OOPS! New App Allows Users To Remain ANONYMOUS…Defies Liberal Media Narrative…Shows TRUMP Winning

[Katzndogz]

and why isnt Hillary campaigning every day? oh, forgot, she needs her two day long naps twice a week, and can never be woken up at 3am cause of her many ailments

Clinton could phone it in until election day and still whoop Donnie's ass.

She has a complicit media. Kim Jong Un can do the same thing. It's nothing to be proud of.

Hilly is a very sick woman. She has to take time off and rest before she drops. She doesn't have the stamina. Trump never stops. He will run her ragged.

 

[Maryland Patriot]

hillary will win. even if she doesnt win, she will win.
I would expect that she should get somewhere between 65 and 70% of the electoral vote.
she will take popular vote by 2 to 5%
this will also be the last year anyone but the ultra rich will be able to bet on the election, after the bitch takes office the expendable income for families is going to dive into the negative pretty quick.

 

[Old Rocks]

well at least 36% of all Americans barley have an IQ. they would vote for Hillary even if she's in a coma

"Well at least 36% of Americans barley have an IQ"

Obviously Rex, you are speaking for yourself. LOL

 

[Old Rocks]

and why isnt Hillary campaigning every day? oh, forgot, she needs her two day long naps twice a week, and can never be woken up at 3am cause of her many ailments

One thing I know, no one at work dares to admit the support Trump, but I hear libs all the time talking about how much they hate him. You get the distinct feeling that your job would be at risk if you admitted to being a Trump supporter.

Well, I can see where that would be the case if your work involves anything more complex than flipping burgers. I don't think that Bripat has anything to worry about.

 

[Juan de Fuca]

and why isnt Hillary campaigning every day? oh, forgot, she needs her two day long naps twice a week, and can never be woken up at 3am cause of her many ailments

Clinton could phone it in until election day and still whoop Donnie's ass.

She has a complicit media. Kim Jong Un can do the same thing. It's nothing to be proud of.

Hilly is a very sick woman. She has to take time off and rest before she drops. She doesn't have the stamina. Trump never stops. He will run her ragged.

She has no such thing, they were hammering her hard before the convention, but after the media had a chance to compare, they ran away from Trump as if he had EBOLA.

 

[bripat9643]

and why isnt Hillary campaigning every day? oh, forgot, she needs her two day long naps twice a week, and can never be woken up at 3am cause of her many ailments

One thing I know, no one at work dares to admit the support Trump, but I hear libs all the time talking about how much they hate him. You get the distinct feeling that your job would be at risk if you admitted to being a Trump supporter.

Well, I can see where that would be the case if your work involves anything more complex than flipping burgers. I don't think that Bripat has anything to worry about.

The burger flippers are all supporting Hillary. That's how you must know.

 

[my2¢]

Thanks for the news. I'm booking my flight and hotel reservation for his inauguration today!

 

[konradv]

Yeah... Kinda funny how the word on the street doesn't jive with all these lib dem media polls. I've got family and friends across the country; and they've noticed the same thing. The establishment media polls show something totally different than the "man on the street" polls. Now how do you suppose they'll try and spin a Trump landslide victory in the popular vote, VS. a sweeping victory for Hillary amongst tha ElectoralCollege vote...? Keep your powder dry boys; this could get very exciting...

...and when Hillary wins the "she cheated" excuse is all lined up.

 

[Juan de Fuca]

Thanks for the news. I'm booking my flight and hotel reservation for his inauguration today!

Don't use your cellphone in Moscow, I hear they rip you off outrageously.

 

[Old Rocks]

Yeah... Kinda funny how the word on the street doesn't jive with all these lib dem media polls. I've got family and friends across the country; and they've noticed the same thing. The establishment media polls show something totally different than the "man on the street" polls. Now how do you suppose they'll try and spin a Trump landslide victory in the popular vote, VS. a sweeping victory for Hillary amongst tha ElectoralCollege vote...?
Keep your powder dry boys; this could get very exciting.

