Obama: It's 'Insane' That People On A No-Fly List Can Legally Buy A Gun In The U.S.

In 10 days most residents from many states will be stripped of rights to fly, pass through TSA checkpoints or enter any federal buildings because their drivers license will no longer be accepted as Real ID. This is a much larger infringing of constitutional rights than restricting guns from Terrorist. Our constitution was gutted by Repubtards!

You got a link?

Found it, it was a law passed in 2005 for the states to update the drivers license. All but 9 states have done so and now those 9 are running out of time.

So 10 years these 9 states have failed at what 41 states have done. Homeland Security is not allowing the extensions, not the Republicans. Obama can give extensions by executive order but won't.

Looks like the states screwed up.

Nice spin trying to make it a partisan issue.

BTW: The ability to fly on an airline is a privilege, not a right.

Wrong! - Travel restrictions is a violation of the most basic constitutional rights & Articles of Confederation. States have pushed back against it, citing constitutional & privacy concerns. Only about half of all states are fully compliant with the federal law. Some have been granted 6 month extensions, but many residents will be banned from freedom to travel in 9 days. Republicans caused this.
 
If you pass an FBI background check, you can legally acquire a firearm. It's the law. Everyone is innocent until proven guilty in our country. If a person is deemed a 'criminal', they shoud be arrested and prosecuted. If that doesn't occur, they aren't criminals.

If Hussein's gang feels some people on No-Fly Lists are criminals, they should immediately pursue legal action. If not, they are legally allowed to acquire firearms. It's actually all on Hussein and his gang. It is what it is. Time to move on.

Back when the constitution was written, weapons of mass destruction were not around. A horse & buggy could fly into a sky scrapers at 500mph killing thousands. A muzzle loader could not cut down hundreds before they could escape or defend themselves. There were no 500hp 4wd trucks to drive over large crowds of people. They did not have small biotech labs that could create viruses that could kill everyone. Today these things are reliable & readily available to everyone. A small number of people are to risky to be allowed to handle these things.

Take the Underwear Bomber for instance. His parents told authorities he was being radicalized. He was immediately put on a watch list of 600k that still were able to fly & have all their rights. Investigators were going to talk to him when he landed in the USA determine f he should be stripped of his rights to fly, etc. But he almost blew up an airliner full of people over a dense population in the mean time.

I'm sorry, but if your parents believe you are a danger, you should should lose your flight & weapons privileges until things can be sorted out. It takes time to gather evidence, locate the person, interrogate them, get probable cause, have a judge sign a warrant, then track down & arrest the potential terrorist. Then remember this person has not actually committed a crime yet, so they usually just get stripped of a few of their rights.

"Gun Free Zones" must end along with the rights of one crazy person with car & guns does not trump the rights of the hundreds he can kill & injure before stopped. Government & business don't have the rights to refuse Gays, they should not have the rights to refuse CCW people either unless they are on a no guns list.
And if your dad is a felon ahole who hates just for the sake of hating we just take away the Constitutional Rights of people?
It's called Due Process.

Ex-parte's limit people all the time based solely on one persons accusation. You can also be forced to register as a sex offender for life based on one persons accusation.

Temporarily being put on a no gun list is a much smaller infringing of rights than those.

We already have 'Gun Control.' If you pass an FBI background check, you're entitled to acquire a firearm. It is what it is. Movin on...

The US Government Accountability Office records show in last 10 years 2,233 people on the terror watch list applied for a federal background check to buy guns or explosives, and of those 2,043 were allowed to proceed.
And? So what's the problem here? I fail to see one.
 
In 10 days most residents from many states will be stripped of rights to fly, pass through TSA checkpoints or enter any federal buildings because their drivers license will no longer be accepted as Real ID. This is a much larger infringing of constitutional rights than restricting guns from Terrorist. Our constitution was gutted by Repubtards!

You got a link?

Found it, it was a law passed in 2005 for the states to update the drivers license. All but 9 states have done so and now those 9 are running out of time.

So 10 years these 9 states have failed at what 41 states have done. Homeland Security is not allowing the extensions, not the Republicans. Obama can give extensions by executive order but won't.

Looks like the states screwed up.

Nice spin trying to make it a partisan issue.

BTW: The ability to fly on an airline is a privilege, not a right.

Travel restrictions is a violation of the most basic constitutional rights & Articles of Confederation. States have pushed back against it, citing constitutional & privacy concerns. Only about half of all states are fully compliant with the federal law. Some have been granted 6 month extensions, but many residents will be banned from freedom to travel in 9 days.
Articles of Confederation? WTF??? Do you even understand what that is??
 
In 10 days most residents from many states will be stripped of rights to fly, pass through TSA checkpoints or enter any federal buildings because their drivers license will no longer be accepted as Real ID. This is a much larger infringing of constitutional rights than restricting guns from Terrorist. Our constitution was gutted by Repubtards!

