Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Islam is more than a religion. It is a theocracy that demands ALL people to submit. It pushes for Sharia Law throughout the world. It is slowly taking over nations by establishing no-go zones where Sharia Law is observed.Whats wrong with your POTUS respecting Islam? I thought you would want your POTUS to respect all religions in a country committed to freedom of religion.The world's leaders assembled in Paris to march against radical Islam. Obama can't bring himself to do that...especially in light of these public statements declaring his unfettered respect for Islam. Obama is a Muslim.
Watch Very Disturbing Obama Talking About His Love For Islam And Being Muslim Truth Uncensored
The US Ambassador to France was there.That sounds like a very good representative from the US. European world leaders were there. Were the leaders of Australia, Canada, New Zealand, etc. there? Were any leaders of South American countries there? Were leaders from Japan, Thailand, India there?Was any representative from the US there?
America snubs historic Paris rally: Holder skipped out of proceedings early, Kerry was in India, Obama and Biden just stayed home
- German Chancellor Angela Merkel, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and David Cameron were among the leaders at the march today
- Neither President Obama or Vice President Joe Biden attended the historic event, though both of their schedules were open
- U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder was in Paris for a terrorism summit, but was not seen at the march which followed
- The only U.S. representative at the march was Ambassador Jane Hartley
Read more: America snubs historic Paris rally Holder skipped out early Kerry was in India and Obama and Biden just stayed home to leave no U.S. presence at anti-terror march joined by global leaders Daily Mail Online
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
I know that....but if one doesn't respond, one makes the same mistake the GOP has made for years in not bothering to rebut the ridiculous claims against them. It only bolsters the liberal's contention that he is right about the charge. Many (if not most) that defend what Obama does tend to revert to the 'you don't like him because he's black' charge. These are the truly idiotic among the liberals.The PC Police just throw this out to put you on the defensive, so they can change the topic and control the conversation.How foolish can you get. His color means nothing to me. His disdain for the Constitution is obvious. He is the Manchurian Candidate. He is destroying a great nation, emulating his Marxist father and fighting for the cause of anti-colonialism. Obama is a Marxist asshole and you know it.IOW being Black...to you.His being black does not bother me at all. His being an incompetent, anti-American Marxist asshole does.It must suck for you to know you have a Black POTUS.He won the first one by having everybody else removed from the ballot.
He is a snake!
That people continue to worship the worthless bastard is beyond comprehension.
I'd suggest not playing along.
.
Islam is more than a religion. It is a theocracy that demands ALL people to submit. It pushes for Sharia Law throughout the world. It is slowly taking over nations by establishing no-go zones where Sharia Law is observed.Whats wrong with your POTUS respecting Islam? I thought you would want your POTUS to respect all religions in a country committed to freedom of religion.The world's leaders assembled in Paris to march against radical Islam. Obama can't bring himself to do that...especially in light of these public statements declaring his unfettered respect for Islam. Obama is a Muslim.
Watch Very Disturbing Obama Talking About His Love For Islam And Being Muslim Truth Uncensored
I want all religions to be allowed...with the exception of any whose practices call for the annihilation of all other religions....such as ISLAM!
You have to be extremely dense not to understand the difference between radical Islam and a peaceful, tolerant religion.
It obvious you dont know what you are talking about but its not wise to argue with foolish people.Islam is more than a religion. It is a theocracy that demands ALL people to submit. It pushes for Sharia Law throughout the world. It is slowly taking over nations by establishing no-go zones where Sharia Law is observed.Whats wrong with your POTUS respecting Islam? I thought you would want your POTUS to respect all religions in a country committed to freedom of religion.The world's leaders assembled in Paris to march against radical Islam. Obama can't bring himself to do that...especially in light of these public statements declaring his unfettered respect for Islam. Obama is a Muslim.
Watch Very Disturbing Obama Talking About His Love For Islam And Being Muslim Truth Uncensored
I want all religions to be allowed...with the exception of any whose practices call for the annihilation of all other religions....such as ISLAM!
You have to be extremely dense not to understand the difference between radical Islam and a peaceful, tolerant religion.
Then defend it. Instead you just deny then accuse me of lying, I don't need to lie. Typical left lack of ability to actually think.Then you're just too stupid to be arguing the point.Don't be a simpleton. His words and his inaction are only debatable to idiots like yourself who are in denial.
The link I gave is 100% sympathetic towards the terrorists as well as the victims. You can't have it both ways, he is lying about one.
