OOPS! New App Allows Users To Remain ANONYMOUS…Defies Liberal Media Narrative…Shows TRUMP Winning

[oreo]

More evidence that support for Trump is much stronger than what the media polls indicate. Big surprise there:

OOPS! New App Allows Users To Remain ANONYMOUS...Defies Liberal Media Narrative...Shows TRUMP Winning BIG Over Crooked Hillary » 100percentfedUp.com​

Whole Title: "OOPS! New App Allows Users To Remain ANONYMOUS…Defies Liberal Media Narrative…Shows TRUMP Winning BIG Over Crooked Hillary"

Funny what happens when liberals aren’t able to bully or shame someone they don’t agree with…

The results don’t read like any poll you’ve seen reported in the last weeks, but instead like they have been answered primarily by the most ardent Trump supporters.

Some Zip questions:

— ”New polls suggest Trump is getting crushed by Clinton. Do they reflect how you are going to vote?” Some 64% told Zip they would vote for Trump, compared to 36% for Clinton. In the latest Reuters/Ipsos poll, Clinton leads Trump, 42% to 36%.

— ”California, who you voting for?” Trump got 55%, compared to 45% for Clinton. In the latest Public Policy Institute of California poll, Clinton has a 16-point advantage over Trump, 46% to 30%.

After one week of the media defining what Trump really meant when he suggested 2nd Amendment supporters will defeat Hillary, here is how Americans really feel about Trump’s comments:

— “What do you honestly think Trump meant by saying “The 2nd amendment people can do something about Hillary? Vote against her? 63% Assassinate her 37%”

Militi insists his replies are a cross-section of voters in age, gender and geography. “These are the same results we saw when he (Trump) was in the primaries,” he says. He contends that most media polls are just flat-out wrong and that smartphone answers are the future.

Douglas Rivers, a Stanford University political science professor and chief scientist for YouGov, which conducts online polls with such partners as CBS and the Economist, disagrees. “What do they know about these people?” Rivers says. “We worry a lot about who we’re talking to.”​

Well you can continue to grasp at worthless data such as this. Online--Anonymous polls are worthless because you've probably got every Trump supporter pushing the same button a thousand times over.

Hillary Clinton has pulled adds in several battleground states, because they're internal polling data is showing her ahead by double digits. This money is now moving into RED states that are in play, like Nevada, Arizona & Utah.
Clinton campaign pulls ads from Colorado
Clinton pauses ads in Virginia in sign of confidence
Clinton campaign halts ads in two battleground states
Confident Clinton Pulling Ads, as the Trump Train Goes Off the Rails | RedState

In fact, Trump is losing states that Romney won.
Trump is losing all 10 of the states with the closest results in 2012

Hillary Clinton will most certainly be the next President of the United States, and the way it is going right now, with another 90 days prior to the election, she may be the 1st President in the history of this nation that wins all 50 states.

You Wanted Trump, You’ve Got Him | The American Spectator

This is why all your Reich wing talk show hosts are in full throttle melt down right now.

 

[bripat9643]

More evidence that support for Trump is much stronger than what the media polls indicate. Big surprise there:

OOPS! New App Allows Users To Remain ANONYMOUS...Defies Liberal Media Narrative...Shows TRUMP Winning BIG Over Crooked Hillary » 100percentfedUp.com​

Whole Title: "OOPS! New App Allows Users To Remain ANONYMOUS…Defies Liberal Media Narrative…Shows TRUMP Winning BIG Over Crooked Hillary"

Funny what happens when liberals aren’t able to bully or shame someone they don’t agree with…

The results don’t read like any poll you’ve seen reported in the last weeks, but instead like they have been answered primarily by the most ardent Trump supporters.

Some Zip questions:

— ”New polls suggest Trump is getting crushed by Clinton. Do they reflect how you are going to vote?” Some 64% told Zip they would vote for Trump, compared to 36% for Clinton. In the latest Reuters/Ipsos poll, Clinton leads Trump, 42% to 36%.

— ”California, who you voting for?” Trump got 55%, compared to 45% for Clinton. In the latest Public Policy Institute of California poll, Clinton has a 16-point advantage over Trump, 46% to 30%.

After one week of the media defining what Trump really meant when he suggested 2nd Amendment supporters will defeat Hillary, here is how Americans really feel about Trump’s comments:

— “What do you honestly think Trump meant by saying “The 2nd amendment people can do something about Hillary? Vote against her? 63% Assassinate her 37%”

Militi insists his replies are a cross-section of voters in age, gender and geography. “These are the same results we saw when he (Trump) was in the primaries,” he says. He contends that most media polls are just flat-out wrong and that smartphone answers are the future.

Douglas Rivers, a Stanford University political science professor and chief scientist for YouGov, which conducts online polls with such partners as CBS and the Economist, disagrees. “What do they know about these people?” Rivers says. “We worry a lot about who we’re talking to.”​

It's hilarious that Trump supporters want to be fooled into thinking he is winning. Hilarious. If Hillary was losing - I would want to know it truthfully.

We all know that you would lie, lie, lie because that's what lefties always do.

