I already said what I thought. No spin included.I sound outraged about that, do I? Whatever you say, old boy.Thank you for the article! It really seems, though, that Chalupa was looking into the same set of affairs that ultimately got Paul Manafort arrested. She smelled a rat and she was right, wasn't she? Trump ditched Manafort fast--perhaps he smelled a rat, too. This is really a story about Manafort, not Trump. Remember, Mueller didn't find any reason to think Trump was in on it.What, you didn't know that Ukraine admitted their involvement and meddling in US elections?
Ukraine Court Rules Manafort Disclosure Caused ‘Meddling’ in U.S. Election - NYTimes
Ukrainian efforts to sabotage Trump backfire - Politico
Now, tell me, why would Ukraine work with DNC against Trump, and in favor of Hillary Clinton?
Are you getting dizzy form all that spinning? Manafort was the chairman of the Trump campaign at that time. Chalupa was looking to a foreign country to dig up dirt on the campaign, exactly what you're accusing Trump of doing. Your selective outrage is duly noted.
.
I read the article, appreciated the background, but I honestly don't see how you could read that article and NOT come to the conclusion that it was about Manafort. It sounds as if the alarm bells had gone off about Manafort well before he was chosen as chairman of Trump's campaign. Did you read the article?
And of course the only way to get information was from the Ukrainian Embassy, right? That's called going to a foreign country to get dirt on a campaign opponent, isn't it? According to you commies, information is something of value, that would make the activities of Chalupa illegal, wouldn't it? That, along with public statements from Ukrainians about Trumps fitness for office, justifies Trumps concerns about Ukraine interference in the 2016, doesn't it?
Don't give me spin, just answer the questions.
.
Yet you didn't answer one question, what are you hiding?
.