There is absolutely nothing anywhere in your link that in any way substantiates your false view.
No, the problem is that you are completely full of shit. There is not one word in your entire link that could be in any way interpreted as sympathetic with terrorism.
Begs the question: Why do you people have to lie about everything all the time?
I gave the link, his words. I'm not about to hand you what could be a point of debate, that's your job. You simply can't do it
Are you fucking kidding or what? Are you in fourth grade? Is superficial rhetoric really as far as your thinking takes you?
Superficial rhetoric is what's usually coming out of this administration. Keep up.
I see....so then your goal must be to emulate that behavior and dumb things down just a little bit more.
Have you studied Obama's past, including his book?
How Obama Thinks - Forbes
"So who was Barack Obama Sr.? He was a Luo tribesman who grew up in Kenya and studied at Harvard. He was a polygamist who had, over the course of his lifetime, four wives and eight children. One of his sons, Mark Obama, has accused him of abuse and wife-beating. He was also a regular drunk driver who got into numerous accidents, killing a man in one and causing his own legs to be amputated due to injury in another. In 1982 he got drunk at a bar in Nairobi and drove into a tree, killing himself.
An odd choice, certainly, as an inspirational hero. But to his son, the elder Obama represented a great and noble cause, the cause of anticolonialism. Obama Sr. grew up during Africa’s struggle to be free of European rule, and he was one of the early generation of Africans chosen to study in America and then to shape his country’s future.
Anticolonialism is the doctrine that rich countries of the West got rich by invading, occupying and looting poor countries of Asia, Africa and South America. As one of Obama’s acknowledged intellectual influences, Frantz Fanon, wrote in The Wretched of the Earth, “The well-being and progress of Europe have been built up with the sweat and the dead bodies of Negroes, Arabs, Indians and the yellow races.”
Anticolonialists hold that even when countries secure political independence they remain economically dependent on their former captors. This dependence is called neocolonialism, a term defined by the African statesman Kwame Nkrumah (1909–72) in his book Neocolonialism: The Last Stage of Imperialism. Nkrumah, Ghana’s first president, writes that poor countries may be nominally free, but they continue to be manipulated from abroad by powerful corporate and plutocratic elites. These forces of neocolonialism oppress not only Third World people but also citizens in their own countries. Obviously the solution is to resist and overthrow the oppressors. This was the anticolonial ideology of Barack Obama Sr. and many in his generation, including many of my own relatives in India.
Obama Sr. was an economist, and in 1965 he published an important article in the East Africa Journal called “Problems Facing Our Socialism.” Obama Sr. wasn’t a doctrinaire socialist; rather, he saw state appropriation of wealth as a necessary means to achieve the anticolonial objective of taking resources away from the foreign looters and restoring them to the people of Africa. For Obama Sr. this was an issue of national autonomy. “Is it the African who owns this country? If he does, then why should he not control the economic means of growth in this country?”
As he put it, “We need to eliminate power structures that have been built through excessive accumulation so that not only a few individuals shall control a vast magnitude of resources as is the case now.” The senior Obama proposed that the state confiscate private land and raise taxes with no upper limit. In fact, he insisted that “theoretically there is nothing that can stop the government from taxing 100% of income so long as the people get benefits from the government commensurate with their income which is taxed.”
Remarkably, President Obama, who knows his father’s history very well, has never mentioned his father’s article. Even more remarkably, there has been virtually no reporting on a document that seems directly relevant to what the junior Obama is doing in the White House.
While the senior Obama called for Africa to free itself from the neocolonial influence of Europe and specifically Britain, he knew when he came to America in 1959 that the global balance of power was shifting. Even then, he recognized what has become a new tenet of anticolonialist ideology: Today’s neocolonial leader is not Europe but America. As the late Palestinian scholar Edward Said–who was one of Obama’s teachers at Columbia University–wrote in Culture and Imperialism, “The United States has replaced the earlier great empires and is the dominant outside force.”
From the anticolonial perspective, American imperialism is on a rampage. For a while, U.S. power was checked by the Soviet Union, but since the end of the Cold War, America has been the sole superpower. Moreover, 9/11 provided the occasion for America to invade and occupy two countries, Iraq and Afghanistan, and also to seek political and economic domination in the same way the French and the British empires once did. So in the anticolonial view, America is now the rogue elephant that subjugates and tramples the people of the world.
