Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
oh wait, are you saying that a president can never be taken out? you can't be making that statement. Impeachment is how they do it. so, again, a little differently where are the impeachment papers and why hasn't he been removed from his position. sorry, I felt the other way was easier. but ok. I guess you love semantics.it is based on what? and why wasn't the president arrested then? I mean you made that statement rather strongly. so why isn't he arrested? BTW, you know obummer did the same thing when he was in office.Tellng people to stop the investigation of Flynn, and firing those who didn't get the hint hint wink wink, is clearly obstruction of a criminal investigation.
You need to read the constitution, the president is immune from legal prosecution while in office. Take a civics court, get your GED, or just read the Constitution before making a fool of youself.
I only want his policies put in place by congress. let's go.I'm not worried about what trump says,
You should be. The man tweets his foot into his mouth.
oh wait, are you saying that a president can never be taken out? you can't be making that statement. Impeachment is how they do it. so, again, a little differently where are the impeachment papers and why hasn't he been removed from his position. sorry, I felt the other way was easier. but ok. I guess you love semantics.
it is based on what? and why wasn't the president arrested then? I mean you made that statement rather strongly. so why isn't he arrested? BTW, you know obummer did the same thing when he was in office.
The world has known about this since Wednesday, you found out from a tweet from Trump this morning.he isn't the director of the FBI stated so under oath. I don't need anything else. thanks. any comments after that are made up fake news. just like that same director said under oath.And you're too stupid to retract your claim Trump isn't under investigation by the FBI.
Perhaps you don't know about the flow of time. Sessions said that a week ago, Trump said he was under investigation this morning.
so does he stay in power during impeachment or is he removed? semantics.There's a difference between arresting the president and impeaching him.
Get a GED
I did not. It wasn't interesting to me. I was busy with family business.so does he stay in power during impeachment or is he removed? semantics.There's a difference between arresting the president and impeaching him.
Get a GED
An impeached president remains in power. Didn't you watch the Clinton impeachment?
I stand corrected. thank you for the education.oh wait, are you saying that a president can never be taken out? you can't be making that statement. Impeachment is how they do it. so, again, a little differently where are the impeachment papers and why hasn't he been removed from his position. sorry, I felt the other way was easier. but ok. I guess you love semantics.
Let me remind you of what you said.
it is based on what? and why wasn't the president arrested then? I mean you made that statement rather strongly. so why isn't he arrested? BTW, you know obummer did the same thing when he was in office.
There's a difference between arresting the president and impeaching him.
Get a GED
. If the director told the prez that he wasn't investigating (joemoma), otherwise all in hopes to get something on him by way of (joemoma), and this when he was asked about it, and it was found out later that he was doing just that after saying that he (the President) wasn't under investigation, then a scorning or firing would have been appropriate at that point and time by the President. We've done heard over and over again about how these investigation's could possibly lead to bigger questions or targets, and then the lies began flying all over the place to suggest that this was not the case, and that no further investigation was taking place that involved the President or that he was NEVER under investigation to begin with. But then the political pressure from the Dems began poisoning the wells in hopes to push further into poisoning Trump if they could get the slightest of information on him in order to connect any dots somehow to destroy him. Comey was being used by the Dems to continue a witch Hunt, and Trump finally saw through the bullcrap.Uh, no.If the FBI is investigating Joemoma and the president fires the FBI director, then the president is obstructing justice for that case.And using that logic it's always obstruction of justice for the president to fire the FBI director because the FBI is always investigating someone.So Trump obstructed justice by firing Comey because he was in the future going to be investigated for obstruction of justice because he fired Comey?
No.
Mike Flynn broke the law. The FBI is investigating. Comey is the head of the FBI.
With me so far? Probably not. Don’t care.
Comey was told to drop it. He didn’t. Trump fired him because of that.
Thus creating a new scandal…Obstruction of Justice.
Flynn is still under investigation.
So is Trump now.
Really, how so? This should be interesting (or at least entertaining).
