and how many millions are these conservative lol fools spending and wasting?Haha, Carly Fiorina stated months ago that Clinton wouldn't be charged for any crime, so just keep on beating this dead horse.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
and how many millions are these conservative lol fools spending and wasting?Haha, Carly Fiorina stated months ago that Clinton wouldn't be charged for any crime, so just keep on beating this dead horse.
Ah, but there were laws regarding handling of classified information ever since Christ was a Corporal. About who is authorized to view or handle it. Say GOODBYE, Hillary.there was no law regarding email records until 2014 ... so nothing will happen.
Do you know what is the significance of "Classified Material" ?Ah, but there were laws regarding handling of classified information ever since Christ was a Corporal. About who is authorized to view or handle it. Say GOODBYE, Hillary.there was no law regarding email records until 2014 ... so nothing will happen.
President Obama the day before Thanksgiving signed a set of amendments to the 1950 Federal Records Act that modernize the definition of a federal record to include electronic documents.
H.R. 1233
electronic documents ... Madam President.
Do you know what is the significance of "Classified Material" ?Ah, but there were laws regarding handling of classified information ever since Christ was a Corporal. About who is authorized to view or handle it. Say GOODBYE, Hillary.there was no law regarding email records until 2014 ... so nothing will happen.
President Obama the day before Thanksgiving signed a set of amendments to the 1950 Federal Records Act that modernize the definition of a federal record to include electronic documents.
H.R. 1233
electronic documents ... Madam President.
How's that indictment coming along?
You keep bringing up "hearings", like they result in an indictment....How's that indictment coming along?
which one? the first 9 hearings or now?
LMAO
Oh my stars….what ever will we do?
Good to see you place partisan behavior above national security concerns...
She hasn’t been SoS in 4 years, they’ve been investigating the shite for nearly as long….if anything were to come out, it would be out by now. This is why I mock these threads.
Oh my stars….what ever will we do?
Good to see you place partisan behavior above national security concerns...
She hasn’t been SoS in 4 years, they’ve been investigating the shite for nearly as long….if anything were to come out, it would be out by now. This is why I mock these threads.
Given the FBI is investigating this, it would seem there is something rather significant here...
You keep bringing up "hearings", like they result in an indictment....How's that indictment coming along?
which one? the first 9 hearings or now?
LMAO
Any idiot knows the information used to bring an indictment is the result of a law-enforcement investigation, and THAT started when the FBI got ahold of her server (which her idiot IT people forgot to wipe)...
The FBI should be interviewing Hillary and making a decision pretty soon now, and from the information coming out, Hillary and the Democrats probably won't like what the FBI has to say...
I wonder what wingers will do when they don't charge her with anything. Should someone set up a suicide help hotline?
The FBI gets its opportunity to question Hillary Clinton, but Obama's hand-picked Atty General is doing her best to ensure the short leash is applied to Comey and the limits and restrictions are firmly in place.
Lynch is staying CONSTANTLY in Comey's back pocket, up to her neck in this investigation rather than allowing the investigation to go forward and be briefed of its findings at the end.
Is Hillary getting special political treatment? You better believe it:
"In a case like this you get one shot at the queen,” the source, who was not authorized to speak on the record, said referring to Clinton, the former secretary of state and current front-runner for the Democratic presidential nomination. “The pressures are enormous on the agents, as the case has to be airtight and perfect.”
Umm, who decides if you get 'one shot' at Hillary? Obviously Loretta Lynch. If it were anyone else the FBI would be free to call the person in for questioning as they saw fit, not any of this 'You get 1 shot' crap!
“This in an incredibly high stakes, high-wire act,” Hosko said. “Timing is of the essence, but being right is absolutely critical. Comey must be the one to make the case that the law has been broken and a prosecution is recommended.”
The stakes are high and the timing is critical NOT because of how Hillary's private server usage and extremely classified e-mails sent over unclassified means put national security in jeopardy - not that's not the primary focus at all. Hillary Clinton's freedom, her chance to be President, the entire democratic party's 2016 Presidential nomination / nominee is at stake. To hell with national security and what laws may have been broken - this is about high-stakes POLITICS, baby!