 

[bripat9643]

More evidence that support for Trump is much stronger than what the media polls indicate. Big surprise there:

OOPS! New App Allows Users To Remain ANONYMOUS...Defies Liberal Media Narrative...Shows TRUMP Winning BIG Over Crooked Hillary » 100percentfedUp.com​

Whole Title: "OOPS! New App Allows Users To Remain ANONYMOUS…Defies Liberal Media Narrative…Shows TRUMP Winning BIG Over Crooked Hillary"

Funny what happens when liberals aren’t able to bully or shame someone they don’t agree with…

The results don’t read like any poll you’ve seen reported in the last weeks, but instead like they have been answered primarily by the most ardent Trump supporters.

Some Zip questions:

— ”New polls suggest Trump is getting crushed by Clinton. Do they reflect how you are going to vote?” Some 64% told Zip they would vote for Trump, compared to 36% for Clinton. In the latest Reuters/Ipsos poll, Clinton leads Trump, 42% to 36%.

— ”California, who you voting for?” Trump got 55%, compared to 45% for Clinton. In the latest Public Policy Institute of California poll, Clinton has a 16-point advantage over Trump, 46% to 30%.

After one week of the media defining what Trump really meant when he suggested 2nd Amendment supporters will defeat Hillary, here is how Americans really feel about Trump’s comments:

— “What do you honestly think Trump meant by saying “The 2nd amendment people can do something about Hillary? Vote against her? 63% Assassinate her 37%”

Militi insists his replies are a cross-section of voters in age, gender and geography. “These are the same results we saw when he (Trump) was in the primaries,” he says. He contends that most media polls are just flat-out wrong and that smartphone answers are the future.

Douglas Rivers, a Stanford University political science professor and chief scientist for YouGov, which conducts online polls with such partners as CBS and the Economist, disagrees. “What do they know about these people?” Rivers says. “We worry a lot about who we’re talking to.”​

Are you dumb enough to actually believe this or does reading it make you feel better?

How much does Hillary pay you to suck her asshole?

How much do the Koch Brothers pay you?

Apparently Hillary didn't tell you that the Koch brothers aren't supporting Trump.

 

[bripat9643]

More evidence that support for Trump is much stronger than what the media polls indicate. Big surprise there:

OOPS! New App Allows Users To Remain ANONYMOUS...Defies Liberal Media Narrative...Shows TRUMP Winning BIG Over Crooked Hillary » 100percentfedUp.com​

Whole Title: "OOPS! New App Allows Users To Remain ANONYMOUS…Defies Liberal Media Narrative…Shows TRUMP Winning BIG Over Crooked Hillary"

Funny what happens when liberals aren’t able to bully or shame someone they don’t agree with…

The results don’t read like any poll you’ve seen reported in the last weeks, but instead like they have been answered primarily by the most ardent Trump supporters.

Some Zip questions:

— ”New polls suggest Trump is getting crushed by Clinton. Do they reflect how you are going to vote?” Some 64% told Zip they would vote for Trump, compared to 36% for Clinton. In the latest Reuters/Ipsos poll, Clinton leads Trump, 42% to 36%.

— ”California, who you voting for?” Trump got 55%, compared to 45% for Clinton. In the latest Public Policy Institute of California poll, Clinton has a 16-point advantage over Trump, 46% to 30%.

After one week of the media defining what Trump really meant when he suggested 2nd Amendment supporters will defeat Hillary, here is how Americans really feel about Trump’s comments:

— “What do you honestly think Trump meant by saying “The 2nd amendment people can do something about Hillary? Vote against her? 63% Assassinate her 37%”

Militi insists his replies are a cross-section of voters in age, gender and geography. “These are the same results we saw when he (Trump) was in the primaries,” he says. He contends that most media polls are just flat-out wrong and that smartphone answers are the future.

Douglas Rivers, a Stanford University political science professor and chief scientist for YouGov, which conducts online polls with such partners as CBS and the Economist, disagrees. “What do they know about these people?” Rivers says. “We worry a lot about who we’re talking to.”​

Well you can continue to grasp at worthless data such as this. Online--Anonymous polls are worthless because you've probably got every Trump supporter pushing the same button a thousand times over.

Hillary Clinton has pulled adds in several battleground states, because they're internal polling data is showing her ahead by double digits. This money is now moving into RED states that are in play, like Nevada, Arizona & Utah.
Clinton campaign pulls ads from Colorado
Clinton pauses ads in Virginia in sign of confidence
Clinton campaign halts ads in two battleground states
Confident Clinton Pulling Ads, as the Trump Train Goes Off the Rails | RedState

In fact, Trump is losing states that Romney won.
Trump is losing all 10 of the states with the closest results in 2012

Hillary Clinton will most certainly be the next President of the United States, and the way it is going right now, with another 90 days prior to the election, she may be the 1st President in the history of this nation that wins all 50 states.

You Wanted Trump, You’ve Got Him | The American Spectator

This is why all your Reich wing talk show hosts are in full throttle melt down right now.

It will be more like this:

 

[Maryland Patriot]

I just want to go on record to say that all along I have been saying it would be Hillary.
She was promised the position.

 

[Flopper]

More evidence that support for Trump is much stronger than what the media polls indicate. Big surprise there:

OOPS! New App Allows Users To Remain ANONYMOUS...Defies Liberal Media Narrative...Shows TRUMP Winning BIG Over Crooked Hillary » 100percentfedUp.com​

Whole Title: "OOPS! New App Allows Users To Remain ANONYMOUS…Defies Liberal Media Narrative…Shows TRUMP Winning BIG Over Crooked Hillary"

Funny what happens when liberals aren’t able to bully or shame someone they don’t agree with…

The results don’t read like any poll you’ve seen reported in the last weeks, but instead like they have been answered primarily by the most ardent Trump supporters.

