Obama: "A shameful day in Washington"

The "shameful day in Washington" was when Obama, a committed socialist, was elected POTUS

Obama's right...this was about background checks. I wonder how this will play in 2014.

I support back ground checks on criminals, but we all know that they're going to go to the black market. How do you stop them from doing that?
 
It was a great day. Gun control was shot down.

True, still the GOP is going to have to come up with a plan to remove the 46 democrat senators in the Senate that tried to ram gun control down the throats of american people. That should be the top priority now.
 
The "shameful day in Washington" was when Obama, a committed socialist, was elected POTUS

A shameful day in Washington is every day as we can't/won't get our spending
under control.
:clap2: AMEN to that.

O'bummer is pissed that his "feel good" bill failed, but still spends us into oblivion.
No mention either of how he would have paid for all these background checks, but the assumption would be to make law abiding gun owners pay for their own which equates to another tax.
 
GOPers, you're loud & clear: Newtows are A-OK. We gotcha.

Why don't you share with the rest of the class how you feel this bill would have stopped Adam Lanza?

The burden of proof is on the right to prove why he and his stupid mom should have been allowed to have the guns they had.

The next mass murder is the GOP's fault. Mark it down.

This is what I thought. You dont even know what was in the bill, the authors them selves even said it changes nothing. In reality it would do nothing. You can only parrot Hissy Matthews and lament the black mark on your heroes vanity. Here stupid, go educate your self and come back when you can hang.

http://www.manchin.senate.gov/publi...555ff4889&SK=BDEA0DD2B0F4D93F905B5BC8DF6F76B6
 
GOPers, you're loud & clear: Newtows are A-OK. We gotcha.

Why don't you share with the rest of the class how you feel this bill would have stopped Adam Lanza?

The burden of proof is on the right to prove why he and his stupid mom should have been allowed to have the guns they had.

The next mass murder is the GOP's fault. Mark it down.

All the guns were registered to Nancy Lanza; an upstanding member of the community.

A non criminal legal gun owner. Who followed all the laws of the state.

Adam had to kill his mother to get her guns and go on his killing spree.
 
First, they did not all agree this was the thing to do, second, if you are willing to be a useful idiot then you need to be ready to take your lumps.

GOPers, you're loud & clear: Newtows are A-OK. We gotcha.

Libtards, you are sore losers.

Would background checks have prevented newtown?

Libtards you are such tards.

Hear what you want, you are wrong.

They are, but a jilted Obama was SOOO much better. Epic fail. It was nice to see the emperor told no.

BarackObama-Crybaby.gif
 
I am a bit perplexed whether to be slightly more pleased by the awkward but still real vindication of the 2nd Amendment

or

by the President's silly petty meltdown and tantrum.
 
Why don't you share with the rest of the class how you feel this bill would have stopped Adam Lanza?

The burden of proof is on the right to prove why he and his stupid mom should have been allowed to have the guns they had.

No it isn't, turd. The 2nd Amendment is the law of the land. Those who want to strike it down need to make a case for doing so.

The next mass murder is the GOP's fault. Mark it down.

ROFL!
 
How about you read it then opine for us ?

Did...own guns....not frightened by it.

Pleas, Enlighten us as to how it would have prevented any of the mass murders committed with firearms in the last 40 years . Wry, and a few others really need a hand.

It may very well have prevented some people who used guns for murders....but please....keep saying no to background checks. Be loud and proud.
 

Forum List

Back
Top