Of Course Pelosi Defends Conyers!

Defending ConyersMoore is a political necessity for the DemocratsRepublicans.

Moore proof please...
Here is what we have proof of so far:
Conyers paid to hide his obnoxious behavior. With our money!!! We'd go to jail for that.
And, that our career politicians are so abhorrent, that they set up a fund to pay off blackmailers to keep their mouths shut. And funded their little insurance program with our money.
Our politicians are starting to sound more Hollywood, than Hollywood.
 
Last edited:
Screw the harassment crap, put the SOB in jail for using taxpayer funds for his payoffs and transportation of his concubines.
 
Defending ConyersMoore is a political necessity for the DemocratsRepublicans.

Proof please. Here is what we have proof of so far:
Conyers paid to hide his obnoxious behavior. With our money!!! We'd go to jail for that.
It was a settlement, the same type made every day in offices all over this country. LOL you don't go to jail for it.
Seems to me if the allegations had been true, she would have wanted a lot more than $27,000 to keep quiet. So I wonder how strong the evidence was, but then you look at the information in the affidavits and the new bits coming out and it seems like he is really a randy old goat and I'm guessing this wasn't new behavior begun at age 83.
 
Screw the harassment crap, put the SOB in jail for using taxpayer funds for his payoffs and transportation of his concubines.
Will you jerks PLEASE stop trying to putting all the Dems in prison? It is so unattractive to behave like a dictator's henchmen.
 
Defending ConyersMoore is a political necessity for the DemocratsRepublicans.

Moore proof please...
Here is what we have proof of so far:
Conyers paid to hide his obnoxious behavior. With our money!!! We'd go to jail for that.
And, that our career politicians are so abhorrent, that they set up a fund to pay off blackmailers to keep their mouths shut. And funded their little insurance program with our money.
Our politicians are starting to sound more Hollywood, than Hollywood.
Moore married his proof...
 
Screw the harassment crap, put the SOB in jail for using taxpayer funds for his payoffs and transportation of his concubines.
Will you jerks PLEASE stop trying to putting all the Dems in prison? It is so unattractive to behave like a dictator's henchmen.


Misappropriation of federal funds is nothing to be lax about. Diverting taxpayer money for personal use is the epitome of corruption and should be dealt with very harshly. I'd say the same if he were a republican, I'll leave it to you to be the hack.


.
 
Saw the accusermon tv . He yelled at her while in his boxer shorts .

Big f’n deal .
WUT?
On way accuser was being interviewed and said he cussed her out while in his boxers .

I didn’t think that was a big deal .
I heard from reading some of the allegations in the affidavits that there was a lot of travel and working in his hotel room, etc. But damn! Hanging around in his boxers? I'd have politely told him to buzz me once he'd gotten dressed and I would have gone straight back out of the room.
 
Screw the harassment crap, put the SOB in jail for using taxpayer funds for his payoffs and transportation of his concubines.
Will you jerks PLEASE stop trying to putting all the Dems in prison? It is so unattractive to behave like a dictator's henchmen.


Misappropriation of federal funds is nothing to be lax about. Diverting taxpayer money for personal use is the epitome of corruption and should be dealt with very harshly. I'd say the same if he were a republican, I'll leave it to you to be the hack.


.
The claim was duly arbitrated and a settlement was offered and paid, all legal as far as I know. He wasn't trying to keep it quiet because it had already been dragged through the whole pre-mediation process! There were sworn affidavits. It was no longer a secret! Why he paid it out of his office funds instead of otherwise, I don't know, but I know this--he wasn't keeping it secret from anyone except the public, and the Congressional apparatus would have done exactly the same.
 
This paragraph breaks me UP. Pelosi is finally admitting accusations mean nothing! LOL

“We are strengthened by due process. Just because someone is accused — and was it one accusation? Is it two?” Pelosi asked on “Meet The Press.”

Go, Moore! December 12th.[/QUOTE]
 
DC Republicans have been so disappointing they deserve to lose control of Congress, but I swear they won't if Senile Pelosi keeps going on national TV.

That woman is so stupid.

Please Democrats, keep her out there, front & center.

Please.
 
This paragraph breaks me UP. Pelosi is finally admitting accusations mean nothing! LOL

“We are strengthened by due process. Just because someone is accused — and was it one accusation? Is it two?” Pelosi asked on “Meet The Press.”

Go, Moore! December 12th.

Pelosi stuck her foot in her big stupid mouth hilarious :laugh:
 
DC Republicans have been so disappointing they deserve to lose control of Congress, but I swear they won't if Senile Pelosi keeps going on national TV.

That woman is so stupid.

Please Democrats, keep her out there, front & center.

Please.

Pelosi was hilarious as speaker of the House, remember when she accused the CIA of trying to make her look bad. Her fellow Dem's escorted her off the House floor before too much damage was done. lol
 
Always leave it to Nancy to pass up a chance to be objective. The case against Conyers was arbitrated and he lost, resulting in a payout of $27,000 of taxpayer hush money.
I hear it was his own office that paid it, not through the Congress, though.
Yep....and you believe what you heard without question like a good little sheeple.
 
Defending Conyers is a political necessity for the Democrats.


1. Nancy Pelosi: John Conyers deserves ‘due process’

WASHINGTON — House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi on Sunday urged “due process” before making conclusions about Rep. John Conyers, D-Mich., following accusations of sexual harassment, saying the 27-term congressman is “an icon” who has worked to protect women.