Some Zip questions:

— ”New polls suggest Trump is getting crushed by Clinton. Do they reflect how you are going to vote?” Some 64% told Zip they would vote for Trump, compared to 36% for Clinton. In the latest Reuters/Ipsos poll, Clinton leads Trump, 42% to 36%.

— ”California, who you voting for?” Trump got 55%, compared to 45% for Clinton. In the latest Public Policy Institute of California poll, Clinton has a 16-point advantage over Trump, 46% to 30%.

After one week of the media defining what Trump really meant when he suggested 2nd Amendment supporters will defeat Hillary, here is how Americans really feel about Trump’s comments:

— “What do you honestly think Trump meant by saying “The 2nd amendment people can do something about Hillary? Vote against her? 63% Assassinate her 37%”

Militi insists his replies are a cross-section of voters in age, gender and geography. “These are the same results we saw when he (Trump) was in the primaries,” he says. He contends that most media polls are just flat-out wrong and that smartphone answers are the future.

Douglas Rivers, a Stanford University political science professor and chief scientist for YouGov, which conducts online polls with such partners as CBS and the Economist, disagrees. “What do they know about these people?” Rivers says. “We worry a lot about who we’re talking to.”​

First the primaries were rigged then the convention, was rigged, then the election is rigged and now polls are rigged. Poor Donald. He keeps seeing conspiracies everywhere he looks.

 

[Maryland Patriot]

More evidence that support for Trump is much stronger than what the media polls indicate. Big surprise there:

OOPS! New App Allows Users To Remain ANONYMOUS...Defies Liberal Media Narrative...Shows TRUMP Winning BIG Over Crooked Hillary » 100percentfedUp.com​

Whole Title: "OOPS! New App Allows Users To Remain ANONYMOUS…Defies Liberal Media Narrative…Shows TRUMP Winning BIG Over Crooked Hillary"

Funny what happens when liberals aren’t able to bully or shame someone they don’t agree with…

The results don’t read like any poll you’ve seen reported in the last weeks, but instead like they have been answered primarily by the most ardent Trump supporters.

Some Zip questions:

— ”New polls suggest Trump is getting crushed by Clinton. Do they reflect how you are going to vote?” Some 64% told Zip they would vote for Trump, compared to 36% for Clinton. In the latest Reuters/Ipsos poll, Clinton leads Trump, 42% to 36%.

— ”California, who you voting for?” Trump got 55%, compared to 45% for Clinton. In the latest Public Policy Institute of California poll, Clinton has a 16-point advantage over Trump, 46% to 30%.

After one week of the media defining what Trump really meant when he suggested 2nd Amendment supporters will defeat Hillary, here is how Americans really feel about Trump’s comments:

— “What do you honestly think Trump meant by saying “The 2nd amendment people can do something about Hillary? Vote against her? 63% Assassinate her 37%”

Militi insists his replies are a cross-section of voters in age, gender and geography. “These are the same results we saw when he (Trump) was in the primaries,” he says. He contends that most media polls are just flat-out wrong and that smartphone answers are the future.

Douglas Rivers, a Stanford University political science professor and chief scientist for YouGov, which conducts online polls with such partners as CBS and the Economist, disagrees. “What do they know about these people?” Rivers says. “We worry a lot about who we’re talking to.”​

It's hilarious that Trump supporters want to be fooled into thinking he is winning. Hilarious. If Hillary was losing - I would want to know it truthfully.

Trump cant win. It was promised to hillary.
Just consider Trump the Indians and Hillary the Americans, the office of president is equal to the Indians land and dignity. Just like the Indians, Trump is in for a major ass whooping.

 

[Flopper]

More evidence that support for Trump is much stronger than what the media polls indicate. Big surprise there:

OOPS! New App Allows Users To Remain ANONYMOUS...Defies Liberal Media Narrative...Shows TRUMP Winning BIG Over Crooked Hillary » 100percentfedUp.com​

Whole Title: "OOPS! New App Allows Users To Remain ANONYMOUS…Defies Liberal Media Narrative…Shows TRUMP Winning BIG Over Crooked Hillary"

Funny what happens when liberals aren’t able to bully or shame someone they don’t agree with…

The results don’t read like any poll you’ve seen reported in the last weeks, but instead like they have been answered primarily by the most ardent Trump supporters.

Some Zip questions:

— ”New polls suggest Trump is getting crushed by Clinton. Do they reflect how you are going to vote?” Some 64% told Zip they would vote for Trump, compared to 36% for Clinton. In the latest Reuters/Ipsos poll, Clinton leads Trump, 42% to 36%.

— ”California, who you voting for?” Trump got 55%, compared to 45% for Clinton. In the latest Public Policy Institute of California poll, Clinton has a 16-point advantage over Trump, 46% to 30%.

After one week of the media defining what Trump really meant when he suggested 2nd Amendment supporters will defeat Hillary, here is how Americans really feel about Trump’s comments:

— “What do you honestly think Trump meant by saying “The 2nd amendment people can do something about Hillary? Vote against her? 63% Assassinate her 37%”

Militi insists his replies are a cross-section of voters in age, gender and geography. “These are the same results we saw when he (Trump) was in the primaries,” he says. He contends that most media polls are just flat-out wrong and that smartphone answers are the future.

