Obama: It's 'Insane' That People On A No-Fly List Can Legally Buy A Gun In The U.S.

[SassyIrishLass]

Obama violated the rights of over 6,000 terrorist he has killed including Osama Bin Laden. I'm ok with that! Bush let them run wild killing US. No guns or ammo for terrorist is fine with me.

You forgot he allowed a JV team to kill 14 in California.

At least the terrorist get killed under Obama. We lost 8,000 US citizens by large terror organization allowed by Bush & he just let the terrorist go free! You retards cry over a few dead lone wolfs.

How many terrorists do you think we killed in Afghanistan and Iraq? Good grief

People defending their land against foreign invaders are not terrorist. That is mostly who were tortured & killed under Bush.

Bush had our soldiers invade a foreign land to create more terrorist & let our people get slaughtered by IED's.

You're chock full of left loon talking points ain't ya?

 

[Rustic]

 

[Vigilante]

I wonder why the Manchurian muslim didn't do something about this muslim no fly list... perhaps Putin has something here....

 

[KissMy]

Obama violated the rights of over 6,000 terrorist he has killed including Osama Bin Laden. I'm ok with that! Bush let them run wild killing US. No guns or ammo for terrorist is fine with me.

You forgot he allowed a JV team to kill 14 in California.

At least the terrorist get killed under Obama. We lost 8,000 US citizens by large terror organization allowed by Bush & he just let the terrorist go free! You retards cry over a few dead lone wolfs.

How many terrorists do you think we killed in Afghanistan and Iraq? Good grief

People defending their land against foreign invaders are not terrorist. That is mostly who were tortured & killed under Bush.

Bush had our soldiers invade a foreign land to create more terrorist & let our people get slaughtered by IED's.

You're chock full of left loon talking points ain't ya?

Please post a link to those leftist talking points I am supposedly quoting from!

 

[KissMy]

I'd take all USMB Progressive OFF the No Fly list and send them to the Progressive Mecca of their choice: Cuba, North Korea, Venezuela, just fucking go!!!

Send them to Iraq or Syria for a few months and IF they make it back they'll change their tunes

You cry about terrorist losing gun rights, yet promote violating peaceful US citizens civil rights & shipping them out to killers. You need to STFU!

Stop & Frisk is a constitutional violation of civil rights that Repubtards love!

What terrorists? We are talking suspects on a No Fly List, no charges, no convictions, just suspects like Kennedy and other innocent Americans.

Give your rights up, not me.

As long as over 90+% of us have the right to carry at all times, the country is well protected against criminals, insane, terrorist & tyranny. Less than 0.3% have been on a no fly list, only 3% travel overseas, 1% incarcerated & under 5% mentally ill.

I don't care if it is one person being denied their Constitutional right to bear arms. No conviction, no charges, no mentally ill, then they should be allowed to have guns. We don't take away the rights of suspects just because they may or may not at some undetermined time in the future, might, not saying the will he or she will, but they maybe be a terrorist.

Funny how under Bush 100% of US citizens were not allowed to fly for days after 9/11 even if you had your own plane & airport, while he allowed foreigners & terrorist families to fly inside the USA. He also preemptively invaded countries that maybe be had a terrorist, then tortured & killed their citizens.

You can shove your terrorist gun rights B.S where the sun don't shine!

 

[Indofred]

It ain't rocket science. If you're on a no-fly list - you shouldn't be legally allowed to purchase guns in the U.S. until that issue is resolved.

Let me get this right - you support gun control?

 

[Papageorgio]

Send them to Iraq or Syria for a few months and IF they make it back they'll change their tunes

You cry about terrorist losing gun rights, yet promote violating peaceful US citizens civil rights & shipping them out to killers. You need to STFU!

Stop & Frisk is a constitutional violation of civil rights that Repubtards love!

What terrorists? We are talking suspects on a No Fly List, no charges, no convictions, just suspects like Kennedy and other innocent Americans.

Give your rights up, not me.

As long as over 90+% of us have the right to carry at all times, the country is well protected against criminals, insane, terrorist & tyranny. Less than 0.3% have been on a no fly list, only 3% travel overseas, 1% incarcerated & under 5% mentally ill.

