Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
lol @ National Review.
Go fuck yourself.
Yes, 17 intelligence agencies really did say Russia was behind hacking
Clinton, Trump clash on Russia's role in election
USA Today... Politifact?
No... you go fuck yourself, chump.
See how that worked?
Major, reputable, national news organizations that have not bee debunked by anyone with credibility?
Just those silly old things?
What do you have? Tomi Lahren and the blaze? Infowars and Alex Jones' sulfur theories? Please fuck yourself.
The fact remains, Russia had nothing to do with the outcome of the election…
Meanwhile Obama and the DNC supported by Hillary have used words like "Hacked the election" to imply just that.The intelligence community has no proof Russia hacked the 2016 presidential election to get Donald Trump elected, according to the chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence.
“There’s no proof that we have from intelligence sources that I’ve seen that show that the Russians were directly trying to help Trump,” said Rep. Devin Nunes during an interview with the Washington Examiner’s “Examining Politics” podcast Monday. Nunes did not rule out that Russia possibly had a hand in the recent hacking of various political institutions."
-- HUGE difference between 'did hack' and 'did not rule it out'!
"In his role as chairman overseeing the intelligence community, Nunes has access to the nation’s most important secrets. He is also a member of the intelligence version of the Gang of Eight, a select group of congressional leaders who are given special access to national security information from the executive branch."
http://dailycaller.com/2017/01/03/house-intelligence-chair-no-proof-russians-were-trying-to-get-trump-elected/#ixzz4Und2Qxtk
'Russia Hacked The Election To Help Trump Win' 'Fake News' EXPOSED!'
'Snowflake Bubble Bursts!
THIS is why the CIA and other Intel agencies illegally ignored a Congressional Subpoena to come before congress and show them the 'evidence' they have - THEY DIDN'T HAVE ANY!
THIS is why Barry hasn't released 'definitive' proof Russia 'hacked the election' - HE DOESN'T HAVE ANY.
THIS is why snowflakes on this board keep parroting liberal sources, Barry, and the Intel agencies yet not being able to post any 'evidence' it happened - THERE ISN'T ANY!
Doesn't matter to the left... they've already morphed the narrative into this fantastical conspiracy that Russians hacked into the voting machines and switched Hillary's votes to Trump. They will continue to throw it out there and claim the evil Republicans swept it all under the rug.
This is what these people do.... they live in their own alternate universe. They can't possibly lose elections because their candidate is corrupt as hell or they're wrong about what the American people want. It's got to be something else... you see? Because, they're the smartest people in the world.
Playing into this same narrative, they're out there smugly making these "New Year's Resolutions" to be skeptical of all news sources, even the ones who tell them what they want to hear! ...translation: They won't believe any news sources that report the truth on this. They will continue to believe their own conspiracy theory and reject the "news sources" who tell them otherwise.The intelligence community has no proof Russia hacked the 2016 presidential election to get Donald Trump elected, according to the chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence.
“There’s no proof that we have from intelligence sources that I’ve seen that show that the Russians were directly trying to help Trump,” said Rep. Devin Nunes during an interview with the Washington Examiner’s “Examining Politics” podcast Monday. Nunes did not rule out that Russia possibly had a hand in the recent hacking of various political institutions."
-- HUGE difference between 'did hack' and 'did not rule it out'!
"In his role as chairman overseeing the intelligence community, Nunes has access to the nation’s most important secrets. He is also a member of the intelligence version of the Gang of Eight, a select group of congressional leaders who are given special access to national security information from the executive branch."
http://dailycaller.com/2017/01/03/house-intelligence-chair-no-proof-russians-were-trying-to-get-trump-elected/#ixzz4Und2Qxtk
'Russia Hacked The Election To Help Trump Win' 'Fake News' EXPOSED!'
'Snowflake Bubble Bursts!
THIS is why the CIA and other Intel agencies illegally ignored a Congressional Subpoena to come before congress and show them the 'evidence' they have - THEY DIDN'T HAVE ANY!
THIS is why Barry hasn't released 'definitive' proof Russia 'hacked the election' - HE DOESN'T HAVE ANY.