Douglas Rivers, a Stanford University political science professor and chief scientist for YouGov, which conducts online polls with such partners as CBS and the Economist, disagrees. “What do they know about these people?” Rivers says. “We worry a lot about who we’re talking to.”​

Well you can continue to grasp at worthless data such as this. Online--Anonymous polls are worthless because you've probably got every Trump supporter pushing the same button a thousand times over.

Hillary Clinton has pulled adds in several battleground states, because they're internal polling data is showing her ahead by double digits. This money is now moving into RED states that are in play, like Nevada, Arizona & Utah.
Clinton campaign pulls ads from Colorado
Clinton pauses ads in Virginia in sign of confidence
Clinton campaign halts ads in two battleground states
Confident Clinton Pulling Ads, as the Trump Train Goes Off the Rails | RedState

In fact, Trump is losing states that Romney won.
Trump is losing all 10 of the states with the closest results in 2012

Hillary Clinton will most certainly be the next President of the United States, and the way it is going right now, with another 90 days prior to the election, she may be the 1st President in the history of this nation that wins all 50 states.

You Wanted Trump, You’ve Got Him | The American Spectator

This is why all your Reich wing talk show hosts are in full throttle melt down right now.

Nope. He looses Arizona and Georgia and maybe South Carolina.

 

[bripat9643]

More evidence that support for Trump is much stronger than what the media polls indicate. Big surprise there:

OOPS! New App Allows Users To Remain ANONYMOUS...Defies Liberal Media Narrative...Shows TRUMP Winning BIG Over Crooked Hillary » 100percentfedUp.com​

Whole Title: "OOPS! New App Allows Users To Remain ANONYMOUS…Defies Liberal Media Narrative…Shows TRUMP Winning BIG Over Crooked Hillary"

Funny what happens when liberals aren’t able to bully or shame someone they don’t agree with…

The results don’t read like any poll you’ve seen reported in the last weeks, but instead like they have been answered primarily by the most ardent Trump supporters.

Some Zip questions:

— ”New polls suggest Trump is getting crushed by Clinton. Do they reflect how you are going to vote?” Some 64% told Zip they would vote for Trump, compared to 36% for Clinton. In the latest Reuters/Ipsos poll, Clinton leads Trump, 42% to 36%.

— ”California, who you voting for?” Trump got 55%, compared to 45% for Clinton. In the latest Public Policy Institute of California poll, Clinton has a 16-point advantage over Trump, 46% to 30%.

After one week of the media defining what Trump really meant when he suggested 2nd Amendment supporters will defeat Hillary, here is how Americans really feel about Trump’s comments:

— “What do you honestly think Trump meant by saying “The 2nd amendment people can do something about Hillary? Vote against her? 63% Assassinate her 37%”

Militi insists his replies are a cross-section of voters in age, gender and geography. “These are the same results we saw when he (Trump) was in the primaries,” he says. He contends that most media polls are just flat-out wrong and that smartphone answers are the future.

Douglas Rivers, a Stanford University political science professor and chief scientist for YouGov, which conducts online polls with such partners as CBS and the Economist, disagrees. “What do they know about these people?” Rivers says. “We worry a lot about who we’re talking to.”​

First the primaries were rigged then the convention, was rigged, then the election is rigged and now polls are rigged. Poor Donald. He keeps seeing conspiracies everywhere he looks.

He understand who thoroughly corrupt the establishment is.

 

[Vastator]

More evidence that support for Trump is much stronger than what the media polls indicate. Big surprise there:

OOPS! New App Allows Users To Remain ANONYMOUS...Defies Liberal Media Narrative...Shows TRUMP Winning BIG Over Crooked Hillary » 100percentfedUp.com​

Whole Title: "OOPS! New App Allows Users To Remain ANONYMOUS…Defies Liberal Media Narrative…Shows TRUMP Winning BIG Over Crooked Hillary"

Funny what happens when liberals aren’t able to bully or shame someone they don’t agree with…

The results don’t read like any poll you’ve seen reported in the last weeks, but instead like they have been answered primarily by the most ardent Trump supporters.

Some Zip questions:

— ”New polls suggest Trump is getting crushed by Clinton. Do they reflect how you are going to vote?” Some 64% told Zip they would vote for Trump, compared to 36% for Clinton. In the latest Reuters/Ipsos poll, Clinton leads Trump, 42% to 36%.

— ”California, who you voting for?” Trump got 55%, compared to 45% for Clinton. In the latest Public Policy Institute of California poll, Clinton has a 16-point advantage over Trump, 46% to 30%.

After one week of the media defining what Trump really meant when he suggested 2nd Amendment supporters will defeat Hillary, here is how Americans really feel about Trump’s comments:

— “What do you honestly think Trump meant by saying “The 2nd amendment people can do something about Hillary? Vote against her? 63% Assassinate her 37%”

Militi insists his replies are a cross-section of voters in age, gender and geography. “These are the same results we saw when he (Trump) was in the primaries,” he says. He contends that most media polls are just flat-out wrong and that smartphone answers are the future.

Douglas Rivers, a Stanford University political science professor and chief scientist for YouGov, which conducts online polls with such partners as CBS and the Economist, disagrees. “What do they know about these people?” Rivers says. “We worry a lot about who we’re talking to.”​

First the primaries were rigged then the convention, was rigged, then the election is rigged and now polls are rigged. Poor Donald. He keeps seeing conspiracies everywhere he looks.