You got a link?

Found it, it was a law passed in 2005 for the states to update the drivers license. All but 9 states have done so and now those 9 are running out of time.

So 10 years these 9 states have failed at what 41 states have done. Homeland Security is not allowing the extensions, not the Republicans. Obama can give extensions by executive order but won't.

Looks like the states screwed up.

Nice spin trying to make it a partisan issue.

BTW: The ability to fly on an airline is a privilege, not a right.

Wrong! - Travel restrictions is a violation of the most basic constitutional rights & Articles of Confederation. States have pushed back against it, citing constitutional & privacy concerns. Only about half of all states are fully compliant with the federal law. Some have been granted 6 month extensions, but many residents will be banned from freedom to travel in 9 days. Republicans caused this.

Their travel is not restricted. They can travel wherever they want.

From what I have read most states are almost compliant. They have had since 2005 to comply, the government has granted extensions since 2008. Only nine states are not being granted extensions because they are not compliant.
 
"Obama: It's 'Insane' That People On A No-Fly List Can Legally Buy A Gun In The U.S."

What liars on the right refuse to acknowledge is the fact that if being on the no fly list were added to the NICS background check, those declined as a result are still afforded full due process and the right to appeal the decline; and if the FBI is unable to justify the decline, the purchaser is allowed to take possession of his firearm.

It's a lie being propagated by conservatives that anyone is 'advocating' that persons on the no fly list be summarily 'denied' possession of a firearm for no other reason than being on the list, absent due process and the right to appeal.

Consequently, it's perfectly appropriate and reasonable to check the backgrounds of those on the list for criminal convictions, immigration status, or other criteria related to being a prohibited person.
 
"Obama: It's 'Insane' That People On A No-Fly List Can Legally Buy A Gun In The U.S."

What liars on the right refuse to acknowledge is the fact that if being on the no fly list were added to the NICS background check, those declined as a result are still afforded full due process and the right to appeal the decline; and if the FBI is unable to justify the decline, the purchaser is allowed to take possession of his firearm.

It's a lie being propagated by conservatives that anyone is 'advocating' that persons on the no fly list be summarily 'denied' possession of a firearm for no other reason than being on the list, absent due process and the right to appeal.

Consequently, it's perfectly appropriate and reasonable to check the backgrounds of those on the list for criminal convictions, immigration status, or other criteria related to being a prohibited person.
We do not deny people rights arbitrarily and then let them sue to get them back. Why dont we make everyone prove he is eligible to vote before issuing a voter registration card? Make people prove they ae eligible to write a blog before issuing a license? It's nonsense.
Besides, being on the no fly list is not a prohibiting event for firearms purchase. And if it were it would be unconstitutional.
 
In 10 days most residents from many states will be stripped of rights to fly, pass through TSA checkpoints or enter any federal buildings because their drivers license will no longer be accepted as Real ID. This is a much larger infringing of constitutional rights than restricting guns from Terrorist. Our constitution was gutted by Repubtards!

You got a link?

Found it, it was a law passed in 2005 for the states to update the drivers license. All but 9 states have done so and now those 9 are running out of time.

So 10 years these 9 states have failed at what 41 states have done. Homeland Security is not allowing the extensions, not the Republicans. Obama can give extensions by executive order but won't.

Looks like the states screwed up.

Nice spin trying to make it a partisan issue.

BTW: The ability to fly on an airline is a privilege, not a right.

Travel restrictions is a violation of the most basic constitutional rights & Articles of Confederation. States have pushed back against it, citing constitutional & privacy concerns. Only about half of all states are fully compliant with the federal law. Some have been granted 6 month extensions, but many residents will be banned from freedom to travel in 9 days.
Articles of Confederation? WTF??? Do you even understand what that is??

The Articles of Confederation were adopted by the Continental Congress on November 15, 1777. This document served as the United States' first constitution, and was in force from March 1, 1781, until 1789 when the present day Constitution went into effect.

Fact: Restricting anyone from flying is UNCONSTITUTIONAL!!!!!!!!!!! Repubtards do not believe in the US Constitution. They used it for toilet paper & should never be trusted.
 
Last edited:
Back when the constitution was written, weapons of mass destruction were not around. A horse & buggy could fly into a sky scrapers at 500mph killing thousands. A muzzle loader could not cut down hundreds before they could escape or defend themselves. There were no 500hp 4wd trucks to drive over large crowds of people. They did not have small biotech labs that could create viruses that could kill everyone. Today these things are reliable & readily available to everyone. A small number of people are to risky to be allowed to handle these things.

Take the Underwear Bomber for instance. His parents told authorities he was being radicalized. He was immediately put on a watch list of 600k that still were able to fly & have all their rights. Investigators were going to talk to him when he landed in the USA determine f he should be stripped of his rights to fly, etc. But he almost blew up an airliner full of people over a dense population in the mean time.

