Official Impeachment Thread 2.0: House Judiciary Committee Hearings

[Hutch Starskey]

Anyone with average intelligence that is watching this hearing can see that it's purely partisan and unfair.

It's only unfair insofar as the case is so solid against the president that there is no possible defense the Republicans can make.

So solid a case that the only two charges in the flimsy-assed articles are the nebulous accusations of "obstruction" and "abuse of power".

You clowns don't have a popcorn fart.

LOL...
Yes. So solid in fact that all you dopes can do is screech about how unfair it is.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Anyone with average intelligence that is watching this hearing can see that it's purely partisan and unfair.

It's only unfair insofar as the case is so solid against the president that there is no possible defense the Republicans can make.

Well, when you are not allowed to call any witnesses, it's a bit difficult to put up a defense, you corrupt cocksucker.

What witness(es) would have "cleared it all up" for the president?

That isn't the point. The point is in an open and FAIR hearing both prosecution and defense are allowed to call witnesses. The Democrat chairman isn't allowing the minority to call witnesses. Both hearing Democrat chairmen did this. You call that fair?

Totally fair. Committee chairs always decide who testifies.
That is the point. The WH was given the opportunity to provide witnesses and send counsel. They opted not to. I wonder why?
Because there is nothing that can be said that will help.

 

[Oddball]

Anyone with average intelligence that is watching this hearing can see that it's purely partisan and unfair.

It's only unfair insofar as the case is so solid against the president that there is no possible defense the Republicans can make.

So solid a case that the only two charges in the flimsy-assed articles are the nebulous accusations of "obstruction" and "abuse of power".

You clowns don't have a popcorn fart.

LOL...
Yes. So solid in fact that all you dopes can do is screech about is how unfair it is.

You haven't heard me say anything about unfairness...So stuff that in your pipe and smoke it.

And you still have neither jack nor shit.

 

[BS Filter]

Anyone with average intelligence that is watching this hearing can see that it's purely partisan and unfair.

It's only unfair insofar as the case is so solid against the president that there is no possible defense the Republicans can make.

So solid a case that the only two charges in the flimsy-assed articles are the nebulous accusations of "obstruction" and "abuse of power".

You clowns don't have a popcorn fart.

LOL...
Yes. So solid in fact that all you dopes can do is screech about is how unfair it is.

You haven't replied to the fact that Republicans weren't allowed to call witnesses. Do you think that's fair?

 

[BS Filter]

Anyone with average intelligence that is watching this hearing can see that it's purely partisan and unfair.

It's only unfair insofar as the case is so solid against the president that there is no possible defense the Republicans can make.

Well, when you are not allowed to call any witnesses, it's a bit difficult to put up a defense, you corrupt cocksucker.

What witness(es) would have "cleared it all up" for the president?

That isn't the point. The point is in an open and FAIR hearing both prosecution and defense are allowed to call witnesses. The Democrat chairman isn't allowing the minority to call witnesses. Both hearing Democrat chairmen did this. You call that fair?

That is the point. The WH was given the opportunity to provide witnesses and send counsel. They opted not to. I wonder why?
Because there is nothing that can be said that will help.

The Republicans on the committee aren't allowed to call witnesses. Is that fair?

 

[Olde Europe]

Oh, don't worry--I never said I was washing my hands of the whole thing. I'll keep up by reading a bit. Can't stand anymore live performances is all I'm saying.

I am not worried about you. Rather I worry what folks with an otherwise similar disposition but less of an inclination to read up on the matter might do - particularly in light of recent polling indicating that, among those who haven't yet made up their mind on the matter, very few are paying attention at all. That leaves a very narrow path to convince more of the electorate of the appropriateness and necessity of both impeachment and removal, which the Goobers busy themselves further to narrow while throwing gobs of red meat into the general direction of their "base".

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Anyone with average intelligence that is watching this hearing can see that it's purely partisan and unfair.

It's only unfair insofar as the case is so solid against the president that there is no possible defense the Republicans can make.

So solid a case that the only two charges in the flimsy-assed articles are the nebulous accusations of "obstruction" and "abuse of power".

You clowns don't have a popcorn fart.

LOL...
Yes. So solid in fact that all you dopes can do is screech about is how unfair it is.

You haven't heard me say anything about unfairness...So stuff that in your pipe and smoke it.

And you still have neither jack nor shit.

LOL.....
No, you're just playing deaf, dumb and blind instead of crying.

 

[BS Filter]

Anyone with average intelligence that is watching this hearing can see that it's purely partisan and unfair.

It's only unfair insofar as the case is so solid against the president that there is no possible defense the Republicans can make.

