Juan de Fuca
Gold Member
- May 24, 2016
- 3,254
- 452
The official uniform of the 2016 Trump election observer has been approved by Donald Trump
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More options
🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
OOPS! New App Allows Users To Remain ANONYMOUS…Defies Liberal Media Narrative…Shows TRUMP Winning
- Thread starter bripat9643
- Start date
Skylar
Diamond Member
- Jul 5, 2014
- 52,660
- 15,666
Yeah... Kinda funny how the word on the street doesn't jive with all these lib dem media polls. I've got family and friends across the country; and they've noticed the same thing. The establishment media polls show something totally different than the "man on the street" polls. Now how do you suppose they'll try and spin a Trump landslide victory in the popular vote, VS. a sweeping victory for Hillary amongst tha ElectoralCollege vote...?
Keep your powder dry boys; this could get very exciting.
Trump's losing. Badly. You can lie to yourself all you like. You can insulate yourself from anyone who disagrees with you. But the majority of the electorate isn't interested in the man.
HUGGY
I Post Because I Care
- Mar 24, 2009
- 33,748
- 3,883
But Trump's words are so easy to misinterpret because his mouth outruns his brain.More evidence that support for Trump is much stronger than what the media polls indicate. Big surprise there:
Whole Title: "OOPS! New App Allows Users To Remain ANONYMOUS…Defies Liberal Media Narrative…Shows TRUMP Winning BIG Over Crooked Hillary"
Funny what happens when liberals aren’t able to bully or shame someone they don’t agree with…
The results don’t read like any poll you’ve seen reported in the last weeks, but instead like they have been answered primarily by the most ardent Trump supporters.
Some Zip questions:
— ”New polls suggest Trump is getting crushed by Clinton. Do they reflect how you are going to vote?” Some 64% told Zip they would vote for Trump, compared to 36% for Clinton. In the latest Reuters/Ipsos poll, Clinton leads Trump, 42% to 36%.
— ”California, who you voting for?” Trump got 55%, compared to 45% for Clinton. In the latest Public Policy Institute of California poll, Clinton has a 16-point advantage over Trump, 46% to 30%.
After one week of the media defining what Trump really meant when he suggested 2nd Amendment supporters will defeat Hillary, here is how Americans really feel about Trump’s comments:
— “What do you honestly think Trump meant by saying “The 2nd amendment people can do something about Hillary? Vote against her? 63% Assassinate her 37%”
Militi insists his replies are a cross-section of voters in age, gender and geography. “These are the same results we saw when he (Trump) was in the primaries,” he says. He contends that most media polls are just flat-out wrong and that smartphone answers are the future.
Douglas Rivers, a Stanford University political science professor and chief scientist for YouGov, which conducts online polls with such partners as CBS and the Economist, disagrees. “What do they know about these people?” Rivers says. “We worry a lot about who we’re talking to.”
If Trump got 13.5 million primary votes then 37% or roughly 5 million believe Trump meant assassination. You think Trump suggesting killing Hillary to 5 million followers is a good thing?
He didn't recommend any such thing, douche bag.
He said he was just being sarcastic. Just funnin around. Meaning...he conceded that his comments COULD be misinterpreted. If you are going to be a Trumpbot do try to keep up.
In other words, he didn't recommend any such thing. Everyone's words can be misinterpreted, and the leftwing media is on a jihad to deliberately misinterpret everything Trump says.
June 13, 2016: "We're led by a man who is a very — look, we're led by a man that either is, is not tough, not smart, or he's got something else in mind,"
Nov. 24, 2015: “Now, the poor guy, you ought to see this guy, ‘Ah, I don’t know what I said, I don’t remember, I don’t remember, maybe that’s what I said,’”
Aug. 7, 2015: Megyn Kelly “gets out and she starts asking me all sorts of ridiculous questions … You could see there was blood coming out of her eyes, blood coming out of her wherever,"
I know it might be embarrassing but it would be funny to see him addressing the UN.
Trump DOES say some pretty stupid shit. The media is probably twisting his words but he DOES give them plenty to work with.
Skylar
Diamond Member
- Jul 5, 2014
- 52,660
- 15,666
Trump draws huge crowds everywhere he goes and Hillary has to pay people to come her rallies. Yeah, we're supposed to believe she's winning?
Laughing......now its the very concept of polling that's wrong because it doesn't ape what you've chosen to believe? Um, have you ever heard of comfirmation bias? Because you're living it.
Oh, and Zip is a strawpoll. And if those were even remotely accurate, Ron Paul would have been president for the last 12 years.
