Obama - a legacy of recycling Jimmy Carter's failed policies

[P@triot]

I would call this astounding "failure" - except that these are the exact results Obama intended from the beginning:

The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported Friday that U.S. employers added only 169,000 jobs in August and that the labor force participation rate edged down to 63.2 percent, its lowest point since August 1978.

(and who was president again in 1978?)

It’s worth noting that the unemployment rate today would be approximately 10.8% if labor force participation were at January 2009 levels.

(after 4.5 years and 100% of the policies he insisted would "solve" the problem - we see an economy exponentially worse than the one he inherited)

Obamas failed economy

 

[P@triot]

More than 300,000 people stopped working or looking for a job in August.

News from The Associated Press

 

[Moonglow]

Yet the corporations are making billions. At our expense.

 

[P@triot]

Yet the corporations are making billions. At our expense.

No - they aren't. Nothing is done at "your expense". Nothing. That is the most asinine, selfish, immature, marxist, idiot view imaginable. Anyone who makes that statement really is an asshole.

How has Microsoft exploited you? How has Ford done anything at "your expense"? Listening to you play the victim is just deplorable. Could you possibly feel any sorrier for yourself? Could you possibly be any more selfish in your belief that America's corporations owe you whatever success they achieve?

By the way - if America's corporations are so "bad", why don't you get off your lazy ass and build one so you can hire everyone and show America your view for how it's done the "right" way? Exactly.... Game. Set. Match....stupid.

 

[Moonglow]

Yet the corporations are making billions. At our expense.

No - they aren't. Nothing is done at "your expense". Nothing. That is the most asinine, selfish, immature, marxist, idiot view imaginable. Anyone who makes that statement really is an asshole.

How has Microsoft exploited you? How has Ford done anything at "your expense"? Listening to you play the victim is just deplorable. Could you possibly feel any sorrier for yourself? Could you possibly be any more selfish in your belief that America's corporations owe you whatever success they achieve?

By the way - if America's corporations are so "bad", why don't you get off your lazy ass and build one so you can hire everyone and show America your view for how it's done the "right" way? Exactly.... Game. Set. Match....stupid.

trillions in bailout monies from taxpayers, yeah not from us.
If you'd like to buy my house and 43 acres I will be glad to move.
I did have a company, yet we small timers didn't get any bail out monies.

 

[P@triot]

Yet the corporations are making billions. At our expense.

No - they aren't. Nothing is done at "your expense". Nothing. That is the most asinine, selfish, immature, marxist, idiot view imaginable. Anyone who makes that statement really is an asshole.

How has Microsoft exploited you? How has Ford done anything at "your expense"? Listening to you play the victim is just deplorable. Could you possibly feel any sorrier for yourself? Could you possibly be any more selfish in your belief that America's corporations owe you whatever success they achieve?

By the way - if America's corporations are so "bad", why don't you get off your lazy ass and build one so you can hire everyone and show America your view for how it's done the "right" way? Exactly.... Game. Set. Match....stupid.

trillions in bailout monies from taxpayers, yeah not from us.
If you'd like to buy my house and 43 acres I will be glad to move.
I did have a company, yet we small timers didn't get any bail out monies.

Dude, you are unbelievable. Who was behind the bailouts? Did Microsoft write the checks for the bail out? No. No, not them. Did Ford write the checks for the bail out? No. Did Apple write the checks for the bails outs? Nope. Not them either.

Gee...who was responsible for unconstitutionally pissing away the American people's tax dollars? This is just so hard!

Wait! Wait, I got it! It was the government! That's right - the government! The same government you worship. It was liberal George Bush and Marxist Barack Obama who signed the checks.

So lets get this straight - Moonglow here is upset over the bailouts (as he should be). But rather than place the anger where it belongs - at the government who made the decision and wrote the checks, he blames the corporations who were completely powerless in the entire debacle.

That's it stupid, keep giving them more money and power so they can keep ass-fucking you in to believing you should blame corporations...