So solid a case that the only two charges in the flimsy-assed articles are the nebulous accusations of "obstruction" and "abuse of power".

You clowns don't have a popcorn fart.

LOL...
Yes. So solid in fact that all you dopes can do is screech about is how unfair it is.

You haven't heard me say anything about unfairness...So stuff that in your pipe and smoke it.

And you still have neither jack nor shit.

LOL.....
No, you're just playing deaf, dumb and blind instead of crying.

Answer my question. Republicans on the committee are not allowed to call witnesses. Is that fair?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Anyone with average intelligence that is watching this hearing can see that it's purely partisan and unfair.

It's only unfair insofar as the case is so solid against the president that there is no possible defense the Republicans can make.

So solid a case that the only two charges in the flimsy-assed articles are the nebulous accusations of "obstruction" and "abuse of power".

You clowns don't have a popcorn fart.

LOL...
Yes. So solid in fact that all you dopes can do is screech about is how unfair it is.

You haven't replied to the fact that Republicans weren't allowed to call witnesses. Do you think that's fair?

The committee chair decides who testifies. That is as fair as it has ever been.

 

[Ame®icano]

Anyone with average intelligence that is watching this hearing can see that it's purely partisan and unfair.

It's only unfair insofar as the case is so solid against the president that there is no possible defense the Republicans can make.

So solid a case that the only two charges in the flimsy-assed articles are the nebulous accusations of "obstruction" and "abuse of power".

You clowns don't have a popcorn fart.

LOL...
Yes. So solid in fact that all you dopes can do is screech about is how unfair it is.

You haven't replied to the fact that Republicans weren't allowed to call witnesses. Do you think that's fair?

The committee chair decides who testifies. That is as fair as it has ever been.

House rules says otherwise, moron.

 

[Ame®icano]

What happen with required minority hearing?

Shouldn't it happen before Articles of Impeachments are issued?

You weren't supposed to remember that.

If I were a Democrat, I wouldn't.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

It's only unfair insofar as the case is so solid against the president that there is no possible defense the Republicans can make.

So solid a case that the only two charges in the flimsy-assed articles are the nebulous accusations of "obstruction" and "abuse of power".

You clowns don't have a popcorn fart.

LOL...
Yes. So solid in fact that all you dopes can do is screech about is how unfair it is.

You haven't replied to the fact that Republicans weren't allowed to call witnesses. Do you think that's fair?

The committee chair decides who testifies. That is as fair as it has ever been.

House rules says otherwise, moron.

Post them, dope.

 

[Persistence Of Memory]

OMG. Look at that disgusting Maxipad Waters and her swollen collagen lips.

Folks. Never trust a woman who wears wigs or who hides behind pantsuits.

OMG. Look at that disgusting Trump and his swollen ass and hips.

Folks. Never trust a man with the world's worst comb-over or who hides behind an inch of orange paint.

LOL....

How ridiculous he must look getting out of the shower.

For sure. Lol

 

[Olde Europe]

Okay, thanks. I finally found the relevant rule. Who do the minority want to appear that have not been called?

O. Separate Day of Hearings with Minority Witnesses
At any committee hearing, a majority of the minority members are entitled by House rule XI clause 2(j)(1) to demand at least one separate day of hearings to allow witnesses selected by the minority to testify on the subject of the hearing. Under the rule, minority members must submit a request in writing to the chair before the end of the hearing.

Practice Note: In practice, the minority normally requests in advance of any hearing that its desired witnesses appear as part of the main hearing and negotiates the details with the majority. The right to a minority day of hearings is usually formally invoked only if the chair has refused to call the witnesses requested by the minority. If this minority right is invoked, the chair must schedule another day of hearings at which the witnesses requested by the minority must be invited to testify, but the chair retains the discretion to determine the timing of the hearing. The chair may also call witnesses at any such hearing.

Two points, as underlined above. First, Nadler called Turley at the request of Republicans. Second, the "witnesses" Republicans reportedly wanted to call - Schiff, Hunter Biden - had no valid testimony to offer on the "subject" of the hearing, which is Trump's corrupt dealings with Ukraine.

 

[BS Filter]

Anyone with average intelligence that is watching this hearing can see that it's purely partisan and unfair.

It's only unfair insofar as the case is so solid against the president that there is no possible defense the Republicans can make.

So solid a case that the only two charges in the flimsy-assed articles are the nebulous accusations of "obstruction" and "abuse of power".

You clowns don't have a popcorn fart.

LOL...
Yes. So solid in fact that all you dopes can do is screech about is how unfair it is.

You haven't replied to the fact that Republicans weren't allowed to call witnesses. Do you think that's fair?

The committee chair decides who testifies. That is as fair as it has ever been.