Skylar
Diamond Member
- Jul 5, 2014
- 52,660
- 15,666
Aren't you the retard who started a GoFundMe page to beat Ryan? How many of you tards scoffed at the post I made showing Ryan was ahead by 60 points in the polls?More evidence that support for Trump is much stronger than what the media polls indicate. Big surprise there:
Whole Title: "OOPS! New App Allows Users To Remain ANONYMOUS…Defies Liberal Media Narrative…Shows TRUMP Winning BIG Over Crooked Hillary"
Funny what happens when liberals aren’t able to bully or shame someone they don’t agree with…
The results don’t read like any poll you’ve seen reported in the last weeks, but instead like they have been answered primarily by the most ardent Trump supporters.
Some Zip questions:
— ”New polls suggest Trump is getting crushed by Clinton. Do they reflect how you are going to vote?” Some 64% told Zip they would vote for Trump, compared to 36% for Clinton. In the latest Reuters/Ipsos poll, Clinton leads Trump, 42% to 36%.
— ”California, who you voting for?” Trump got 55%, compared to 45% for Clinton. In the latest Public Policy Institute of California poll, Clinton has a 16-point advantage over Trump, 46% to 30%.
After one week of the media defining what Trump really meant when he suggested 2nd Amendment supporters will defeat Hillary, here is how Americans really feel about Trump’s comments:
— “What do you honestly think Trump meant by saying “The 2nd amendment people can do something about Hillary? Vote against her? 63% Assassinate her 37%”
Militi insists his replies are a cross-section of voters in age, gender and geography. “These are the same results we saw when he (Trump) was in the primaries,” he says. He contends that most media polls are just flat-out wrong and that smartphone answers are the future.
Douglas Rivers, a Stanford University political science professor and chief scientist for YouGov, which conducts online polls with such partners as CBS and the Economist, disagrees. “What do they know about these people?” Rivers says. “We worry a lot about who we’re talking to.”
And now you are doubling down on your stupidity in the mistaken bleef an app is more scientifically accurate than a poll? Really?
If your two brain cells are feeling so confident, why not take up candycorn's challenge?
Its the stink of desperation. They know what's up. They know Trump is losing. They want Trump to win. This disparity between what they want the world to be and what it is creates a cognitive dissonance and is quite uncomfortable.
So they turn to comfortable lies that sooth the dissonance and tell them that the world is what they want it to be.
Last edited:
bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,163
- 47,312
- Thread starter
- #66
More evidence that support for Trump is much stronger than what the media polls indicate. Big surprise there:
Whole Title: "OOPS! New App Allows Users To Remain ANONYMOUS…Defies Liberal Media Narrative…Shows TRUMP Winning BIG Over Crooked Hillary"
Funny what happens when liberals aren’t able to bully or shame someone they don’t agree with…
The results don’t read like any poll you’ve seen reported in the last weeks, but instead like they have been answered primarily by the most ardent Trump supporters.
Some Zip questions:
— ”New polls suggest Trump is getting crushed by Clinton. Do they reflect how you are going to vote?” Some 64% told Zip they would vote for Trump, compared to 36% for Clinton. In the latest Reuters/Ipsos poll, Clinton leads Trump, 42% to 36%.
— ”California, who you voting for?” Trump got 55%, compared to 45% for Clinton. In the latest Public Policy Institute of California poll, Clinton has a 16-point advantage over Trump, 46% to 30%.
After one week of the media defining what Trump really meant when he suggested 2nd Amendment supporters will defeat Hillary, here is how Americans really feel about Trump’s comments:
— “What do you honestly think Trump meant by saying “The 2nd amendment people can do something about Hillary? Vote against her? 63% Assassinate her 37%”
Militi insists his replies are a cross-section of voters in age, gender and geography. “These are the same results we saw when he (Trump) was in the primaries,” he says. He contends that most media polls are just flat-out wrong and that smartphone answers are the future.
Douglas Rivers, a Stanford University political science professor and chief scientist for YouGov, which conducts online polls with such partners as CBS and the Economist, disagrees. “What do they know about these people?” Rivers says. “We worry a lot about who we’re talking to.”
If Trump got 13.5 million primary votes then 37% or roughly 5 million believe Trump meant assassination. You think Trump suggesting killing Hillary to 5 million followers is a good thing?
He didn't recommend any such thing, douche bag.
He said he was just being sarcastic. Just funnin around. Meaning...he conceded that his comments COULD be misinterpreted. If you are going to be a Trumpbot do try to keep up.
