Obama Will Be The Only President In History To Never Have A Year Of 3% GDP Growth

[owebo]

Can you say obamacare?

The magic of Obamacare was a job eliminator

Still trying to sell that bullshit when 9 million jobs have been created since Obamacare

You don't get it fool I'm certainly not your educator. But we did discuss earlier the jobs that are created are not full time jobs. But you don't understand the difference between full and part time. Fool.

More bullshit, different day

A small percentage of new jobs are part time

"Yes, we have created 11.5 million jobs as of June during the last five years of labor force expansion, but the number of full-time jobs today is 0.7 percent, or 822,000, lower than it was at the pre-recession peak and that was eight years ago. What we have seen within these numbers is a dramatic and unexpected increase in part-time jobs. We are living with a dismaying regression in wages and salaries growing at the slowest pace in three decades."

The Part-Time Recovery

The facts show you to be a liar youngster..

Gramps......less than one percent (0.7 percent) of jobs are full time?

Making stuff up as you go along?

The old work week? Or Obamas new work week?

 

[rightwinger]

United States GDP Annual Growth Rate | 1948-2016 | Data | Chart | Calendar

This is why right wingers are so ignorant. They don't bother to look anything up. I don't know why. And what's funny, is you don't even need to really look anything up to know the truth.

At the end of 2008, the GDP shrank to around -3. By the end of 2009, it had grown to over +2. That's a change of over 5. And right there, the entire argument is busted.

View attachment 84539

In 2006, the unemployment rate was 4.9% and food stamp use was 27 million. Today, unemployment is claimed to be 4.9% but food stamp use is well over 40 million. If all the jobs that have claimed to be created have been, why are so many more on food stamps?

Seems like the job creators have found the market can support low wages if the taxpayer helps with food stamps

So, should we continue to support low wage workers or make the job creators do it

 

[Conservative65]

United States GDP Annual Growth Rate | 1948-2016 | Data | Chart | Calendar

This is why right wingers are so ignorant. They don't bother to look anything up. I don't know why. And what's funny, is you don't even need to really look anything up to know the truth.

At the end of 2008, the GDP shrank to around -3. By the end of 2009, it had grown to over +2. That's a change of over 5. And right there, the entire argument is busted.

View attachment 84539

In 2006, the unemployment rate was 4.9% and food stamp use was 27 million. Today, unemployment is claimed to be 4.9% but food stamp use is well over 40 million. If all the jobs that have claimed to be created have been, why are so many more on food stamps?

Seems like the job creators have found the market can support low wages if the taxpayer helps with food stamps

So, should we continue to support low wage workers or make the job creators do it

We should leave businesses alone and do away with things like food stamps. Because a worker offers low skills doesn't mean the taxpayers should offset their poor work ability.

By the way, since you want to blame job creators, blame Obama. You are the one giving him credit for having created millions of jobs.

 

[Weatherman2020]

United States GDP Annual Growth Rate | 1948-2016 | Data | Chart | Calendar

This is why right wingers are so ignorant. They don't bother to look anything up. I don't know why. And what's funny, is you don't even need to really look anything up to know the truth.

At the end of 2008, the GDP shrank to around -3. By the end of 2009, it had grown to over +2. That's a change of over 5. And right there, the entire argument is busted.

View attachment 84539

In 2006, the unemployment rate was 4.9% and food stamp use was 27 million. Today, unemployment is claimed to be 4.9% but food stamp use is well over 40 million. If all the jobs that have claimed to be created have been, why are so many more on food stamps?

Seems like the job creators have found the market can support low wages if the taxpayer helps with food stamps

So, should we continue to support low wage workers or make the job creators do it

Seems like the job creators have found the market can support low wages if the taxpayer helps with food stamps

So time to cut food stamps.

 

[Freewill]

Has anyone really listened to Hillary's speeches? In terms of the economy it sounds as if she is running against Obama more than Trump.