The committee chair has a personal vendetta. The committee chair said Trump had to be removed even before Trump was sworn into office.

 

[BS Filter]

Okay, thanks. I finally found the relevant rule. Who do the minority want to appear that have not been called?

O. Separate Day of Hearings with Minority Witnesses
At any committee hearing, a majority of the minority members are entitled by House rule XI clause 2(j)(1) to demand at least one separate day of hearings to allow witnesses selected by the minority to testify on the subject of the hearing. Under the rule, minority members must submit a request in writing to the chair before the end of the hearing.

Practice Note: In practice, the minority normally requests in advance of any hearing that its desired witnesses appear as part of the main hearing and negotiates the details with the majority. The right to a minority day of hearings is usually formally invoked only if the chair has refused to call the witnesses requested by the minority. If this minority right is invoked, the chair must schedule another day of hearings at which the witnesses requested by the minority must be invited to testify, but the chair retains the discretion to determine the timing of the hearing. The chair may also call witnesses at any such hearing.

Two points, as underlined above. First, Nadler called Turley at the request of Republicans. Second, the "witnesses" Republicans reportedly wanted to call - Schiff, Hunter Biden - had no valid testimony to offer on the "subject" of the hearing, which is Trump's corrupt dealings with Ukraine.

What about Hunter Biden's corruption?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

It's only unfair insofar as the case is so solid against the president that there is no possible defense the Republicans can make.

So solid a case that the only two charges in the flimsy-assed articles are the nebulous accusations of "obstruction" and "abuse of power".

You clowns don't have a popcorn fart.

LOL...
Yes. So solid in fact that all you dopes can do is screech about is how unfair it is.

You haven't replied to the fact that Republicans weren't allowed to call witnesses. Do you think that's fair?

The committee chair decides who testifies. That is as fair as it has ever been.

The committee chair has a personal vendetta. The committee chair said Trump had to be removed even before Trump was sworn in.

So, just more crying?

The committees are operating under the current rules as established in 2015 by the republican majority.

Choke on your own cuntery.

 

[Oddball]

Anyone with average intelligence that is watching this hearing can see that it's purely partisan and unfair.

It's only unfair insofar as the case is so solid against the president that there is no possible defense the Republicans can make.

So solid a case that the only two charges in the flimsy-assed articles are the nebulous accusations of "obstruction" and "abuse of power".

You clowns don't have a popcorn fart.

LOL...
Yes. So solid in fact that all you dopes can do is screech about is how unfair it is.

You haven't heard me say anything about unfairness...So stuff that in your pipe and smoke it.

And you still have neither jack nor shit.

LOL.....
No, you're just playing deaf, dumb and blind instead of crying.

Where's the proof, fuckwit?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

It's only unfair insofar as the case is so solid against the president that there is no possible defense the Republicans can make.

So solid a case that the only two charges in the flimsy-assed articles are the nebulous accusations of "obstruction" and "abuse of power".

You clowns don't have a popcorn fart.

LOL...
Yes. So solid in fact that all you dopes can do is screech about is how unfair it is.

You haven't heard me say anything about unfairness...So stuff that in your pipe and smoke it.

And you still have neither jack nor shit.

LOL.....
No, you're just playing deaf, dumb and blind instead of crying.

Where's the proof, fuckwit?

Exactly my point.

 

[g5000]

Okay, thanks. I finally found the relevant rule. Who do the minority want to appear that have not been called?

O. Separate Day of Hearings with Minority Witnesses
At any committee hearing, a majority of the minority members are entitled by House rule XI clause 2(j)(1) to demand at least one separate day of hearings to allow witnesses selected by the minority to testify on the subject of the hearing. Under the rule, minority members must submit a request in writing to the chair before the end of the hearing.

Practice Note: In practice, the minority normally requests in advance of any hearing that its desired witnesses appear as part of the main hearing and negotiates the details with the majority. The right to a minority day of hearings is usually formally invoked only if the chair has refused to call the witnesses requested by the minority. If this minority right is invoked, the chair must schedule another day of hearings at which the witnesses requested by the minority must be invited to testify, but the chair retains the discretion to determine the timing of the hearing. The chair may also call witnesses at any such hearing.

Two points, as underlined above. First, Nadler called Turley at the request of Republicans. Second, the "witnesses" Republicans reportedly wanted to call - Schiff, Hunter Biden - had no valid testimony to offer on the "subject" of the hearing, which is Trump's corrupt dealings with Ukraine.

What about Hunter Biden's corruption?

There is nothing stopping the Republican Senate from investigating that hoax.

And yet they aren't.


Hmmmm...

Because it's a nothing burger hoax invented in Trump's head to slander Biden.