Occupy Wall Street is over.

Wow you dont even know what hypocrit means, but you are one, so it's IRONIC.
Fanny and Freddy were Barney Fag's boys. AG was your boy Dodds friends, and Obama bailed out wallstreet and you blame republicans, do some research so you wont look like a moron next time.

I know what hypocrite means, do you know what hyperbolic bullshit means?

Dude, he pegged you, be a man and face it.

You read that corny shit and found value in it? Good god we are overrun with imbeciles.
 
I am amused by the ass wipes who do not see that OWS and the TP had identical goals, which were to end government bail outs of the special interests - oh the power of the elite socialist media - they will brainwash any idiot who thinks he is so smart

They dont have identical goals at all.

The Tea Party wants to Restore the Republic.
The Occupy movement wants to violently overthrow the Republic and the Capitalist system.

They have completely opposite goals. Not to mention their behavior is completely different.

You are wrong on both counts.

The Tea Party was started here:

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bEZB4taSEoA]Rick Santelli and the "Rant of the Year" - YouTube[/ame]

It was promoted by FOX:

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ynTLYkvy-Kw]Biased FOX News promotes Tea Parties - YouTube[/ame]

It was all about a bailout for mortgages that never happened. It was also about an election that left a black guy leading the country.

OWS was about bailing out the financial industry, no one being held accountable for the financial meltdown, income inequality and wealth driving the political process.
 
They have already been out this summer, to a suspicious absence of news coverage, bet they will show up when the police end up beating the crap out of a few (or many).

You don't get it, there was NO ONE there but German Tourists and myself. There was no one for the cops to beat up.

Physical prolonged occupations are a thing of the past, get with it. Since people such as yourself could not see past the hippies to the message that tactic is all but abandoned, a similar phenomena occurred during the Vietnam protests of the 60s-70s.

I know exactly what the message was, I read their list of demands. They wanted free stuff and an end to capitalism. They're parasites and crybabies.
 
I am amused by the ass wipes who do not see that OWS and the TP had identical goals, which were to end government bail outs of the special interests - oh the power of the elite socialist media - they will brainwash any idiot who thinks he is so smart

They dont have identical goals at all.

The Tea Party wants to Restore the Republic.
The Occupy movement wants to violently overthrow the Republic and the Capitalist system.

They have completely opposite goals. Not to mention their behavior is completely different.

You are wrong on both counts.

The Tea Party was started here:

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bEZB4taSEoA]Rick Santelli and the "Rant of the Year" - YouTube[/ame]

It was promoted by FOX:

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ynTLYkvy-Kw]Biased FOX News promotes Tea Parties - YouTube[/ame]

It was all about a bailout for mortgages that never happened. It was also about an election that left a black guy leading the country.

OWS was about bailing out the financial industry, no one being held accountable for the financial meltdown, income inequality and wealth driving the political process.

You haven't a clue what you are talking about as usual. It started in 2007 when Bush was still POTUS. I went to a TP rally in 2008, when FOX and Santorum didn't even know who they were.
 
Mission accomplished. Pub dupes alone didn't get the message. But you know who the 1% is at least. That's pretty good with you numbskulls...LOL

What was the mission, I heard many different missions, which one was it?

BTW, who got the huge bank account that was left?
 
You don't get it, there was NO ONE there but German Tourists and myself. There was no one for the cops to beat up.

Physical prolonged occupations are a thing of the past, get with it. Since people such as yourself could not see past the hippies to the message that tactic is all but abandoned, a similar phenomena occurred during the Vietnam protests of the 60s-70s.

I know exactly what the message was, I read their list of demands. They wanted free stuff and an end to capitalism. They're parasites and crybabies.

You know nothing but what you have been told. I also wonder just how bad Wall Street would have to screw us all before you got a little upset with them? At this point I believe you would allow them anything.
 
They dont have identical goals at all.

The Tea Party wants to Restore the Republic.
The Occupy movement wants to violently overthrow the Republic and the Capitalist system.

They have completely opposite goals. Not to mention their behavior is completely different.

You are wrong on both counts.

The Tea Party was started here:

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bEZB4taSEoA]Rick Santelli and the "Rant of the Year" - YouTube[/ame]

It was promoted by FOX:

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ynTLYkvy-Kw]Biased FOX News promotes Tea Parties - YouTube[/ame]

It was all about a bailout for mortgages that never happened. It was also about an election that left a black guy leading the country.

OWS was about bailing out the financial industry, no one being held accountable for the financial meltdown, income inequality and wealth driving the political process.

You haven't a clue what you are talking about as usual. It started in 2007 when Bush was still POTUS. I went to a TP rally in 2008, when FOX and Santorum didn't even know who they were.

Well you should be able to provide links..or something..

You know..like the ones in my post.

Which actually show the history of the Tea Party?
 
Physical prolonged occupations are a thing of the past, get with it. Since people such as yourself could not see past the hippies to the message that tactic is all but abandoned, a similar phenomena occurred during the Vietnam protests of the 60s-70s.

I know exactly what the message was, I read their list of demands. They wanted free stuff and an end to capitalism. They're parasites and crybabies.

You know nothing but what you have been told. I also wonder just how bad Wall Street would have to screw us all before you got a little upset with them? At this point I believe you would allow them anything.

The Koch Brothers, and other similar people have made an alliance with the evangelists. Now they are defacto monarchs.