 

[Moonglow]

the companies got the money, therefore they put that money to use everywhere but where it was needed most, the USA. Trickle down economics does not work.

 

[Old Rocks]

The correct term for trickle down economics it 'Piss on the Peon'.

 

[JoeB131]

Yet the corporations are making billions. At our expense.

No - they aren't. Nothing is done at "your expense". Nothing. That is the most asinine, selfish, immature, marxist, idiot view imaginable. Anyone who makes that statement really is an asshole.

How has Microsoft exploited you? How has Ford done anything at "your expense"? Listening to you play the victim is just deplorable. Could you possibly feel any sorrier for yourself? Could you possibly be any more selfish in your belief that America's corporations owe you whatever success they achieve?

By the way - if America's corporations are so "bad", why don't you get off your lazy ass and build one so you can hire everyone and show America your view for how it's done the "right" way? Exactly.... Game. Set. Match....stupid.

Rottweiller's philosophy on rape-

If you think rapists are so bad, why don't you go out and buy a strap-on Dildo and show how it's done the "right" way.

 

[P@triot]

the companies got the money, therefore they put that money to use everywhere but where it was needed most, the USA. Trickle down economics does not work.

First, please stop posting while you're high. You're not even forming coherent sentences. Therefore means "for that reason", stupid.

Second, that's not even "trickle down economics" you ignorant fuck. When did Reagan ever advocate for government bailouts?!? His entire platform was to get government OUT of the free market. Your libtard government bailouts are the exact opposite of that! (God Almighty are you a fuck'n moron).

Third, the only thing that doesn't work is your Trickle Up Poverty. Jobs come from the wealthy ass-wipe. There has never been a homeless man yet who has hired someone...

 

[ClosedCaption]

Don't mention Bush....Then talks about Jimmy Carter.

Makes sense?

 

[P@triot]

Yet the corporations are making billions. At our expense.

No - they aren't. Nothing is done at "your expense". Nothing. That is the most asinine, selfish, immature, marxist, idiot view imaginable. Anyone who makes that statement really is an asshole.

How has Microsoft exploited you? How has Ford done anything at "your expense"? Listening to you play the victim is just deplorable. Could you possibly feel any sorrier for yourself? Could you possibly be any more selfish in your belief that America's corporations owe you whatever success they achieve?

By the way - if America's corporations are so "bad", why don't you get off your lazy ass and build one so you can hire everyone and show America your view for how it's done the "right" way? Exactly.... Game. Set. Match....stupid.

Rottweiller's philosophy on rape-

If you think rapists are so bad, why don't you go out and buy a strap-on Dildo and show how it's done the "right" way.

You're such a disingenuous asshole because you know you've had your ass handed to you by me in this debate....

I said go out there and do it better. Go out there and show them how you think it should be done. Since you don't like the "rape", go out there and show them how NOT to rape.

Come on stupid, what's your response now? This could not be more clear. What is your lazy, ignorant ass going to hide behind now?

 

[P@triot]

Yet the corporations are making billions. At our expense.

No - they aren't. Nothing is done at "your expense". Nothing. That is the most asinine, selfish, immature, marxist, idiot view imaginable. Anyone who makes that statement really is an asshole.

How has Microsoft exploited you? How has Ford done anything at "your expense"? Listening to you play the victim is just deplorable. Could you possibly feel any sorrier for yourself? Could you possibly be any more selfish in your belief that America's corporations owe you whatever success they achieve?

By the way - if America's corporations are so "bad", why don't you get off your lazy ass and build one so you can hire everyone and show America your view for how it's done the "right" way? Exactly.... Game. Set. Match....stupid.

Rottweiller's philosophy on rape-

If you think rapists are so bad, why don't you go out and buy a strap-on Dildo and show how it's done the "right" way.

JoeB131's philosophy on debate-

Once you've had your ass thoroughly handed to you in a debate, pretend like you misunderstood what was said and attempt to convince other people of a different narrative in hopes of avoiding having to admit you've been painted into a corner and have no answer to support your indefensible position of communism.

