OFFICIAL: Kavanaugh Hearings Thread

The Dems Character assassination circus ended today..................Bunch of unethical hags............

Now it is way past time to SHOVE THE DANG VOTE DOWN YOUR THROATS.

TOMMORROW.................see if your BS worked.

 
Favorite part was Feinstein's excuse that she held onto Dr. Ford's letter because she asked it to remain confidential and the Reps smacking that down with how the committee would have done a confidential investigation :04:
 
Just pointing out your circus while this hearing gets stalled mindlessly. But yeah, why is Booker trying to grandstand again? Didn't he grope a girl?
Did he? Maybe if you read your own article, you would know.

And yes, let's compare the contrition of booker's article with the infantile little tantrum Kavanaugh is throwing. Do you always do all the work of making yourself look stupid? Seriously, I can just sit back and let you embarrass yourself....

If you want to circle around being apologist for perv DNC members then have at it, sport.
Oops, you seem confused again, little guy. See, today is about the attempted rapist abortion fairy Kavanaugh. And the one embarrassing himself by licking the perv's buttcrack is you.

Wait, now you're oblivious that Booker the groper didn't having his "Spartacus" moment?
Huh? Are you stroking out? No idea what you are crybabying about. But you certainly have a talent for being completely unable to follow a simple topic. Like your president.
I'm debating you, sport. Just admit you're that apologist for the swamp DNC already.
 
Ford brought nothing new.

Kavanaugh brought documentation.

Fords best friend denies it happened.

Game Over

Kavanaugh won the day.

The clincher, Ford not remembering if her Polygraph test was the same day as her Grandmothers funeral. Less than 60 days ago.

Who forgets that, then why would she lie about that?
The problem with a polygraph is that you have to have an unbiased expert to give and interp[ret the results. That attorney is a shrew and p[robably paid for the answer he wanted.

The testimony that Dr. Ford gave said she had problems with fear and trust. Not really acceptable for a true polygraph. She could be on medication which would alter the test results. You did notice that her attorney refused to send the papers of the test. He didn't want a real expert to respond on it.
 
As we've done in the past for elections and hearings, there will ONE OFFICIAL thread for comments, opinions, updates on tomorrow's hearing in the Senate Judiciary Committee.. After closing, moving, or merging over 200 threads these past 5 days on the topic -- we're out of patience. Other threads will be closed. Repeat violators will be warned.

This thread will be OPENED by 10AM tomorrow morning. Maybe earlier. All threads between now and then will be merged and placed in the "Senate Judiciary Peanut Gallery" thread --- which will CLOSE when this thread opens. Use that one now -- if you can't wait.

DO NOT POST other threads on this until Friday. And those MAY still be subject to merge and warnings if folks are STILL not complying with using existing open threads on the topic.

Comply this

DoG8P_BXUAMqtXL.jpg_large

Dr. Ford's view of the cowardly Republicans

Gas-lighting.
 
They never wanted one. They knew it was a done deal and then swinestien came up with this crap as a Hail Mary. It was bullshit from the start.
 
So let's get this straight...

* Brett "Chad" Kavanugh, despite of being 15 invites bunch of 20 year old chicks to a house party.
* They show up, so he naturally drugs them with Qualudes.
* In between drugging, he drinks excessively.
* Once they're passed out, he drags them to other room and violently rape them with his 15 year old virgin cock.
* He high five his boy on the way out cause the line is long and it's finally his turn.
* Next week, and week after that, and the following weeks, the same chicks come to his house party.
* He get away with it for 37 years until some brave woman with everything to lose comes forward and blows the lid of his operation.
* Out of all people (rapists and raped), the only name clearly remembered was Brett Chad Kavanaugh.

That is a good point. A whole bunch of rapists and the ONLY name anyone remembers is his? I don't buy it.

Well, and Mark Judge, obviously. But only because his name has been in the papers with Kavanaugh's.

Follow the timeline when she first mentioned Mark Judge and the second guy PJ.
 