I don't care if it is one person being denied their Constitutional right to bear arms. No conviction, no charges, no mentally ill, then they should be allowed to have guns. We don't take away the rights of suspects just because they may or may not at some undetermined time in the future, might, not saying the will he or she will, but they maybe be a terrorist.

Funny how under Bush 100% of US citizens were not allowed to fly for days after 9/11 even if you had your own plane & airport, while he allowed foreigners & terrorist families to fly inside the USA. He also preemptively invaded countries that maybe be had a terrorist.

You can shove your terrorist gun rights B.S where the sun don't shine!

Flying is not a Constitutional right, a right to bear arms is. I am not surprised you don't care about an individual's Constitutional rights, as long as you got yours, screw everyone else, right?

 

[Lakhota]

It ain't rocket science. If you're on a no-fly list - you shouldn't be legally allowed to purchase guns in the U.S. until that issue is resolved.

Let me get this right - you support gun control?

As a country boy who cherishes his guns and hunting rights - YES I support reasonable gun control. I support closing all loopholes, limiting magazine capacities, universal background checks - with accurate and timely information fed into the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS). I'm also against criminals, mental nuts, and domestic abusers having gun rights. So yes - I support common-sense gun control. Why are waterfowl hunters only allowed three shells in their shotguns (two in the magazine, one in the chamber)? Seems reasonable.

 

[KissMy]

You cry about terrorist losing gun rights, yet promote violating peaceful US citizens civil rights & shipping them out to killers. You need to STFU!

Stop & Frisk is a constitutional violation of civil rights that Repubtards love!

What terrorists? We are talking suspects on a No Fly List, no charges, no convictions, just suspects like Kennedy and other innocent Americans.

Give your rights up, not me.

As long as over 90+% of us have the right to carry at all times, the country is well protected against criminals, insane, terrorist & tyranny. Less than 0.3% have been on a no fly list, only 3% travel overseas, 1% incarcerated & under 5% mentally ill.

I don't care if it is one person being denied their Constitutional right to bear arms. No conviction, no charges, no mentally ill, then they should be allowed to have guns. We don't take away the rights of suspects just because they may or may not at some undetermined time in the future, might, not saying the will he or she will, but they maybe be a terrorist.

Funny how under Bush 100% of US citizens were not allowed to fly for days after 9/11 even if you had your own plane & airport, while he allowed foreigners & terrorist families to fly inside the USA. He also preemptively invaded countries that maybe be had a terrorist.

You can shove your terrorist gun rights B.S where the sun don't shine!

Flying is not a Constitutional right, a right to bear arms is. I am not surprised you don't care about an individual's Constitutional rights, as long as you got yours, screw everyone else, right?

Using force to prevent citizens from moving about is a violation Constitutional rights. Regulating guns is not.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

What terrorists? We are talking suspects on a No Fly List, no charges, no convictions, just suspects like Kennedy and other innocent Americans.

Give your rights up, not me.

As long as over 90+% of us have the right to carry at all times, the country is well protected against criminals, insane, terrorist & tyranny. Less than 0.3% have been on a no fly list, only 3% travel overseas, 1% incarcerated & under 5% mentally ill.

I don't care if it is one person being denied their Constitutional right to bear arms. No conviction, no charges, no mentally ill, then they should be allowed to have guns. We don't take away the rights of suspects just because they may or may not at some undetermined time in the future, might, not saying the will he or she will, but they maybe be a terrorist.

Funny how under Bush 100% of US citizens were not allowed to fly for days after 9/11 even if you had your own plane & airport, while he allowed foreigners & terrorist families to fly inside the USA. He also preemptively invaded countries that maybe be had a terrorist.

You can shove your terrorist gun rights B.S where the sun don't shine!

Flying is not a Constitutional right, a right to bear arms is. I am not surprised you don't care about an individual's Constitutional rights, as long as you got yours, screw everyone else, right?

Using force to prevent citizens from moving about is a violation Constitutional rights. Regulating guns is not.

"the right to bear arms shall not be infringed.."

 

[Papageorgio]

What terrorists? We are talking suspects on a No Fly List, no charges, no convictions, just suspects like Kennedy and other innocent Americans.

Give your rights up, not me.