In other words, he didn't recommend any such thing. Everyone's words can be misinterpreted, and the leftwing media is on a jihad to deliberately misinterpret everything Trump says.
Duh! The left and a hell of a lot of other folks.
The left and establishment Republicans - in other word, all the douche bags in the country.
bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,163
- 47,312
- Thread starter
- #67
Here's the official uniform for election observers approved by Hillary:The official uniform of the 2016 Trump election observer has been approved by Donald Trump
HUGGY
I Post Because I Care
- Mar 24, 2009
- 33,748
- 3,883
If Trump got 13.5 million primary votes then 37% or roughly 5 million believe Trump meant assassination. You think Trump suggesting killing Hillary to 5 million followers is a good thing?
He didn't recommend any such thing, douche bag.
He said he was just being sarcastic. Just funnin around. Meaning...he conceded that his comments COULD be misinterpreted. If you are going to be a Trumpbot do try to keep up.
In other words, he didn't recommend any such thing. Everyone's words can be misinterpreted, and the leftwing media is on a jihad to deliberately misinterpret everything Trump says.
Duh! The left and a hell of a lot of other folks.
The left and establishment Republicans - in other word, all the douche bags in the country.
Ya... But if he was as smart as he claims he would have kept his trap shut and not pissed off so many people.
HappyJoy
Platinum Member
- Apr 15, 2015
- 32,056
- 5,943
More evidence that support for Trump is much stronger than what the media polls indicate. Big surprise there:
Whole Title: "OOPS! New App Allows Users To Remain ANONYMOUS…Defies Liberal Media Narrative…Shows TRUMP Winning BIG Over Crooked Hillary"
Funny what happens when liberals aren’t able to bully or shame someone they don’t agree with…
The results don’t read like any poll you’ve seen reported in the last weeks, but instead like they have been answered primarily by the most ardent Trump supporters.
Some Zip questions:
— ”New polls suggest Trump is getting crushed by Clinton. Do they reflect how you are going to vote?” Some 64% told Zip they would vote for Trump, compared to 36% for Clinton. In the latest Reuters/Ipsos poll, Clinton leads Trump, 42% to 36%.
— ”California, who you voting for?” Trump got 55%, compared to 45% for Clinton. In the latest Public Policy Institute of California poll, Clinton has a 16-point advantage over Trump, 46% to 30%.
After one week of the media defining what Trump really meant when he suggested 2nd Amendment supporters will defeat Hillary, here is how Americans really feel about Trump’s comments:
— “What do you honestly think Trump meant by saying “The 2nd amendment people can do something about Hillary? Vote against her? 63% Assassinate her 37%”
Militi insists his replies are a cross-section of voters in age, gender and geography. “These are the same results we saw when he (Trump) was in the primaries,” he says. He contends that most media polls are just flat-out wrong and that smartphone answers are the future.
Douglas Rivers, a Stanford University political science professor and chief scientist for YouGov, which conducts online polls with such partners as CBS and the Economist, disagrees. “What do they know about these people?” Rivers says. “We worry a lot about who we’re talking to.”
I just wanted to say thank you. You're sputtering meltdown threads are entertaining.
bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,163
- 47,312
- Thread starter
- #70
You have a vivid imagination.More evidence that support for Trump is much stronger than what the media polls indicate. Big surprise there:
Whole Title: "OOPS! New App Allows Users To Remain ANONYMOUS…Defies Liberal Media Narrative…Shows TRUMP Winning BIG Over Crooked Hillary"
Funny what happens when liberals aren’t able to bully or shame someone they don’t agree with…
The results don’t read like any poll you’ve seen reported in the last weeks, but instead like they have been answered primarily by the most ardent Trump supporters.
Some Zip questions:
— ”New polls suggest Trump is getting crushed by Clinton. Do they reflect how you are going to vote?” Some 64% told Zip they would vote for Trump, compared to 36% for Clinton. In the latest Reuters/Ipsos poll, Clinton leads Trump, 42% to 36%.
— ”California, who you voting for?” Trump got 55%, compared to 45% for Clinton. In the latest Public Policy Institute of California poll, Clinton has a 16-point advantage over Trump, 46% to 30%.
After one week of the media defining what Trump really meant when he suggested 2nd Amendment supporters will defeat Hillary, here is how Americans really feel about Trump’s comments:
— “What do you honestly think Trump meant by saying “The 2nd amendment people can do something about Hillary? Vote against her? 63% Assassinate her 37%”
Militi insists his replies are a cross-section of voters in age, gender and geography. “These are the same results we saw when he (Trump) was in the primaries,” he says. He contends that most media polls are just flat-out wrong and that smartphone answers are the future.