 

[Conservative65]

United States GDP Annual Growth Rate | 1948-2016 | Data | Chart | Calendar

This is why right wingers are so ignorant. They don't bother to look anything up. I don't know why. And what's funny, is you don't even need to really look anything up to know the truth.

At the end of 2008, the GDP shrank to around -3. By the end of 2009, it had grown to over +2. That's a change of over 5. And right there, the entire argument is busted.

View attachment 84539

In 2006, the unemployment rate was 4.9% and food stamp use was 27 million. Today, unemployment is claimed to be 4.9% but food stamp use is well over 40 million. If all the jobs that have claimed to be created have been, why are so many more on food stamps?

Seems like the job creators have found the market can support low wages if the taxpayer helps with food stamps

So, should we continue to support low wage workers or make the job creators do it

Seems like the job creators have found the market can support low wages if the taxpayer helps with food stamps

So time to cut food stamps.

Agreed. People like rightwinger quite often claim they have compassion for people. I say let them prove it and that proof doesn't come from supporting someone else paying higher taxes.

If all those that righwinger claimed to care about had to rely on the voluntary compassion so many like him say they have, they would have already starved to death. Righwinger says he has no problem paying more taxes if it goes to help other. My question to him has been why do you have to be told to do something you say is a good idea and why does the government have to be involved. If it's that good of a concept, why isn't he doing it on his own with his own money? I know you know the answer.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Has anyone really listened to Hillary's speeches? In terms of the economy it sounds as if she is running against Obama more than Trump.

Politicians can BS and fool people about a lot of things. But not their personal financial situation.

 

[Weatherman2020]

United States GDP Annual Growth Rate | 1948-2016 | Data | Chart | Calendar

This is why right wingers are so ignorant. They don't bother to look anything up. I don't know why. And what's funny, is you don't even need to really look anything up to know the truth.

At the end of 2008, the GDP shrank to around -3. By the end of 2009, it had grown to over +2. That's a change of over 5. And right there, the entire argument is busted.

View attachment 84539

In 2006, the unemployment rate was 4.9% and food stamp use was 27 million. Today, unemployment is claimed to be 4.9% but food stamp use is well over 40 million. If all the jobs that have claimed to be created have been, why are so many more on food stamps?

Seems like the job creators have found the market can support low wages if the taxpayer helps with food stamps

So, should we continue to support low wage workers or make the job creators do it

Seems like the job creators have found the market can support low wages if the taxpayer helps with food stamps

So time to cut food stamps.

Agreed. People like rightwinger quite often claim they have compassion for people. I say let them prove it and that proof doesn't come from supporting someone else paying higher taxes.

If all those that righwinger claimed to care about had to rely on the voluntary compassion so many like him say they have, they would have already starved to death. Righwinger says he has no problem paying more taxes if it goes to help other. My question to him has been why do you have to be told to do something you say is a good idea and why does the government have to be involved. If it's that good of a concept, why isn't he doing it on his own with his own money? I know you know the answer.

Several times he has trapped himself in his own BS in this thread. He blamed government spending now food stamps. While he supports government spending and food stamps. If he had any self awareness he'd delete his account and start over.

 

[jon_berzerk]

Obamanomics. I told you this would happen 8 years ago.

We just got another extremely disappointing GDP number. It was being projected that U.S. GDP would grow by 2.5 percent during the second quarter of 2016, but instead it only grew by just 1.2 percent. In addition, the Census Bureau announced that GDP growth for the first quarter of 2016 had been revised down from 1.1 percent to 0.8 percent. What this means is that the U.S. economy is just barely hanging on by its fingernails from falling into a recession. As Zero Hedge has pointed out, the “average annual growth rate during the current business cycle remains the weakest of any expansion since at least 1949″. This is not what a recovery looks like.

In addition, Barack Obama remains solidly on track to be the only president in all of U.S. history to never have a single year when the economy grew by at least 3 percent. Every other president in American history, even the really bad ones, had at least one year when U.S. GDP grew by at least 3 percent. But this has not happened under Obama even though he has had two terms in the White House.