As long as over 90+% of us have the right to carry at all times, the country is well protected against criminals, insane, terrorist & tyranny. Less than 0.3% have been on a no fly list, only 3% travel overseas, 1% incarcerated & under 5% mentally ill.

I don't care if it is one person being denied their Constitutional right to bear arms. No conviction, no charges, no mentally ill, then they should be allowed to have guns. We don't take away the rights of suspects just because they may or may not at some undetermined time in the future, might, not saying the will he or she will, but they maybe be a terrorist.

Funny how under Bush 100% of US citizens were not allowed to fly for days after 9/11 even if you had your own plane & airport, while he allowed foreigners & terrorist families to fly inside the USA. He also preemptively invaded countries that maybe be had a terrorist.

You can shove your terrorist gun rights B.S where the sun don't shine!

Flying is not a Constitutional right, a right to bear arms is. I am not surprised you don't care about an individual's Constitutional rights, as long as you got yours, screw everyone else, right?

Using force to prevent citizens from moving about is a violation Constitutional rights. Regulating guns is not.

The planes were grounded, Americans weren't prevented for moving about, just not in an airplane. The right to fly in an airplane is nowhere in the Constitution.

You can regulate guns, but the people you want to regulate against have no criminal record, no mental health issues, no pending charges, just like yourself. You want to take the rights away for no reason other than they may or may not, at some future date, do something illegal. Why don't we throw them in jail just in case. Does that work for you?

 

[KissMy]

As long as over 90+% of us have the right to carry at all times, the country is well protected against criminals, insane, terrorist & tyranny. Less than 0.3% have been on a no fly list, only 3% travel overseas, 1% incarcerated & under 5% mentally ill.

I don't care if it is one person being denied their Constitutional right to bear arms. No conviction, no charges, no mentally ill, then they should be allowed to have guns. We don't take away the rights of suspects just because they may or may not at some undetermined time in the future, might, not saying the will he or she will, but they maybe be a terrorist.

Funny how under Bush 100% of US citizens were not allowed to fly for days after 9/11 even if you had your own plane & airport, while he allowed foreigners & terrorist families to fly inside the USA. He also preemptively invaded countries that maybe be had a terrorist.

You can shove your terrorist gun rights B.S where the sun don't shine!

Flying is not a Constitutional right, a right to bear arms is. I am not surprised you don't care about an individual's Constitutional rights, as long as you got yours, screw everyone else, right?

Using force to prevent citizens from moving about is a violation Constitutional rights. Regulating guns is not.

"the right to bear arms shall not be infringed.."

Freaking political hack selectively edited out "well regulated"!

 

[2aguy]

"If you’re too dangerous to board a plane, you’re too dangerous, by definition, to buy a gun."

WASHINGTON -- President Barack Obama honored the victims of the mass shooting in San Bernardino, California, that left 14 dead and 21 injured and renewed his call for tougher gun restrictions in his weekly address on Saturday.

Obama has called for similar action many times before during his presidency, but Congress has failed to act. On Thursday, Congress failed yet again, when an amendment that would have required background checks for all gun sales did not pass the Senate.

"This tragedy reminds us of our obligation to do everything in our power, together, to keep our communities safe," Obama said in his address. "We know that the killers in San Bernardino used military-style assault weapons -- weapons of war -- to kill as many people as they could. It’s another tragic reminder that here in America it’s way too easy for dangerous people to get their hands on a gun."

Obama, who has said that failing to pass comprehensive gun reform is the "greatest frustration" of his time in office, said it was ridiculous that people on a no-fly list in the United States could legally purchase a gun.

"That is insane. If you’re too dangerous to board a plane, you’re too dangerous, by definition, to buy a gun. And so I’m calling on Congress to close this loophole, now," he said. "We may not be able to prevent every tragedy, but -- at a bare minimum -- we shouldn’t be making it so easy for potential terrorists or criminals to get their hands on a gun that they could use against Americans."

Two of the assault-style rifles used in the San Bernardino attack were bought legally in California because of a loophole in state law.

More: Obama: It's 'Insane' That People On A No-Fly List Can Legally Buy A Gun In The U.S.

I agree! House Speaker Paul Ryan opposes because he says many people are wrongly placed on the no-fly list. That may be true - but his excuse is bullshit. Their gun rights would be restored once their names are removed from the no-fly list.