It is very similar to the Reagan v. Carter election. Carter was ahead by double digits, then the hammer came down. One reporter said that she couldn't believe Reagan won, no one voted for him.

At this far out, no one knows. In one day, one scream, Howard Dean went from front runner to no runner. Hilly has already made some serious mistakes that the media has down played. She will put the coal miners out of business. She will raise taxes on the middle class. She's married to Trump.

All it takes is one that hits the right nerve. She may do it, she may not.

On the other hand Trump has withstood blistering attack after blistering attack from the obedient Hillary media. Their partisanship is so obvious they don't even bother denying it anymore.

LOL You silly fuck, no one attacks Trump, they just play back videos of his speeches. There is enough insanity in them to establish a new asylum.

 

[bripat9643]

and why isnt Hillary campaigning every day? oh, forgot, she needs her two day long naps twice a week, and can never be woken up at 3am cause of her many ailments

Clinton could phone it in until election day and still whoop Donnie's ass.

She has a complicit media. Kim Jong Un can do the same thing. It's nothing to be proud of.

Hilly is a very sick woman. She has to take time off and rest before she drops. She doesn't have the stamina. Trump never stops. He will run her ragged.

She has no such thing, they were hammering her hard before the convention, but after the media had a chance to compare, they ran away from Trump as if he had EBOLA.

They have never laid a glove on her once in her entire life.

 

[bripat9643]

Yeah... Kinda funny how the word on the street doesn't jive with all these lib dem media polls. I've got family and friends across the country; and they've noticed the same thing. The establishment media polls show something totally different than the "man on the street" polls. Now how do you suppose they'll try and spin a Trump landslide victory in the popular vote, VS. a sweeping victory for Hillary amongst tha ElectoralCollege vote...?
Keep your powder dry boys; this could get very exciting.

It is very similar to the Reagan v. Carter election. Carter was ahead by double digits, then the hammer came down. One reporter said that she couldn't believe Reagan won, no one voted for him.

At this far out, no one knows. In one day, one scream, Howard Dean went from front runner to no runner. Hilly has already made some serious mistakes that the media has down played. She will put the coal miners out of business. She will raise taxes on the middle class. She's married to Trump.

All it takes is one that hits the right nerve. She may do it, she may not.

On the other hand Trump has withstood blistering attack after blistering attack from the obedient Hillary media. Their partisanship is so obvious they don't even bother denying it anymore.

LOL You silly fuck, no one attacks Trump, they just play back videos of his speeches. There is enough insanity in them to establish a new asylum.

You're obviously just a sleazy lying piece of shit. They attack him all the time. Her media surrogates shout down anyone who dares to criticize the sainted Hillary.

 

[Juan de Fuca]

and why isnt Hillary campaigning every day? oh, forgot, she needs her two day long naps twice a week, and can never be woken up at 3am cause of her many ailments

Clinton could phone it in until election day and still whoop Donnie's ass.

She has a complicit media. Kim Jong Un can do the same thing. It's nothing to be proud of.

Hilly is a very sick woman. She has to take time off and rest before she drops. She doesn't have the stamina. Trump never stops. He will run her ragged.

She has no such thing, they were hammering her hard before the convention, but after the media had a chance to compare, they ran away from Trump as if he had EBOLA.

They have never laid a glove on her once in her entire life.

You mean to tell me that right wing media has never blistered Hillary Clinton?

 

[AceRothstein]

More evidence that support for Trump is much stronger than what the media polls indicate. Big surprise there:

OOPS! New App Allows Users To Remain ANONYMOUS...Defies Liberal Media Narrative...Shows TRUMP Winning BIG Over Crooked Hillary » 100percentfedUp.com​

Whole Title: "OOPS! New App Allows Users To Remain ANONYMOUS…Defies Liberal Media Narrative…Shows TRUMP Winning BIG Over Crooked Hillary"

Funny what happens when liberals aren’t able to bully or shame someone they don’t agree with…

The results don’t read like any poll you’ve seen reported in the last weeks, but instead like they have been answered primarily by the most ardent Trump supporters.