I'm sorry, but if your parents believe you are a danger, you should should lose your flight & weapons privileges until things can be sorted out. It takes time to gather evidence, locate the person, interrogate them, get probable cause, have a judge sign a warrant, then track down & arrest the potential terrorist. Then remember this person has not actually committed a crime yet, so they usually just get stripped of a few of their rights.

"Gun Free Zones" must end along with the rights of one crazy person with car & guns does not trump the rights of the hundreds he can kill & injure before stopped. Government & business don't have the rights to refuse Gays, they should not have the rights to refuse CCW people either unless they are on a no guns list.
And if your dad is a felon ahole who hates just for the sake of hating we just take away the Constitutional Rights of people?
It's called Due Process.

Ex-parte's limit people all the time based solely on one persons accusation. You can also be forced to register as a sex offender for life based on one persons accusation.

Temporarily being put on a no gun list is a much smaller infringing of rights than those.

We already have 'Gun Control.' If you pass an FBI background check, you're entitled to acquire a firearm. It is what it is. Movin on...

The US Government Accountability Office records show in last 10 years 2,233 people on the terror watch list applied for a federal background check to buy guns or explosives, and of those 2,043 were allowed to proceed.
And? So what's the problem here? I fail to see one.

Right? And it makes you wonder who Hussein considers 'Terrorists.' Is it people who don't vote Democrat? It's always been rumored he has an 'Enemies List.' I'm very skeptical of how he compiles his list.
 
In 10 days most residents from many states will be stripped of rights to fly, pass through TSA checkpoints or enter any federal buildings because their drivers license will no longer be accepted as Real ID. This is a much larger infringing of constitutional rights than restricting guns from Terrorist. Our constitution was gutted by Repubtards!

You got a link?

Found it, it was a law passed in 2005 for the states to update the drivers license. All but 9 states have done so and now those 9 are running out of time.

So 10 years these 9 states have failed at what 41 states have done. Homeland Security is not allowing the extensions, not the Republicans. Obama can give extensions by executive order but won't.

Looks like the states screwed up.

Nice spin trying to make it a partisan issue.

BTW: The ability to fly on an airline is a privilege, not a right.

Travel restrictions is a violation of the most basic constitutional rights & Articles of Confederation. States have pushed back against it, citing constitutional & privacy concerns. Only about half of all states are fully compliant with the federal law. Some have been granted 6 month extensions, but many residents will be banned from freedom to travel in 9 days.
Articles of Confederation? WTF??? Do you even understand what that is??

The Articles of Confederation were adopted by the Continental Congress on November 15, 1777. This document served as the United States' first constitution, and was in force from March 1, 1781, until 1789 when the present day Constitution went into effect.

Fact: Restricting anyone from flying is UNCONSTITUTIONAL!!!!!!!!!!! Repubtards do not believe in the US Constitution. They used it for toilet paper & should never be trusted.

Let's end this now; show me in the Constitution where restricting anyone from flying is a right.

It is amazing how DemoRATS make shit up that is not in the Constitution. If restricting ANYONE from flying is a right as you claim, then why isn't it free? Is driving a car a right, what about a train?
 
"If you’re too dangerous to board a plane, you’re too dangerous, by definition, to buy a gun."

WASHINGTON -- President Barack Obama honored the victims of the mass shooting in San Bernardino, California, that left 14 dead and 21 injured and renewed his call for tougher gun restrictions in his weekly address on Saturday.

Obama has called for similar action many times before during his presidency, but Congress has failed to act. On Thursday, Congress failed yet again, when an amendment that would have required background checks for all gun sales did not pass the Senate.

"This tragedy reminds us of our obligation to do everything in our power, together, to keep our communities safe," Obama said in his address. "We know that the killers in San Bernardino used military-style assault weapons -- weapons of war -- to kill as many people as they could. It’s another tragic reminder that here in America it’s way too easy for dangerous people to get their hands on a gun."

Obama, who has said that failing to pass comprehensive gun reform is the "greatest frustration" of his time in office, said it was ridiculous that people on a no-fly list in the United States could legally purchase a gun.

"That is insane. If you’re too dangerous to board a plane, you’re too dangerous, by definition, to buy a gun. And so I’m calling on Congress to close this loophole, now," he said. "We may not be able to prevent every tragedy, but -- at a bare minimum -- we shouldn’t be making it so easy for potential terrorists or criminals to get their hands on a gun that they could use against Americans."

Two of the assault-style rifles used in the San Bernardino attack were bought legally in California because of a loophole in state law.

More: Obama: It's 'Insane' That People On A No-Fly List Can Legally Buy A Gun In The U.S.

I agree! House Speaker Paul Ryan opposes because he says many people are wrongly placed on the no-fly list. That may be true - but his excuse is bullshit. Their gun rights would be restored once their names are removed from the no-fly list.

Because you are on a no-fly list does not mean you should lose your right to bear arms. The no-fly list is sometimes incorrect, and should not be used to justify someone right to buy a firearm.