You do realize the primaries were rigged? It's been proven. That's why it's so easy to see that she'll cheat to win. It's a valid concern. It should concern all voters if they expect thier vote to matter. Half the Dems just blow it off because they are happy that Hilkary got the nomination. But she cheated to get it. Of this there is no doubt or question. It's been proven.

 

[HUGGY]

More evidence that support for Trump is much stronger than what the media polls indicate. Big surprise there:

OOPS! New App Allows Users To Remain ANONYMOUS...Defies Liberal Media Narrative...Shows TRUMP Winning BIG Over Crooked Hillary » 100percentfedUp.com​

Whole Title: "OOPS! New App Allows Users To Remain ANONYMOUS…Defies Liberal Media Narrative…Shows TRUMP Winning BIG Over Crooked Hillary"

Funny what happens when liberals aren’t able to bully or shame someone they don’t agree with…

The results don’t read like any poll you’ve seen reported in the last weeks, but instead like they have been answered primarily by the most ardent Trump supporters.

Some Zip questions:

— ”New polls suggest Trump is getting crushed by Clinton. Do they reflect how you are going to vote?” Some 64% told Zip they would vote for Trump, compared to 36% for Clinton. In the latest Reuters/Ipsos poll, Clinton leads Trump, 42% to 36%.

— ”California, who you voting for?” Trump got 55%, compared to 45% for Clinton. In the latest Public Policy Institute of California poll, Clinton has a 16-point advantage over Trump, 46% to 30%.

After one week of the media defining what Trump really meant when he suggested 2nd Amendment supporters will defeat Hillary, here is how Americans really feel about Trump’s comments:

— “What do you honestly think Trump meant by saying “The 2nd amendment people can do something about Hillary? Vote against her? 63% Assassinate her 37%”

Militi insists his replies are a cross-section of voters in age, gender and geography. “These are the same results we saw when he (Trump) was in the primaries,” he says. He contends that most media polls are just flat-out wrong and that smartphone answers are the future.

Douglas Rivers, a Stanford University political science professor and chief scientist for YouGov, which conducts online polls with such partners as CBS and the Economist, disagrees. “What do they know about these people?” Rivers says. “We worry a lot about who we’re talking to.”​

If Trump got 13.5 million primary votes then 37% or roughly 5 million believe Trump meant assassination. You think Trump suggesting killing Hillary to 5 million followers is a good thing?

 

[bripat9643]

More evidence that support for Trump is much stronger than what the media polls indicate. Big surprise there:

OOPS! New App Allows Users To Remain ANONYMOUS...Defies Liberal Media Narrative...Shows TRUMP Winning BIG Over Crooked Hillary » 100percentfedUp.com​

Whole Title: "OOPS! New App Allows Users To Remain ANONYMOUS…Defies Liberal Media Narrative…Shows TRUMP Winning BIG Over Crooked Hillary"

Funny what happens when liberals aren’t able to bully or shame someone they don’t agree with…

The results don’t read like any poll you’ve seen reported in the last weeks, but instead like they have been answered primarily by the most ardent Trump supporters.

Some Zip questions:

— ”New polls suggest Trump is getting crushed by Clinton. Do they reflect how you are going to vote?” Some 64% told Zip they would vote for Trump, compared to 36% for Clinton. In the latest Reuters/Ipsos poll, Clinton leads Trump, 42% to 36%.

— ”California, who you voting for?” Trump got 55%, compared to 45% for Clinton. In the latest Public Policy Institute of California poll, Clinton has a 16-point advantage over Trump, 46% to 30%.

After one week of the media defining what Trump really meant when he suggested 2nd Amendment supporters will defeat Hillary, here is how Americans really feel about Trump’s comments:

— “What do you honestly think Trump meant by saying “The 2nd amendment people can do something about Hillary? Vote against her? 63% Assassinate her 37%”

Militi insists his replies are a cross-section of voters in age, gender and geography. “These are the same results we saw when he (Trump) was in the primaries,” he says. He contends that most media polls are just flat-out wrong and that smartphone answers are the future.

Douglas Rivers, a Stanford University political science professor and chief scientist for YouGov, which conducts online polls with such partners as CBS and the Economist, disagrees. “What do they know about these people?” Rivers says. “We worry a lot about who we’re talking to.”​

If Trump got 13.5 million primary votes then 37% or roughly 5 million believe Trump meant assassination. You think Trump suggesting killing Hillary to 5 million followers is a good thing?

He didn't recommend any such thing, douche bag.

 

[Flopper]

More evidence that support for Trump is much stronger than what the media polls indicate. Big surprise there:

OOPS! New App Allows Users To Remain ANONYMOUS...Defies Liberal Media Narrative...Shows TRUMP Winning BIG Over Crooked Hillary » 100percentfedUp.com​

Whole Title: "OOPS! New App Allows Users To Remain ANONYMOUS…Defies Liberal Media Narrative…Shows TRUMP Winning BIG Over Crooked Hillary"

Funny what happens when liberals aren’t able to bully or shame someone they don’t agree with…

The results don’t read like any poll you’ve seen reported in the last weeks, but instead like they have been answered primarily by the most ardent Trump supporters.

Some Zip questions:

— ”New polls suggest Trump is getting crushed by Clinton. Do they reflect how you are going to vote?” Some 64% told Zip they would vote for Trump, compared to 36% for Clinton. In the latest Reuters/Ipsos poll, Clinton leads Trump, 42% to 36%.