Barack Obama Will Be The Only President In History To Never Have A Year Of 3% GDP Growth | Zero Hedge

Pants on fire, liar:

US GDP Growth Rate by Year

BTW, wars sure helps the rich get richer if one reads between the lines in the link above.

BTW, to understand REAL GDP see this link:

How to Calculate the Annual Growth Rate for Real GDP -- The Motley Fool

from your website

Current US Real GDP Growth Rate: 2.09%

US Real GDP Growth Rate

 

[Freewill]

Obamanomics. I told you this would happen 8 years ago.

We just got another extremely disappointing GDP number. It was being projected that U.S. GDP would grow by 2.5 percent during the second quarter of 2016, but instead it only grew by just 1.2 percent. In addition, the Census Bureau announced that GDP growth for the first quarter of 2016 had been revised down from 1.1 percent to 0.8 percent. What this means is that the U.S. economy is just barely hanging on by its fingernails from falling into a recession. As Zero Hedge has pointed out, the “average annual growth rate during the current business cycle remains the weakest of any expansion since at least 1949″. This is not what a recovery looks like.

In addition, Barack Obama remains solidly on track to be the only president in all of U.S. history to never have a single year when the economy grew by at least 3 percent. Every other president in American history, even the really bad ones, had at least one year when U.S. GDP grew by at least 3 percent. But this has not happened under Obama even though he has had two terms in the White House.

Barack Obama Will Be The Only President In History To Never Have A Year Of 3% GDP Growth | Zero Hedge

Pants on fire, liar:

US GDP Growth Rate by Year

BTW, wars sure helps the rich get richer if one reads between the lines in the link above.

BTW, to understand REAL GDP see this link:

How to Calculate the Annual Growth Rate for Real GDP -- The Motley Fool

from your website

Current US Real GDP Growth Rate: 2.09%

US Real GDP Growth Rate

View attachment 84571

Obama was handed an opportunity and blew it. Look at when the economy took drops as low as the one in 2008/9. The recovery was quite large, not so for Obama.

 

[jon_berzerk]

Obamanomics. I told you this would happen 8 years ago.

We just got another extremely disappointing GDP number. It was being projected that U.S. GDP would grow by 2.5 percent during the second quarter of 2016, but instead it only grew by just 1.2 percent. In addition, the Census Bureau announced that GDP growth for the first quarter of 2016 had been revised down from 1.1 percent to 0.8 percent. What this means is that the U.S. economy is just barely hanging on by its fingernails from falling into a recession. As Zero Hedge has pointed out, the “average annual growth rate during the current business cycle remains the weakest of any expansion since at least 1949″. This is not what a recovery looks like.

In addition, Barack Obama remains solidly on track to be the only president in all of U.S. history to never have a single year when the economy grew by at least 3 percent. Every other president in American history, even the really bad ones, had at least one year when U.S. GDP grew by at least 3 percent. But this has not happened under Obama even though he has had two terms in the White House.

Barack Obama Will Be The Only President In History To Never Have A Year Of 3% GDP Growth | Zero Hedge

Pants on fire, liar:

US GDP Growth Rate by Year

BTW, wars sure helps the rich get richer if one reads between the lines in the link above.

BTW, to understand REAL GDP see this link:

How to Calculate the Annual Growth Rate for Real GDP -- The Motley Fool

from your website

Current US Real GDP Growth Rate: 2.09%

US Real GDP Growth Rate

View attachment 84571

Obama was handed an opportunity and blew it. Look at when the economy took drops as low as the one in 2008/9. The recovery was quite large, not so for Obama.

it should have been easy pickins

 

[Weatherman2020]

Obamanomics. I told you this would happen 8 years ago.

We just got another extremely disappointing GDP number. It was being projected that U.S. GDP would grow by 2.5 percent during the second quarter of 2016, but instead it only grew by just 1.2 percent. In addition, the Census Bureau announced that GDP growth for the first quarter of 2016 had been revised down from 1.1 percent to 0.8 percent. What this means is that the U.S. economy is just barely hanging on by its fingernails from falling into a recession. As Zero Hedge has pointed out, the “average annual growth rate during the current business cycle remains the weakest of any expansion since at least 1949″. This is not what a recovery looks like.