Yeah....you guys still don't get that whole "Due Process" and Civil Rights.....and faceless bureaucrats putting innocent people on lists as enemies of the state........you sure do love you some stalin, mao, hitler, pol pot, castros, lenin.......

Stephen Moore, a columnist for National Review ended up on the no fly list......do you know how he got off the list after trying for months to get off the list........the head of Homeland Security was on the Fox Sunday News show with Brett Baier and he asked the Secretary....is this guy a terrorist risk......and the Secretary himself took his name off he list.....otherwise he would still be on it....Ted Kennedy couldn't fix the problem as a sitting Senator...

And excuse me...but the IRS targeted enemies of the democrat party....so no....I do not trust the democrats with the ability to deny rights to Americans by simply putting their name on a list....

You guys are nuts.

 

[Papageorgio]

I don't care if it is one person being denied their Constitutional right to bear arms. No conviction, no charges, no mentally ill, then they should be allowed to have guns. We don't take away the rights of suspects just because they may or may not at some undetermined time in the future, might, not saying the will he or she will, but they maybe be a terrorist.

Funny how under Bush 100% of US citizens were not allowed to fly for days after 9/11 even if you had your own plane & airport, while he allowed foreigners & terrorist families to fly inside the USA. He also preemptively invaded countries that maybe be had a terrorist.

You can shove your terrorist gun rights B.S where the sun don't shine!

Flying is not a Constitutional right, a right to bear arms is. I am not surprised you don't care about an individual's Constitutional rights, as long as you got yours, screw everyone else, right?

Using force to prevent citizens from moving about is a violation Constitutional rights. Regulating guns is not.

"the right to bear arms shall not be infringed.."

Freaking political hack selectively edited out "well regulated"!

Don't talk about "selective" anything. You are trying to claim flying is a Constitutional right and owning a gun isn't.

 

[2aguy]

As long as over 90+% of us have the right to carry at all times, the country is well protected against criminals, insane, terrorist & tyranny. Less than 0.3% have been on a no fly list, only 3% travel overseas, 1% incarcerated & under 5% mentally ill.

I don't care if it is one person being denied their Constitutional right to bear arms. No conviction, no charges, no mentally ill, then they should be allowed to have guns. We don't take away the rights of suspects just because they may or may not at some undetermined time in the future, might, not saying the will he or she will, but they maybe be a terrorist.

Funny how under Bush 100% of US citizens were not allowed to fly for days after 9/11 even if you had your own plane & airport, while he allowed foreigners & terrorist families to fly inside the USA. He also preemptively invaded countries that maybe be had a terrorist.

You can shove your terrorist gun rights B.S where the sun don't shine!

Flying is not a Constitutional right, a right to bear arms is. I am not surprised you don't care about an individual's Constitutional rights, as long as you got yours, screw everyone else, right?

Using force to prevent citizens from moving about is a violation Constitutional rights. Regulating guns is not.

The planes were grounded, Americans weren't prevented for moving about, just not in an airplane. The right to fly in an airplane is nowhere in the Constitution.

You can regulate guns, but the people you want to regulate against have no criminal record, no mental health issues, no pending charges, just like yourself. You want to take the rights away for no reason other than they may or may not, at some future date, do something illegal. Why don't we throw them in jail just in case. Does that work for you?

You want to take the rights away for no reason other than they may or may not, at some future date, do something illegal.

Actually, you and I both know that isn't why they want to do it...........the list is just an easy way to get rid of guns from all the people they manage to put on that list...they could care less if they are or aren't a threat to the country...they just know it is the best way to get rid of guns for the people they target.......it is as simple as that.....

 

[SassyIrishLass]

I don't care if it is one person being denied their Constitutional right to bear arms. No conviction, no charges, no mentally ill, then they should be allowed to have guns. We don't take away the rights of suspects just because they may or may not at some undetermined time in the future, might, not saying the will he or she will, but they maybe be a terrorist.

Funny how under Bush 100% of US citizens were not allowed to fly for days after 9/11 even if you had your own plane & airport, while he allowed foreigners & terrorist families to fly inside the USA. He also preemptively invaded countries that maybe be had a terrorist.

You can shove your terrorist gun rights B.S where the sun don't shine!