IF the Director is asked to stop investigating Joemoma and doesn’t do it and is THEN fired by the President, he is obstructing justice. There are potentially plenty of reasons to fire someone…
no one is investigating trump didn't you pay attention to the comey testimony? wow, you guys sure are stupid. it's in the transcripts I will post those if you need me to.The issue of obstruction of justice is so obvious, it is amazing that the rightwingers on this board don't get it.
Definition: the crime or act of willfully interfering with the process of justice and law especially by influencing, threatening, harming, or impeding a witness, potential witness, juror, or judicial or legal officer or by furnishing false information in or otherwise impeding an investigation or legal process ...
Trump tried to impede the investigation into Flynn's Russia connection by asking Comey to backoff. When Comey didn't back off, he fired him. He was trying to influence and impede the investigation and the legal process. His telling Comey he 'hoped' he could let the investigation go and at the same time asking Comey if he wanted to keep his job was a threat. When Comey didn't back off, he fired him.
It's really very obvious to anyone who can think about it in an unbiased way. If your boss 'suggested' you stop doing something and you continued to do it, and then he/she fired you, you would believe you were fired for not doing what the boss wanted, especially if up until that time he/she had nothing but praise for you.
This is a legal issue, you clearly do not have a legal mind. Thank goodness I am here to help you out. Here is what a famous (liberal) legal mind thinks about your obstruction charge- your welcome.
Dershowitz, also a criminal law expert and the author of more than 30 books, said, “The president could have told Comey, you are commanded, directed, to drop the prosecution against Flynn. The president has the right to do that. Comey acknowledges that. He says in the statement that historically, historically presidents have done that to the Justice Department."
“But in the last few years, we've had a tradition of separation, but that tradition doesn't create crime," said Dershowitz. "Remember also what the president could have done. He could have said to Comey, stop this investigation, I am now pardoning Flynn."
Liberal Dershowitz on Trump: It's Not 'Obstruction,' There's No 'Crime'
Dershowitz is not the authority on this issue.
Ahh, I guess according to you Esmeralda is a more reliable authority. Interesting you chose not to site another constitutional legal expert as a source.
The man investigating Trump is a lawyer. So his opinion cancels out Dershowitz's opinion.
dude, that's fake. it's from a fake news libturd paper.no one is investigating trump didn't you pay attention to the comey testimony? wow, you guys sure are stupid. it's in the transcripts I will post those if you need me to.This is a legal issue, you clearly do not have a legal mind. Thank goodness I am here to help you out. Here is what a famous (liberal) legal mind thinks about your obstruction charge- your welcome.
Dershowitz, also a criminal law expert and the author of more than 30 books, said, “The president could have told Comey, you are commanded, directed, to drop the prosecution against Flynn. The president has the right to do that. Comey acknowledges that. He says in the statement that historically, historically presidents have done that to the Justice Department."
“But in the last few years, we've had a tradition of separation, but that tradition doesn't create crime," said Dershowitz. "Remember also what the president could have done. He could have said to Comey, stop this investigation, I am now pardoning Flynn."
Liberal Dershowitz on Trump: It's Not 'Obstruction,' There's No 'Crime'
Dershowitz is not the authority on this issue.
Ahh, I guess according to you Esmeralda is a more reliable authority. Interesting you chose not to site another constitutional legal expert as a source.
The man investigating Trump is a lawyer. So his opinion cancels out Dershowitz's opinion.
There are reports that Mueller is investigating Trump-
Special counsel is investigating Trump for possible obstruction of justice, officials say
It just amuses me that we have posters here with no evidence claiming obstruction.
Tellng people to stop the investigation of Flynn, and firing those who didn't get the hint hint wink wink, is clearly obstruction of a criminal investigation.
dude, that's fake. it's from a fake news libturd paper.no one is investigating trump didn't you pay attention to the comey testimony? wow, you guys sure are stupid. it's in the transcripts I will post those if you need me to.Dershowitz is not the authority on this issue.
Ahh, I guess according to you Esmeralda is a more reliable authority. Interesting you chose not to site another constitutional legal expert as a source.
