Obama Sends 300 Troops To Iraq. Why?

[Samson]

He called them advisors, 300 advisors, what a putz

Barry's disapproval ratings are higher than they've ever been during the Obama presidency.

(Gallup this week at 55%)

Golfing while Iraq Burns is not a popular strategy.

 

[1776]

oh sure.... Saddam's sons wouldn't be worse than him on non-Sunnis inside Iraq and wouldn't be aligned with ISIS aka AQ.

Fairy dust and unicorns if you were in charge....

Obama demanding the Iraq GOV make changes is giving ISIS credibility that they don't deserve. Now they can claim they are Sunni liberators trying to create "political change" in Iraq when in reality they are terrorists with a demented view of islam that many in that region hate.

Most muslims in the middle east don't want roving gangs of terrorists running their lives and executing or cutting off limbs of the "wrong sect" or someone claimed to be infidel or a common criminal. PBS aired a documentary about the Lost Children of Syria and they highlighted the secular groups fighting Assad and ISIS because ISIS would roll into cities and start public executions of anyone they didn't like.

Obama being a fucking idiot is giving ISIS public support with his stupid ass comments.

Iraq's fate was set as soon the US adopted a policy of regime change. It's over, the US leaving one way or another, with the exception of the Kurd controlled portion of the country. If Saddam and the Baathists were left in power, love them or hate them, Iraq would still be in one piece and minorities (Christians and others) wouldn't be used for target practice as they are now.

 

[Samson]

Obama ran for office in 2012 on ending the war in Iraq. Whoops.

Just wait until 2016 and our complete withdrawal from Afghanistan...(But that will be left for Obama's predecessor to deal with)...

 

[The T]

Iraq's fate was set as soon the US adopted a policy of regime change. It's over, the US leaving one way or another.

Obama does the same thing...Egypt Ring a bell? Moe Khadafi? An attmpt by Obama and his "RED LINE(S)" to get rid of Assad...

Is Libya better off without Khadafi? And Assad was going nowhere, even with the US providing material support to Jihadists.

I'll take what was Benghazi for $1,000 Alex...

And what of Mubarak? The Muslim brotherhood that Obama supported...?

It took the Military to arrest Morsi...and start killing MB members...Obama must be aghast...

"Arab Spring"

 

[1776]

Obama pulled 100% out of Iraq despite the US military warning him.....ISIS and Iran now turning Iraq into Syria II.

Obama went along with Europe to "get back their oil" from Qadaffi....Libya is now a terrorist haven that got a US Ambassador killed, thanks to Obama.

Obama stood around and didn't help the secular muslims and Christians fighting Assad in Syria, so Russia, AQ groups and Iran rushed in to turn Syria into the world's biggest shithole with thousands dead.

Obama is now handing over Taliban leaders for a US traitor and projecting our departure from Afghanistan giving the Taliban a time table to return to power....

Endless fuck-ups by the brainless community organizer.

 

[The Rabbi]

Three pages and no one can explain what our strategy in Iraq is that Obama is sending 300 "advisors" wearing pink tennis shoes.

 

[Kimura]

Obama does the same thing...Egypt Ring a bell? Moe Khadafi? An attmpt by Obama and his "RED LINE(S)" to get rid of Assad...

Is Libya better off without Khadafi? And Assad was going nowhere, even with the US providing material support to Jihadists.

I'll take what was Benghazi for $1,000 Alex...

And what of Mubarak? The Muslim brotherhood that Obama supported...?

It took the Military to arrest Morsi...and start killing MB members...Obama must be aghast...

"Arab Spring"

Egypt was stable under Mubarak, and the flag of Al-Queda is all over Egypt.

 

[Kimura]

oh sure.... Saddam's sons wouldn't be worse than him on non-Sunnis inside Iraq and wouldn't be aligned with ISIS aka AQ.

Fairy dust and unicorns if you were in charge....

Obama demanding the Iraq GOV make changes is giving ISIS credibility that they don't deserve. Now they can claim they are Sunni liberators trying to create "political change" in Iraq when in reality they are terrorists with a demented view of islam that many in that region hate.

Most muslims in the middle east don't want roving gangs of terrorists running their lives and executing or cutting off limbs of the "wrong sect" or someone claimed to be infidel or a common criminal. PBS aired a documentary about the Lost Children of Syria and they highlighted the secular groups fighting Assad and ISIS because ISIS would roll into cities and start public executions of anyone they didn't like.

Obama being a fucking idiot is giving ISIS public support with his stupid ass comments.

Iraq's fate was set as soon the US adopted a policy of regime change. It's over, the US leaving one way or another, with the exception of the Kurd controlled portion of the country. If Saddam and the Baathists were left in power, love them or hate them, Iraq would still be in one piece and minorities (Christians and others) wouldn't be used for target practice as they are now.

Sadaam was a Baathist, they were secular and Arab socialists more or less. The country was in one piece, there were no roving gangs of Islamic nuts under his tenure. He would simply execute these people on a whim. Question: was Iraq more stable under Saddam or now?

 

[The T]

Is Libya better off without Khadafi? And Assad was going nowhere, even with the US providing material support to Jihadists.

I'll take what was Benghazi for $1,000 Alex...

And what of Mubarak? The Muslim brotherhood that Obama supported...?

It took the Military to arrest Morsi...and start killing MB members...Obama must be aghast...

"Arab Spring"

Egypt was stable under Mubarak, and the flag of Al-Queda is all over Egypt.

"World Apology Tor 2009" Began in Cairo...The Arab Spring...

The "Spring" has turned into the Summer from HELL courtesy of Obama's ineptness.

 

[The T]

Three pages and no one can explain what our strategy in Iraq is that Obama is sending 300 "advisors" wearing pink tennis shoes.