Flying is not a Constitutional right, a right to bear arms is. I am not surprised you don't care about an individual's Constitutional rights, as long as you got yours, screw everyone else, right?

Using force to prevent citizens from moving about is a violation Constitutional rights. Regulating guns is not.

"the right to bear arms shall not be infringed.."

Freaking political hack selectively edited out "well regulated"!

in·fringe
inˈfrinj/
verb
past tense: infringed; past participle: infringed

1. actively break the terms of (a law, agreement, etc.).
   "making an unauthorized copy would infringe copyright"
   synonyms: contravene, violate, transgress, break, breach; More
   
   
   • act so as to limit or undermine (something); encroach on.
     "his legal rights were being infringed"

 

[2aguy]

"If you’re too dangerous to board a plane, you’re too dangerous, by definition, to buy a gun."

WASHINGTON -- President Barack Obama honored the victims of the mass shooting in San Bernardino, California, that left 14 dead and 21 injured and renewed his call for tougher gun restrictions in his weekly address on Saturday.

Obama has called for similar action many times before during his presidency, but Congress has failed to act. On Thursday, Congress failed yet again, when an amendment that would have required background checks for all gun sales did not pass the Senate.

"This tragedy reminds us of our obligation to do everything in our power, together, to keep our communities safe," Obama said in his address. "We know that the killers in San Bernardino used military-style assault weapons -- weapons of war -- to kill as many people as they could. It’s another tragic reminder that here in America it’s way too easy for dangerous people to get their hands on a gun."

Obama, who has said that failing to pass comprehensive gun reform is the "greatest frustration" of his time in office, said it was ridiculous that people on a no-fly list in the United States could legally purchase a gun.

"That is insane. If you’re too dangerous to board a plane, you’re too dangerous, by definition, to buy a gun. And so I’m calling on Congress to close this loophole, now," he said. "We may not be able to prevent every tragedy, but -- at a bare minimum -- we shouldn’t be making it so easy for potential terrorists or criminals to get their hands on a gun that they could use against Americans."

Two of the assault-style rifles used in the San Bernardino attack were bought legally in California because of a loophole in state law.

More: Obama: It's 'Insane' That People On A No-Fly List Can Legally Buy A Gun In The U.S.

I agree! House Speaker Paul Ryan opposes because he says many people are wrongly placed on the no-fly list. That may be true - but his excuse is bullshit. Their gun rights would be restored once their names are removed from the no-fly list.

How strict would you say are the gun laws out in San Bernadino? Now what would be crazy, is to not rethink the issue of allowing unchecked refugees to freely come into this country. President Obama has an obligation to prevent any further threats from entering our nation in the FIRST place. Our president actually believes, terrorists entering this country would not be a threat if they are allowed to come here unarmed. Yet through all his efforts to vocally appease and be sympathetic towards those Muslims overseas, and we are not any safer today than when Obama first took office. We are not to categorize and judge the Muslim faith based on the actions of a few extremists, however he is willing to judge all gun owners through further regulations on the actions of a few. Again I ask, how strict were those regulations where the deaths of these 14 Americans occurred?

It ain't rocket science. If you're on a no-fly list - you shouldn't be legally allowed to purchase guns in the U.S. until that issue is resolved.

It's not rocket science, you can't be denied a CONSTITUTIONAL right over a suspicion.

So a non-citizen on a no-fly or watch list should be able to get a AR15? You're just asking for attacks.

There are over 3 million AR-15s in private hands......and only a few are ever used for any type of crime...ever....

In France.....all military rifles are completely banned for all civilians...that means fully auto rifles......and 11 different terrorists in two seperate atttacks had no problem getting fully automatic AK-47s in a country that completely bans them.....

The terrorists are going to get those weapons no matter what you do.......you simply want to keep normal people from having them......

 

[2aguy]

"If you’re too dangerous to board a plane, you’re too dangerous, by definition, to buy a gun."

WASHINGTON -- President Barack Obama honored the victims of the mass shooting in San Bernardino, California, that left 14 dead and 21 injured and renewed his call for tougher gun restrictions in his weekly address on Saturday.

Obama has called for similar action many times before during his presidency, but Congress has failed to act. On Thursday, Congress failed yet again, when an amendment that would have required background checks for all gun sales did not pass the Senate.