In addition, Barack Obama remains solidly on track to be the only president in all of U.S. history to never have a single year when the economy grew by at least 3 percent. Every other president in American history, even the really bad ones, had at least one year when U.S. GDP grew by at least 3 percent. But this has not happened under Obama even though he has had two terms in the White House.

Barack Obama Will Be The Only President In History To Never Have A Year Of 3% GDP Growth | Zero Hedge

Pants on fire, liar:

US GDP Growth Rate by Year

BTW, wars sure helps the rich get richer if one reads between the lines in the link above.

BTW, to understand REAL GDP see this link:

How to Calculate the Annual Growth Rate for Real GDP -- The Motley Fool

from your website

Current US Real GDP Growth Rate: 2.09%

US Real GDP Growth Rate

View attachment 84571

Obama was handed an opportunity and blew it. Look at when the economy took drops as low as the one in 2008/9. The recovery was quite large, not so for Obama.

Obama despises the US, he had every intention to hurt the economy.

 

[sealybobo]

Obamanomics. I told you this would happen 8 years ago.

We just got another extremely disappointing GDP number. It was being projected that U.S. GDP would grow by 2.5 percent during the second quarter of 2016, but instead it only grew by just 1.2 percent. In addition, the Census Bureau announced that GDP growth for the first quarter of 2016 had been revised down from 1.1 percent to 0.8 percent. What this means is that the U.S. economy is just barely hanging on by its fingernails from falling into a recession. As Zero Hedge has pointed out, the “average annual growth rate during the current business cycle remains the weakest of any expansion since at least 1949″. This is not what a recovery looks like.

In addition, Barack Obama remains solidly on track to be the only president in all of U.S. history to never have a single year when the economy grew by at least 3 percent. Every other president in American history, even the really bad ones, had at least one year when U.S. GDP grew by at least 3 percent. But this has not happened under Obama even though he has had two terms in the White House.

Barack Obama Will Be The Only President In History To Never Have A Year Of 3% GDP Growth | Zero Hedge

Yea but something like 80 straight months of job growth.

Republicans can't say Obama isn't great. Hes just not great enough.

America sucked under GOP rule. Tom delay and Dennis hastert ruined the middle class, and little boys assholes

 

[Weatherman2020]

Obamanomics. I told you this would happen 8 years ago.

We just got another extremely disappointing GDP number. It was being projected that U.S. GDP would grow by 2.5 percent during the second quarter of 2016, but instead it only grew by just 1.2 percent. In addition, the Census Bureau announced that GDP growth for the first quarter of 2016 had been revised down from 1.1 percent to 0.8 percent. What this means is that the U.S. economy is just barely hanging on by its fingernails from falling into a recession. As Zero Hedge has pointed out, the “average annual growth rate during the current business cycle remains the weakest of any expansion since at least 1949″. This is not what a recovery looks like.

In addition, Barack Obama remains solidly on track to be the only president in all of U.S. history to never have a single year when the economy grew by at least 3 percent. Every other president in American history, even the really bad ones, had at least one year when U.S. GDP grew by at least 3 percent. But this has not happened under Obama even though he has had two terms in the White House.

Barack Obama Will Be The Only President In History To Never Have A Year Of 3% GDP Growth | Zero Hedge

Yea but something like 80 straight months of job growth.

Republicans can't say Obama isn't great. Hes just not great enough.

America sucked under GOP rule. Tom delay and Dennis hastert ruined the middle class, and little boys assholes

80 straight months of job growth? On what planet?
And blaming a Republican Congress for ruining the economy while praising Obama - mind boggling.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Obamanomics. I told you this would happen 8 years ago.