Not a good argument from where I am standing.

Not "sometimes incorrect". Sadly a lot of times incorrect.

False positives and abuses that have been in the news include:

  • Numerous children (including many under the age of five, and some under the age of one) have generated false positives.

  • Daniel Brown, a United States Marine returning from Iraq, was prevented from boarding a flight home in April 2006 because his name matched one on the No Fly List.

  • David Fathi, an attorney for the ACLU of Iranian descent and a plaintiff in an ACLU lawsuit, has been arrested and detained because his name was on No Fly List.

  • Asif Iqbal, a management consultant and legal resident of the United States born in Pakistan, plans to sue the U.S. government because he is regularly detained when he tries to fly, because he has the same name as a former Guantanamo detainee.

  • Iqbal's work requires a lot of travel, and, even though the Guantanamo detainee has been released, his name remains on the No Fly List, and Iqbal the software consultant experiences frequent, unpredictable delays and missed flights.

  • He is pushing for a photo ID and birthdate matching system, in addition to the current system of checking names.

  • Robert J. Johnson, a surgeon and a former lieutenant colonel in the U.S. Army, was told in 2006 that he was on the list, although he had had no problem in flying the month before. Johnson was running as a Democrat against U.S. Representative John McHugh, a Republican. Johnson wondered whether he was on the list because of his opposition to the Iraq War. He stated, "This could just be a government screw-up, but I don't know, and they won't tell me."

  • Later, a 60 Minutes report brought together 12 men named Robert Johnson, all of whom had experienced problems in airports with being pulled aside and interrogated. The report suggested that the individual whose name was intended to be on the list was most likely the Robert Johnson who had been convicted of plotting to bomb a movie theater and a Hindu temple in Toronto

  • In August 2004, Senator Ted Kennedy (D-MA) told a Senate Judiciary Committee discussing the No Fly List that he had appeared on the list and had been repeatedly delayed at airports. He said it had taken him three weeks of appeals directly to Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge to have him removed from the list. Kennedy said he was eventually told that the name "T Kennedy" was added to the list because it was once used as an alias of a suspected terrorist.

  • There are an estimated 7,000 American men whose legal names correspond to "T Kennedy". (Senator Kennedy, whose first name was Edward and for whom "Ted" was only a nickname, would not have been one of them.) Recognizing that as a U.S. Senator he was in a privileged position of being able to contact Ridge, Kennedy said of "ordinary citizens": "How are they going to be able to get to be treated fairly and not have their rights abused?"

  • Former mayor of New York City Rudy Giuliani pointed to this incident as an example for the necessity to "rethink aviation security" in an essay on homeland security published while he was seeking the Republican nomination for the 2008 presidential election.

  • U.S. Representative, former Freedom Rider, and Chairman of SNCC John Lewis (politician) (D-GA) has been stopped many times.

  • Canadian journalist Patrick Martin has been frequently interrogated while traveling, because of a suspicious individual, believed to be a former Provisional Irish Republican Army bomb-maker, with the same name.

  • Walter F. Murphy, McCormick Professor of Jurisprudence at Princeton, reported that the following exchange took place at Newark on 1 March 2007, where he was denied a boarding pass "because I [Murphy] was on the Terrorist Watch list." The airline employee asked, "Have you been in any peace marches? We ban a lot of people from flying because of that."

  • Replied Murphy, "I explained that I had not so marched but had, in September 2006, given a lecture at Princeton, televised and put on the web, highly critical of George Bush for his many violations of the constitution." To which the airline employee responded, "That'll do it."

  • David Nelson, the actor best known for his role on The Adventures of Ozzie and Harriet, is among various persons named David Nelson who have been stopped at airports because their name apparently appears on the list.

  • Jesselyn Radack, a former United States Department of Justice ethics adviser who argued that John Walker Lindh was entitled to an attorney, was placed on the No Fly List as part of what she [44] believes to be a reprisal for her whistle-blowing.

  • In September 2004, former pop singer Cat Stevens (who converted to Islam and changed his name to "Yusuf Islam" in 1978) was denied entry into the U.S. after his name was found on the list.

  • In February 2006, U.S. Senator Ted Stevens (R-AK) stated in a committee hearing that his wife Catherine had been subjected to questioning at an airport as to whether she was Cat Stevens due to the similarity of their names.

  • U.S. Representative Don Young (R-AK), the third-most senior Republican in the House, was flagged in 2004 after he was mistaken for a "Donald Lee Young".

  • Some members of the Federal Air Marshal Service have been denied boarding on flights that they were assigned to protect because their names matched those of persons on the no-fly list.

  • In August 2008, CNN reported that an airline captain and retired brigadier general for the United States Air Force has had numerous encounters with security officials when attempting to pilot his own plane.

  • After frequent harassment at airport terminals, a Canadian businessman changed his name to avoid being delayed every time he took a flight.