Anti colonialism? What kind of fucking half wit finds Dinesh D'Souza horseshit to be compelling. You really have to be a shallow thoughtless moron to be inspired by that kind of speculation.
not speculation at all.
based on Obama Sr's political philosophy
dreams of Obama's father you zero wit
I am sure he couldn't have helped but make a statement about how brave it was of these terrorists to die for their cause.Look at the bright side, no Hillary, Obama or Biden saying stupid shit for the whole world to hear.Isn't France one of our allies? Why was nobody there to represent the USA??? THAT is the question.
True. I can see Obama. I can't stop the terrorist. But I can stop the seas rising and heal the planet too...
I imagine he didn't show up because as soon as he said something stupid, the Parisian mob would have ripped him limb from limb.
Many obvious reasons. The march was about UNITY and Obama is all about DIVISION, and the march wasn't a good representative of "European Imperialists and Colonialists oppressing the less advantaged people of the world".
Are you fucking kidding or what? Are you in fourth grade? Is superficial rhetoric really as far as your thinking takes you?
Superficial rhetoric is what's usually coming out of this administration. Keep up.
I see....so then your goal must be to emulate that behavior and dumb things down just a little bit more.
Have you studied Obama's past, including his book?
How Obama Thinks - Forbes
"So who was Barack Obama Sr.? He was a Luo tribesman who grew up in Kenya and studied at Harvard. He was a polygamist who had, over the course of his lifetime, four wives and eight children. One of his sons, Mark Obama, has accused him of abuse and wife-beating. He was also a regular drunk driver who got into numerous accidents, killing a man in one and causing his own legs to be amputated due to injury in another. In 1982 he got drunk at a bar in Nairobi and drove into a tree, killing himself.
An odd choice, certainly, as an inspirational hero. But to his son, the elder Obama represented a great and noble cause, the cause of anticolonialism. Obama Sr. grew up during Africa’s struggle to be free of European rule, and he was one of the early generation of Africans chosen to study in America and then to shape his country’s future.
Anticolonialism is the doctrine that rich countries of the West got rich by invading, occupying and looting poor countries of Asia, Africa and South America. As one of Obama’s acknowledged intellectual influences, Frantz Fanon, wrote in The Wretched of the Earth, “The well-being and progress of Europe have been built up with the sweat and the dead bodies of Negroes, Arabs, Indians and the yellow races.”
Anticolonialists hold that even when countries secure political independence they remain economically dependent on their former captors. This dependence is called neocolonialism, a term defined by the African statesman Kwame Nkrumah (1909–72) in his book Neocolonialism: The Last Stage of Imperialism. Nkrumah, Ghana’s first president, writes that poor countries may be nominally free, but they continue to be manipulated from abroad by powerful corporate and plutocratic elites. These forces of neocolonialism oppress not only Third World people but also citizens in their own countries. Obviously the solution is to resist and overthrow the oppressors. This was the anticolonial ideology of Barack Obama Sr. and many in his generation, including many of my own relatives in India.
Obama Sr. was an economist, and in 1965 he published an important article in the East Africa Journal called “Problems Facing Our Socialism.” Obama Sr. wasn’t a doctrinaire socialist; rather, he saw state appropriation of wealth as a necessary means to achieve the anticolonial objective of taking resources away from the foreign looters and restoring them to the people of Africa. For Obama Sr. this was an issue of national autonomy. “Is it the African who owns this country? If he does, then why should he not control the economic means of growth in this country?”
As he put it, “We need to eliminate power structures that have been built through excessive accumulation so that not only a few individuals shall control a vast magnitude of resources as is the case now.” The senior Obama proposed that the state confiscate private land and raise taxes with no upper limit. In fact, he insisted that “theoretically there is nothing that can stop the government from taxing 100% of income so long as the people get benefits from the government commensurate with their income which is taxed.”
Remarkably, President Obama, who knows his father’s history very well, has never mentioned his father’s article. Even more remarkably, there has been virtually no reporting on a document that seems directly relevant to what the junior Obama is doing in the White House.
While the senior Obama called for Africa to free itself from the neocolonial influence of Europe and specifically Britain, he knew when he came to America in 1959 that the global balance of power was shifting. Even then, he recognized what has become a new tenet of anticolonialist ideology: Today’s neocolonial leader is not Europe but America. As the late Palestinian scholar Edward Said–who was one of Obama’s teachers at Columbia University–wrote in Culture and Imperialism, “The United States has replaced the earlier great empires and is the dominant outside force.”