Some Zip questions:

— ”New polls suggest Trump is getting crushed by Clinton. Do they reflect how you are going to vote?” Some 64% told Zip they would vote for Trump, compared to 36% for Clinton. In the latest Reuters/Ipsos poll, Clinton leads Trump, 42% to 36%.

— ”California, who you voting for?” Trump got 55%, compared to 45% for Clinton. In the latest Public Policy Institute of California poll, Clinton has a 16-point advantage over Trump, 46% to 30%.

After one week of the media defining what Trump really meant when he suggested 2nd Amendment supporters will defeat Hillary, here is how Americans really feel about Trump’s comments:

— “What do you honestly think Trump meant by saying “The 2nd amendment people can do something about Hillary? Vote against her? 63% Assassinate her 37%”

Militi insists his replies are a cross-section of voters in age, gender and geography. “These are the same results we saw when he (Trump) was in the primaries,” he says. He contends that most media polls are just flat-out wrong and that smartphone answers are the future.

Douglas Rivers, a Stanford University political science professor and chief scientist for YouGov, which conducts online polls with such partners as CBS and the Economist, disagrees. “What do they know about these people?” Rivers says. “We worry a lot about who we’re talking to.”​

Are you dumb enough to actually believe this or does reading it make you feel better?

 

[bripat9643]

More evidence that support for Trump is much stronger than what the media polls indicate. Big surprise there:

OOPS! New App Allows Users To Remain ANONYMOUS...Defies Liberal Media Narrative...Shows TRUMP Winning BIG Over Crooked Hillary » 100percentfedUp.com​

Whole Title: "OOPS! New App Allows Users To Remain ANONYMOUS…Defies Liberal Media Narrative…Shows TRUMP Winning BIG Over Crooked Hillary"

Funny what happens when liberals aren’t able to bully or shame someone they don’t agree with…

The results don’t read like any poll you’ve seen reported in the last weeks, but instead like they have been answered primarily by the most ardent Trump supporters.

Some Zip questions:

— ”New polls suggest Trump is getting crushed by Clinton. Do they reflect how you are going to vote?” Some 64% told Zip they would vote for Trump, compared to 36% for Clinton. In the latest Reuters/Ipsos poll, Clinton leads Trump, 42% to 36%.

— ”California, who you voting for?” Trump got 55%, compared to 45% for Clinton. In the latest Public Policy Institute of California poll, Clinton has a 16-point advantage over Trump, 46% to 30%.

After one week of the media defining what Trump really meant when he suggested 2nd Amendment supporters will defeat Hillary, here is how Americans really feel about Trump’s comments:

— “What do you honestly think Trump meant by saying “The 2nd amendment people can do something about Hillary? Vote against her? 63% Assassinate her 37%”

Militi insists his replies are a cross-section of voters in age, gender and geography. “These are the same results we saw when he (Trump) was in the primaries,” he says. He contends that most media polls are just flat-out wrong and that smartphone answers are the future.

Douglas Rivers, a Stanford University political science professor and chief scientist for YouGov, which conducts online polls with such partners as CBS and the Economist, disagrees. “What do they know about these people?” Rivers says. “We worry a lot about who we’re talking to.”​

Are you dumb enough to actually believe this or does reading it make you feel better?

How much does Hillary pay you to suck her asshole?

 

[AceRothstein]

More evidence that support for Trump is much stronger than what the media polls indicate. Big surprise there:

OOPS! New App Allows Users To Remain ANONYMOUS...Defies Liberal Media Narrative...Shows TRUMP Winning BIG Over Crooked Hillary » 100percentfedUp.com​

Whole Title: "OOPS! New App Allows Users To Remain ANONYMOUS…Defies Liberal Media Narrative…Shows TRUMP Winning BIG Over Crooked Hillary"

Funny what happens when liberals aren’t able to bully or shame someone they don’t agree with…

The results don’t read like any poll you’ve seen reported in the last weeks, but instead like they have been answered primarily by the most ardent Trump supporters.

