On Truth Social trump demands to be reinstated...again

[Lastamender]

LOL

That's correct. It will end with this court.

They will deny certiorari, they will not explain why and you will continue crying, just as you have for more than 2 years now.

They cannot ignore what happened or they are guilty of the same crime. Think about it dumbass.

 

[Faun]

No it is not. Their job is to find a resolution on the facts at hand. That is why it is there. Are you worried?

LOLOLOLOL

You couldn't be more clueless. A lower court dismissed the case due to lack of standing and lack of merit. Before the case can be reviewed by all 9 justices, the court must first review the lower court's dismissal. If they deny cert, it's over. No explanation. No review by the full court.

 

[Lastamender]

Moron, there is no law which compelled them to break the law requiring certification on January 6th by holding a 10 day investigation.

There is a precedent. When precedents favor your side you are all over them. There was a 10 day investigation of a presidential election in the late 1800's. True or false?

 

[Delldude]

"A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution."

So you can't have a fraud of this magnitude unless you shitcan all the rules, laws and the constitution?

Where does He explicitly say He want's to terminate the constitution?

 

[Delldude]

LOL

Your derangement is funny. Who knows what you see in the Constitution that enables an entire Congress to be removed from office.

Where the hell you get that?

 

[Lastamender]

LOLOLOLOL

You couldn't be more clueless. A lower court dismissed the case due to lack of standing and lack of merit. Before the case can be reviewed by all 9 justices, the court must first review the lower court's dismissal. That can be done by the Chief Justice by simply denying cert. If he does that, itxs over. No explanation. No review by the full court.

No the court has to vote and if 4 justices say to take the case the Chief Justice ass sucks cottonwood and the case will be heard.

 

[Faun]

They cannot ignore what happened or they are guilty of the same crime. Think about it dumbass.

I thought about it.

You have still not shown a law which compelled Congress to hold a 10 day investigation.

You have still not shown where Congress can be sued because you don't like how they voted on a particular measure.

You have still not shown where the plaintiff has standing to sue on behalf of others.

You are still utterly clueless.

 

[Faun]

Where the hell you get that?

"118th" is Congress.

 

[Faun]

No the court has to vote and if 4 justices say to take the case the Chief Justice ass sucks cottonwood and the case will be heard.

You are correct, 4 justices can grant certiorari.

You have yet to offer any legally sound theory for why the lower court was wrong for dismissing the case due to lack of standing or lack of merit.

 

[Delldude]

Tell that to Delldude who's anticipating the unseating of the "118th."

No need to lie....so that's your MO?

When the 118th is seated, I anticipate whining from you and your cronies to rival a Cat 5 hurricane.

 

[Delldude]

"118th" is Congress.

No need to lie....so that's your MO?

When the 118th is seated, I anticipate whining from you and your cronies to rival a Cat 5 hurricane.

 

[Lastamender]

Moron, there is no law which compelled them to break the law requiring certification on January 6th by holding a 10 day investigation.

They did break the law by not investigating. This is about law not opinion. The Constitution guarantees free and fair elections. That did not happen. Every citizen has the standing to file the exact same suit. Rule of law.

 

[Lastamender]

I thought about it.

You have still not shown a law which compelled Congress to hold a 10 day investigation.

You have still not shown where Congress can be sued because you don't like how they voted on a particular measure.

You have still not shown where the plaintiff has standing to sue on behalf of others.

You are still utterly clueless.

Here are the facts. 147 members of Congress said fraud was very probable and taking the side of the Constitution they wanted to investigate. By voting not to investigate those members sided with the enemy. That is a violation of their oath of office. You do not take chances with our Constitution you make sure things are right. They decided our Constitution was not worthy of defense and they should pay for that.

Again rule of law. You seem not to value it one bit. Why is that traitor?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Under direction from a candidate ( the left's Man ) for president to eliminate another candidate or party from making counter claims is participating in the rigging of an election.

So, if FoxNews does not allow the Dem to come on their show and make a counter claim, then that is election rigging?

Is this really where you want to go with this?

Trump never said that, He said if you want to rig an election, why do we have laws, rules and a constitution for.

Try a little reading comprehension.

Trump's words....no matter how you spin it, he said it.


So, with the revelation of MASSIVE & WIDESPREAD FRAUD & DECEPTION in working closely with Big Tech Companies, the DNC, & the Democrat Party, do you throw the Presidential Election Results of 2020 OUT and declare the RIGHTFUL WINNER, or do you have a NEW ELECTION? A Massive Fraud of this type and magnitude allows for the termination of all rules, regulations, and articles, even those found in the Constitution. Our great “Founders” did not want, and would not condone, False & Fraudulent Elections!

 

[Delldude]

So, if FoxNews does not allow the Dem to come on their show and make a counter claim, then that is election rigging?

Is this really where you want to go with this?

Only problem here is Fox routinely has people from the left come on their shows and provide political discourse. That's where the term fair and balanced comes from. Brett Baier has a segment called 'Common Ground, weekly featuring opposing parties working together on issues.
All the other shows have the left on, many times they're afraid to answer for their views.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Only problem here is Fox routinely has people from the left come on their shows and provide political discourse. That's where the term fair and balanced comes from.

The term fair and balanced was always a joke.

But if all that is all it takes, then Twitter has lots of people from the right on it thus no rigging.

 

[Delldude]

The term fair and balanced was always a joke.

But if all that is all it takes, then Twitter has lots of people from the right on it thus no rigging.

You couldn't lower yourself to watch and find out for yourself, could you?

 

[Lastamender]

The term fair and balanced was always a joke.

But if all that is all it takes, then Twitter has lots of people from the right on it thus no rigging.

Fair is a word you should stay away from. Do you know what it means. Does it apply to the 2020 election?

 

[Lastamender]

You couldn't lower yourself to watch and find out for yourself, could you?

How can he go any lower?

 

[Delldude]

How can he go any lower?

I thought someone said he was an All American limbo exspurt, I could be wrong.