  • In October 2008, the Washington Post reported that Maryland State Police classified 53 nonviolent political activists as terrorists, and entered their names and personal information into state and federal databases, with labels indicating that they were terror suspects.
  • The protest groups were also entered as terrorist organizations. During a hearing, it was revealed that these individuals and organizations had been placed in the databases because of a surveillance operation that targeted opponents of the death penalty and the Iraq war.

  • In April 2009, TSA refused to allow an Air France flight from Paris to Mexico to cross U.S. airspace because it was carrying Colombian journalist Hernando Calvo Ospina. Air France did not send the passenger manifest to the US authorities; they did however send it to Mexico who forwarded it to the US.

  • Bollywood actor Shah Rukh Khan was held for extensive questioning by US Immigration and Customs officials in August 2009, because as he reported, "his name came up on a computer alert list." Customs officials claimed he "was questioned as part of a routine process that took 66 minutes." Khan was visiting the United States to promote his film My Name Is Khan, which concerns racial profiling of Muslims in the United States.

  • In June 2010, The New York Times reported Yahya Wehelie, a 26-year-old Muslim-American man was being prevented from returning to the United States, and trapped in Cairo. Despite Wehelie's offer to FBI agents to allow them to accompany him in the plane, while shackled, he was not permitted to return. The ACLU has argued that this constitutes banishment.

  • A U.S. citizen, stranded in Colombia after being placed on the no-fly list as a result of having studied in Yemen, sought to re-enter the U.S. through Mexico but was returned to Colombia by Mexican authorities.

  • Michael Migliore, a 23-year-old Muslim convert and dual citizen of the United States and Italy, was detained in the United Kingdom after traveling there from the U.S. by train and then cruise ship because he was not permitted to fly. He said that he believes he was placed on the no-fly list because he refused to answer questions about a 2010 Portland car bomb plot without his lawyer present.

  • He was released eight or ten hours later, but authorities confiscated his electronic media items including a cell phone and media player.

  • Abe Mashal, a 31-year-old Muslim and United States Marine Veteran, found himself on the No Fly List in April 2010 while attempting to board a plane out of Midway Airport. He was questioned by the TSA, FBI and Chicago Police at the airport and was told they had no clue why he was on the No Fly List. Once he arrived at home that day two other FBI agents came to his home and used a Do Not Fly question-and-answer sheet to question him.

  • They informed him they had no idea why he was on the No Fly List. In June 2010 those same two FBI agents summoned Mashal to a local hotel and invited him to a private room. They told him that he was in no trouble and the reason he ended up on the No Fly List was because of possibly sending emails to an American imam they may have been monitoring. They then informed him that if he would go undercover at various local mosques, they could get him off the No Fly List immediately and he would be compensated for such actions.

  • Mashal refused to answer any additional questions without a lawyer present and was told to leave the hotel. Mashal then contacted the ACLU and is now being represented in a class-action lawsuit filed against the TSA, FBI and DHS concerning the legality of the No Fly List and how people end up on it. Mashal feels as if he was blackmailed into becoming an informant by being placed on the No Fly List. Mashal has since appeared on ABC, NBC, PBS and Al Jazeera concerning his inclusion on the No Fly List. He has also written a book about his experience titled "No Spy No Fly."

  • In November 2002 Salon reported that the No-Fly program seemed "to be netting mostly priests, elderly nuns, Green Party campaign operatives, left-wing journalists, right-wing activists and people affiliated with Arab or Arab-American groups." Art dealer Doug Stuber, who ran Ralph Nader’s Green Party presidential campaign in North Carolina in 2000, was prevented from flying to Europe on business in October 2002.

  • He was repeatedly pulled out of line, held for questioning until his flight left, then told falsely he could take a later flight or depart from a different airport. Barbara Olshansky, then Assistant Legal Director for the Center for Constitutional Rights, noted that she and several of her colleagues received special attention on numerous occasions. On at least one occasion, she was ordered to pull her trousers down in view of other passengers
More at link:
No Fly List - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

One would think that NaziCons would rather be safe than sorry.

Being on a no-fly list means nothing. Hell, what, tens of dozens of DHS employees are on no-fly lists. No reason to deprive a person of their constitutional rights you fascist piece of shit.
 
In 10 days most residents from many states will be stripped of rights to fly, pass through TSA checkpoints or enter any federal buildings because their drivers license will no longer be accepted as Real ID. This is a much larger infringing of constitutional rights than restricting guns from Terrorist. Our constitution was gutted by Repubtards!

You got a link?

Found it, it was a law passed in 2005 for the states to update the drivers license. All but 9 states have done so and now those 9 are running out of time.

So 10 years these 9 states have failed at what 41 states have done. Homeland Security is not allowing the extensions, not the Republicans. Obama can give extensions by executive order but won't.

Looks like the states screwed up.

