Slade3200
Diamond Member
- Jan 13, 2016
- 66,995
- 17,031
- 2,190
Trump's latest whine is about something he calls Obamagate. Despite being asked several times, he can't say what crimes he thinks Obama committed. I'm sure there are a lot of smart Trump supporters who can shed light on what Trump is talking about since Trump is incapable of doing that himself. I'm not asking for a list of everything you want to whine about. Just specifically what Obamagate is supposed to refer to, and what definable crime you think Obama committed to deserve gate to be added to his name. Also, show any evidence you might have that proves he committed any crimes you might mention.
It's a huge talk radio thing, so Trump and the Trumpsters can tell you all about it. Much like Russiagate and Maddow and her fans.
It's the winger national pastime.
View attachment 335066
Ah, your response is a talk radio meme. Cool.
You constantly bash conservative media. I'm guessing you think all right leaning media is false and everyone who listens to it is a winger, right? But you are not a winger. You've stated that it is possible to be a republican and not a winger. Do you have any examples of who would be in that category?
Those who believe right wing media are nut bags.
Do you think Ben Shapiro is a nut?
You mean this childish little idiot who is pitching a tantrum?
Ya know, I actually thought Shapiro was doing pretty good until he lost it and backed out of the interview
Obviously, he didn't think he was doing as well as you did when he ran from the hard questions. I guess he was used to softball questions from inside the right wing bubble. He even admitted he was destroyed. I was pleasantly surprised that he made such an admission. His one admission isn't enough to resuscitate the dormant integrity the right once had, but it is at least a step in the right direction. I wonder if or when there might be another act of honesty from the right.
I’ve never understood the big resistance against Shapiro. He, unlike most the other conservative blowhards, doesn’t hide behind his microphone. He seems to encourage substantive debate over living in an echo chamber. There are tons of videos of him on campuses taking all the hard questions the students can dish and he has always come off as straight forward and honest. I don’t agree with all his stuff but I respect how he carries himself Most of the time. I think the gotchya questions got to him during this interview when he clearly just wanted to discuss his book and not defend tweets from his past.
Of course he wanted to ignore the dumb things he said in the past. He should have thought about that before he said them. Those tweets define his credibility, and it's childish for him to think a real interviewer would just ignore them. He should limit his interviews to Fox if that is what he wants. Whether Shapiro is a straight down the middle honest pundit or not, his output alone has little effect on the lying dishonorable mouthpiece with disdain for integrity, the right wing media has become.
I get that but at some Point years later being asked about stupid comments from the past gets old. Agreed that he should be asked and expected to answer a few but they shouldn’t be the focus of every interview.
You think there is a statute of limitations on stupid?
There is Absolutely a statute of limitations on Stupid... we have all done and said stupid things many times in our lives
I disagree, but what do you think the statute of limitations of stupid should be? How many years?
I don’t think it should take years. I think people deserve forgiveness if they show genuine remorse. Like I said... we’ve all done and said stupid things... do you disagree?
I haven't seen where Shapiro has listed his stupid remarks, or expressed remorse for them. You got a link to all that?
He referenced it in that BBC video. Said he wrote a book or some Articles listing all the stupid things he said in the past. One of the points the BBC guy brought up Shapiro said was mentioned in what he wrote