Some Zip questions:

— ”New polls suggest Trump is getting crushed by Clinton. Do they reflect how you are going to vote?” Some 64% told Zip they would vote for Trump, compared to 36% for Clinton. In the latest Reuters/Ipsos poll, Clinton leads Trump, 42% to 36%.

— ”California, who you voting for?” Trump got 55%, compared to 45% for Clinton. In the latest Public Policy Institute of California poll, Clinton has a 16-point advantage over Trump, 46% to 30%.

After one week of the media defining what Trump really meant when he suggested 2nd Amendment supporters will defeat Hillary, here is how Americans really feel about Trump’s comments:

— “What do you honestly think Trump meant by saying “The 2nd amendment people can do something about Hillary? Vote against her? 63% Assassinate her 37%”

Militi insists his replies are a cross-section of voters in age, gender and geography. “These are the same results we saw when he (Trump) was in the primaries,” he says. He contends that most media polls are just flat-out wrong and that smartphone answers are the future.

Douglas Rivers, a Stanford University political science professor and chief scientist for YouGov, which conducts online polls with such partners as CBS and the Economist, disagrees. “What do they know about these people?” Rivers says. “We worry a lot about who we’re talking to.”​

Are you dumb enough to actually believe this or does reading it make you feel better?

How much does Hillary pay you to suck her asshole?

So it just makes you feel better.

 

[Lakhota]

More evidence that support for Trump is much stronger than what the media polls indicate. Big surprise there:

OOPS! New App Allows Users To Remain ANONYMOUS...Defies Liberal Media Narrative...Shows TRUMP Winning BIG Over Crooked Hillary » 100percentfedUp.com​

Whole Title: "OOPS! New App Allows Users To Remain ANONYMOUS…Defies Liberal Media Narrative…Shows TRUMP Winning BIG Over Crooked Hillary"

Funny what happens when liberals aren’t able to bully or shame someone they don’t agree with…

The results don’t read like any poll you’ve seen reported in the last weeks, but instead like they have been answered primarily by the most ardent Trump supporters.

Some Zip questions:

— ”New polls suggest Trump is getting crushed by Clinton. Do they reflect how you are going to vote?” Some 64% told Zip they would vote for Trump, compared to 36% for Clinton. In the latest Reuters/Ipsos poll, Clinton leads Trump, 42% to 36%.

— ”California, who you voting for?” Trump got 55%, compared to 45% for Clinton. In the latest Public Policy Institute of California poll, Clinton has a 16-point advantage over Trump, 46% to 30%.

After one week of the media defining what Trump really meant when he suggested 2nd Amendment supporters will defeat Hillary, here is how Americans really feel about Trump’s comments:

— “What do you honestly think Trump meant by saying “The 2nd amendment people can do something about Hillary? Vote against her? 63% Assassinate her 37%”

Militi insists his replies are a cross-section of voters in age, gender and geography. “These are the same results we saw when he (Trump) was in the primaries,” he says. He contends that most media polls are just flat-out wrong and that smartphone answers are the future.

Douglas Rivers, a Stanford University political science professor and chief scientist for YouGov, which conducts online polls with such partners as CBS and the Economist, disagrees. “What do they know about these people?” Rivers says. “We worry a lot about who we’re talking to.”​

It's hilarious that Trump supporters want to be fooled into thinking he is winning. Hilarious. If Hillary was losing - I would want to know it truthfully.