Nice spin trying to make it a partisan issue.

BTW: The ability to fly on an airline is a privilege, not a right.

Travel restrictions is a violation of the most basic constitutional rights & Articles of Confederation. States have pushed back against it, citing constitutional & privacy concerns. Only about half of all states are fully compliant with the federal law. Some have been granted 6 month extensions, but many residents will be banned from freedom to travel in 9 days.
Articles of Confederation? WTF??? Do you even understand what that is??

No shit, what time warp is t his one living in? You gotta love the left.. always claiming to be the smart ones and then saying that sort of stupid shit.
 
"If you’re too dangerous to board a plane, you’re too dangerous, by definition, to buy a gun."

WASHINGTON -- President Barack Obama honored the victims of the mass shooting in San Bernardino, California, that left 14 dead and 21 injured and renewed his call for tougher gun restrictions in his weekly address on Saturday.

Obama has called for similar action many times before during his presidency, but Congress has failed to act. On Thursday, Congress failed yet again, when an amendment that would have required background checks for all gun sales did not pass the Senate.

"This tragedy reminds us of our obligation to do everything in our power, together, to keep our communities safe," Obama said in his address. "We know that the killers in San Bernardino used military-style assault weapons -- weapons of war -- to kill as many people as they could. It’s another tragic reminder that here in America it’s way too easy for dangerous people to get their hands on a gun."

Obama, who has said that failing to pass comprehensive gun reform is the "greatest frustration" of his time in office, said it was ridiculous that people on a no-fly list in the United States could legally purchase a gun.

"That is insane. If you’re too dangerous to board a plane, you’re too dangerous, by definition, to buy a gun. And so I’m calling on Congress to close this loophole, now," he said. "We may not be able to prevent every tragedy, but -- at a bare minimum -- we shouldn’t be making it so easy for potential terrorists or criminals to get their hands on a gun that they could use against Americans."

Two of the assault-style rifles used in the San Bernardino attack were bought legally in California because of a loophole in state law.

More: Obama: It's 'Insane' That People On A No-Fly List Can Legally Buy A Gun In The U.S.

I agree! House Speaker Paul Ryan opposes because he says many people are wrongly placed on the no-fly list. That may be true - but his excuse is bullshit. Their gun rights would be restored once their names are removed from the no-fly list.

Because you are on a no-fly list does not mean you should lose your right to bear arms. The no-fly list is sometimes incorrect, and should not be used to justify someone right to buy a firearm.

Not a good argument from where I am standing.

Not "sometimes incorrect". Sadly a lot of times incorrect.

False positives and abuses that have been in the news include:

  • Numerous children (including many under the age of five, and some under the age of one) have generated false positives.

  • Daniel Brown, a United States Marine returning from Iraq, was prevented from boarding a flight home in April 2006 because his name matched one on the No Fly List.

  • David Fathi, an attorney for the ACLU of Iranian descent and a plaintiff in an ACLU lawsuit, has been arrested and detained because his name was on No Fly List.

  • Asif Iqbal, a management consultant and legal resident of the United States born in Pakistan, plans to sue the U.S. government because he is regularly detained when he tries to fly, because he has the same name as a former Guantanamo detainee.

  • Iqbal's work requires a lot of travel, and, even though the Guantanamo detainee has been released, his name remains on the No Fly List, and Iqbal the software consultant experiences frequent, unpredictable delays and missed flights.

  • He is pushing for a photo ID and birthdate matching system, in addition to the current system of checking names.

  • Robert J. Johnson, a surgeon and a former lieutenant colonel in the U.S. Army, was told in 2006 that he was on the list, although he had had no problem in flying the month before. Johnson was running as a Democrat against U.S. Representative John McHugh, a Republican. Johnson wondered whether he was on the list because of his opposition to the Iraq War. He stated, "This could just be a government screw-up, but I don't know, and they won't tell me."

  • Later, a 60 Minutes report brought together 12 men named Robert Johnson, all of whom had experienced problems in airports with being pulled aside and interrogated. The report suggested that the individual whose name was intended to be on the list was most likely the Robert Johnson who had been convicted of plotting to bomb a movie theater and a Hindu temple in Toronto

  • In August 2004, Senator Ted Kennedy (D-MA) told a Senate Judiciary Committee discussing the No Fly List that he had appeared on the list and had been repeatedly delayed at airports. He said it had taken him three weeks of appeals directly to Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge to have him removed from the list. Kennedy said he was eventually told that the name "T Kennedy" was added to the list because it was once used as an alias of a suspected terrorist.

  • There are an estimated 7,000 American men whose legal names correspond to "T Kennedy". (Senator Kennedy, whose first name was Edward and for whom "Ted" was only a nickname, would not have been one of them.) Recognizing that as a U.S. Senator he was in a privileged position of being able to contact Ridge, Kennedy said of "ordinary citizens": "How are they going to be able to get to be treated fairly and not have their rights abused?"

