Freewill
Platinum Member
- Oct 26, 2011
- 31,158
- 5,073
- 1,130
This....What I think is being said by the poster is that all the change is expected from one side...
Which is, in the long run, not a sustainable condition.
And, 50 years (since the 1964 Civil Rights Act), this is all beginning to take-on the characteristics of "the long run".
Change must come from all sides.
Preferential treatment was intended to level the playing field a bit for a generation or two, as a matter of reparation and in the interests of fairness and justice, but it was not intended - it was never intended - to be sustained in perpetuity.
Preferential treatment can't last forever, and we've already had a half-century of it.
With Donor Exhaustion setting in, beyond January 20, 2017, I would not be surprised to see the beginning of the end of such preferential treatment - at law.
But we won't know that for a couple of years, yet.
We're merely seeing the stage being set for such a shift, in the run-up to that timeframe.
Donor Exhaustion... it's a bitch-kitty... and it may be on its way to a legislature near you... sooner than many might think.
You see pefferential treatment, I see fair treatment which should never end. For opportunity the color of one's skin should never be a litmus test. By and large by what I see in my industry that is true. Blacks who are accomplished move forward just as do whites. Blacks who wish to be gang bangers stagnant.
So we must guard against moving back to the democrat policies that suppressed the black man.
I think also we have to move past the point where a black man driving a Cadillac gets pulled over for no other reason then he is a black man driving a Cadillac.