- Feb 22, 2017
- 109,030
- 37,880
- 2,290
Yes.Reason always makes sense. Otherwise it wouldn’t be reasonable.Not as false as you would like. In order to understand this... You would have to understand the practice of taxation, at the time of our nations founding. Conflating the modern, with the original isn't a valid argument against the original intent.So many false assumptions in one post, it is very impressive you could squeeze them all in.
People that do not own land still pay taxes into the coffers, so you first point is false.
People who do not own land still contribute and owning land is not a sign of contribution.
But we are in the modern and not the original days, so any reasoning that made sense then no longer does.
So, is it just the land ownership or do you want to restrict it to white males also, like the original intent?
Was talking about this with my wife at the grocery store and she wondered if you considered people who still owed a bank money on their property to the bank land owners or does the bank own it till it is all paid for?
Let's try this again...what made sense in 1750 does not automatically make sense in 2018.
So, is it just the land ownership or do you want to restrict it to white males also, like the original intent?
Ok, you have explained your views on land ownership, could you expound on why women and non-whites should not be allowed to vote?