  • Former mayor of New York City Rudy Giuliani pointed to this incident as an example for the necessity to "rethink aviation security" in an essay on homeland security published while he was seeking the Republican nomination for the 2008 presidential election.

  • U.S. Representative, former Freedom Rider, and Chairman of SNCC John Lewis (politician) (D-GA) has been stopped many times.

  • Canadian journalist Patrick Martin has been frequently interrogated while traveling, because of a suspicious individual, believed to be a former Provisional Irish Republican Army bomb-maker, with the same name.

  • Walter F. Murphy, McCormick Professor of Jurisprudence at Princeton, reported that the following exchange took place at Newark on 1 March 2007, where he was denied a boarding pass "because I [Murphy] was on the Terrorist Watch list." The airline employee asked, "Have you been in any peace marches? We ban a lot of people from flying because of that."

  • Replied Murphy, "I explained that I had not so marched but had, in September 2006, given a lecture at Princeton, televised and put on the web, highly critical of George Bush for his many violations of the constitution." To which the airline employee responded, "That'll do it."

  • David Nelson, the actor best known for his role on The Adventures of Ozzie and Harriet, is among various persons named David Nelson who have been stopped at airports because their name apparently appears on the list.

  • Jesselyn Radack, a former United States Department of Justice ethics adviser who argued that John Walker Lindh was entitled to an attorney, was placed on the No Fly List as part of what she [44] believes to be a reprisal for her whistle-blowing.

  • In September 2004, former pop singer Cat Stevens (who converted to Islam and changed his name to "Yusuf Islam" in 1978) was denied entry into the U.S. after his name was found on the list.

  • In February 2006, U.S. Senator Ted Stevens (R-AK) stated in a committee hearing that his wife Catherine had been subjected to questioning at an airport as to whether she was Cat Stevens due to the similarity of their names.

  • U.S. Representative Don Young (R-AK), the third-most senior Republican in the House, was flagged in 2004 after he was mistaken for a "Donald Lee Young".

  • Some members of the Federal Air Marshal Service have been denied boarding on flights that they were assigned to protect because their names matched those of persons on the no-fly list.

  • In August 2008, CNN reported that an airline captain and retired brigadier general for the United States Air Force has had numerous encounters with security officials when attempting to pilot his own plane.

  • After frequent harassment at airport terminals, a Canadian businessman changed his name to avoid being delayed every time he took a flight.

  • In October 2008, the Washington Post reported that Maryland State Police classified 53 nonviolent political activists as terrorists, and entered their names and personal information into state and federal databases, with labels indicating that they were terror suspects.
  • The protest groups were also entered as terrorist organizations. During a hearing, it was revealed that these individuals and organizations had been placed in the databases because of a surveillance operation that targeted opponents of the death penalty and the Iraq war.

  • In April 2009, TSA refused to allow an Air France flight from Paris to Mexico to cross U.S. airspace because it was carrying Colombian journalist Hernando Calvo Ospina. Air France did not send the passenger manifest to the US authorities; they did however send it to Mexico who forwarded it to the US.

  • Bollywood actor Shah Rukh Khan was held for extensive questioning by US Immigration and Customs officials in August 2009, because as he reported, "his name came up on a computer alert list." Customs officials claimed he "was questioned as part of a routine process that took 66 minutes." Khan was visiting the United States to promote his film My Name Is Khan, which concerns racial profiling of Muslims in the United States.

  • In June 2010, The New York Times reported Yahya Wehelie, a 26-year-old Muslim-American man was being prevented from returning to the United States, and trapped in Cairo. Despite Wehelie's offer to FBI agents to allow them to accompany him in the plane, while shackled, he was not permitted to return. The ACLU has argued that this constitutes banishment.

  • A U.S. citizen, stranded in Colombia after being placed on the no-fly list as a result of having studied in Yemen, sought to re-enter the U.S. through Mexico but was returned to Colombia by Mexican authorities.

  • Michael Migliore, a 23-year-old Muslim convert and dual citizen of the United States and Italy, was detained in the United Kingdom after traveling there from the U.S. by train and then cruise ship because he was not permitted to fly. He said that he believes he was placed on the no-fly list because he refused to answer questions about a 2010 Portland car bomb plot without his lawyer present.

  • He was released eight or ten hours later, but authorities confiscated his electronic media items including a cell phone and media player.

  • Abe Mashal, a 31-year-old Muslim and United States Marine Veteran, found himself on the No Fly List in April 2010 while attempting to board a plane out of Midway Airport. He was questioned by the TSA, FBI and Chicago Police at the airport and was told they had no clue why he was on the No Fly List. Once he arrived at home that day two other FBI agents came to his home and used a Do Not Fly question-and-answer sheet to question him.