We just got another extremely disappointing GDP number. It was being projected that U.S. GDP would grow by 2.5 percent during the second quarter of 2016, but instead it only grew by just 1.2 percent. In addition, the Census Bureau announced that GDP growth for the first quarter of 2016 had been revised down from 1.1 percent to 0.8 percent. What this means is that the U.S. economy is just barely hanging on by its fingernails from falling into a recession. As Zero Hedge has pointed out, the “average annual growth rate during the current business cycle remains the weakest of any expansion since at least 1949″. This is not what a recovery looks like.

In addition, Barack Obama remains solidly on track to be the only president in all of U.S. history to never have a single year when the economy grew by at least 3 percent. Every other president in American history, even the really bad ones, had at least one year when U.S. GDP grew by at least 3 percent. But this has not happened under Obama even though he has had two terms in the White House.

Barack Obama Will Be The Only President In History To Never Have A Year Of 3% GDP Growth | Zero Hedge

Yea but something like 80 straight months of job growth.

Republicans can't say Obama isn't great. Hes just not great enough.

America sucked under GOP rule. Tom delay and Dennis hastert ruined the middle class, and little boys assholes

 

[rightwinger]

United States GDP Annual Growth Rate | 1948-2016 | Data | Chart | Calendar

This is why right wingers are so ignorant. They don't bother to look anything up. I don't know why. And what's funny, is you don't even need to really look anything up to know the truth.

At the end of 2008, the GDP shrank to around -3. By the end of 2009, it had grown to over +2. That's a change of over 5. And right there, the entire argument is busted.

View attachment 84539

In 2006, the unemployment rate was 4.9% and food stamp use was 27 million. Today, unemployment is claimed to be 4.9% but food stamp use is well over 40 million. If all the jobs that have claimed to be created have been, why are so many more on food stamps?

Seems like the job creators have found the market can support low wages if the taxpayer helps with food stamps

So, should we continue to support low wage workers or make the job creators do it

We should leave businesses alone and do away with things like food stamps. Because a worker offers low skills doesn't mean the taxpayers should offset their poor work ability.

By the way, since you want to blame job creators, blame Obama. You are the one giving him credit for having created millions of jobs.

Well lets do that then

Let Obama get some legislation allowing him to force job creators to trickle down more of their profits.
If they are unwilling to do so, they can pay higher taxes to offset those record food stamps

 

[sealybobo]

Obamanomics. I told you this would happen 8 years ago.

We just got another extremely disappointing GDP number. It was being projected that U.S. GDP would grow by 2.5 percent during the second quarter of 2016, but instead it only grew by just 1.2 percent. In addition, the Census Bureau announced that GDP growth for the first quarter of 2016 had been revised down from 1.1 percent to 0.8 percent. What this means is that the U.S. economy is just barely hanging on by its fingernails from falling into a recession. As Zero Hedge has pointed out, the “average annual growth rate during the current business cycle remains the weakest of any expansion since at least 1949″. This is not what a recovery looks like.

In addition, Barack Obama remains solidly on track to be the only president in all of U.S. history to never have a single year when the economy grew by at least 3 percent. Every other president in American history, even the really bad ones, had at least one year when U.S. GDP grew by at least 3 percent. But this has not happened under Obama even though he has had two terms in the White House.

Barack Obama Will Be The Only President In History To Never Have A Year Of 3% GDP Growth | Zero Hedge

Yea but something like 80 straight months of job growth.

Republicans can't say Obama isn't great. Hes just not great enough.

America sucked under GOP rule. Tom delay and Dennis hastert ruined the middle class, and little boys assholes

80 straight months of job growth? On what planet?
And blaming a Republican Congress for ruining the economy while praising Obama - mind boggling.

Jobs were fleeing the country in 2009 and Republicans obstructed from day one still Obama got it done.

Don't praise Mike pence in Indiana and not give Obama credit

 

[sealybobo]

Obamanomics. I told you this would happen 8 years ago.