The man investigating Trump is a lawyer. So his opinion cancels out Dershowitz's opinion.
There are reports that Mueller is investigating Trump-
Special counsel is investigating Trump for possible obstruction of justice, officials say
They no longer carry any credibility.
dude, that's fake. it's from a fake news libturd paper.no one is investigating trump didn't you pay attention to the comey testimony? wow, you guys sure are stupid. it's in the transcripts I will post those if you need me to.Dershowitz is not the authority on this issue.
Ahh, I guess according to you Esmeralda is a more reliable authority. Interesting you chose not to site another constitutional legal expert as a source.
The man investigating Trump is a lawyer. So his opinion cancels out Dershowitz's opinion.
There are reports that Mueller is investigating Trump-
Special counsel is investigating Trump for possible obstruction of justice, officials say
They no longer carry any credibility.
it is based on what? and why wasn't the president arrested then? I mean you made that statement rather strongly. so why isn't he arrested? BTW, you know obummer did the same thing when he was in office.It just amuses me that we have posters here with no evidence claiming obstruction.
Tellng people to stop the investigation of Flynn, and firing those who didn't get the hint hint wink wink, is clearly obstruction of a criminal investigation.
dude, that's fake. it's from a fake news libturd paper.no one is investigating trump didn't you pay attention to the comey testimony? wow, you guys sure are stupid. it's in the transcripts I will post those if you need me to.Ahh, I guess according to you Esmeralda is a more reliable authority. Interesting you chose not to site another constitutional legal expert as a source.
The man investigating Trump is a lawyer. So his opinion cancels out Dershowitz's opinion.
There are reports that Mueller is investigating Trump-
Special counsel is investigating Trump for possible obstruction of justice, officials say
They no longer carry any credibility.
Trump confirmed it by tweet this morning
he confirmed he read the story and tweeted.dude, that's fake. it's from a fake news libturd paper.no one is investigating trump didn't you pay attention to the comey testimony? wow, you guys sure are stupid. it's in the transcripts I will post those if you need me to.Ahh, I guess according to you Esmeralda is a more reliable authority. Interesting you chose not to site another constitutional legal expert as a source.
The man investigating Trump is a lawyer. So his opinion cancels out Dershowitz's opinion.
There are reports that Mueller is investigating Trump-
Special counsel is investigating Trump for possible obstruction of justice, officials say
They no longer carry any credibility.
Trump confirmed it by tweet this morning
. You recall wrong.. Trump said that he "HOPED" that Flynn being investigated could be dropped because Flynn was a good man. Nothing wrong with backing up a person for whom you see as a good man, and that maybe he (Flynn) was the victim of a political witch hunt in which was unfortunate for him. Trump knows he can't intervene with Flynn's investigation, but maybe he could speak highly of the man's character in order to change the tone or Hardline a little bit. We see it all the time in cases where there is a hard line approach to cases and tactics by investigator's until they figure out who is who and what is what. They handcuffed OJ at his capture, but was convinced he wasn't a flight risk so they removed the cuffs, and began treating him better at that point. Now for the one who asked that the cuffs be removed, was he trying to obstruct justice or did he just know that OJ in his mind was not guilty until proven otherwise ? Saying that Flynn was a good guy wasn't obstructing anything, and hoping that he get a fair shake wasn't suggesting or directing or ordering that he be let go. The deeper question is how compromised was Comey, and was he in cullusion with the Demon-crats once he made the MATTER of Hillary go away ?? Who truly are the real bad guy's here ?I'm using Candycorn logic, ask her?/----- Does the Director handle the investigations for all FBI cases? Firing him ends investigations? How does that work?If the FBI is investigating Joemoma and the president fires the FBI director, then the president is obstructing justice for that case.And using that logic it's always obstruction of justice for the president to fire the FBI director because the FBI is always investigating someone.
Really, how so? This should be interesting (or at least entertaining).
You should try using Candycorn memory. I recall Comey saying that Trump told him to drop it. When did didn’t; he was fired shortly thereafter.
You seem to be immune from understanding that detail.
Trump is mocking you moron.
