Obama! You are the ONLY one talking about war with Iran!

[Wry Catcher]

Jeb Bush and Scott Walker both talk about war with Iran:

Walker And Bush Clash Over When To Go After Iran -- Day One Or Two

It's easy for them, for they never saw the elephant.

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

Lindsey Graham talks about war with Iran

WRMEA Lindsey Graham s Plan for War on Iran

Iran must be liberated from the mullahs. The killing of Iranian citizens would be collateral damage in the name of feedom.

 

[healthmyths]

Lindsey Graham talks about war with Iran

WRMEA Lindsey Graham s Plan for War on Iran

BUT NO WHERE in the above article was there any MENTION what Obama stated clearly:
Obama said walking away from the deal would leave the international sanctions regime in tatters and would ensure that he, or a future president, would be more likely to be forced to resort to military action to thwart Iran’s nuclear ambitions.
No one except OBAMA is stating that NOT signing Iran deal means military action! NO one says it is one way or the war way!!!

 

[Wry Catcher]

Lindsey Graham talks about war with Iran

WRMEA Lindsey Graham s Plan for War on Iran

Iran must be liberated from the mullahs. The killing of Iranian citizens would be collateral damage in the name of feedom.

You might have made a great recruit when OBL decided to hire true believers to fly aircraft into the Twin Towers, but for the fact that you're an armchair ideologue.

Did L. Graham ever walk in harms way?

 

[healthmyths]

Jeb Bush and Scott Walker both talk about war with Iran:

Walker And Bush Clash Over When To Go After Iran -- Day One Or Two

It's easy for them, for they never saw the elephant.

NO WHERE in the above ARTICLE was that stated! It is a made up headline!!!

"It's very possible, God forbid that this would happen, but very possible,
that the next president could be called to take aggressive actions, including military actions, on their very first day in office."
NOTHING NOTHING was said in the article BUT idiots like you READ HEADLINES ONLY which are MADE UP!
READ the article and is there ANYWHERE in the article that stated IF WE DON'T SIGN THE AGREEMENT then it is WAR with IRAN!!!!!
NO WHERE!!!
BUT once again YOU idiots believe the headlines and DON"T READ THE ARTICLE!
Quote as I've done exactly from the ARTICLE where Bush/ Walker state clearly IF THE AGREEMENT IS NOT SIGNED then that means WAR WITH IRAN!!
AGAIN Obama statement:
Obama said walking away from the deal would leave the international sanctions regime in tatters and would ensure that he, or a future president, would be more likely to be forced to resort to military action to thwart Iran’s nuclear ambitions.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Jeb Bush and Scott Walker both talk about war with Iran:

Walker And Bush Clash Over When To Go After Iran -- Day One Or Two

It's easy for them, for they never saw the elephant.

NO WHERE in the above ARTICLE was that stated! It is a made up headline!!!

"It's very possible, God forbid that this would happen, but very possible,
that the next president could be called to take aggressive actions, including military actions, on their very first day in office."
NOTHING NOTHING was said in the article BUT idiots like you READ HEADLINES ONLY which are MADE UP!
READ the article and is there ANYWHERE in the article that stated IF WE DON'T SIGN THE AGREEMENT then it is WAR with IRAN!!!!!
NO WHERE!!!
BUT once again YOU idiots believe the headlines and DON"T READ THE ARTICLE!
Quote as I've done exactly from the ARTICLE where Bush/ Walker state clearly IF THE AGREEMENT IS NOT SIGNED then that means WAR WITH IRAN!!
AGAIN Obama statement:
Obama said walking away from the deal would leave the international sanctions regime in tatters and would ensure that he, or a future president, would be more likely to be forced to resort to military action to thwart Iran’s nuclear ambitions.

Take your rant and shove it. The rhetoric I referenced wasn't in any article, it's in the public domain in off the cuff comments by Republican Pols. The fact remains neither Bush nor Walker ever served in our military, never walked in harms way or observed the human misery of war.

BTW, Walker is this years iteration of Michelle Bachmann.

 

[Pete7469]

Bed wetters are of course blithering idiots, but for them to be stupid enough to believe that the moonbat messiah's asinine "agreement" is going to result in any sort of peace really proves that their ignorance is infinite.

WE ARE AT WAR WITH IRAN, in so far as they're working diligently to destroy us. Just because we don't have our armies actively engaged in combat doesn't mean we are in a state of peace. We don't want to be at war with them, but they do want to be at war with us when they think they're ready. It is inevitable that combat opertaions will start eventually. Now thanks to the moonbat messiah, when the war is started, millions of people are going to be vaporized by nuclear weapons.

Rather than take them on now before they have serious weapons and casualties can be minimized, we have given them all they wanted and needed to finish their nuclear ambitions. That's why I am convinced that liberals are so fucking stupid that they're dangerous to human life.

 

[Wry Catcher]

Bed wetters are of course blithering idiots, but for them to be stupid enough to believe that the moonbat messiah's asinine "agreement" is going to result in any sort of peace really proves that their ignorance is infinite.

WE ARE AT WAR WITH IRAN, in so far as they're working diligently to destroy us. Just because we don't have our armies actively engaged in combat doesn't mean we are in a state of peace. We don't want to be at war with them, but they do want to be at war with us when they think they're ready. It is inevitable that combat opertaions will start eventually. Now thanks to the moonbat messiah, when the war is started, millions of people are going to be vaporized by nuclear weapons. Rather than take them on now before they have serious weapons and casualties can be minimized, we have given them all they wanted and needed to finish their nuclear ambitions.

I wonder, did Nostradamus write in blue too? You should know, and so do the Mullahs leading Iran, that we have Nuclear Subs sitting on the bottom of waters close enough to rain down more fire power on Iran in an hour than expended in WW II.