THIS is why snowflakes on this board keep parroting liberal sources, Barry, and the Intel agencies yet not being able to post any 'evidence' it happened - THERE ISN'T ANY!
Doesn't matter to the left... they've already morphed the narrative into this fantastical conspiracy that Russians hacked into the voting machines and switched Hillary's votes to Trump. They will continue to throw it out there and claim the evil Republicans swept it all under the rug.
This is what these people do.... they live in their own alternate universe. They can't possibly lose elections because their candidate is corrupt as hell or they're wrong about what the American people want. It's got to be something else... you see? Because, they're the smartest people in the world.
Playing into this same narrative, they're out there smugly making these "New Year's Resolutions" to be skeptical of all news sources, even the ones who tell them what they want to hear! ...translation: They won't believe any news sources that report the truth on this. They will continue to believe their own conspiracy theory and reject the "news sources" who tell them otherwise.
It's pretty ridiculous to say that voting machines were hacked - they aren't connected to the Internet.
But the Russians were certainly hacking the DNC's emails.
lol @ National Review.
Go fuck yourself.
Yes, 17 intelligence agencies really did say Russia was behind hacking
Clinton, Trump clash on Russia's role in election
USA Today... Politifact?
No... you go fuck yourself, chump.
See how that worked?
Major, reputable, national news organizations that have not bee debunked by anyone with credibility?
Just those silly old things?
What do you have? Tomi Lahren and the blaze? Infowars and Alex Jones' sulfur theories? Please fuck yourself.
Nope... your OWN SOURCES say they don't KNOW that Russians did the hacking... they don't have evidence to PROVE it... they simply "believe" they did because "it looks like" they did. Well it also looks like Hillary Clinton is a criminally corrupt bitch from hell! So if that's now our standard for "PROOF" then we need to lock her up, right?
Meanwhile Obama and the DNC supported by Hillary have used words like "Hacked the election" to imply just that.
lol @ National Review.
Go fuck yourself.
Yes, 17 intelligence agencies really did say Russia was behind hacking
Clinton, Trump clash on Russia's role in election
USA Today... Politifact?
No... you go fuck yourself, chump.
See how that worked?
Major, reputable, national news organizations that have not bee debunked by anyone with credibility?
Just those silly old things?
What do you have? Tomi Lahren and the blaze? Infowars and Alex Jones' sulfur theories? Please fuck yourself.
Nope... your OWN SOURCES say they don't KNOW that Russians did the hacking... they don't have evidence to PROVE it... they simply "believe" they did because "it looks like" they did. Well it also looks like Hillary Clinton is a criminally corrupt bitch from hell! So if that's now our standard for "PROOF" then we need to lock her up, right?
The sources are 17 American Intelligence Agencies, they all unanimously say that Russia was behind hacks. Lay off the crack.
Why do you and your fellow snowflakes - not care that Russia may have hacked our election?
Why do you snowflakes insist on creating false narratives,!
No real conservative would ever vote for Hillary under ANY circumstance, and I expect the same thing from the other side.The fact remains, Russia had nothing to do with the outcome of the election…
How did you establish that fact? Did you count how many people didn't vote for Hillary due to leaked emails?
And they have no evidence to back up their claim, have illegally refused to comply with a Congressional Subpoena to come before Congress to share what they have. Barry has not provided evidence. NO ONE has provided the evidence.The sources are 17 American Intelligence Agencies, they all unanimously say that Russia was behind hacks. Lay off the crack.
lol @ National Review.
Go fuck yourself.
Yes, 17 intelligence agencies really did say Russia was behind hacking
Clinton, Trump clash on Russia's role in election
USA Today... Politifact?
No... you go fuck yourself, chump.
See how that worked?
Major, reputable, national news organizations that have not bee debunked by anyone with credibility?
Just those silly old things?
What do you have? Tomi Lahren and the blaze? Infowars and Alex Jones' sulfur theories? Please fuck yourself.
Nope... your OWN SOURCES say they don't KNOW that Russians did the hacking... they don't have evidence to PROVE it... they simply "believe" they did because "it looks like" they did. Well it also looks like Hillary Clinton is a criminally corrupt bitch from hell! So if that's now our standard for "PROOF" then we need to lock her up, right?