— ”California, who you voting for?” Trump got 55%, compared to 45% for Clinton. In the latest Public Policy Institute of California poll, Clinton has a 16-point advantage over Trump, 46% to 30%.

After one week of the media defining what Trump really meant when he suggested 2nd Amendment supporters will defeat Hillary, here is how Americans really feel about Trump’s comments:

— “What do you honestly think Trump meant by saying “The 2nd amendment people can do something about Hillary? Vote against her? 63% Assassinate her 37%”

Militi insists his replies are a cross-section of voters in age, gender and geography. “These are the same results we saw when he (Trump) was in the primaries,” he says. He contends that most media polls are just flat-out wrong and that smartphone answers are the future.

Douglas Rivers, a Stanford University political science professor and chief scientist for YouGov, which conducts online polls with such partners as CBS and the Economist, disagrees. “What do they know about these people?” Rivers says. “We worry a lot about who we’re talking to.”​

First the primaries were rigged then the convention, was rigged, then the election is rigged and now polls are rigged. Poor Donald. He keeps seeing conspiracies everywhere he looks.

He understand who thoroughly corrupt the establishment is.

He should know. Nobody knows corruption better than Donald Trump.

 

[HUGGY]

More evidence that support for Trump is much stronger than what the media polls indicate. Big surprise there:

OOPS! New App Allows Users To Remain ANONYMOUS...Defies Liberal Media Narrative...Shows TRUMP Winning BIG Over Crooked Hillary » 100percentfedUp.com​

Whole Title: "OOPS! New App Allows Users To Remain ANONYMOUS…Defies Liberal Media Narrative…Shows TRUMP Winning BIG Over Crooked Hillary"

Funny what happens when liberals aren’t able to bully or shame someone they don’t agree with…

The results don’t read like any poll you’ve seen reported in the last weeks, but instead like they have been answered primarily by the most ardent Trump supporters.

Some Zip questions:

— ”New polls suggest Trump is getting crushed by Clinton. Do they reflect how you are going to vote?” Some 64% told Zip they would vote for Trump, compared to 36% for Clinton. In the latest Reuters/Ipsos poll, Clinton leads Trump, 42% to 36%.

— ”California, who you voting for?” Trump got 55%, compared to 45% for Clinton. In the latest Public Policy Institute of California poll, Clinton has a 16-point advantage over Trump, 46% to 30%.

After one week of the media defining what Trump really meant when he suggested 2nd Amendment supporters will defeat Hillary, here is how Americans really feel about Trump’s comments:

— “What do you honestly think Trump meant by saying “The 2nd amendment people can do something about Hillary? Vote against her? 63% Assassinate her 37%”

Militi insists his replies are a cross-section of voters in age, gender and geography. “These are the same results we saw when he (Trump) was in the primaries,” he says. He contends that most media polls are just flat-out wrong and that smartphone answers are the future.

Douglas Rivers, a Stanford University political science professor and chief scientist for YouGov, which conducts online polls with such partners as CBS and the Economist, disagrees. “What do they know about these people?” Rivers says. “We worry a lot about who we’re talking to.”​

If Trump got 13.5 million primary votes then 37% or roughly 5 million believe Trump meant assassination. You think Trump suggesting killing Hillary to 5 million followers is a good thing?

He didn't recommend any such thing, douche bag.

He said he was just being sarcastic. Just funnin around. Meaning...he conceded that his comments COULD be misinterpreted. If you are going to be a Trumpbot do try to keep up.

 

[g5000]

More evidence that support for Trump is much stronger than what the media polls indicate. Big surprise there:

OOPS! New App Allows Users To Remain ANONYMOUS...Defies Liberal Media Narrative...Shows TRUMP Winning BIG Over Crooked Hillary » 100percentfedUp.com​

Whole Title: "OOPS! New App Allows Users To Remain ANONYMOUS…Defies Liberal Media Narrative…Shows TRUMP Winning BIG Over Crooked Hillary"

Funny what happens when liberals aren’t able to bully or shame someone they don’t agree with…

The results don’t read like any poll you’ve seen reported in the last weeks, but instead like they have been answered primarily by the most ardent Trump supporters.

Some Zip questions:

— ”New polls suggest Trump is getting crushed by Clinton. Do they reflect how you are going to vote?” Some 64% told Zip they would vote for Trump, compared to 36% for Clinton. In the latest Reuters/Ipsos poll, Clinton leads Trump, 42% to 36%.

— ”California, who you voting for?” Trump got 55%, compared to 45% for Clinton. In the latest Public Policy Institute of California poll, Clinton has a 16-point advantage over Trump, 46% to 30%.

After one week of the media defining what Trump really meant when he suggested 2nd Amendment supporters will defeat Hillary, here is how Americans really feel about Trump’s comments:

— “What do you honestly think Trump meant by saying “The 2nd amendment people can do something about Hillary? Vote against her? 63% Assassinate her 37%”

Militi insists his replies are a cross-section of voters in age, gender and geography. “These are the same results we saw when he (Trump) was in the primaries,” he says. He contends that most media polls are just flat-out wrong and that smartphone answers are the future.

