
Gads, you're an imbecile.

When white student Allan Bakke was rejected from medical student because the university chose a different, less qualified student based on skin color, Patrick Chavis.....this was the result:

NEWS
Liposuction Doctor Has License Revoked
August 26, 1998 | JULIE MARQUIS, TIMES STAFF WRITER
The Medical Board of California revoked the license of a Lynwood obstetrician on Tuesday, calling him grossly negligent in his care of seven liposuction patients--including one who bled to death after he abandoned her bedside. Dr. Patrick Chavis' license should be pulled "to protect the public," according to a 28-page decision accusing the physician of violations ranging from botching procedures to allowing his nurse to practice medicine.
ARTICLES BY DATE

Articles about Patrick Chavis - latimes


CALIFORNIA | LOCAL
Doctor in Landmark Anti-Bias Case Slain
August 13, 2002 | ERIC MALNIC, TIMES STAFF WRITER
To proponents of affirmative action, Patrick Chavis was viewed six years ago as a hero. Sen. Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.) called the personable black doctor the perfect example of how the controversial college admissions program could help minorities and disadvantaged communities. To opponents of the program, Chavis was seen four years ago as one of its failures.

You are the fool and racist. I do believe colleges should seek out diversity however I don't believe in quotas. And why not go after all preferences. Why just racial? That shows the racism that is involved here.

If race can be used as a consideration to benefit, why can't it be used as a consideration to deny? How is using race in one manner OK and not OK in the other?
 
Racism is not always a purposeful nefarious act .

.

Affirmative action is. It was and is all about hurting white people.



Hurting white People ? That's a laugh . College campuses are overwhelmingly white . More than population % .

1. Here's what you're laughing at, you racist:

"To put it another way: Asians need SAT scores 140 points higher than whites, 270 points higher than Hispanics, and an incredible 450 points higher than blacks (out of 1,600 points) to get into these schools. An Asian applicant with an SAT score of 1,500, that is, has the same chance of being accepted as a white student with a 1,360, a Latino with a 1,230, or an African-American with a 1,050. Among candidates in the highest (1,400ā€“1,600) SAT range, 77 percent of blacks, 48 percent of Hispanics, 40 percent of whites, and only 30 percent of Asians are admitted."
Fewer Asians Need Apply



2. And here is the result of your plan:

When white student Allan Bakke was rejected from medical student because the university chose a different, less qualified student based on skin color, Patrick Chavis.....this was the result:

NEWS
Liposuction Doctor Has License Revoked
August 26, 1998 | JULIE MARQUIS, TIMES STAFF WRITER
The Medical Board of California revoked the license of a Lynwood obstetrician on Tuesday, calling him grossly negligent in his care of seven liposuction patients--including one who bled to death after he abandoned her bedside. Dr. Patrick Chavis' license should be pulled "to protect the public," according to a 28-page decision accusing the physician of violations ranging from botching procedures to allowing his nurse to practice medicine.
ARTICLES BY DATE

Articles about Patrick Chavis - latimes


CALIFORNIA | LOCAL
Doctor in Landmark Anti-Bias Case Slain
August 13, 2002 | ERIC MALNIC, TIMES STAFF WRITER
To proponents of affirmative action, Patrick Chavis was viewed six years ago as a hero. Sen. Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.) called the personable black doctor the perfect example of how the controversial college admissions program could help minorities and disadvantaged communities. To opponents of the program, Chavis was seen four years ago as one of its failures.




upload_2017-8-4_15-53-11.png
 
"Purdue Dean Wants Engineering Dept. to 'De-Center Western Civilization'
"The purpose seems not to be how best to train new engineers but to let everyone know how engineers continue to 'oppress' women and persons of color."

When one thinks of the Progressive subversion of higher education, many people assume that the hard sciences are devoid of the kind of social justice agenda one finds in the humanities. But in a fascinating piece for the James G. Martin Center for Academic Renewal, engineer Indrek Wichman complains that engineering education has become more about social engineering than actual engineering."
Purdue Dean Wants Engineering Dept. to 'De-Center Western Civilization'
 
I love righties when they say shit like "the most qualified should get in". And then they hook up their white freinds and family !

For example . Donald Trumps staff! Oh the hypocrisy. The Don got into penn cause his rich daddy pulled strings .


Penn? you dumbass..............Trump went to Wharton Business College!
 
I love righties when they say shit like "the most qualified should get in". And then they hook up their white freinds and family !

For example . Donald Trumps staff! Oh the hypocrisy. The Don got into penn cause his rich daddy pulled strings .


Penn? you dumbass..............Trump went to Wharton Business College!


That fool you put in his place voted for a guy who used Saudi Arabia to get into college....

"But new questions have been raised about Obamaā€™s student loans and Obamaā€™s ties to a radical Muslim activist who reportedly was raising money for Obamaā€™s Harvard studies during the years 1988 to 1991.

The allegations first surfaced in late March, when former Manhattan Borough president Percy Sutton told a New York cable channel that a former business partner who was ā€œraising moneyā€ for Obama had approached him in 1988 to help Obama get into Harvard Law School.

In the interview, Sutton says he first heard of Obama about twenty years ago from Khalid Al-Mansour, a Black Muslim and Black Nationalist who was a ā€œmentorā€ to the founders of the Black Panther party at the time the party was founded in the early 1960s.

Sutton described al-Mansour as advisor to ā€œone of the worldā€™s richest men,ā€ Saudi prince Alwaleed bin Talal."
Daily Thought Pad: Obama's Harvard Years: Questions Swirl
 
Racism is not always a purposeful nefarious act .