The sources are 17 American Intelligence Agencies, they all unanimously say that Russia was behind hacks. Lay off the crack.
But no proof...they just proclaimed it. Dope
only with an explanation of how they supposedly did it and what the impact supposedly was.The intelligence community has no proof Russia hacked the 2016 presidential election to get Donald Trump elected, according to the chairman of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence.
“There’s no proof that we have from intelligence sources that I’ve seen that show that the Russians were directly trying to help Trump,” said Rep. Devin Nunes during an interview with the Washington Examiner’s “Examining Politics” podcast Monday. Nunes did not rule out that Russia possibly had a hand in the recent hacking of various political institutions."
-- HUGE difference between 'did hack' and 'did not rule it out'!
"In his role as chairman overseeing the intelligence community, Nunes has access to the nation’s most important secrets. He is also a member of the intelligence version of the Gang of Eight, a select group of congressional leaders who are given special access to national security information from the executive branch."
http://dailycaller.com/2017/01/03/house-intelligence-chair-no-proof-russians-were-trying-to-get-trump-elected/#ixzz4Und2Qxtk
'Russia Hacked The Election To Help Trump Win' 'Fake News' EXPOSED!'
'Snowflake Bubble Bursts!
THIS is why the CIA and other Intel agencies illegally ignored a Congressional Subpoena to come before congress and show them the 'evidence' they have - THEY DIDN'T HAVE ANY!
THIS is why Barry hasn't released 'definitive' proof Russia 'hacked the election' - HE DOESN'T HAVE ANY.
THIS is why snowflakes on this board keep parroting liberal sources, Barry, and the Intel agencies yet not being able to post any 'evidence' it happened - THERE ISN'T ANY!
There is no proof that Russia was trying to get Trump elected.
However, that doesn't mean they weren't interfering in our election.
You do understand there's a difference, right?
No real conservative would ever vote for Hillary under ANY circumstance, and I expect the same thing from the other side.The fact remains, Russia had nothing to do with the outcome of the election…
How did you establish that fact? Did you count how many people didn't vote for Hillary due to leaked emails?
The fact remains the Clintons are the most repugnant of people. If you consider all the candidates running for president this time around the number of conservatives outnumbered the progressives. That is why the EC works perfectly… Fact
There isn't even any evidence the Russians hacked anything.there is no hard evidence of exactly what their GOALS for hacking was.
And yet not one of them has provided this supposed proof to the Congress in fact they refused.But you believe in a flat earth.Russian hacking is the new flat Earth society.
The intel agencies, all of them, agree. You don't. Who cares?
based on what exactly?It's pretty ridiculous to say that voting machines were hacked - they aren't connected to the Internet.
But the Russians were certainly hacking the DNC's emails.
Well, Julian Assange SWEARS that Russians didn't do the hacking, nor was it any representative or agent of the Russian government. So what reason would he have to lie? I don't think it's a foregone conclusion the Russians hacked anything.
And you're right... voting machines are not connected online, so hacking them is virtually impossible. That doesn't stop the left from promoting the false narrative or the stupid sheep on the left who will simply believe it because they want to believe it.
He would lie because he wants to protect Wikileaks's reputation, which has taken a battering as it was seen as a tool for the Russian government.
Or he may genuinely believe it and doesn't know. We can be pretty certain that someone didn't call him and say "Hi. I'm from the Russian government. Do you want some stolen emails?" Russian intelligence is a wee bit more sophisticated than that.
There isn't even any evidence the Russians hacked anything.there is no hard evidence of exactly what their GOALS for hacking was.
Potential hacking occurred. An out-dated Ukrainian code was found on several computers but no proof that hacking occurred. that code can be downloaded off the internet and used by anyone today.
none of that is evidence that the Russians hacked anything.
And yet not one of them has provided this supposed proof to the Congress in fact they refused.But you believe in a flat earth.Russian hacking is the new flat Earth society.
The intel agencies, all of them, agree. You don't. Who cares?
The only one promoting false narratives here is you.
PROVE IT - AGAIN, SHOW THE DEFINITVE EVIDENCE. IF NOT, AGAIN, STFU. YOU HAVEN'T YET.
