OFFICIAL: Kavanaugh Hearings Thread

[toobfreak]

Too bad the Republicans refused to allow an FBI investigation. It would have been the best way of finding out the truth.

That's a decision that totally back-fired on them.

JACKASS, there have already been SIX background investigations to vet Kananaugh! The FBI does not investigate sexual assault. Learn the fucking law.

 

[deanrd]

Fox said Clarence Thomas was able to use the race card.

But there’s no race card here.

 

[JBvM]

I wonder how many veterans who suffer PTSD relate

PTSD isn't just for veterans......it's something that happens to anyone that has experienced a traumatic event.

thanks for offering red herring, but I'll pass

no one said what you put forth

 

[Oldstyle]

How can there be any viable witnesses when the accuser can't remember when and where?

Why would you expect specific details of an event from 35 years ago

I remember parties and bars I went to when I was in college where something had happened like a bar fight or someone getting incredibly drunk

I don’t remember the date, how I got to the bar, what I was drinking, everyone who was there, the exact location of the bar.........but I remember the fight

Ms. Ford can't remember the person who gave her a ride home from THE MOST TRAUMATIC EVENT OF HER LIFE, Winger! How is that possible? Does that make sense to anyone?

It's kind of interesting that everything she has forgotten about that night are the items that would allow others to fix both the date and the location of the accusation.

Or her state of mind as she was leaving the party?

She said she stormed out immediately.

That is consistent with victimology.

She "stormed out" and did what? Walked the 6 miles to get home? She testified that she got a ride from someone to the party and from the party but she can't remember who it was that did either. That's something that quite frankly I find difficult to believe.

 

[easyt65]

Quotas on the Court? No seat on the Court belongs to an ideology

What is dirty about asking the FBI to do what they did with Anita Hill?

Obama and Liberals disagree. With a near super-majority control of the House and Senate plus the WH, Democrats rammed whatever they wanted to through, to include the socialist ideology minority supported ACA that was opposed by the majority of Americans at the time.

Obama once mocked the GOP, making fun of them being in the minority, by declaring if they wanted things to change they should WIN MORE ELECTIONS.

Once the GOP did just that and took over, the roles were reversed, and liberals / snowflakes began whining like little bitches ,screaming how it was / is so unfair.

Karma, fate, irony....its a bitch!
Just like with rules, regulations, and laws Democrats believed that 'If you want things to change win some elections' did not / does not apply to them. Instead they prefer Obstruction, sedition, conspiracy, treason....and underhanded, immoral, unethical BS like this.

To them, the ends justifies their means, illegal, immoral, or not.

 

[deanrd]

I have participated in job interviews before. None of them involved witnesses testifying against me.

The allegation makes it a Court, not an interview.

The consequences make it a court as well, and not just an interview.

And the consequences are that he either gets the job or not.

You really think that is the only consequence?

If you really believe all the stories about him, wouldn't you want him Impeached from the DC Circuit?

You really think his career would keep going if he is turned down from the SC because of this?

Oh, wait, character assassination in the pursuit of politics is OK for political hacks like you because the ends justify the means.

No more no less than anyone else who has unpleasant stuff pop up during their job interview. If you are being interviewed for a job and they find that you've done X bad thing.....don't you think your current job should be in jeopardy?

Do they have te person lying about you attend your job interview and lie about you in person?

I never applied for a job to be a Supreme Court justice. Have you?

 

[JustAnotherNut]

'I didn't want to come to New York/DC by plane because I'm afraid of flying. With many friends encouragement, I did fly here many times. I've also flown to many places, many times' WTH?

Yeah there have been a lot of statements like that during this hearing—so contradicting I’m left wondering if I heard it correctly.

Even the news guys are questioning the contradictions in her testimony

 

[dave p]

Ford is failing miserably. She is now a circus clown. But she has created wealth for herself out of this. The book deals and all the other money making avenues are now available to her.

She is handling herself quite well under stressful circumstances

I disagree. Her story has too many holes in it. She is proving that she cant remember things. She is stonewalling.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I have participated in job interviews before. None of them involved witnesses testifying against me.

The allegation makes it a Court, not an interview.

The consequences make it a court as well, and not just an interview.

And the consequences are that he either gets the job or not.

You really think that is the only consequence?

If you really believe all the stories about him, wouldn't you want him Impeached from the DC Circuit?

You really think his career would keep going if he is turned down from the SC because of this?

Oh, wait, character assassination in the pursuit of politics is OK for political hacks like you because the ends justify the means.

No more no less than anyone else who has unpleasant stuff pop up during their job interview. If you are being interviewed for a job and they find that you've done X bad thing.....don't you think your current job should be in jeopardy?

Do they have te person lying about you attend your job interview and lie about you in person?

Actually, for important jobs, yes. That's what FBI background investigations do. Glad you're up to speed!

 

[ZZ PUPPS]

Pupps' take:

Total space cadet

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Judge should be subpoenaed. She mentioned him on many occasions

 

[boedicca]

Blumenthal is such a creepy hack.