Douglas Rivers, a Stanford University political science professor and chief scientist for YouGov, which conducts online polls with such partners as CBS and the Economist, disagrees. “What do they know about these people?” Rivers says. “We worry a lot about who we’re talking to.”​

Aren't you the retard who started a GoFundMe page to beat Ryan? How many of you tards scoffed at the post I made showing Ryan was ahead by 60 points in the polls?

And now you are doubling down on your stupidity in the mistaken bleef an app is more scientifically accurate than a poll? Really?

If your two brain cells are feeling so confident, why not take up candycorn's challenge?

 

[bripat9643]

More evidence that support for Trump is much stronger than what the media polls indicate. Big surprise there:

OOPS! New App Allows Users To Remain ANONYMOUS...Defies Liberal Media Narrative...Shows TRUMP Winning BIG Over Crooked Hillary » 100percentfedUp.com​

Whole Title: "OOPS! New App Allows Users To Remain ANONYMOUS…Defies Liberal Media Narrative…Shows TRUMP Winning BIG Over Crooked Hillary"

Funny what happens when liberals aren’t able to bully or shame someone they don’t agree with…

The results don’t read like any poll you’ve seen reported in the last weeks, but instead like they have been answered primarily by the most ardent Trump supporters.

Some Zip questions:

— ”New polls suggest Trump is getting crushed by Clinton. Do they reflect how you are going to vote?” Some 64% told Zip they would vote for Trump, compared to 36% for Clinton. In the latest Reuters/Ipsos poll, Clinton leads Trump, 42% to 36%.

— ”California, who you voting for?” Trump got 55%, compared to 45% for Clinton. In the latest Public Policy Institute of California poll, Clinton has a 16-point advantage over Trump, 46% to 30%.

After one week of the media defining what Trump really meant when he suggested 2nd Amendment supporters will defeat Hillary, here is how Americans really feel about Trump’s comments:

— “What do you honestly think Trump meant by saying “The 2nd amendment people can do something about Hillary? Vote against her? 63% Assassinate her 37%”

Militi insists his replies are a cross-section of voters in age, gender and geography. “These are the same results we saw when he (Trump) was in the primaries,” he says. He contends that most media polls are just flat-out wrong and that smartphone answers are the future.

Douglas Rivers, a Stanford University political science professor and chief scientist for YouGov, which conducts online polls with such partners as CBS and the Economist, disagrees. “What do they know about these people?” Rivers says. “We worry a lot about who we’re talking to.”​

First the primaries were rigged then the convention, was rigged, then the election is rigged and now polls are rigged. Poor Donald. He keeps seeing conspiracies everywhere he looks.

He understand who thoroughly corrupt the establishment is.

He should know. Nobody knows corruption better than Donald Trump.

He's a piker compared to Hillary.

It's pathetic how blind leftwing dumbasses like you are to Hillary's corruption and criminality.

 

[bripat9643]

More evidence that support for Trump is much stronger than what the media polls indicate. Big surprise there:

OOPS! New App Allows Users To Remain ANONYMOUS...Defies Liberal Media Narrative...Shows TRUMP Winning BIG Over Crooked Hillary » 100percentfedUp.com​

Whole Title: "OOPS! New App Allows Users To Remain ANONYMOUS…Defies Liberal Media Narrative…Shows TRUMP Winning BIG Over Crooked Hillary"

Funny what happens when liberals aren’t able to bully or shame someone they don’t agree with…

The results don’t read like any poll you’ve seen reported in the last weeks, but instead like they have been answered primarily by the most ardent Trump supporters.

Some Zip questions:

— ”New polls suggest Trump is getting crushed by Clinton. Do they reflect how you are going to vote?” Some 64% told Zip they would vote for Trump, compared to 36% for Clinton. In the latest Reuters/Ipsos poll, Clinton leads Trump, 42% to 36%.

— ”California, who you voting for?” Trump got 55%, compared to 45% for Clinton. In the latest Public Policy Institute of California poll, Clinton has a 16-point advantage over Trump, 46% to 30%.

After one week of the media defining what Trump really meant when he suggested 2nd Amendment supporters will defeat Hillary, here is how Americans really feel about Trump’s comments:

— “What do you honestly think Trump meant by saying “The 2nd amendment people can do something about Hillary? Vote against her? 63% Assassinate her 37%”

Militi insists his replies are a cross-section of voters in age, gender and geography. “These are the same results we saw when he (Trump) was in the primaries,” he says. He contends that most media polls are just flat-out wrong and that smartphone answers are the future.

Douglas Rivers, a Stanford University political science professor and chief scientist for YouGov, which conducts online polls with such partners as CBS and the Economist, disagrees. “What do they know about these people?” Rivers says. “We worry a lot about who we’re talking to.”​

If Trump got 13.5 million primary votes then 37% or roughly 5 million believe Trump meant assassination. You think Trump suggesting killing Hillary to 5 million followers is a good thing?

He didn't recommend any such thing, douche bag.

He said he was just being sarcastic. Just funnin around. Meaning...he conceded that his comments COULD be misinterpreted. If you are going to be a Trumpbot do try to keep up.

In other words, he didn't recommend any such thing. Everyone's words can be misinterpreted, and the leftwing media is on a jihad to deliberately misinterpret everything Trump says.