  • They informed him they had no idea why he was on the No Fly List. In June 2010 those same two FBI agents summoned Mashal to a local hotel and invited him to a private room. They told him that he was in no trouble and the reason he ended up on the No Fly List was because of possibly sending emails to an American imam they may have been monitoring. They then informed him that if he would go undercover at various local mosques, they could get him off the No Fly List immediately and he would be compensated for such actions.

  • Mashal refused to answer any additional questions without a lawyer present and was told to leave the hotel. Mashal then contacted the ACLU and is now being represented in a class-action lawsuit filed against the TSA, FBI and DHS concerning the legality of the No Fly List and how people end up on it. Mashal feels as if he was blackmailed into becoming an informant by being placed on the No Fly List. Mashal has since appeared on ABC, NBC, PBS and Al Jazeera concerning his inclusion on the No Fly List. He has also written a book about his experience titled "No Spy No Fly."

  • In November 2002 Salon reported that the No-Fly program seemed "to be netting mostly priests, elderly nuns, Green Party campaign operatives, left-wing journalists, right-wing activists and people affiliated with Arab or Arab-American groups." Art dealer Doug Stuber, who ran Ralph Nader’s Green Party presidential campaign in North Carolina in 2000, was prevented from flying to Europe on business in October 2002.

  • He was repeatedly pulled out of line, held for questioning until his flight left, then told falsely he could take a later flight or depart from a different airport. Barbara Olshansky, then Assistant Legal Director for the Center for Constitutional Rights, noted that she and several of her colleagues received special attention on numerous occasions. On at least one occasion, she was ordered to pull her trousers down in view of other passengers
More at link:
No Fly List - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

One would think that NaziCons would rather be safe than sorry.

Being on a no-fly list means nothing. Hell, what, tens of dozens of DHS employees are on no-fly lists. No reason to deprive a person of their constitutional rights you fascist piece of shit.

If a Progressive Liberal believe the No-Fly list is good enough to deny someone their constitutional right to bear arms then why not deny them the right to vote or free speech while at it?

Do we really want those on the No-Fly list to have any constitutional rights seeing our government deem them as a threat?

Now you know the Progressive Liberal will tell me I am wrong to write those on that list should be deny their other constitutional rights while defending their asinine view that the list is perfectly fine to deny someone right to bear arms.

I mean why would the Progressive Liberal want possible terrorist to have the right to vote in this country?
 
It's insane that people who are deemed so dangerous that they are denied the freedom to fly on America's airlines are free to ride on other public transportation or walk among us. The fact that the feds resort to denying people the right to airline transportation is a sign that they don't trust their own employees to enact the safeguards that they claim will protect us. How can the government deny certain freedoms to citizens without the right to due process? Is that the way it's going to work with the Bill of Rights under a democrat party dictatorship? The system is so insane that the president can authorize the execution of an American citizen by drone strike without due process.
 
"If you’re too dangerous to board a plane, you’re too dangerous, by definition, to buy a gun."

WASHINGTON -- President Barack Obama honored the victims of the mass shooting in San Bernardino, California, that left 14 dead and 21 injured and renewed his call for tougher gun restrictions in his weekly address on Saturday.

Obama has called for similar action many times before during his presidency, but Congress has failed to act. On Thursday, Congress failed yet again, when an amendment that would have required background checks for all gun sales did not pass the Senate.

"This tragedy reminds us of our obligation to do everything in our power, together, to keep our communities safe," Obama said in his address. "We know that the killers in San Bernardino used military-style assault weapons -- weapons of war -- to kill as many people as they could. It’s another tragic reminder that here in America it’s way too easy for dangerous people to get their hands on a gun."

Obama, who has said that failing to pass comprehensive gun reform is the "greatest frustration" of his time in office, said it was ridiculous that people on a no-fly list in the United States could legally purchase a gun.

"That is insane. If you’re too dangerous to board a plane, you’re too dangerous, by definition, to buy a gun. And so I’m calling on Congress to close this loophole, now," he said. "We may not be able to prevent every tragedy, but -- at a bare minimum -- we shouldn’t be making it so easy for potential terrorists or criminals to get their hands on a gun that they could use against Americans."

Two of the assault-style rifles used in the San Bernardino attack were bought legally in California because of a loophole in state law.

More: Obama: It's 'Insane' That People On A No-Fly List Can Legally Buy A Gun In The U.S.

I agree! House Speaker Paul Ryan opposes because he says many people are wrongly placed on the no-fly list. That may be true - but his excuse is bullshit. Their gun rights would be restored once their names are removed from the no-fly list.

:lol:

Asshole obviously forgets that Ted Kennedy was on a no fly list.

Whoopsies.

Along with infants, members of Congress, and at least one active-duty Air Force general!
 
All bomb ingredients are not readily available unless you have access to ammunition. High concentration peroxides & fertilizers require license to purchase.

Bullshit. There are many ways to make explosives, just look online! Off the top of my head, I could get the stuff needed for NAPALM at any convenience store!
 

Forum List

Back
Top