ObamaCare is NOT socialism

One more idiot who has no idea that public is not socialist :rolleyes:

You guys are cloned in a one size fits all incubator?

Socialist ideals....help the middle class prosper.

you are really batshit stupid. :cuckoo:

there is no middle class in socialism.

it does not exist as it is extinguished by the totalitarian regime as the main enemy of socialism :rolleyes:

Back to the name calling?

If you don't think that socialist IDEALS help the middle class prosper, then who pays for the streetlights?
 
No, it's corporatism.

Brought on by Reagan screwing with the HMO act removing competition.

which neither clinton nor obama bothered to revert back? if it was such a big deal, why did they do nothing about it?

How would that be possible? HMO rules were enacted at the inception of HMO's. With Reagan's blunder, HMO's were absorbed into mainstream insurance companies, so one would have to unravel entire corporations to accomplish this.
 
Name calling simply means you have no answer. Now answer the question.

Like a typical shitter, you have no clue what the words you spew mean. You want others to give you things for free, and think yourself entitled to the fruits of the labor of others - but you lack the education and the intellect to explain exactly why you should be entitled to ride on the backs of those you have contempt for...

You don't know what socialism is, you've never read Marx, Freidman, Rothbard, Keynes, or Von Mises. You've never had even an introductory economics class. You're unemployable and spend your time in mom's basement smoking pot.

You protest at Occupy events because you think it makes you kewl, and besides, the world owes you because, um, well just because.

You're an ignorant fool.
 
Name calling simply means you have no answer. Now answer the question.

Like a typical shitter, you have no clue what the words you spew mean. You want others to give you things for free, and think yourself entitled to the fruits of the labor of others - but you lack the education and the intellect to explain exactly why you should be entitled to ride on the backs of those you have contempt for...

You don't know what socialism is, you've never read Marx, Freidman, Rothbard, Keynes, or Von Mises. You've never had even an introductory economics class. You're unemployable and spend your time in mom's basement smoking pot.

You protest at Occupy events because you think it makes you kewl, and besides, the world owes you because, um, well just because.

You're an ignorant fool.

Again, attack rather than debate.
 
Socialist ideals....help the middle class prosper.

you are really batshit stupid. :cuckoo:

there is no middle class in socialism.

it does not exist as it is extinguished by the totalitarian regime as the main enemy of socialism :rolleyes:

Back to the name calling?

If you don't think that socialist IDEALS help the middle class prosper, then who pays for the streetlights?

"the state" pays :D

obviously everybody alive pays as in socialism everybody HAS TO work - otherwise they are criminally prosecuted - so technically they produce profit, though they do not have the benefits of it.

I am sorry, but somebody thinking there are socialist "ideals" IS batshit stupid :D
 
Name calling simply means you have no answer. Now answer the question.

Like a typical shitter, you have no clue what the words you spew mean. You want others to give you things for free, and think yourself entitled to the fruits of the labor of others - but you lack the education and the intellect to explain exactly why you should be entitled to ride on the backs of those you have contempt for...

You don't know what socialism is, you've never read Marx, Freidman, Rothbard, Keynes, or Von Mises. You've never had even an introductory economics class. You're unemployable and spend your time in mom's basement smoking pot.

You protest at Occupy events because you think it makes you kewl, and besides, the world owes you because, um, well just because.

You're an ignorant fool.

Again, attack rather than debate.

you don't debate with a 3 year old about the perils of debt limit default.
Because a 3 y.o. lacks basic knowledge.

Same here - you lack basic knowledge therefore there is no possibility of "debate".
 
you are really batshit stupid. :cuckoo:

there is no middle class in socialism.

it does not exist as it is extinguished by the totalitarian regime as the main enemy of socialism :rolleyes:

Back to the name calling?

If you don't think that socialist IDEALS help the middle class prosper, then who pays for the streetlights?

"the state" pays :D

obviously everybody alive pays as in socialism everybody HAS TO work - otherwise they are criminally prosecuted - so technically they produce profit, though they do not have the benefits of it.

I am sorry, but somebody thinking there are socialist "ideals" IS batshit stupid :D

And with what monies does the state pay?
 
Like a typical shitter, you have no clue what the words you spew mean. You want others to give you things for free, and think yourself entitled to the fruits of the labor of others - but you lack the education and the intellect to explain exactly why you should be entitled to ride on the backs of those you have contempt for...

You don't know what socialism is, you've never read Marx, Freidman, Rothbard, Keynes, or Von Mises. You've never had even an introductory economics class. You're unemployable and spend your time in mom's basement smoking pot.

You protest at Occupy events because you think it makes you kewl, and besides, the world owes you because, um, well just because.

You're an ignorant fool.

Again, attack rather than debate.

you don't debate with a 3 year old about the perils of debt limit default.
Because a 3 y.o. lacks basic knowledge.

Same here - you lack basic knowledge therefore there is no possibility of "debate".

Again attack rather than debate.
 
A capitalist society has winners and losers. We have to do something with the losers to not hinder productivity. Taxes are appropriate for taking care of the losers. As winners, we must take care of the losers and limit the competitors. Taxes to the winners are just like cleaning our rooms as a child. You have to clean up your messes.
 
A capitalist society has winners and losers. We have to do something with the losers to not hinder productivity. Taxes are appropriate for taking care of the losers. As winners, we must take care of the losers and limit the competitors. Taxes to the winners are just like cleaning our rooms as a child. You have to clean up your messes.

Holy crap man.. Another product of the politically correct public schools..

Where do I sign up to be "taken care of".. I'm kinda tired of carrying so many losers..
And -- having being limited in competition..

Just quick question politicalnot... What makes you sure we're only taking care of losers? And how do they QUALIFY as losers?? What gives you the arrogance to make that call?

You remember the mythical 40% uninsured that this was all supposed to fix? Are they ALL LOSERS???
 
Last edited:
A capitalist society has winners and losers. We have to do something with the losers to not hinder productivity. Taxes are appropriate for taking care of the losers. As winners, we must take care of the losers and limit the competitors. Taxes to the winners are just like cleaning our rooms as a child. You have to clean up your messes.

Holy crap man.. Another product of the politically correct public schools..

Where do I sign up to be "taken care of".. I'm kinda tired of carrying so many losers..
And -- having being limited in competition..

Just quick question politicalnot... What makes you sure we're only taking care of losers? And how do they QUALIFY as losers?? What gives you the arrogance to make that call?

the losers are not being taught that every system can function only if the reasonable balance is maintained. and when it is skewed - the losers will be doomed first.
and they are too stupid to figure it out by themselves.
 

Forum List

Back
Top