 

[HUGGY]

More evidence that support for Trump is much stronger than what the media polls indicate. Big surprise there:

OOPS! New App Allows Users To Remain ANONYMOUS...Defies Liberal Media Narrative...Shows TRUMP Winning BIG Over Crooked Hillary » 100percentfedUp.com​

Whole Title: "OOPS! New App Allows Users To Remain ANONYMOUS…Defies Liberal Media Narrative…Shows TRUMP Winning BIG Over Crooked Hillary"

Funny what happens when liberals aren’t able to bully or shame someone they don’t agree with…

The results don’t read like any poll you’ve seen reported in the last weeks, but instead like they have been answered primarily by the most ardent Trump supporters.

Some Zip questions:

— ”New polls suggest Trump is getting crushed by Clinton. Do they reflect how you are going to vote?” Some 64% told Zip they would vote for Trump, compared to 36% for Clinton. In the latest Reuters/Ipsos poll, Clinton leads Trump, 42% to 36%.

— ”California, who you voting for?” Trump got 55%, compared to 45% for Clinton. In the latest Public Policy Institute of California poll, Clinton has a 16-point advantage over Trump, 46% to 30%.

After one week of the media defining what Trump really meant when he suggested 2nd Amendment supporters will defeat Hillary, here is how Americans really feel about Trump’s comments:

— “What do you honestly think Trump meant by saying “The 2nd amendment people can do something about Hillary? Vote against her? 63% Assassinate her 37%”

Militi insists his replies are a cross-section of voters in age, gender and geography. “These are the same results we saw when he (Trump) was in the primaries,” he says. He contends that most media polls are just flat-out wrong and that smartphone answers are the future.

Douglas Rivers, a Stanford University political science professor and chief scientist for YouGov, which conducts online polls with such partners as CBS and the Economist, disagrees. “What do they know about these people?” Rivers says. “We worry a lot about who we’re talking to.”​

If Trump got 13.5 million primary votes then 37% or roughly 5 million believe Trump meant assassination. You think Trump suggesting killing Hillary to 5 million followers is a good thing?

He didn't recommend any such thing, douche bag.

He said he was just being sarcastic. Just funnin around. Meaning...he conceded that his comments COULD be misinterpreted. If you are going to be a Trumpbot do try to keep up.

In other words, he didn't recommend any such thing. Everyone's words can be misinterpreted, and the leftwing media is on a jihad to deliberately misinterpret everything Trump says.

Duh! The left and a hell of a lot of other folks.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

1. All polls are anonymous.
2. This app has the statistical relevance of a USMB poll.

But I have no doubt you'll wholeheartedly believe it.

 

[Flopper]

More evidence that support for Trump is much stronger than what the media polls indicate. Big surprise there:

OOPS! New App Allows Users To Remain ANONYMOUS...Defies Liberal Media Narrative...Shows TRUMP Winning BIG Over Crooked Hillary » 100percentfedUp.com​

Whole Title: "OOPS! New App Allows Users To Remain ANONYMOUS…Defies Liberal Media Narrative…Shows TRUMP Winning BIG Over Crooked Hillary"

Funny what happens when liberals aren’t able to bully or shame someone they don’t agree with…

The results don’t read like any poll you’ve seen reported in the last weeks, but instead like they have been answered primarily by the most ardent Trump supporters.

Some Zip questions:

— ”New polls suggest Trump is getting crushed by Clinton. Do they reflect how you are going to vote?” Some 64% told Zip they would vote for Trump, compared to 36% for Clinton. In the latest Reuters/Ipsos poll, Clinton leads Trump, 42% to 36%.

— ”California, who you voting for?” Trump got 55%, compared to 45% for Clinton. In the latest Public Policy Institute of California poll, Clinton has a 16-point advantage over Trump, 46% to 30%.

After one week of the media defining what Trump really meant when he suggested 2nd Amendment supporters will defeat Hillary, here is how Americans really feel about Trump’s comments:

— “What do you honestly think Trump meant by saying “The 2nd amendment people can do something about Hillary? Vote against her? 63% Assassinate her 37%”

Militi insists his replies are a cross-section of voters in age, gender and geography. “These are the same results we saw when he (Trump) was in the primaries,” he says. He contends that most media polls are just flat-out wrong and that smartphone answers are the future.

Douglas Rivers, a Stanford University political science professor and chief scientist for YouGov, which conducts online polls with such partners as CBS and the Economist, disagrees. “What do they know about these people?” Rivers says. “We worry a lot about who we’re talking to.”​

If Trump got 13.5 million primary votes then 37% or roughly 5 million believe Trump meant assassination. You think Trump suggesting killing Hillary to 5 million followers is a good thing?

He didn't recommend any such thing, douche bag.

He said he was just being sarcastic. Just funnin around. Meaning...he conceded that his comments COULD be misinterpreted. If you are going to be a Trumpbot do try to keep up.

In other words, he didn't recommend any such thing. Everyone's words can be misinterpreted, and the leftwing media is on a jihad to deliberately misinterpret everything Trump says.

But Trump's words are so easy to misinterpret because his mouth outruns his brain.

June 13, 2016: "We're led by a man who is a very — look, we're led by a man that either is, is not tough, not smart, or he's got something else in mind,"

Nov. 24, 2015: “Now, the poor guy, you ought to see this guy, ‘Ah, I don’t know what I said, I don’t remember, I don’t remember, maybe that’s what I said,’”

Aug. 7, 2015: Megyn Kelly “gets out and she starts asking me all sorts of ridiculous questions … You could see there was blood coming out of her eyes, blood coming out of her wherever,"

I know it might be embarrassing but it would be funny to see him addressing the UN.