Diversion in an election year...all there is to it.

 

[Kimura]

I'll take what was Benghazi for $1,000 Alex...

And what of Mubarak? The Muslim brotherhood that Obama supported...?

It took the Military to arrest Morsi...and start killing MB members...Obama must be aghast...

"Arab Spring"

Egypt was stable under Mubarak, and the flag of Al-Queda is all over Egypt.

"World Apology Tor 2009" Began in Cairo...The Arab Spring...

The "Spring" has turned into the Summer from HELL courtesy of Obama's ineptness.

It's US foreign policy ineptness as soon we engaged the Islamic world three decades ago. Again, hard power will not solve any of these problems, which our policy makers don't seem to understand.

 

[Kosh]

Didn't JFK send "advisors" into vietnam?

About 16,000, 4 months before he was assassinated.

 

[Kimura]

Three pages and no one can explain what our strategy in Iraq is that Obama is sending 300 "advisors" wearing pink tennis shoes.

Those 300 advisors really won't make a difference. We should start with pulling out US personnel before complete chaos overtakes Baghdad and the rest of the country.

 

[1776]

Saddam's sons would be in charge today, end of your fairy tale stories.

Eventually Saddam's sons would align themselves with the AQ leaders that hated Israel, the US, Iran, etc.

Even Saddam turned a blind eye to AQ groups hiding and training in Iraq before and during our war in Afghanistan prior to attacking Iraq. Saddam allowed terrorists to exist in his country as long as they didn't threaten his power.

oh sure.... Saddam's sons wouldn't be worse than him on non-Sunnis inside Iraq and wouldn't be aligned with ISIS aka AQ.

Fairy dust and unicorns if you were in charge....

Iraq's fate was set as soon the US adopted a policy of regime change. It's over, the US leaving one way or another, with the exception of the Kurd controlled portion of the country. If Saddam and the Baathists were left in power, love them or hate them, Iraq would still be in one piece and minorities (Christians and others) wouldn't be used for target practice as they are now.

Sadaam was a Baathist, they were secular and Arab socialists more or less. The country was in one piece, there was no roving gangs of Islamic nuts under his tenure. He would simply execute these people on a whim. Question: was Iraq more stable under Saddam or now?

 

[blastoff]

If the fire department claims a fire is out and then has to come back to put it out again.....they are no longer trusted.

Obama should never be allowed near sharp objects or a box of matches.

Note to self: send President Obama a few gross of steak knives and several cases of large wooden matches.

 

[Kimura]

Eventually Saddam's sons would align themselves with the AQ leaders that hated Israel, the US, Iran, etc.

Even Saddam turned a blind eye to AQ groups hiding and training in Iraq before and during our war in Afghanistan prior to attacking Iraq. Saddam allowed terrorists to exist in his country as long as they didn't threaten his power.

That operational link was bullshit. According to the Senate Select Committee and 9/11 Commission, no links were ever proven. It was used as a rationale for war with Iraq. How's that working out so far? Saddam had huge problems with Islamism, including booting out the Ayatollah, his support for Christian militias during the Lebanese civil war, etc

Also, Saddam, his sons and the Baathists were pan-Arab nationalists, which was an amalgamation of secularism and Arab socialism. This is in direct opposition to political Islamism. Michel Aflaq, the founder of the Baathist movement, was a Christian.

 

[Sallow]

Saddam's sons would be in charge today, end of your fairy tale stories.

Eventually Saddam's sons would align themselves with the AQ leaders that hated Israel, the US, Iran, etc.

Even Saddam turned a blind eye to AQ groups hiding and training in Iraq before and during our war in Afghanistan prior to attacking Iraq. Saddam allowed terrorists to exist in his country as long as they didn't threaten his power.

oh sure.... Saddam's sons wouldn't be worse than him on non-Sunnis inside Iraq and wouldn't be aligned with ISIS aka AQ.

Fairy dust and unicorns if you were in charge....

Sadaam was a Baathist, they were secular and Arab socialists more or less. The country was in one piece, there was no roving gangs of Islamic nuts under his tenure. He would simply execute these people on a whim. Question: was Iraq more stable under Saddam or now?

That's complete Bullshit.

Those groups set up in US "controlled" no fly areas.

 

[Kosh]

Saddam's sons would be in charge today, end of your fairy tale stories.

Eventually Saddam's sons would align themselves with the AQ leaders that hated Israel, the US, Iran, etc.

Even Saddam turned a blind eye to AQ groups hiding and training in Iraq before and during our war in Afghanistan prior to attacking Iraq. Saddam allowed terrorists to exist in his country as long as they didn't threaten his power.

Sadaam was a Baathist, they were secular and Arab socialists more or less. The country was in one piece, there was no roving gangs of Islamic nuts under his tenure. He would simply execute these people on a whim. Question: was Iraq more stable under Saddam or now?

That's complete Bullshit.

Those groups set up in US "controlled" no fly areas.

If true (which we know this as far left propaganda), it happend during the Clinton years when Clinton was to chicken to strike at Bin Laden.

 

[Claudette]

I thought he was sending troops to protect the embassy?

Unless this 300 is added to that 275. Wonder why he feels he needs advisors in Iraq. After all, he pulled all of our troops and declared the war over.

Yup. Barry had done wonders for US foreign policy all over the world. One hopes he stops being so smart before he fucks things up even more than they already are.

 

[Kosh]

I thought he was sending troops to protect the embassy?

Unless this 300 is added to that 275. Wonder why he feels he needs advisors in Iraq. After all, he pulled all of our troops and declared the war over.

Yup. Barry had done wonders for US foreign policy all over the world. One hopes he stops being so smart before he fucks things up even more than they already are.

He did and claims he does not need to seek preapproval for any operations in Iraq.

And yes the 300 is on top of the 275.