"This tragedy reminds us of our obligation to do everything in our power, together, to keep our communities safe," Obama said in his address. "We know that the killers in San Bernardino used military-style assault weapons -- weapons of war -- to kill as many people as they could. It’s another tragic reminder that here in America it’s way too easy for dangerous people to get their hands on a gun."

Obama, who has said that failing to pass comprehensive gun reform is the "greatest frustration" of his time in office, said it was ridiculous that people on a no-fly list in the United States could legally purchase a gun.

"That is insane. If you’re too dangerous to board a plane, you’re too dangerous, by definition, to buy a gun. And so I’m calling on Congress to close this loophole, now," he said. "We may not be able to prevent every tragedy, but -- at a bare minimum -- we shouldn’t be making it so easy for potential terrorists or criminals to get their hands on a gun that they could use against Americans."

Two of the assault-style rifles used in the San Bernardino attack were bought legally in California because of a loophole in state law.

More: Obama: It's 'Insane' That People On A No-Fly List Can Legally Buy A Gun In The U.S.

I agree! House Speaker Paul Ryan opposes because he says many people are wrongly placed on the no-fly list. That may be true - but his excuse is bullshit. Their gun rights would be restored once their names are removed from the no-fly list.

Asshole obviously forgets that Ted Kennedy was on a no fly list.

Whoopsies.

And Stephen Moore, a columnist for the National Review magazine...

 

[2aguy]

"If you’re too dangerous to board a plane, you’re too dangerous, by definition, to buy a gun."

WASHINGTON -- President Barack Obama honored the victims of the mass shooting in San Bernardino, California, that left 14 dead and 21 injured and renewed his call for tougher gun restrictions in his weekly address on Saturday.

Obama has called for similar action many times before during his presidency, but Congress has failed to act. On Thursday, Congress failed yet again, when an amendment that would have required background checks for all gun sales did not pass the Senate.

"This tragedy reminds us of our obligation to do everything in our power, together, to keep our communities safe," Obama said in his address. "We know that the killers in San Bernardino used military-style assault weapons -- weapons of war -- to kill as many people as they could. It’s another tragic reminder that here in America it’s way too easy for dangerous people to get their hands on a gun."

Obama, who has said that failing to pass comprehensive gun reform is the "greatest frustration" of his time in office, said it was ridiculous that people on a no-fly list in the United States could legally purchase a gun.

"That is insane. If you’re too dangerous to board a plane, you’re too dangerous, by definition, to buy a gun. And so I’m calling on Congress to close this loophole, now," he said. "We may not be able to prevent every tragedy, but -- at a bare minimum -- we shouldn’t be making it so easy for potential terrorists or criminals to get their hands on a gun that they could use against Americans."

Two of the assault-style rifles used in the San Bernardino attack were bought legally in California because of a loophole in state law.

More: Obama: It's 'Insane' That People On A No-Fly List Can Legally Buy A Gun In The U.S.

I agree! House Speaker Paul Ryan opposes because he says many people are wrongly placed on the no-fly list. That may be true - but his excuse is bullshit. Their gun rights would be restored once their names are removed from the no-fly list.

Because you are on a no-fly list does not mean you should lose your right to bear arms. The no-fly list is sometimes incorrect, and should not be used to justify someone right to buy a firearm.

Not a good argument from where I am standing.

Not "sometimes incorrect". Sadly a lot of times incorrect.

False positives and abuses that have been in the news include:

• Numerous children (including many under the age of five, and some under the age of one) have generated false positives.
• 
  
• Daniel Brown, a United States Marine returning from Iraq, was prevented from boarding a flight home in April 2006 because his name matched one on the No Fly List.
• 
  
• David Fathi, an attorney for the ACLU of Iranian descent and a plaintiff in an ACLU lawsuit, has been arrested and detained because his name was on No Fly List.
• 
  
• Asif Iqbal, a management consultant and legal resident of the United States born in Pakistan, plans to sue the U.S. government because he is regularly detained when he tries to fly, because he has the same name as a former Guantanamo detainee.
• 
  
• Iqbal's work requires a lot of travel, and, even though the Guantanamo detainee has been released, his name remains on the No Fly List, and Iqbal the software consultant experiences frequent, unpredictable delays and missed flights.
• 
  