From the anticolonial perspective, American imperialism is on a rampage. For a while, U.S. power was checked by the Soviet Union, but since the end of the Cold War, America has been the sole superpower. Moreover, 9/11 provided the occasion for America to invade and occupy two countries, Iraq and Afghanistan, and also to seek political and economic domination in the same way the French and the British empires once did. So in the anticolonial view, America is now the rogue elephant that subjugates and tramples the people of the world.
Anti colonialism? What kind of fucking half wit finds Dinesh D'Souza horseshit to be compelling. You really have to be a shallow thoughtless moron to be inspired by that kind of speculation.
No. What is obvious is that you have no sense of logic and substantiated conclusions.It obvious you dont know what you are talking about but its not wise to argue with foolish people.Islam is more than a religion. It is a theocracy that demands ALL people to submit. It pushes for Sharia Law throughout the world. It is slowly taking over nations by establishing no-go zones where Sharia Law is observed.Whats wrong with your POTUS respecting Islam? I thought you would want your POTUS to respect all religions in a country committed to freedom of religion.The world's leaders assembled in Paris to march against radical Islam. Obama can't bring himself to do that...especially in light of these public statements declaring his unfettered respect for Islam. Obama is a Muslim.
Watch Very Disturbing Obama Talking About His Love For Islam And Being Muslim Truth Uncensored
I want all religions to be allowed...with the exception of any whose practices call for the annihilation of all other religions....such as ISLAM!
You have to be extremely dense not to understand the difference between radical Islam and a peaceful, tolerant religion.
Is there a reason Obama chose to sit this one out?
Are you fucking kidding or what? Are you in fourth grade? Is superficial rhetoric really as far as your thinking takes you?
Superficial rhetoric is what's usually coming out of this administration. Keep up.
I see....so then your goal must be to emulate that behavior and dumb things down just a little bit more.
Have you studied Obama's past, including his book?
How Obama Thinks - Forbes
"So who was Barack Obama Sr.? He was a Luo tribesman who grew up in Kenya and studied at Harvard. He was a polygamist who had, over the course of his lifetime, four wives and eight children. One of his sons, Mark Obama, has accused him of abuse and wife-beating. He was also a regular drunk driver who got into numerous accidents, killing a man in one and causing his own legs to be amputated due to injury in another. In 1982 he got drunk at a bar in Nairobi and drove into a tree, killing himself.
An odd choice, certainly, as an inspirational hero. But to his son, the elder Obama represented a great and noble cause, the cause of anticolonialism. Obama Sr. grew up during Africa’s struggle to be free of European rule, and he was one of the early generation of Africans chosen to study in America and then to shape his country’s future.
Anticolonialism is the doctrine that rich countries of the West got rich by invading, occupying and looting poor countries of Asia, Africa and South America. As one of Obama’s acknowledged intellectual influences, Frantz Fanon, wrote in The Wretched of the Earth, “The well-being and progress of Europe have been built up with the sweat and the dead bodies of Negroes, Arabs, Indians and the yellow races.”
Anticolonialists hold that even when countries secure political independence they remain economically dependent on their former captors. This dependence is called neocolonialism, a term defined by the African statesman Kwame Nkrumah (1909–72) in his book Neocolonialism: The Last Stage of Imperialism. Nkrumah, Ghana’s first president, writes that poor countries may be nominally free, but they continue to be manipulated from abroad by powerful corporate and plutocratic elites. These forces of neocolonialism oppress not only Third World people but also citizens in their own countries. Obviously the solution is to resist and overthrow the oppressors. This was the anticolonial ideology of Barack Obama Sr. and many in his generation, including many of my own relatives in India.
Obama Sr. was an economist, and in 1965 he published an important article in the East Africa Journal called “Problems Facing Our Socialism.” Obama Sr. wasn’t a doctrinaire socialist; rather, he saw state appropriation of wealth as a necessary means to achieve the anticolonial objective of taking resources away from the foreign looters and restoring them to the people of Africa. For Obama Sr. this was an issue of national autonomy. “Is it the African who owns this country? If he does, then why should he not control the economic means of growth in this country?”
As he put it, “We need to eliminate power structures that have been built through excessive accumulation so that not only a few individuals shall control a vast magnitude of resources as is the case now.” The senior Obama proposed that the state confiscate private land and raise taxes with no upper limit. In fact, he insisted that “theoretically there is nothing that can stop the government from taxing 100% of income so long as the people get benefits from the government commensurate with their income which is taxed.”