“The authority for these formal interview requests by the Bureau is granted by the Attorney General,” the source added."
This has led many to believe that a Grand Jury may have already met regarding this case. Usually subpoenas and immunity are not handed out for 'security reviews', as the State Department and the WH have called what's going on.
"High-profile names convicted of violating Section 1001 include Martha Stewart, as well as former CIA Director David Petraeus."
As experts have already outlined, what happened in this case far surpasses what led to Stewart and Patraeus being arrested.
Does that mean Hillary will be charged/convicted. Make no mistake about it, this FBI questioning is not going to be about 'Guilt' or 'Innocence' but rather if Hillary is charged with a crime or not. You can bet Loretta Lynch will insist on beig right there I nthe same room when Hillary is interviewed and will not hesitate to step in if she feels the need to do so for Hillary's sake. After all, before even being fully briefed on the facs both she and the WH declared Hillary was not the subject of an investigation and they saw no reason why she should / will be charged in the future.
Hillary's testimony, still, my not be as important as that of Pagliano:
"Former Clinton campaign staffer and State Department information technology specialist Bryan Pagliano, who installed Clinton’s private server, was granted immunity by the Justice Department and is cooperating with the FBI."
'One shot at the queen': FBI, AG intensify focus on Clinton email probe | Fox News
You keep bringing up "hearings", like they result in an indictment....How's that indictment coming along?
which one? the first 9 hearings or now?
LMAO
Any idiot knows the information used to bring an indictment is the result of a law-enforcement investigation, and THAT started when the FBI got ahold of her server (which her idiot IT people forgot to wipe)...
The FBI should be interviewing Hillary and making a decision pretty soon now, and from the information coming out, Hillary and the Democrats probably won't like what the FBI has to say...
if I were you Bert, I'd study up before you start calling other people idiots ....
Federal laws, or statutes, are created by the United States Congress to safeguard the citizens of this country. Some criminal acts are federal offenses only and must be prosecuted in U.S. District Court. Other criminal acts are offenses under both federal and state law; so, in those cases, federal and county attorneys must decide if the offender should be tried in U.S. District Court or state court.
you idiot.
if Gowdy had reason, he would have had Hillary in Federal Court so fast RWs wouldn't have had time to rub one off ...
Siete, before YOU call anyone an idiot perhaps YOU should study more.you idiot.
if Gowdy had reason, he would have had Hillary in Federal Court so fast RWs wouldn't have had time to rub one off ...
It has already been proven Hillary lied under oath...but she gets to say 'I forgot'. Funny how that didn't work out for Scooter Libby. Eric holder got to say, Ok - you got me. F* You' and he was never indicted for his proven 3 Felony counts of Perjury. Stewart and Patraeus didn't get such luxuries. Then again they weren't one of the protected political elitist royalty.Someone made a big deal that the interview wouldn't be conducted while under oath. Ask Martha Stewart or Scooter Libby, if that really matters.
Siete, before YOU call anyone an idiot perhaps YOU should study more.you idiot.
if Gowdy had reason, he would have had Hillary in Federal Court so fast RWs wouldn't have had time to rub one off ...
Gowdy / Congressional committees do NOT have prosecutorial Powers. If they did Ex-Obama hand-picked/protected US AG would be in jail right now for 3 Felony Counts of Perjury. Even the FBI can not simply investigate and drag Hillary into federal court. Even if the FBI finds evidence of criminal wrong-doing - as the 2nd federal judge has declared he has seen - Comey still has to ask Lynch, his boss, 'pretty please' call for a Grand Jury and indictments...and even THEN Lynch and Obama can say 'No'...as Obama did with Holder.
Bottom line: You're Wrong.
No, Gowdy can NOT have that done. The DOJ is responsible for calling the Special Prosecutor and Grand Jury.....you see how that worked out with Eric Holder.
They'll blame James Comey, of course, and say that he's just protecting Hillary.I wonder what wingers will do when they don't charge her with anything. Should someone set up a suicide help hotline?