• He is pushing for a photo ID and birthdate matching system, in addition to the current system of checking names.
• 
  
• Robert J. Johnson, a surgeon and a former lieutenant colonel in the U.S. Army, was told in 2006 that he was on the list, although he had had no problem in flying the month before. Johnson was running as a Democrat against U.S. Representative John McHugh, a Republican. Johnson wondered whether he was on the list because of his opposition to the Iraq War. He stated, "This could just be a government screw-up, but I don't know, and they won't tell me."
• 
  
• Later, a 60 Minutes report brought together 12 men named Robert Johnson, all of whom had experienced problems in airports with being pulled aside and interrogated. The report suggested that the individual whose name was intended to be on the list was most likely the Robert Johnson who had been convicted of plotting to bomb a movie theater and a Hindu temple in Toronto
• 
  
• In August 2004, Senator Ted Kennedy (D-MA) told a Senate Judiciary Committee discussing the No Fly List that he had appeared on the list and had been repeatedly delayed at airports. He said it had taken him three weeks of appeals directly to Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge to have him removed from the list. Kennedy said he was eventually told that the name "T Kennedy" was added to the list because it was once used as an alias of a suspected terrorist.
  
• 
  
• There are an estimated 7,000 American men whose legal names correspond to "T Kennedy". (Senator Kennedy, whose first name was Edward and for whom "Ted" was only a nickname, would not have been one of them.) Recognizing that as a U.S. Senator he was in a privileged position of being able to contact Ridge, Kennedy said of "ordinary citizens": "How are they going to be able to get to be treated fairly and not have their rights abused?"
• 
  
• Former mayor of New York City Rudy Giuliani pointed to this incident as an example for the necessity to "rethink aviation security" in an essay on homeland security published while he was seeking the Republican nomination for the 2008 presidential election.
• 
  
• U.S. Representative, former Freedom Rider, and Chairman of SNCC John Lewis (politician) (D-GA) has been stopped many times.
• 
  
• Canadian journalist Patrick Martin has been frequently interrogated while traveling, because of a suspicious individual, believed to be a former Provisional Irish Republican Army bomb-maker, with the same name.
• 
  
• Walter F. Murphy, McCormick Professor of Jurisprudence at Princeton, reported that the following exchange took place at Newark on 1 March 2007, where he was denied a boarding pass "because I [Murphy] was on the Terrorist Watch list." The airline employee asked, "Have you been in any peace marches? We ban a lot of people from flying because of that."
  
• 
  
• Replied Murphy, "I explained that I had not so marched but had, in September 2006, given a lecture at Princeton, televised and put on the web, highly critical of George Bush for his many violations of the constitution." To which the airline employee responded, "That'll do it."
• 
  
• David Nelson, the actor best known for his role on The Adventures of Ozzie and Harriet, is among various persons named David Nelson who have been stopped at airports because their name apparently appears on the list.
• 
  
• Jesselyn Radack, a former United States Department of Justice ethics adviser who argued that John Walker Lindh was entitled to an attorney, was placed on the No Fly List as part of what she [44] believes to be a reprisal for her whistle-blowing.
• 
  
• In September 2004, former pop singer Cat Stevens (who converted to Islam and changed his name to "Yusuf Islam" in 1978) was denied entry into the U.S. after his name was found on the list.
• 
  
• In February 2006, U.S. Senator Ted Stevens (R-AK) stated in a committee hearing that his wife Catherine had been subjected to questioning at an airport as to whether she was Cat Stevens due to the similarity of their names.
• 
  
• U.S. Representative Don Young (R-AK), the third-most senior Republican in the House, was flagged in 2004 after he was mistaken for a "Donald Lee Young".
• 
  
• Some members of the Federal Air Marshal Service have been denied boarding on flights that they were assigned to protect because their names matched those of persons on the no-fly list.
• 
  
• In August 2008, CNN reported that an airline captain and retired brigadier general for the United States Air Force has had numerous encounters with security officials when attempting to pilot his own plane.
• 
  
• After frequent harassment at airport terminals, a Canadian businessman changed his name to avoid being delayed every time he took a flight.
• 
  
• In October 2008, the Washington Post reported that Maryland State Police classified 53 nonviolent political activists as terrorists, and entered their names and personal information into state and federal databases, with labels indicating that they were terror suspects.
  
