MaggieMae
Reality bits
- Apr 3, 2009
- 24,043
- 1,635
Perhaps next time you'll apply a bit more thought if you are tempted to lie and/or whine. Perhaps not. It's pretty pathetic to lie in writing then whine about being called on it. But now you know my style - I like truth and supportable truth when someone makes a claim. Claims are different than opinions and learning the difference might be in your best interest.How imbecilic. Here is your lie (in bold, so that you can focus). MM even told you it was a lie. You are so wrought with emotions you can't even remember telling lies. Maybe it's pathological.
I don't say things I cannot support. Try doing the same, if you wish to post coherently, that is. Don't like being called a liar? There's a simple solution: Think if you can support what you post, don't emote bullshit.
Ohhhh, good one. What a whopper I told. My bad.
Got another one?
Was saying that proof of support was required at Bush rallies a LIE? No, it was not. Was it embellished by me? Yes. I suppose lots of people managed to attend those functions without signing loyalty oaths. But they certainly tried to get as many to sign on as possible. And that's no lie. Here are but three of many links concerning those loyalty oaths.
One nation under Bush. - By Chris Suellentrop - Slate Magazine
Bush-backers-only policy riles voters at RNC rallies - The Boston Globe
Loyalty Oaths? | Ask Metafilter
Now, are you going to spend another several hours trying to whack me over this silly thing or are you able to put your EMOTIONS aside and move on like an adult?