But that's what conservatism ultimately wants. Either a Monarchy or a Kingdom of some sort.
 
I know exactly what the message was, I read their list of demands. They wanted free stuff and an end to capitalism. They're parasites and crybabies.

You know nothing but what you have been told. I also wonder just how bad Wall Street would have to screw us all before you got a little upset with them? At this point I believe you would allow them anything.

The Koch Brothers, and other similar people have made an alliance with the evangelists. Now they are defacto monarchs.

But that's what conservatism ultimately wants. Either a Monarchy or a Kingdom of some sort.

Trillions disappeared from the economy and magically reappeared in bank profits and somehow it is not grand, grand, grand, grand theft.
 
You know nothing but what you have been told. I also wonder just how bad Wall Street would have to screw us all before you got a little upset with them? At this point I believe you would allow them anything.

The Koch Brothers, and other similar people have made an alliance with the evangelists. Now they are defacto monarchs.

But that's what conservatism ultimately wants. Either a Monarchy or a Kingdom of some sort.

Trillions disappeared from the economy and magically reappeared in bank profits and somehow it is not grand, grand, grand, grand theft.

Well not to conservatives.

They believe that pooling wealth into the hands of a few..is the natural order of things.

It might be. And along with that generally comes bloody revolution.

Almost every time.
 
I am amused by the ass wipes who do not see that OWS and the TP had identical goals, which were to end government bail outs of the special interests - oh the power of the elite socialist media - they will brainwash any idiot who thinks he is so smart

They dont have identical goals at all.

The Tea Party wants to Restore the Republic.
The Occupy movement wants to violently overthrow the Republic and the Capitalist system.

They have completely opposite goals. Not to mention their behavior is completely different.

You are wrong on both counts.

The Tea Party was started here:

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bEZB4taSEoA]Rick Santelli and the "Rant of the Year" - YouTube[/ame]

It was promoted by FOX:

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ynTLYkvy-Kw]Biased FOX News promotes Tea Parties - YouTube[/ame]

It was all about a bailout for mortgages that never happened. It was also about an election that left a black guy leading the country.

OWS was about bailing out the financial industry, no one being held accountable for the financial meltdown, income inequality and wealth driving the political process.


You are a fool, It started before the Rant on CNBC, He simply became a Symbol of the Movement that had already been around when he made the Rant. Fox Reported on the Tea Party, That's not Promoting it dude, The Left wing Media on the Other hand tried to Ignore them. Which is Of course why you are wrong, Because you only FUCKING WATCH left wing Media and had never heard of the Tea Party Before the Rant.

You are a Typical Ignorant Wingnut. Side does not even matter, you are all the same.
 
The Koch Brothers, and other similar people have made an alliance with the evangelists. Now they are defacto monarchs.

But that's what conservatism ultimately wants. Either a Monarchy or a Kingdom of some sort.

Trillions disappeared from the economy and magically reappeared in bank profits and somehow it is not grand, grand, grand, grand theft.

Well not to conservatives.

They believe that pooling wealth into the hands of a few..is the natural order of things.

It might be. And along with that generally comes bloody revolution.

Almost every time.

Wait, you're the supporter of the 1%, so it's confusing. Yeah you're right, in the US we just concentrate wealth in a few people's hands, unlike your USSR, Cuba, Mao China, SAndanista Nicaraugua, Khmer rouge Cambodia. Just loads of freedom and money was so spread out in those countries, I mean in Cuba you have Castro, Castro, and Castro, everyone else is dirt poor!!!!!!!!!!!

Venezuela (cant have US dollars, but Chavez's girl has them, hmmmm let me check with Occupied and see if that meets his definition of hypocrite well?)
 
Last edited:
You are a fool, It started before the Rant on CNBC, He simply became a Symbol of the Movement that had already been around when he made the Rant. Fox Reported on the Tea Party, That's not Promoting it dude, The Left wing Media on the Other hand tried to Ignore them. Which is Of course why you are wrong, Because you only FUCKING WATCH left wing Media and had never heard of the Tea Party Before the Rant.

You are a Typical Ignorant Wingnut. Side does not even matter, you are all the same.

Bullshit.

I posted the exact rant that started the current tea party and showed the FOX saudi/conservative propaganda arm promoting it. It was like a monster truck rally promotion.

There were almost no conservatives complaining about George Bush's wildly reckless spending..and radical "Bush Doctrine"..with the notable exception, possibly of fruit cakes like Ron Paul..and maybe George Will.

But there was no tea party.

You are a Typical Fantasy Based Wingnut..with no foot in reality..and filled with piss and hyperbole.
 
I love liberals. Repulicans put rules on sex, liberals on EVERYTHING BUT and they say we want less freedom, not sure I understand. Does sex really equal that much to liberals?
 
I know what hypocrite means, do you know what hyperbolic bullshit means?

awwwww, did I hurt your feelings. I love riding you liberals, it might even be enough to make me gay....oh wait that's genetic, I forgot, nevermind.

I have no feelings to hurt on this board, I do not care enough about the worthless, infantile comments of a retarded jackass enough to get bent out of shape. You fit the stereotype of a empty headed reactionary so well that you provoke only a sense of satisfaction in me.

You sure sound bent out of shape for someone who claims not to get bent out of shape.
 

Forum List

Back
Top