• The protest groups were also entered as terrorist organizations. During a hearing, it was revealed that these individuals and organizations had been placed in the databases because of a surveillance operation that targeted opponents of the death penalty and the Iraq war.
• 
  
• In April 2009, TSA refused to allow an Air France flight from Paris to Mexico to cross U.S. airspace because it was carrying Colombian journalist Hernando Calvo Ospina. Air France did not send the passenger manifest to the US authorities; they did however send it to Mexico who forwarded it to the US.
• 
  
• Bollywood actor Shah Rukh Khan was held for extensive questioning by US Immigration and Customs officials in August 2009, because as he reported, "his name came up on a computer alert list." Customs officials claimed he "was questioned as part of a routine process that took 66 minutes." Khan was visiting the United States to promote his film My Name Is Khan, which concerns racial profiling of Muslims in the United States.
• 
  
• In June 2010, The New York Times reported Yahya Wehelie, a 26-year-old Muslim-American man was being prevented from returning to the United States, and trapped in Cairo. Despite Wehelie's offer to FBI agents to allow them to accompany him in the plane, while shackled, he was not permitted to return. The ACLU has argued that this constitutes banishment.
• 
  
• A U.S. citizen, stranded in Colombia after being placed on the no-fly list as a result of having studied in Yemen, sought to re-enter the U.S. through Mexico but was returned to Colombia by Mexican authorities.
• 
  
• Michael Migliore, a 23-year-old Muslim convert and dual citizen of the United States and Italy, was detained in the United Kingdom after traveling there from the U.S. by train and then cruise ship because he was not permitted to fly. He said that he believes he was placed on the no-fly list because he refused to answer questions about a 2010 Portland car bomb plot without his lawyer present.
• 
  
• He was released eight or ten hours later, but authorities confiscated his electronic media items including a cell phone and media player.
• 
  
• Abe Mashal, a 31-year-old Muslim and United States Marine Veteran, found himself on the No Fly List in April 2010 while attempting to board a plane out of Midway Airport. He was questioned by the TSA, FBI and Chicago Police at the airport and was told they had no clue why he was on the No Fly List. Once he arrived at home that day two other FBI agents came to his home and used a Do Not Fly question-and-answer sheet to question him.
  
• 
  
• They informed him they had no idea why he was on the No Fly List. In June 2010 those same two FBI agents summoned Mashal to a local hotel and invited him to a private room. They told him that he was in no trouble and the reason he ended up on the No Fly List was because of possibly sending emails to an American imam they may have been monitoring. They then informed him that if he would go undercover at various local mosques, they could get him off the No Fly List immediately and he would be compensated for such actions.
  
• 
  
• Mashal refused to answer any additional questions without a lawyer present and was told to leave the hotel. Mashal then contacted the ACLU and is now being represented in a class-action lawsuit filed against the TSA, FBI and DHS concerning the legality of the No Fly List and how people end up on it. Mashal feels as if he was blackmailed into becoming an informant by being placed on the No Fly List. Mashal has since appeared on ABC, NBC, PBS and Al Jazeera concerning his inclusion on the No Fly List. He has also written a book about his experience titled "No Spy No Fly."

• In November 2002 Salon reported that the No-Fly program seemed "to be netting mostly priests, elderly nuns, Green Party campaign operatives, left-wing journalists, right-wing activists and people affiliated with Arab or Arab-American groups." Art dealer Doug Stuber, who ran Ralph Nader’s Green Party presidential campaign in North Carolina in 2000, was prevented from flying to Europe on business in October 2002.
  
• 
  
• He was repeatedly pulled out of line, held for questioning until his flight left, then told falsely he could take a later flight or depart from a different airport. Barbara Olshansky, then Assistant Legal Director for the Center for Constitutional Rights, noted that she and several of her colleagues received special attention on numerous occasions. On at least one occasion, she was ordered to pull her trousers down in view of other passengers

More at link:
No Fly List - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The no fly list is their dream come true....they can just put anyone on that list and bingo...no guns for you......something they dream about being able to do everytime they see someone with a gun........it has nothing to do with terrorism or keeping the country safe...

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Epic response from this kid