Remarkably, President Obama, who knows his father’s history very well, has never mentioned his father’s article. Even more remarkably, there has been virtually no reporting on a document that seems directly relevant to what the junior Obama is doing in the White House.
While the senior Obama called for Africa to free itself from the neocolonial influence of Europe and specifically Britain, he knew when he came to America in 1959 that the global balance of power was shifting. Even then, he recognized what has become a new tenet of anticolonialist ideology: Today’s neocolonial leader is not Europe but America. As the late Palestinian scholar Edward Said–who was one of Obama’s teachers at Columbia University–wrote in Culture and Imperialism, “The United States has replaced the earlier great empires and is the dominant outside force.”
From the anticolonial perspective, American imperialism is on a rampage. For a while, U.S. power was checked by the Soviet Union, but since the end of the Cold War, America has been the sole superpower. Moreover, 9/11 provided the occasion for America to invade and occupy two countries, Iraq and Afghanistan, and also to seek political and economic domination in the same way the French and the British empires once did. So in the anticolonial view, America is now the rogue elephant that subjugates and tramples the people of the world.
Anti colonialism? What kind of fucking half wit finds Dinesh D'Souza horseshit to be compelling. You really have to be a shallow thoughtless moron to be inspired by that kind of speculation.
its a fact, not speculation. Look it up.
Just as Christians have extremists following the Old Testament (eye for an eye) rather than the New Testament (turn the other cheek), Muslims have assholes following every word of the demented Muhammed rather than the tenants that promote peace and tolerance. Radical Islam is not practiced by all Muslims. The non-radicals just seem to be afraid to say, "To hell with radical Islam!"Islam is more than a religion. It is a theocracy that demands ALL people to submit. It pushes for Sharia Law throughout the world. It is slowly taking over nations by establishing no-go zones where Sharia Law is observed.Whats wrong with your POTUS respecting Islam? I thought you would want your POTUS to respect all religions in a country committed to freedom of religion.The world's leaders assembled in Paris to march against radical Islam. Obama can't bring himself to do that...especially in light of these public statements declaring his unfettered respect for Islam. Obama is a Muslim.
Watch Very Disturbing Obama Talking About His Love For Islam And Being Muslim Truth Uncensored
I want all religions to be allowed...with the exception of any whose practices call for the annihilation of all other religions....such as ISLAM!
You have to be extremely dense not to understand the difference between radical Islam and a peaceful, tolerant religion.
Most of the world can't tel the difference. That's because the radicals seem to be following true Islam.
Did anyone from the GOP show any leadership and show up in France?
Heck no , the GOP big wigs are war mongers.
There's a war a-comin' if Islam doesn't reform.
Your blaming this on Islam? No WWIII will not be due to any terrorist attack, it will be over land, water and oil. and has stated with the boom at 911, when Israel and the GOP neocons in our gov. begun the war on terror. Also I don't remember a time we have not been at war, whether a cold war or one fought with arms.
Superficial rhetoric is what's usually coming out of this administration. Keep up.
I see....so then your goal must be to emulate that behavior and dumb things down just a little bit more.
Have you studied Obama's past, including his book?
How Obama Thinks - Forbes
"So who was Barack Obama Sr.? He was a Luo tribesman who grew up in Kenya and studied at Harvard. He was a polygamist who had, over the course of his lifetime, four wives and eight children. One of his sons, Mark Obama, has accused him of abuse and wife-beating. He was also a regular drunk driver who got into numerous accidents, killing a man in one and causing his own legs to be amputated due to injury in another. In 1982 he got drunk at a bar in Nairobi and drove into a tree, killing himself.
An odd choice, certainly, as an inspirational hero. But to his son, the elder Obama represented a great and noble cause, the cause of anticolonialism. Obama Sr. grew up during Africa’s struggle to be free of European rule, and he was one of the early generation of Africans chosen to study in America and then to shape his country’s future.
Anticolonialism is the doctrine that rich countries of the West got rich by invading, occupying and looting poor countries of Asia, Africa and South America. As one of Obama’s acknowledged intellectual influences, Frantz Fanon, wrote in The Wretched of the Earth, “The well-being and progress of Europe have been built up with the sweat and the dead bodies of Negroes, Arabs, Indians and the yellow races.”
