Bootney Lee Farnsworth
Diamond Member
Yes.And a hand carried $300 oxyacetylene rig would do that and more in minutes
Any tradesman knows this
So, why not use steel-reinforced concrete?
Because it's too effective?
.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yes.And a hand carried $300 oxyacetylene rig would do that and more in minutes
Any tradesman knows this
We should model our wall after Israelis wall...
/----/ Libtards - take the challenge and put your money where your mouth is.Poor snowflakeNBC = fake news![]()
Ouch. Or not...
Department of Homeland Security testing of a steel slat prototype proved it could be cut through with a saw, according to a report by DHS.
A photo exclusively obtained by NBC News shows the results of the test after military and Border Patrol personnel were instructed to attempt to destroy the barriers with common tools.
Steel prototype for border wall cut through with saw, photo shows![]()
This is possibly the most irritating misconception of the State of Texas.WTF do you think the Texas border looks like?
It's miles of desert
/----/ Funny you should say that.No free people ever begged to be walled in by concentrated wealth and power./----/ I wouldn't be in that position because I'd enter the US legally. But I understand your question. Assuming I could heft the ladder up and pass it over the top to the other side so I could climb down leaving it for others to use. The the other wet backs would only need one more ladder to get up. But the whole notion is stupid./----/ You can use a ladder to climb up but then how do you get down on the other side?
What would you do if you're in that position?
True, but they'll use whatever works for them.
That's why we don't need a fence, we need a wall. Full blown, 40ft high concrete wall.
If it makes those on the left happy, we'll even call it a fence.
![]()
The bottom line is that 5 billion isn't going to build a wall
It's a number picked out of a hat.
You want border security...then show what you want to spend it on. You'll probably find that most if not all of the money needed for that has already been appropriated
Trump is playing fucking GAMES here
This is possibly the most irritating misconception of the State of Texas.WTF do you think the Texas border looks like?
It's miles of desert
El Paso is in the Chihuahuan Desert, but from Big Bend through The Rio Grande Valley (aka "The Valley") it is prairie land, much like the rest of Central and South Texas. The Valley is the worst spot for illegal border crossings because it is so far South and not desert.
So what? You could cut up a freaking aircraft carrier with the right saw and with enough time but it ain't gonna happen with sensoring devices and patrols. The point of course is that a steel slab will stop the almost casual entry into the U.S. that the Border Patrol has been plagued with for a quarter century.
/----/ Libtards - take the challenge and put your money where your mouth is.Poor snowflakeNBC = fake news![]()
Ouch. Or not...
Department of Homeland Security testing of a steel slat prototype proved it could be cut through with a saw, according to a report by DHS.
A photo exclusively obtained by NBC News shows the results of the test after military and Border Patrol personnel were instructed to attempt to destroy the barriers with common tools.
Steel prototype for border wall cut through with saw, photo shows![]()
![]()
Do you know what resources are?Looks like the Fake News and their bots have never heard of electronic sensors.
Who needs sensors when they have drones?
The bottom line is that 5 billion isn't going to build a wall
It's a number picked out of a hat.
You want border security...then show what you want to spend it on. You'll probably find that most if not all of the money needed for that has already been appropriated
Trump is playing fucking GAMES here
The bottom line is that 5 billion isn't going to build a wall
It's a number picked out of a hat.
You want border security...then show what you want to spend it on. You'll probably find that most if not all of the money needed for that has already been appropriated
Trump is playing fucking GAMES here
Trump should have stayed on original $25B price tag.
For every day Democrats refuse to negotiate, Trump should demand additional $1B for the wall.
To objectively address the thread's title, we need to review Trump's campaign mantra.....
Trump promised his loyal base a wall (never mind the moronic assertion that Mexico would pay for it; THAT was just demagoguery.)
Trump also knows that if a wall is NOT built, his chances of re-election are about as probable as Jill Stein's in 2016
Then we have the made-up DOJ policy that a sitting president cannot be indicted until he or she is out of office and Trump well knows that there are a ton of legal quagmires awaiting him AND his family in 2021 were he out of office.
Finally, the only viable defense that Trump may have in facing these legal issues, is to rely on the statutes of limitation to save his hide.
Sooooooo, the real reason why Trump NEEDS a wall to be built, is NOT because of a made-up "national crisis"........but simply, to keep his fat ass out of bankruptcies, shame and even possibly out of prison.
Hope and Change:Trump promised his loyal base a wall (never mind the moronic assertion that Mexico would pay for it; THAT was just demagoguery.)
For real...take your meds!Sooooooo, the real reason why Trump NEEDS a wall to be built, is NOT because of a made-up "national crisis"........but simply, to keep his fat ass out of bankruptcies, shame and even possibly out of prison.
For real...take your meds!