“We are strengthened by due process. Just because someone is accused — and was it one accusation? Is it two?” Pelosi asked on “Meet The Press.”

Rep. Conyers steps down from committee leadership position amid harassment accusations



Conyers is worth 16 electoral votes.



2. But, the Dems can's take a chance on losing the black constituency....so, here we are.
They're pretty much saddled with this donkey.
"...what would happen if a smaller percentage of blacks turned out:

- At 90 percent black turn-out, Wisconsin’s 10 electoral votes slide into the GOP column.

- At 75 percent black turn-out, Pennsylvania’s 21 electoral votes go Republican.

- At 70 percent Michigan’s 17 electoral votes turn from blue to red.

- At 50 percent the GOP collects Delawre’s three electoral votes.

I don’t know what a realistic number to project is for the effects of angry black apathy, but I’ll stop at 50 percent. It may be that going as low as 75 percent is unrealistic. Most likely it’s impossible to say. (And this doesn’t take into account things like congressional districts where black voters make the margin of difference.)"
Do Democrats need the black vote? | RobertEmmet



3. And....this, a while back:

"The Future of the Obama Coalition
By THOMAS B. EDSALL NOVEMBER 27, 2011 11:34 PM November 27, 2011 11:34 pm
For decades, Democrats have suffered continuous and increasingly severe losses among white voters. But preparations by Democratic operatives for the 2012 election make it clear for the first time that the party will explicitly abandon the white working class."
The Future of the Obama Coalition


But preparations by Democratic operatives for the 2012 election make it clear for the first time that the party will explicitly abandon the white working class.


All pretense of trying to win a majority of the white working class has been effectively jettisoned in favor of cementing a center-left coalition made up, on the one hand, of voters who have gotten ahead on the basis of educational attainment — professors, artists, designers, editors, human resources managers, lawyers, librarians, social workers, teachers and therapists — and a second, substantial constituency of lower-income voters who are disproportionately African-American and Hispanic."
The Future of the Obama Coalition


Hillary Clinton Had No Concession Speech, Blames Loss On ‘White People’ [VIDEO] Hillary Clinton Had No Concession Speech, Blames Loss On ‘White People’ [VIDEO]







Of course, there is an alternative......Conyers steps down and some other experienced politician takes his place.....as long as he has the proper melanin, and hates white folks.


I suggest Robert Mugabe....he just became available.

"ZIMBABWE PRESIDENT ROBERT MUGABE: 'WE WILL NOT PROSECUTE KILLERS OF WHITE FARMERS'"
Robert Mugabe says that the killers of Zimbabwe's white farmers will not be prosecuted



After all.....it's always about race for Democrats.......
Hypocrisy is in the blood of progressives
 
Screw the harassment crap, put the SOB in jail for using taxpayer funds for his payoffs and transportation of his concubines.
Will you jerks PLEASE stop trying to putting all the Dems in prison? It is so unattractive to behave like a dictator's henchmen.


Misappropriation of federal funds is nothing to be lax about. Diverting taxpayer money for personal use is the epitome of corruption and should be dealt with very harshly. I'd say the same if he were a republican, I'll leave it to you to be the hack.


.
The claim was duly arbitrated and a settlement was offered and paid, all legal as far as I know. He wasn't trying to keep it quiet because it had already been dragged through the whole pre-mediation process! There were sworn affidavits. It was no longer a secret! Why he paid it out of his office funds instead of otherwise, I don't know, but I know this--he wasn't keeping it secret from anyone except the public, and the Congressional apparatus would have done exactly the same.

Which leads to questions on what due process remains?
 
Screw the harassment crap, put the SOB in jail for using taxpayer funds for his payoffs and transportation of his concubines.
Will you jerks PLEASE stop trying to putting all the Dems in prison? It is so unattractive to behave like a dictator's henchmen.


Misappropriation of federal funds is nothing to be lax about. Diverting taxpayer money for personal use is the epitome of corruption and should be dealt with very harshly. I'd say the same if he were a republican, I'll leave it to you to be the hack.


.
The claim was duly arbitrated and a settlement was offered and paid, all legal as far as I know. He wasn't trying to keep it quiet because it had already been dragged through the whole pre-mediation process! There were sworn affidavits. It was no longer a secret! Why he paid it out of his office funds instead of otherwise, I don't know, but I know this--he wasn't keeping it secret from anyone except the public, and the Congressional apparatus would have done exactly the same.


It was paid from his office operating funds, that's not part of the slush fund law. And you failed to address his using the same funds to fly in his concubines.


.
 
Defending Conyers is a political necessity for the Democrats.


1. Nancy Pelosi: John Conyers deserves ‘due process’

WASHINGTON — House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi on Sunday urged “due process” before making conclusions about Rep. John Conyers, D-Mich., following accusations of sexual harassment, saying the 27-term congressman is “an icon” who has worked to protect women.

“We are strengthened by due process. Just because someone is accused — and was it one accusation? Is it two?” Pelosi asked on “Meet The Press.”

Rep. Conyers steps down from committee leadership position amid harassment accusations

...



THIS IS THE HEADLINE YOU CITED Ms. SCUM-BUCKET (notwhat your edited to suit your hatred.

Rep. John Conyers steps down from committee leadership position amid harassment accusations
 

Forum List

Back
Top