Wyatt earp
Diamond Member
- Apr 21, 2012
- 69,975
- 16,398
- 2,180
15 years of searching still haven`t turned up those massive stockpiles of biological and nuclear weapons. Have you seen them?Let them do it already and stop trying to use our military to do his dirty work. Did you think Iraq had WMDs too?You'll be changing your tune after Israel takes out Iran's nuclear capabilities. They've had practice.USA. Home of the chicken shits. Countries much closer to Iran are okay with the treaty but we need another country to fuck with and get kicked out of.
Only the blind thinks there were no WMDs in Iraq.
What do you live in a bubble?
Do Reports of WMD Found in Iraq Vindicate George W. Bush?
Adriana Scott • Oct. 16, 2014, at 5:45 p.m.
The New York Times published an article this week that has re-ignited a 12-year-old debate: Was then-President George W. Bush right about Iraq? The report examined U.S. service personnel's encounters with abandoned chemical weapons in Iraq – and some conservatives were quick to pounce on the story as evidence that claims by Bush in the lead-up to the war that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction were true and that the United States' 2003 invasion was justified.
The article by Times reporter C.J. Chivers focused on U.S. soldiers who suffered from exposure to the sulfur mustard and other nerve gases which emitted from the bombs. According to the story, about "5,000 chemical warheads, shells or aviation bombs" were found scattered across Iraqi soil. The U.S. government buried the cases from both the public and the troops. As a result, injured soldiers did not receive proper medical treatment.