.

Affirmative action is. It was and is all about hurting white people.



Hurting white People ? That's a laugh . College campuses are overwhelmingly white . More than population % .

1. Here's what you're laughing at, you racist:

"To put it another way: Asians need SAT scores 140 points higher than whites, 270 points higher than Hispanics, and an incredible 450 points higher than blacks (out of 1,600 points) to get into these schools. An Asian applicant with an SAT score of 1,500, that is, has the same chance of being accepted as a white student with a 1,360, a Latino with a 1,230, or an African-American with a 1,050. Among candidates in the highest (1,400ā€“1,600) SAT range, 77 percent of blacks, 48 percent of Hispanics, 40 percent of whites, and only 30 percent of Asians are admitted."
Fewer Asians Need Apply



2. And here is the result of your plan:

When white student Allan Bakke was rejected from medical student because the university chose a different, less qualified student based on skin color, Patrick Chavis.....this was the result:

NEWS
Liposuction Doctor Has License Revoked
August 26, 1998 | JULIE MARQUIS, TIMES STAFF WRITER
The Medical Board of California revoked the license of a Lynwood obstetrician on Tuesday, calling him grossly negligent in his care of seven liposuction patients--including one who bled to death after he abandoned her bedside. Dr. Patrick Chavis' license should be pulled "to protect the public," according to a 28-page decision accusing the physician of violations ranging from botching procedures to allowing his nurse to practice medicine.
ARTICLES BY DATE

Articles about Patrick Chavis - latimes


CALIFORNIA | LOCAL
Doctor in Landmark Anti-Bias Case Slain
August 13, 2002 | ERIC MALNIC, TIMES STAFF WRITER
To proponents of affirmative action, Patrick Chavis was viewed six years ago as a hero. Sen. Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.) called the personable black doctor the perfect example of how the controversial college admissions program could help minorities and disadvantaged communities. To opponents of the program, Chavis was seen four years ago as one of its failures.



View attachment 142088


I say just hand out any kind of a degree a negro wants...make them all Ph'ds ....do not waste tax money sending them to occupy space in our prestigious univirsities...which just go through the motions of affirmative action....a camouflage education...as in make it appear they negroes are really being educated...whilst most understand it is phoney b.s. The saner policy would be just to give them all degrees....free of charge...and let the universities educate those who are capable....no one is going to hire a negro anyway no matter what kind of degree he has unless the government forces them to. Folks this is not rocket science....quit being hypocrites and members of the cast of 'the emperor has no clothes' if you have any integrity, any courage, any morality aka........more reality....tell it like it is...cease mouthing propaganda aka politically correct nonsense.
 
Racism is not always a purposeful nefarious act .

.

Affirmative action is. It was and is all about hurting white people.



Hurting white People ? That's a laugh . College campuses are overwhelmingly white . More than population % .

1. Here's what you're laughing at, you racist:

"To put it another way: Asians need SAT scores 140 points higher than whites, 270 points higher than Hispanics, and an incredible 450 points higher than blacks (out of 1,600 points) to get into these schools. An Asian applicant with an SAT score of 1,500, that is, has the same chance of being accepted as a white student with a 1,360, a Latino with a 1,230, or an African-American with a 1,050. Among candidates in the highest (1,400ā€“1,600) SAT range, 77 percent of blacks, 48 percent of Hispanics, 40 percent of whites, and only 30 percent of Asians are admitted."
Fewer Asians Need Apply



2. And here is the result of your plan:

When white student Allan Bakke was rejected from medical student because the university chose a different, less qualified student based on skin color, Patrick Chavis.....this was the result:

NEWS
Liposuction Doctor Has License Revoked
August 26, 1998 | JULIE MARQUIS, TIMES STAFF WRITER
The Medical Board of California revoked the license of a Lynwood obstetrician on Tuesday, calling him grossly negligent in his care of seven liposuction patients--including one who bled to death after he abandoned her bedside. Dr. Patrick Chavis' license should be pulled "to protect the public," according to a 28-page decision accusing the physician of violations ranging from botching procedures to allowing his nurse to practice medicine.
ARTICLES BY DATE

Articles about Patrick Chavis - latimes


CALIFORNIA | LOCAL
Doctor in Landmark Anti-Bias Case Slain
August 13, 2002 | ERIC MALNIC, TIMES STAFF WRITER
To proponents of affirmative action, Patrick Chavis was viewed six years ago as a hero. Sen. Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.) called the personable black doctor the perfect example of how the controversial college admissions program could help minorities and disadvantaged communities. To opponents of the program, Chavis was seen four years ago as one of its failures.



View attachment 142088


I say just hand out any kind of a degree a negro wants...make them all Ph'ds ....do not waste tax money sending them to occupy space in our prestigious univirsities...which just go through the motions of affirmative action....a camouflage education...as in make it appear they negroes are really being educated...whilst most understand it is phoney b.s. The saner policy would be just to give them all degrees....free of charge...and let the universities educate those who are capable....no one is going to hire a negro anyway no matter what kind of degree he has unless the government forces them to. Folks this is not rocket science....quit being hypocrites and members of the cast of 'the emperor has no clothes' if you have any integrity, any courage, any morality aka........more reality....tell it like it is...cease mouthing propaganda aka politically correct nonsense.


It's hard to see reality catching up to the Leftists....

...but a girl can dream.
 

Forum List

Back
Top