Douglas Rivers, a Stanford University political science professor and chief scientist for YouGov, which conducts online polls with such partners as CBS and the Economist, disagrees. “What do they know about these people?” Rivers says. “We worry a lot about who we’re talking to.”
I just wanted to say thank you. You're sputtering meltdown threads are entertaining.
You're a good little Hillary stooge.
Norman
Diamond Member
- Sep 24, 2010
- 31,254
- 15,182
More evidence that support for Trump is much stronger than what the media polls indicate. Big surprise there:
Whole Title: "OOPS! New App Allows Users To Remain ANONYMOUS…Defies Liberal Media Narrative…Shows TRUMP Winning BIG Over Crooked Hillary"
Funny what happens when liberals aren’t able to bully or shame someone they don’t agree with…
The results don’t read like any poll you’ve seen reported in the last weeks, but instead like they have been answered primarily by the most ardent Trump supporters.
Some Zip questions:
— ”New polls suggest Trump is getting crushed by Clinton. Do they reflect how you are going to vote?” Some 64% told Zip they would vote for Trump, compared to 36% for Clinton. In the latest Reuters/Ipsos poll, Clinton leads Trump, 42% to 36%.
— ”California, who you voting for?” Trump got 55%, compared to 45% for Clinton. In the latest Public Policy Institute of California poll, Clinton has a 16-point advantage over Trump, 46% to 30%.
After one week of the media defining what Trump really meant when he suggested 2nd Amendment supporters will defeat Hillary, here is how Americans really feel about Trump’s comments:
— “What do you honestly think Trump meant by saying “The 2nd amendment people can do something about Hillary? Vote against her? 63% Assassinate her 37%”
Militi insists his replies are a cross-section of voters in age, gender and geography. “These are the same results we saw when he (Trump) was in the primaries,” he says. He contends that most media polls are just flat-out wrong and that smartphone answers are the future.
Douglas Rivers, a Stanford University political science professor and chief scientist for YouGov, which conducts online polls with such partners as CBS and the Economist, disagrees. “What do they know about these people?” Rivers says. “We worry a lot about who we’re talking to.”
The presidential election reminds me so much of the Brexit vote. I am sure they will have some democrats murdered to paint Trump as a Nazi...
Not that there haven't been democrats near Hillary vanishing already.
Political Junky
Gold Member
- May 27, 2009
- 25,793
- 3,990
OMG, shades of 2012 & the cons celebrating a Romney win.More evidence that support for Trump is much stronger than what the media polls indicate. Big surprise there:
Whole Title: "OOPS! New App Allows Users To Remain ANONYMOUS…Defies Liberal Media Narrative…Shows TRUMP Winning BIG Over Crooked Hillary"
Funny what happens when liberals aren’t able to bully or shame someone they don’t agree with…
The results don’t read like any poll you’ve seen reported in the last weeks, but instead like they have been answered primarily by the most ardent Trump supporters.
Some Zip questions:
— ”New polls suggest Trump is getting crushed by Clinton. Do they reflect how you are going to vote?” Some 64% told Zip they would vote for Trump, compared to 36% for Clinton. In the latest Reuters/Ipsos poll, Clinton leads Trump, 42% to 36%.
— ”California, who you voting for?” Trump got 55%, compared to 45% for Clinton. In the latest Public Policy Institute of California poll, Clinton has a 16-point advantage over Trump, 46% to 30%.
After one week of the media defining what Trump really meant when he suggested 2nd Amendment supporters will defeat Hillary, here is how Americans really feel about Trump’s comments:
— “What do you honestly think Trump meant by saying “The 2nd amendment people can do something about Hillary? Vote against her? 63% Assassinate her 37%”
Militi insists his replies are a cross-section of voters in age, gender and geography. “These are the same results we saw when he (Trump) was in the primaries,” he says. He contends that most media polls are just flat-out wrong and that smartphone answers are the future.
Douglas Rivers, a Stanford University political science professor and chief scientist for YouGov, which conducts online polls with such partners as CBS and the Economist, disagrees. “What do they know about these people?” Rivers says. “We worry a lot about who we’re talking to.”
S.J.