Joe... if an insurance company is fucking customers over, why don't you go out and build your own insurance company and NOT fuck customers over? Everyone in the U.S. would insure themselves with YOU if you're claims are true (and you'd actually have the "single payer" system you crave)...

Joe... if an corporation is fucking employees over, why don't you go out and build your own corporation and NOT fuck employees over?

I'm telling you to go out, NOT by a "dildo" and NOT "rape". What is your response now stupid? Still going to pretend like you don't understand because you can't admit YOU'RE TOO FUCKING LAZY to work for what you want?

 

[P@triot]

Don't mention Bush....Then talks about Jimmy Carter.

Makes sense?

First of all, you guys have spent 13 years talking about Bush.

Second, and much more importantly, the highest unemployment levels under George Bush were exponentially lower than the lowest unemployment numbers under Jimmy Carter or Barack Obama. How do you explain that?

Watching you guys run from cold, hard statistics because they don't fit your narrative for your indefensible ideology is comical... "The numbers show Dumbocrat policy is a monumental failure - QUICK - somebody mention Bush"

 

[Moonglow]

just think next year it will be 14 years.

 

[blastoff]

Let's see 99 weeks divided by 52 weeks = 1.90 years. What's the rush in looking for a job while the paychecks are rolling in?

 

[P@triot]

Let's see 99 weeks divided by 52 weeks = 1.90 years. What's the rush in looking for a job while the paychecks are rolling in?

And if the Dumbocrats have their way - there won't be any jobs at all to even look for. They achieved it in Detroit!

Libtard slaves (JoeB., moonglow) are too lazy to work and thus don't want to. Libtard masters (Obama, Pelosi, Reid) want to solidify their power by ensuring everyone is forced to live off of government.

 

[P@triot]

No - they aren't. Nothing is done at "your expense". Nothing. That is the most asinine, selfish, immature, marxist, idiot view imaginable. Anyone who makes that statement really is an asshole.

How has Microsoft exploited you? How has Ford done anything at "your expense"? Listening to you play the victim is just deplorable. Could you possibly feel any sorrier for yourself? Could you possibly be any more selfish in your belief that America's corporations owe you whatever success they achieve?

By the way - if America's corporations are so "bad", why don't you get off your lazy ass and build one so you can hire everyone and show America your view for how it's done the "right" way? Exactly.... Game. Set. Match....stupid.

trillions in bailout monies from taxpayers, yeah not from us.
If you'd like to buy my house and 43 acres I will be glad to move.
I did have a company, yet we small timers didn't get any bail out monies.

Dude, you are unbelievable. Who was behind the bailouts? Did Microsoft write the checks for the bail out? No. No, not them. Did Ford write the checks for the bail out? No. Did Apple write the checks for the bails outs? Nope. Not them either.

Gee...who was responsible for unconstitutionally pissing away the American people's tax dollars? This is just so hard!

Wait! Wait, I got it! It was the government! That's right - the government! The same government you worship. It was liberal George Bush and Marxist Barack Obama who signed the checks.

So lets get this straight - Moonglow here is upset over the bailouts (as he should be). But rather than place the anger where it belongs - at the government who made the decision and wrote the checks, he blames the corporations who were completely powerless in the entire debacle.

That's it stupid, keep giving them more money and power so they can keep ass-fucking you in to believing you should blame corporations...

Still waiting for a (coherent) response [MENTION=30820]Moonglow[/MENTION]. If you're so pissed about the bailouts, why are you a big government libtard? It's the government that approved the bailouts and wrote the checks - why are you blaming everyone except the one entity that is to blame?

 

[ClosedCaption]

Don't mention Bush....Then talks about Jimmy Carter.

Makes sense?

First of all, you guys have spent 13 years talking about Bush.

13 years = too much

30 years = cool

Consistency = zero

 

[ShootSpeeders]

Don't compare obozo to carter. Carter didn't start any wars or give trillions of $ to banksters or give amnesty to millions of foreign invaders. Carter was prolly the best prez of the last 50 years.