Senate Dems on the Judiciary Committee could have revealed Ford's letter to Chairman Chuck Grassley 60 days ago and the FBI could have conducted and completed a confidential investigation two or three weeks ago. But the Democrats didn't do that. They held onto this flimsy accusation until after the hearings and just as the Senate was going to vote on Kavanaugh's nomination.

So it was pure hypocrisy for Democratic members of the committee to ask Kavanaugh if he would now call for an FBI investigation. Where was their desire for an FBI investigation 60 days ago, or when they had their private interviews with him, or during the hearings? Sheer hypocrisy.
Because they know it's all a sham. They are behaving criminally in order to postpone the hearing.

Because they are racketeers, sodomites, and all around criminals. That's how democrats roll.

They didn't call for an investigation for the same reasons they didn't call for *investigations* before lynching blacks for "violatin' the honor of our beautiful, delicate Democratic wives and daughters" back in the day.

Because it isn't about investigating a crime. It's about victimizing people. That's all the democrats are about, it's all they've ever been about, it's all they'll ever be about.

They are shitting their expensive drawers at the thought of honorable judges at every level. Nothing makes a democrat more nervous than the thought of judges who can't be bought.

They're sweatin like sinners in church.

 
Last edited:
DUMBSHIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! DUMB
INSANE
I listened to this stuff--OMG -
WASTE of tax $$$$$
Senator - S ----------Kav - BK
S-- '' do you remember [ hahahahah ] NOT remembering a night you got drunk and remembered nothing''........????!!!!!!!!!!
BK --''it was a fun night, friendship, etc ...you're wrong, no''

S-- ''it was [ hahahahha] quoted by ??? that you were aggressive''
BK-- ''no, I if what you mean as aggressive, no ''...?????!!!

S--''we should delay the vote till further investigation''
other S--''we've delayed already, he's been nominated almost 3 months ago''

S-- '''I want to ask.....etc''' ...goes on and on and on
BK tries to answer, S interrupts, then Bk interrupts
on and on ---same same dumbshit
etc

DUMBSHIT
 
Hey Progtards, You know that little voice you hear right now?

That’s the tiny bit of you that’s not dead. It’s letting you know that you were wrong . You can sense it. The way you feel right now ? Yeah, that’s how lynching an innocent guy feels . That’s how being part of The Totalitarian Mob feels .

Hurry up and push that feeling of humanity and decency away. Getting a glimpse of truth and humanity might shake you to your core. Just scream at the sky “ Rape Parties , it was her turn “ ! And you’ll be back to normal.

And where is your link to unbiased, factual proof that this 'guy' is innocent?
All of this is opinion there are no facts in either side.
 
DUMBSHIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! DUMB
INSANE
I listened to this stuff--OMG -
WASTE of tax $$$$$
Senator - S ----------Kav - BK
S-- '' do you remember [ hahahahah ] NOT remembering a night you got drunk and remembered nothing''........????!!!!!!!!!!
BK --''it was a fun night, friendship, etc ...you're wrong, no''

S-- ''it was [ hahahahha] quoted by ??? that you were aggressive''
BK-- ''no, I if what you mean as aggressive, no ''...?????!!!

S--''we should delay the vote till further investigation''
other S--''we've delayed already, he's been nominated almost 3 months ago''

S-- '''I want to ask.....etc''' ...goes on and on and on
BK tries to answer, S interrupts, then Bk interrupts
on and on ---same same dumbshit
etc

DUMBSHIT
Are you okay?
 
democrats ask Brett Kavanaugh why he does not want the fbi to get involved. That's a dead giveaway that this farce is political wanting to hold up the vote
 
DUMBSHIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! DUMB
INSANE
I listened to this stuff--OMG -
WASTE of tax $$$$$
Senator - S ----------Kav - BK
S-- '' do you remember [ hahahahah ] NOT remembering a night you got drunk and remembered nothing''........????!!!!!!!!!!
BK --''it was a fun night, friendship, etc ...you're wrong, no''

S-- ''it was [ hahahahha] quoted by ??? that you were aggressive''
BK-- ''no, I if what you mean as aggressive, no ''...?????!!!