We just got another extremely disappointing GDP number. It was being projected that U.S. GDP would grow by 2.5 percent during the second quarter of 2016, but instead it only grew by just 1.2 percent. In addition, the Census Bureau announced that GDP growth for the first quarter of 2016 had been revised down from 1.1 percent to 0.8 percent. What this means is that the U.S. economy is just barely hanging on by its fingernails from falling into a recession. As Zero Hedge has pointed out, the “average annual growth rate during the current business cycle remains the weakest of any expansion since at least 1949″. This is not what a recovery looks like.

In addition, Barack Obama remains solidly on track to be the only president in all of U.S. history to never have a single year when the economy grew by at least 3 percent. Every other president in American history, even the really bad ones, had at least one year when U.S. GDP grew by at least 3 percent. But this has not happened under Obama even though he has had two terms in the White House.

Barack Obama Will Be The Only President In History To Never Have A Year Of 3% GDP Growth | Zero Hedge

Yea but something like 80 straight months of job growth.

Republicans can't say Obama isn't great. Hes just not great enough.

America sucked under GOP rule. Tom delay and Dennis hastert ruined the middle class, and little boys assholes

View attachment 84573

You want to ignore all the facts that contribute to those numbers. I don't have time and you won't understand anyways

 

[Conservative65]

United States GDP Annual Growth Rate | 1948-2016 | Data | Chart | Calendar

This is why right wingers are so ignorant. They don't bother to look anything up. I don't know why. And what's funny, is you don't even need to really look anything up to know the truth.

At the end of 2008, the GDP shrank to around -3. By the end of 2009, it had grown to over +2. That's a change of over 5. And right there, the entire argument is busted.

View attachment 84539

In 2006, the unemployment rate was 4.9% and food stamp use was 27 million. Today, unemployment is claimed to be 4.9% but food stamp use is well over 40 million. If all the jobs that have claimed to be created have been, why are so many more on food stamps?

Seems like the job creators have found the market can support low wages if the taxpayer helps with food stamps

So, should we continue to support low wage workers or make the job creators do it

We should leave businesses alone and do away with things like food stamps. Because a worker offers low skills doesn't mean the taxpayers should offset their poor work ability.

By the way, since you want to blame job creators, blame Obama. You are the one giving him credit for having created millions of jobs.

Well lets do that then

Let Obama get some legislation allowing him to force job creators to trickle down more of their profits.
If they are unwilling to do so, they can pay higher taxes to offset those record food stamps

You mean pay those who have little to no skills more than those skills are worth? Not how it works. Let those with little to no skills do something for what they want instead of sticking out their paws and demanding it be given to them for nothing.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Obamanomics. I told you this would happen 8 years ago.

We just got another extremely disappointing GDP number. It was being projected that U.S. GDP would grow by 2.5 percent during the second quarter of 2016, but instead it only grew by just 1.2 percent. In addition, the Census Bureau announced that GDP growth for the first quarter of 2016 had been revised down from 1.1 percent to 0.8 percent. What this means is that the U.S. economy is just barely hanging on by its fingernails from falling into a recession. As Zero Hedge has pointed out, the “average annual growth rate during the current business cycle remains the weakest of any expansion since at least 1949″. This is not what a recovery looks like.

In addition, Barack Obama remains solidly on track to be the only president in all of U.S. history to never have a single year when the economy grew by at least 3 percent. Every other president in American history, even the really bad ones, had at least one year when U.S. GDP grew by at least 3 percent. But this has not happened under Obama even though he has had two terms in the White House.

Barack Obama Will Be The Only President In History To Never Have A Year Of 3% GDP Growth | Zero Hedge

Yea but something like 80 straight months of job growth.

Republicans can't say Obama isn't great. Hes just not great enough.

America sucked under GOP rule. Tom delay and Dennis hastert ruined the middle class, and little boys assholes

80 straight months of job growth? On what planet?
And blaming a Republican Congress for ruining the economy while praising Obama - mind boggling.

Jobs were fleeing the country in 2009 and Republicans obstructed from day one still Obama got it done.

Don't praise Mike pence in Indiana and not give Obama credit

Who had a super majority in 2009, dufus?