georgephillip
Diamond Member
And yet...Hillary was protected against prosecution by leftist stooges in the FBI. This was reveled in testimony.The only person it's fatal to testify against is Hillary.Your OP theory sounds reasonable regarding a lack of indictments of Don, Jr, and any other family members, but I wonder if Mueller made a fatal mistake by not requiring the POTUS to answer questions under oath in person? Sure, he would likely have invoked his Fifth Amendment right, but it would have provided evidence of his criminal tendencies.Hillary lost, remember?The only person it's fatal to testify against is Hillary
Congress received over 80,000 documents relating to investigations into her conduct. How likely is it Trump will do likewise?
Special Counsel investigation (2017–2019) - Wikipedia
"White House attorneys expect to preview whatever findings Barr decides to provide to Congress and the public, in order to consider asserting executive privilege to withhold the release of information gleaned from internal documents and interviews with White House officials.[58]
"Todd Gaziano, a legal scholar associated with The Federalist Society and Heritage Foundation[59][60]— organizations instrumental in forming Trump administration policies[61][62] — has asserted that United States v. Nixon 'held that executive privilege cannot be invoked at all if the purpose is to shield wrongdoing.'[63]
"John Bies, who served as a deputy assistant attorney general in the Office of Legal Counsel in the Obama Administration, wrote in the influential Lawfare blog, 'the Department of Justice’s longstanding position has been that the privilege cannot be asserted to conceal evidence of wrongdoing or conduct by executive officers that is criminal or unlawful.'[64][speculation?][neutrality is disputed]"
And the only people surprised by that are Hillary bootlickers.
Are you really that brainwashed?And yet...Hillary was protected against prosecution by leftist stooges in the FBI. This was reveled in testimony.
Most FBI agents are anti-Trump?
Why was the FBI's New York field office known as "Trumpland"?
"The Real F.B.I. Election Culprit
Hint: It’s not Peter Strzok...."
Opinion | The Real F.B.I. Election Culprit
"The F.B.I. agent corps today overwhelmingly fits the demographic profile of a Trump voter.
"During the 2016 campaign, in The Guardian, one agent said, 'The F.B.I. is Trumpland.'
"In his testimony, Mr. Strzok all but laughed out loud when committee members pressed him Thursday on whether the whole F.B.I. was made up of Democrats."
"At that time, Rudy Giuliani gave voice on television to what he called the anti-Clinton 'revolution going on inside the F.B.I....'"
![1018316866.jpg](https://www.haaretz.com/polopoly_fs/1.5584405.1514906928!/image/1018316866.jpg_gen/derivatives/headline_1200x630/1018316866.jpg)
"Mr. Giuliani, whose former law firm Bracewell & Giuliani represented the F.B.I. Agents Association, seemed to boast in the final days of the campaign that he knew that a twist — like the revelations of emails on Anthony Weiner’s laptop — was coming about Mrs. Clinton’s campaign, referring on Fox to 'a surprise or two that you’re going to hear about in the next few days.'
"In his testimony on Thursday, Mr. Strzok said that 'it caused me great concern' that Mr. Giuliani 'had information about that — that he should not have had.'"