thereisnospoon
Gold Member
Yep...Not many people understand this concept( state vs national) and quite frankly those are the people that pollsters target. The uninformed and those too lazy to do their own homework.The poll numbers were so far off, can anyone have faith in Obama's polls numbers? I think if we had a real media and a fair polling system his numbers would be under 40%...
Most of the polls were cooked by way oversampling Democrats.
LA Times looks like the most accurate one of all!
Even hack Silver had to adjust somewhat for the bias.
No, the polls were not wrong!!!
They are national polls. When you poll nationally you obviously get national results.
You have to (and they should, but they're too damn lazy to), reduce the percentage by the surplus votes each candidate gets from the non swing states.
This year those should be:
Clinton 9.5 million
Trump 4.5 million.
The difference of 5 million is roughly 3.9% of the total national vote.
She needed that large of a lead to be win the majority of swing states. Below that and she losses swing states and marginal blue states.
The polls call California many more times than any other because they hold a huge population. She will win it with a surplus of +2.6 million votes. That alone will skew the national vote by +1.5 democrat.
The pollsters also showed Clinton with an Electoral college win, which wipes out your national vs. state theory, bub.
Pardon my French, but bullshit.
The national polls are different than the state polls.
Clinton had a massive amount of votes from dark blue states over what she needed to win those states. Trump also had some, but the difference was 3.9% of the total votes cast in the last presidential election.
For her to start even in the swing states, she needed to lead in the national polls by 3.9%. Any less and the swing states start falling trumps way, and the marginally blue states go red.
I posted this two weeks before the election. I also posted that Clinton would win the popular vote and Trump the EC.
And that extra cash I now have in my pocket because folks (even pollsters), are too damn lazy to run a simple spreadsheet, sure feels good too!
This is not the first time polling data for a presidential election was out of touch with the voters.
I was watching CNN and one talking head with a sneer on her face mentioned polling data that showed a Clinton win was skewed by those who either refused to answer pollsters or to avoid being criticized claimed they were for Clinton. She was in essence crying "no fair".....Whiners