S--''we should delay the vote till further investigation''
other S--''we've delayed already, he's been nominated almost 3 months ago''

S-- '''I want to ask.....etc''' ...goes on and on and on
BK tries to answer, S interrupts, then Bk interrupts
on and on ---same same dumbshit
etc

DUMBSHIT
Are you okay?
that is some dumbshit
worthless
waste of $$$$$$$$
it was stupid
 
Bravo! Kavanaugh stood up to Leahy’s bullying

Leahy asked Kavanaugh about his yearbook and the "drinking" and "sexual exploits" it mentions. As Kavanaugh started to respond, Leahy tried to cut him off. Kavanaugh retorted, "I'm going to talk about my high school record if you're going to sit here and mock me." After Kavanaugh talked about how he "busted his butt" on academics and played sports in high school, Leahy said: "We got a filibuster but not a single answer."

Patrick Leahy’s Net Worth is $14 Million. He has been a senator for over 40 years, but a despicable cretin for much longer.

Testy exchange between Sen. Leahy, Brett Kavanaugh

Patrick Joseph Leahy Net Worth & Bio/Wiki 2018: Facts Which You Must To Know!
 
We are find and will be. Trump snowflakes and the working class and needy should be concerned they will be the losers. Read below. Kavanaugh voted to repeal the ACA.

"The last thing Christina remembered was letting two men buy her a drink at a Fort Lauderdale bar. Then she woke up hours later on a roadside, with injuries to her genitals suggesting that she was raped. Though she had no memory of how she left the bar or wound up cut and bruised on the side of a road, it was soon obvious that she'd been drugged.' Months later, Christina learned that her rape was a preexisting condition.

After she woke up with signs of a sexual assault, Christina's doctor prescribed her a month's worth of anti-AIDS medication as a precaution in case her assailants were HIV positive. Several months after she took these drugs, when she lost her health insurance and needed to find a new plan, she discovered that no insurance company would cover her. Though Christina never developed an HIV infection, insurers saw that she'd once taken anti-AIDS drugs-and that marked her as someone who might have an expensive medical condition the insurance companies did not want to pay for.

Christina's experience was not particularly unusual. Before the Affordable Care Act banned the practice, numerous insurers denied care to women infected with a sexually transmitted disease by their [p255] rapist or to rape survivors with post-traumatic stress disorder.' Eight states permitted insurers to deny coverage to a woman because she'd experienced domestic violence."

And these coverage denials were hardly limited to victims of violence. Before Obamacare, insurance companies refused to cover Americans for conditions as severe as cancer or as routine as hay fever. Women who became pregnant could immediately lose their ability to obtain insurance, as could college athletes in excellent physical condition who experienced an injury." Moreover, for the millions of Americans unable to obtain insurance prior to the Affordable Care Act, every trip to the doctor was a flirtation with bankruptcy. According to a 2007 study, nearly two-thirds of all bankruptcies in the United States had a "medical cause."

Worse, in the world before Obamacare, many Americans simply watched their bodies fall into ruin because they were unable to afford care. George, a teenaged diabetic in Buffalo, had a factory job that offered him no insurance and too little money to pay for the insulin, syringes, and testing materials he needed to manage his condition. Unable to control his blood sugar levels, he went blind at age twenty. One year later he died of multiple organ failure."

George's sister Tina worked a waitressing job that also left her uninsured. At twenty-four she had a baby, only to watch that child die five months later due to complications from gestational diabetes. A year later, Tina had a fatal heart attack.

If George and Tina had been insured, their fates almost certainly would have been different. "I had to face their mother at the funerals knowing if they had gotten good care for diabetes, we could have prevented all their end organ disease," their doctor later explained to a reporter. "George would not have gone blind. The baby would have lived. Neither would have had heart or kidney problems."

In Kansas City, a well-regarded gynecologist and Vietnam veteran named Joseph started experiencing involuntary twitches. Eventually, they became so bad that he lost his medical practice-and with it his house, his car, and his health insurance. For eleven years, he was unable to afford the $200 blood test that would have diagnosed his [p 257] condition as Huntington's disease, He frequency skipped meals in order to pay for medication. Joseph's story ended less tragically than George's or Tina's-he eventually found a clinic willing to diagnose his condition and provide him with care-but he watched his life slip into ruin for more than a decade before that happened."