Iranian leaders may want to destroy us, but I doubt very much they are suicidal. In Ten Years the current old men leading that nation will be dead. The younger generation, those who supported the Green Revolution, will have power.

Of course they too can read the bellicose bullshit by the Crazy Right Wing on the Internet, which makes diplomacy more difficult. Something for you and others like you to think about, if you have such an ability.

 

[Pete7469]

I wonder, did Nostradamus write in blue too? You should know, and so do the Mullahs leading Iran, that we have Nuclear Subs sitting on the bottom of waters close enough to rain down more fire power on Iran in an hour than expended in WW II.

Iranian leaders may want to destroy us, but I doubt very much they are suicidal. In Ten Years the current old men leading that nation will be dead. The younger generation, those who supported the Green Revolution, will have power.

Of course they too can read the bellicose bullshit by the Crazy Right Wing on the Internet, which makes diplomacy more difficult. Something for you and others like you to think about, if you have such an ability.

The mullahs themselves might no be suicidal, but you're also talking about the religion well known for people blowing themselves up in crowds. Then when you consider what kind of pussified response they're likely to see from us thanks to liberal pussies in our government I'm not willing to bank on the state of mind in charge of Iranian government.

As far as the rest of your drivel is concerned, when it comes from a bed wetting Obot, it really isn't worth a response.

 

[healthmyths]

Jeb Bush and Scott Walker both talk about war with Iran:

Walker And Bush Clash Over When To Go After Iran -- Day One Or Two

It's easy for them, for they never saw the elephant.

NO WHERE in the above ARTICLE was that stated! It is a made up headline!!!

"It's very possible, God forbid that this would happen, but very possible,
that the next president could be called to take aggressive actions, including military actions, on their very first day in office."
NOTHING NOTHING was said in the article BUT idiots like you READ HEADLINES ONLY which are MADE UP!
READ the article and is there ANYWHERE in the article that stated IF WE DON'T SIGN THE AGREEMENT then it is WAR with IRAN!!!!!
NO WHERE!!!
BUT once again YOU idiots believe the headlines and DON"T READ THE ARTICLE!
Quote as I've done exactly from the ARTICLE where Bush/ Walker state clearly IF THE AGREEMENT IS NOT SIGNED then that means WAR WITH IRAN!!
AGAIN Obama statement:
Obama said walking away from the deal would leave the international sanctions regime in tatters and would ensure that he, or a future president, would be more likely to be forced to resort to military action to thwart Iran’s nuclear ambitions.

Take your rant and shove it. The rhetoric I referenced wasn't in any article, it's in the public domain in off the cuff comments by Republican Pols. The fact remains neither Bush nor Walker ever served in our military, never walked in harms way or observed the human misery of war.

BTW, Walker is this years iteration of Michelle Bachmann.

GEEZ and you think Obama who said this : " our military air-raiding villages and killing civilians" Is the friend of the military????
Obama who the military opinion poll tracks less then 15%???
FACTS: According to a new poll conducted by the Military Times, only 15 percent of active-duty service members approve of President Obama’s performance as commander-in-chief
Obama s approval rating crashes among troops rises with public RT USA

Obama is making the clear statement: either agree with the Iran deal or we go to war!
He said that being the chicken-shit-CIC that he is!
He hates the military and has demonstrated time after time that HE KNOWS better...case in point Iraq!
He hated the military and wanted terrorists to kill more troops because that helped him get elected! So he made stupid statements that the terrorists loved to use to recruit more terrorists!

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

The OP is nonsense.

There are conservatives on this very forum advocating for war with Iran.

 

[healthmyths]

Bed wetters are of course blithering idiots, but for them to be stupid enough to believe that the moonbat messiah's asinine "agreement" is going to result in any sort of peace really proves that their ignorance is infinite.

WE ARE AT WAR WITH IRAN, in so far as they're working diligently to destroy us. Just because we don't have our armies actively engaged in combat doesn't mean we are in a state of peace. We don't want to be at war with them, but they do want to be at war with us when they think they're ready. It is inevitable that combat opertaions will start eventually. Now thanks to the moonbat messiah, when the war is started, millions of people are going to be vaporized by nuclear weapons. Rather than take them on now before they have serious weapons and casualties can be minimized, we have given them all they wanted and needed to finish their nuclear ambitions.

I wonder, did Nostradamus write in blue too? You should know, and so do the Mullahs leading Iran, that we have Nuclear Subs sitting on the bottom of waters close enough to rain down more fire power on Iran in an hour than expended in WW II.

Iranian leaders may want to destroy us, but I doubt very much they are suicidal. In Ten Years the current old men leading that nation will be dead. The younger generation, those who supported the Green Revolution, will have power.

Of course they too can read the bellicose bullshit by the Crazy Right Wing on the Internet, which makes diplomacy more difficult. Something for you and others like you to think about, if you have such an ability.

So then why the need for the one sided Iran deal?
If the old men leading the nation will be dead... then why give Iran an advantage AND $150 billion to spend on more terrorism?
Why not let the sanctions stay in place. Get a verifiable deal... "trust but verify" deal. The "deal" we have now NOT ONE American has seen the deal struck between the IAEA and Iran.
"The side agreements, which probably lay out the terms by which the IAEA will actually perform its five-month investigation under the road map, aren't public. And they're so secret that the US secretary of state isn't able to read them.

Kerry told the Foreign Affairs Committee that he had been briefed on the documents but hadn't had a first-hand look at them.

"No, I haven't seen it," Kerry said, adding that "we don't have access to the actual agreement."

Kerry also clarified that national-security adviser Susan Rice had not seen them either.
Secret part of the Iran agreement - Business Insider