On Truth Social trump demands to be reinstated...again

[Lastamender]

I am not whining at all, I am enjoying you show how much you hate the Constitution



Then prove it.

I will be happy to wait.

Yeah ,maybe, but I did not violate my oath of office. 388 members of Congress did.

 

[Faun]

200 million people witnessed the vote. That is all the evidence needed.

As far as investigating every crime look at what they have done with Trump. You are an idiot.

And most of those 200 million believe the election was legit.

 

[Faun]

No, we know it was stolen and with all that is coming out that number is exploding.

LOL

No, you believe it was stolen. To know it was stolen requires you to have some proof it was and even you admitted there currently is none. Otherwise what you "know" is just a figment of your imagination.

And as you have demonstrated repeatedly on this forum, you are out of your fucking mind.

 

[Faun]

Yeah ,maybe, but I did not violate my oath of office. 388 members of Congress did.

And you will cry like the Karen you are when the SCOTUS upholds the lower court's ruling next month.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Yeah ,maybe, but I did not violate my oath of office. 388 members of Congress did.

Doubtful you have ever taken any oath of office, and 388 member of congress disagreeing with some pissant on the internet is not a violation of their oath

 

[Lastamender]

And most of those 200 million believe the election was legit.

Moot point, and no they don't. Your lie is over.

 

[Lastamender]

And you will cry like the Karen you are when the SCOTUS upholds the lower court's ruling next month.

No, I will expect a detailed explanation of why they did. But if they do I will never get that answer because they will have violated their oath of office also. That means the criminals and traitors have destroyed the Constitution

You people should just take the people who disagree with you out on the street and shoot them. Any decision than the more than obvious one will move country to closer to what I just said. I have no doubt it would happen if the criminals you support were given the chance.

 

[Faun]

Moot point, and no they don't. Your lie is over.

My claim was backed by polling. Something you could never accomplish.

 

[Lastamender]

Doubtful you have ever taken any oath of office, and 388 member of congress disagreeing with some pissant on the internet is not a violation of their oath

No, them disagreeing with the Constitution is the problem. Hack.

 

[Faun]

No, I will expect a detailed explanation of why they did. But if they do I will never get that answer because they will have violated their oath of office also. That means the criminals and traitors have destroyed the Constitution

You people should just take the people who disagree with you out on the street and shoot them. Any decision than the more than obvious one will move country to closer to what I just said. I have no doubt it would happen if the criminals you support were given the chance.

Nope. You're still citing yourself as the source of their criminality.

 

[Faun]

No, them disagreeing with the Constitution is the problem. Hack.

You lie again. They didn't disagree with the Constitution. They abided by it.

 

[Lastamender]

My claim was backed by polling. Something you could never accomplish.

All moot. The investigation was to defend the Constitution. They refused and violated their oat of office.

The founders were ahead of their time. The Constitution is self-cleaning.

 

[Lastamender]

Nope. You're still citing yourself as the source of their criminality.

How? You really are an idiot.

 

[Faun]

All moot. The investigation was to defend the Constitution. They refused and violated their oat of office.

The founders were ahead of their time. The Constitution is self-cleaning.

Nope. The investigation was a witch hunt to find fraud that didn't exist. 384 voted to avoid that nonsense.

 

[Lastamender]

You lie again. They didn't disagree with the Constitution. They abided by it.

Abided by it by not investigating a serious threat to it? Try again, dumbass.

 

[Faun]

How? You really are an idiot.

There's no evidence they went against the Constitution. YOU'RE saying they did based on YOUR opinion they did.

That's you, citing you.

Meaningless.

 

[Lastamender]

Nope. The investigation was a witch hunt to find fraud that didn't exist. 384 voted to avoid that nonsense.

Sorry. According to Constitution that is not how it works.

 

[Lastamender]

There's no evidence they went against the Constitution. YOU'RE saying they did based on YOUR opinion they did.

That's you, citing you.

Meaningless.

Yes, there is evidence. Their votes are the evidence. Again. you get dumber every day.

 

[Faun]

Abided by it by not investigating a serious threat to it? Try again, dumbass.

There was no serious threat. Again, you're citing yourself as your source.

Every state counted and canvassed their elections. Some recounted. Some audited. ALL certified. Just like other elections. That's not a serious threat. That's just YOU claiming it's a serious threat.

 

[Faun]

Sorry. According to Constitution that is not how it works.

Great, quote the Constitution stating there shall be a Congressional investigation prior to certifying the results...