Platinum Member
- Nov 28, 2012
- 37,666
- 7,629
Yep.More evidence that support for Trump is much stronger than what the media polls indicate. Big surprise there:
Whole Title: "OOPS! New App Allows Users To Remain ANONYMOUS…Defies Liberal Media Narrative…Shows TRUMP Winning BIG Over Crooked Hillary"
Funny what happens when liberals aren’t able to bully or shame someone they don’t agree with…
The results don’t read like any poll you’ve seen reported in the last weeks, but instead like they have been answered primarily by the most ardent Trump supporters.
Some Zip questions:
— ”New polls suggest Trump is getting crushed by Clinton. Do they reflect how you are going to vote?” Some 64% told Zip they would vote for Trump, compared to 36% for Clinton. In the latest Reuters/Ipsos poll, Clinton leads Trump, 42% to 36%.
— ”California, who you voting for?” Trump got 55%, compared to 45% for Clinton. In the latest Public Policy Institute of California poll, Clinton has a 16-point advantage over Trump, 46% to 30%.
After one week of the media defining what Trump really meant when he suggested 2nd Amendment supporters will defeat Hillary, here is how Americans really feel about Trump’s comments:
— “What do you honestly think Trump meant by saying “The 2nd amendment people can do something about Hillary? Vote against her? 63% Assassinate her 37%”
Militi insists his replies are a cross-section of voters in age, gender and geography. “These are the same results we saw when he (Trump) was in the primaries,” he says. He contends that most media polls are just flat-out wrong and that smartphone answers are the future.
Douglas Rivers, a Stanford University political science professor and chief scientist for YouGov, which conducts online polls with such partners as CBS and the Economist, disagrees. “What do they know about these people?” Rivers says. “We worry a lot about who we’re talking to.”
The presidential election reminds me so much of the Brexit vote. I am sure they will have some democrats murdered to paint Trump as a Nazi...
Not that there haven't been democrats near Hillary vanishing already.
Assange implies murdered DNC staffer was WikiLeaks' source | Fox News
owebo
Gold Member
- Jul 4, 2016
- 18,638
- 2,011
America really wouldn't be the same without you uneducated idiots among us...and why isnt Hillary campaigning every day? oh, forgot, she needs her two day long naps twice a week, and can never be woken up at 3am cause of her many ailments
Clinton could phone it in until election day and still whoop Donnie's ass.
jon_berzerk
Platinum Member
- Mar 5, 2013
- 31,401
- 7,369
and keep in mind, average Hillary crowd is 300,,,150 of those paid 50.00 and a choice between a 36pack of condoms or 100.00 KFC gift certificate
the other 150 being leftist media outlets
--LOL
owebo
Gold Member
- Jul 4, 2016
- 18,638
- 2,011
There will be a lot of democrats voting for Trump....unfortunately....The official uniform of the 2016 Trump election observer has been approved by Donald Trump
TheGreatGatsby
Gold Member
- Mar 27, 2012
- 24,433
- 3,103
Yup. Dems have been buying presidential elections since 08. 12 was blatant. 16 will be too. Nobody likes HIllary. She's an f'ing felon. Americans want that? No.
BULLDOG
Diamond Member
- Jun 3, 2014
- 95,883
- 31,931
and why isnt Hillary campaigning every day? oh, forgot, she needs her two day long naps twice a week, and can never be woken up at 3am cause of her many ailments
One thing I know, no one at work dares to admit the support Trump, but I hear libs all the time talking about how much they hate him. You get the distinct feeling that your job would be at risk if you admitted to being a Trump supporter.
Probably be at risk if you started saying the world was flat too. Hard to keep an employee around if they just can't accept reality.
owebo
Gold Member
- Jul 4, 2016
- 18,638
- 2,011
You mean like MMGW?and why isnt Hillary campaigning every day? oh, forgot, she needs her two day long naps twice a week, and can never be woken up at 3am cause of her many ailments
One thing I know, no one at work dares to admit the support Trump, but I hear libs all the time talking about how much they hate him. You get the distinct feeling that your job would be at risk if you admitted to being a Trump supporter.
Probably be at risk if you started saying the world was flat too. Hard to keep an employee around if they just can't accept reality.
AvgGuyIA
Gold Member
- Feb 5, 2010
- 17,363
- 2,893
Did you know the KKK was started by the Democrats? Learn your history.The official uniform of the 2016 Trump election observer has been approved by Donald Trump
Similar threads
- Replies
- 44
- Views
- 331
- Replies
- 14
- Views
- 1K
- Replies
- 26
- Views
- 2K
- Replies
- 108
- Views
- 2K
- Replies
- 20
- Views
- 500
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 9
- Views
- 67
- Replies
- 71
- Views
- 362
- Replies
- 37
- Views
- 111
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8473
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 481
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-