Anticolonialists hold that even when countries secure political independence they remain economically dependent on their former captors. This dependence is called neocolonialism, a term defined by the African statesman Kwame Nkrumah (1909–72) in his book Neocolonialism: The Last Stage of Imperialism. Nkrumah, Ghana’s first president, writes that poor countries may be nominally free, but they continue to be manipulated from abroad by powerful corporate and plutocratic elites. These forces of neocolonialism oppress not only Third World people but also citizens in their own countries. Obviously the solution is to resist and overthrow the oppressors. This was the anticolonial ideology of Barack Obama Sr. and many in his generation, including many of my own relatives in India.
Obama Sr. was an economist, and in 1965 he published an important article in the East Africa Journal called “Problems Facing Our Socialism.” Obama Sr. wasn’t a doctrinaire socialist; rather, he saw state appropriation of wealth as a necessary means to achieve the anticolonial objective of taking resources away from the foreign looters and restoring them to the people of Africa. For Obama Sr. this was an issue of national autonomy. “Is it the African who owns this country? If he does, then why should he not control the economic means of growth in this country?”
As he put it, “We need to eliminate power structures that have been built through excessive accumulation so that not only a few individuals shall control a vast magnitude of resources as is the case now.” The senior Obama proposed that the state confiscate private land and raise taxes with no upper limit. In fact, he insisted that “theoretically there is nothing that can stop the government from taxing 100% of income so long as the people get benefits from the government commensurate with their income which is taxed.”
Remarkably, President Obama, who knows his father’s history very well, has never mentioned his father’s article. Even more remarkably, there has been virtually no reporting on a document that seems directly relevant to what the junior Obama is doing in the White House.
While the senior Obama called for Africa to free itself from the neocolonial influence of Europe and specifically Britain, he knew when he came to America in 1959 that the global balance of power was shifting. Even then, he recognized what has become a new tenet of anticolonialist ideology: Today’s neocolonial leader is not Europe but America. As the late Palestinian scholar Edward Said–who was one of Obama’s teachers at Columbia University–wrote in Culture and Imperialism, “The United States has replaced the earlier great empires and is the dominant outside force.”
From the anticolonial perspective, American imperialism is on a rampage. For a while, U.S. power was checked by the Soviet Union, but since the end of the Cold War, America has been the sole superpower. Moreover, 9/11 provided the occasion for America to invade and occupy two countries, Iraq and Afghanistan, and also to seek political and economic domination in the same way the French and the British empires once did. So in the anticolonial view, America is now the rogue elephant that subjugates and tramples the people of the world.
Anti colonialism? What kind of fucking half wit finds Dinesh D'Souza horseshit to be compelling. You really have to be a shallow thoughtless moron to be inspired by that kind of speculation.
its a fact, not speculation. Look it up.
Like I said already: You have to be exceptionally stupid to find Dinesh D'Souza even remotely compelling. Pretty funny idea though.....a guy named Dinesh talking about the unamerican guy named Barrak. Fucking hilarious.
I think the fascinating thing about these threads is how quickly all the conservatives fall into lockstep whenever their masters issue them a new talking point. If nothing else, they're a reliable group of parrots.
So he didn't show sympathy for the victims?Defend what? Your lying characterization of your own link? How stupid are you?
You're right, 2000 dead in Nigeria 17 in France, all the fruits of Islam. And the carnage continues, never a day goes by without a slaughter or genocide committed by non Muslim Muslims. This time Boko Haram strapped bombs on 10 year old girls, And then the talking heads keep coming on the news telling us that all of this has nothing, absolutely nothing to do with Islam.Lets see. 2000 dead in Nigeria, 17 in France. Who had the bigger tragedy? I dont remember seeing any outcry over the POTUS not going to Nigeria. Why not?
Fifty world leaders marched for freedom yesterday. So where was the leader of the free world? Watching football – and dropping the ball
It was one of the most powerful images of solidarity the world has seen since the end of World War II.
A million and a half people marching through the streets of Paris, some crying, many cheering, others chanting ‘Je suis Charlie!’ or singing La Marseillaise – that most spine-tingling of all national anthems.
At the head of the march were 50 world leaders; the Prime Ministers of France, Britain, Spain, Denmark, Poland, Turkey and Israel stood side-by-side, arm-in-arm with the German chancellor, the Palestinian president, and the Queen of Jordan.
Read more: Where was Obama during Sunday s Paris march Daily Mail Online
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