 

[JBvM]

Talk about a High Tech Lynching. The GOP has put a staged show on. They are in total control. No one speaks on the GOP side. They have a supposed prosecutor to make the optics look like Ford is on trial

 

[koshergrl]

A woman whose life is destroyed (which it wasn't), even in theory, because she went to a party and was groped by a drunk teen boy while his friends laughed....is a piss poor example of a female.

If that is the worst thing that has even happened to her, she's not a woman. She's a fucking child.

She is actually very childlike and immature for her physical age and education/profession. She is answering in such a way that a 15yo would. Did she never grow up during those 32 years?

Well this is all taking her back to her 15 year old persona.

Very consistent.

consistently nutty.

 

[Auld Phart]

Absolutely it's a job interview......he's applying for a very very very very very important government job.

It is a job interview

We either hire him or we don’t. Kavenaugh does not need to be criminally convicted to decide he is not worth the chance

What a weasely rationale for character assissination.

This isn't just a job interview. This is judgement about Kavanaugh's character and his entire life. If this were a real issue, it should have come up before he was appointed to the 2nd Highest Court in the country. It wasn't because this is made up crap from a psychological mess.

so why didn't she go after kavanaugh in 2012.? why didn't her husband track his ass down to punch him out in 2012?

Was it before or after Romney put Kavanaugh on his list of potential nominees?

Why on earth did a fight about a second door lead to recalling alleged sexual abuse?

Weird how this didn’t happen for Gorsuch, huh?

Biden Rule

 

[deanrd]

Quotas on the Court? No seat on the Court belongs to an ideology

What is dirty about asking the FBI to do what they did with Anita Hill?

Obama and Liberals disagree. With a near super-majority control of the House and Senate plus the WH, Democrats rammed whatever they wanted to through, to include the socialist ideology minority supported ACA that was opposed by the majority of Americans at the time.

Obama once mocked the GOP, making fun of them being in the minority, by declaring if they wanted things to change they should WIN MORE ELECTIONS.

Once the GOP did just that and took over, the roles were reversed, and liberals / snowflakes began whining like little bitches ,screaming how it was / is so unfair.

Karma, fate, irony....its a bitch!
Just like with rules, regulations, and laws Democrats believed that 'If you want things to change win some elections' did not / does not apply to them. Instead they prefer Obstruction, sedition, conspiracy, treason....and underhanded, immoral, unethical BS like this.

To them, the ends justifies their means, illegal, immoral, or not.

Wow what a ridiculous rent. Who even knows what you’re talking about? Are you the first one to bring up Obama? Makes no sense in this forum.

 

[EverCurious]

She invalidated the polygraph test. Taking it right after a funeral would bork the results up...

?

I won't go into extensive detail, but if you can artificially worry yourself when answering a control question, you can modify the results of your test so that your "normal" responses appear the same as the responses that actually worry you.

 

[easyt65]

Why would you expect specific details of an event from 35 years ago

I remember parties and bars I went to when I was in college where something had happened like a bar fight or someone getting incredibly drunk

I don’t remember the date, how I got to the bar, what I was drinking, everyone who was there, the exact location of the bar.........but I remember the fight

Ms. Ford can't remember the person who gave her a ride home from THE MOST TRAUMATIC EVENT OF HER LIFE, Winger! How is that possible? Does that make sense to anyone?

It's kind of interesting that everything she has forgotten about that night are the items that would allow others to fix both the date and the location of the accusation.

Or her state of mind as she was leaving the party?

She said she stormed out immediately.

That is consistent with victimology.

She "stormed out" and did what? Walked the 6 miles to get home? She testified that she got a ride from someone to the party and from the party but she can't remember who it was that did either. That's something that quite frankly I find difficult to believe.

'Details', like FACTS, do not matter. All that matters is that you blindly accept the accusation that Kavanaugh is asexual criminal / monster.....

 

[Pop23]

So far the first woman is credible at the Senate hearings.

This is not good for Kavanaugh.

He may have gotten away with this back then, but it has come home to haunt him now.

to steal from Templar:

Rachel Mitchell: “Did you ever give Senator Feinstein or anyone else the permission to release that letter?”

Dr. Ford: “Not that I know of.”

NOT THAT I KNOW OF?

How do you not know this?

 

[koshergrl]

“I have twenty times more evidence for my rape by Bill Clinton than Dr. Ford has against Kavanaugh,” Broaddrick says, “Democrats turned their backs on me. They refused to read my testimony or acknowledge me in 1999 when I went public with my story. Democrats turned their backs on me.”

"Broaddrick said that the mantra the ‘All women deserve to be believed” does not apply to her.

“All women are to be believed if they’re not conservatives and as long as the assault was not done by Democrats.”

Juanita Broaddrick Shows Up At Kavanaugh Hearing To ‘Look Hypocrite Democrats In The Eye’