In rural Idaho, a twenty-eight-year-old mother developed a rare bacterial infection in her heart. Because her convenience store job did not provide her with insurance, she delayed care long enough that a mass formed in her heart, entered an artery, and traveled to her brain, killing her. In a particularly cruel twist, the convenience store promoted her to assistant manager shortly before her death-a promotion that came with health insurance. She left behind two small children."

Beth lost her health insurance after her husband crushed his right leg in a motorcycle accident, causing him to lose his job. A diabetic with a heart condition, Beth stopped seeing her specialist, stopped taking one of her insulin drugs, and started rationing her heart medication in order to save money to pay for her husband's care. Before she found care at a free clinic, Beth's health deteriorated to the point that she was unable to get out of bed."

In Jamestown, New York, a small town a little more than an hour south of Buffalo, an unemployed carpenter arrived at the hospital with bloody urine and sky-high blood sugar due to his untreated diabetes. When the hospital diagnosed him with cancer, he refused surgery because he had no way to pay for it-though he changed his mind six months later after the cancer grew worse.

In the final months of his life, he lost his ability to work after he accidentally cut off his own thumb. He faced regular calls from a collection agency seeking payment for the cancer surgery. His toes had to be amputated due to his unchecked diabetes. His vision grew worse and one of his kidneys failed. After he developed cancer in his bladder, he lost that organ as well. Though he eventually qualified for Medicaid, that was after his family discovered him lying on the floor from a stroke brought on by his diabetes. He died in a nursing home, sharing a room with four other men." [p258]

A sixty-four-year-old Idaho woman developed a prolapsed uterus, a weakening in the pelvic muscles that held her womb in place. Although her uterus was literally hanging outside her vagina, the woman delayed surgery for a year so that this expensive procedure would be covered by Medicare. A young boy developed a tooth infection that spread to his heart, eventually causing permanent damage, because his mother did not make enough money as a janitor to pay for his care."

A Chicago electrician blinded by his diabetes had no way to pay for his medications, so he was forced to go back to work despite the fact that he could not see the electric wires he worked with-he'd feel his way along them to figure out what he was doing."

Doctors often based treatment decisions for their uninsured patients on which drug company had recently provided them with free samples of their product. "You change medication every time a patient comes in and switch them to whatever free samples you happen to have that day," according to a physician in an inner-city health clinic. Another doctor relied on free samples to treat a schizophrenic woman with thoughts of suicide. The woman's husband was on ten different medications, and would beg for samples of each one."

[see Above] This is what health care looked like in the United States of America-the richest nation the world has ever known-before President Barack Obama signed the Affordable Care Act. Hard-working Americans died because their jobs did not provide them with health benefits. Mothers prayed helplessly over sick children who were unable to receive the most basic care. Senior citizens counted the days until they qualified for Medicare and could finally receive treatment for long-neglected conditions. Rape survivors were treated like pariahs by the insurance industry.

According to one study published by six Harvard physicians, nearly 45,000 American adults died in 2005 because they lacked health insurance. That's more than one death every twelve minutes.'?

And yet, just seven minutes after Obama signed the Affordable Care Act into law in March of 2010, a group of thirteen state attorneys general filed a lawsuit asking the courts to return America to the days when patients had to beg their doctors for free samples of lifesaving drugs."

Page numbers are included in text above.

'Injustices: The Supreme Court's History of Comforting the Comfortable and Afflicting the Afflicted' Ian Millhiser

Kavanaugh would further hurt the working class and women should he be confirmed. And if you are whining about the so called 'tax' that too is demonstrated to within the laws put forth in the constitution, check the book if you doubt, maybe you'll learn something.

"THE LEGAL CASE against Obamacare was more than simply an indictment of the Supreme Court. It offered a direct window into how easily partisans can be convinced that something is unconstitutional simply because they want it to be. "
 
Last edited:
Not sure how the vote will go, either way won't be a surprise.

I believe some sort of assault happened to Ford, I think however she could be very confused about the severity of the "assault", and who the participants were.
 

Forum List

Back
Top