 

[OnePercenter]

More evidence that support for Trump is much stronger than what the media polls indicate. Big surprise there:

OOPS! New App Allows Users To Remain ANONYMOUS...Defies Liberal Media Narrative...Shows TRUMP Winning BIG Over Crooked Hillary » 100percentfedUp.com​

Whole Title: "OOPS! New App Allows Users To Remain ANONYMOUS…Defies Liberal Media Narrative…Shows TRUMP Winning BIG Over Crooked Hillary"

Funny what happens when liberals aren’t able to bully or shame someone they don’t agree with…

The results don’t read like any poll you’ve seen reported in the last weeks, but instead like they have been answered primarily by the most ardent Trump supporters.

Some Zip questions:

— ”New polls suggest Trump is getting crushed by Clinton. Do they reflect how you are going to vote?” Some 64% told Zip they would vote for Trump, compared to 36% for Clinton. In the latest Reuters/Ipsos poll, Clinton leads Trump, 42% to 36%.

— ”California, who you voting for?” Trump got 55%, compared to 45% for Clinton. In the latest Public Policy Institute of California poll, Clinton has a 16-point advantage over Trump, 46% to 30%.

After one week of the media defining what Trump really meant when he suggested 2nd Amendment supporters will defeat Hillary, here is how Americans really feel about Trump’s comments:

— “What do you honestly think Trump meant by saying “The 2nd amendment people can do something about Hillary? Vote against her? 63% Assassinate her 37%”

Militi insists his replies are a cross-section of voters in age, gender and geography. “These are the same results we saw when he (Trump) was in the primaries,” he says. He contends that most media polls are just flat-out wrong and that smartphone answers are the future.

Douglas Rivers, a Stanford University political science professor and chief scientist for YouGov, which conducts online polls with such partners as CBS and the Economist, disagrees. “What do they know about these people?” Rivers says. “We worry a lot about who we’re talking to.”​

I didn't know we had that many bigots, racists, and sociopaths.

Why would a Canadian care?

 

[OnePercenter]

More evidence that support for Trump is much stronger than what the media polls indicate. Big surprise there:

OOPS! New App Allows Users To Remain ANONYMOUS...Defies Liberal Media Narrative...Shows TRUMP Winning BIG Over Crooked Hillary » 100percentfedUp.com​

Whole Title: "OOPS! New App Allows Users To Remain ANONYMOUS…Defies Liberal Media Narrative…Shows TRUMP Winning BIG Over Crooked Hillary"

Funny what happens when liberals aren’t able to bully or shame someone they don’t agree with…

The results don’t read like any poll you’ve seen reported in the last weeks, but instead like they have been answered primarily by the most ardent Trump supporters.

Some Zip questions:

— ”New polls suggest Trump is getting crushed by Clinton. Do they reflect how you are going to vote?” Some 64% told Zip they would vote for Trump, compared to 36% for Clinton. In the latest Reuters/Ipsos poll, Clinton leads Trump, 42% to 36%.

— ”California, who you voting for?” Trump got 55%, compared to 45% for Clinton. In the latest Public Policy Institute of California poll, Clinton has a 16-point advantage over Trump, 46% to 30%.

After one week of the media defining what Trump really meant when he suggested 2nd Amendment supporters will defeat Hillary, here is how Americans really feel about Trump’s comments:

— “What do you honestly think Trump meant by saying “The 2nd amendment people can do something about Hillary? Vote against her? 63% Assassinate her 37%”

Militi insists his replies are a cross-section of voters in age, gender and geography. “These are the same results we saw when he (Trump) was in the primaries,” he says. He contends that most media polls are just flat-out wrong and that smartphone answers are the future.

Douglas Rivers, a Stanford University political science professor and chief scientist for YouGov, which conducts online polls with such partners as CBS and the Economist, disagrees. “What do they know about these people?” Rivers says. “We worry a lot about who we’re talking to.”​

Are you dumb enough to actually believe this or does reading it make you feel better?

How much does Hillary pay you to suck her asshole?

How much do the Koch Brothers pay you?

 

[RodISHI]

and why isnt Hillary campaigning every day? oh, forgot, she needs her two day long naps twice a week, and can never be woken up at 3am cause of her many ailments

One thing I know, no one at work dares to admit the support Trump, but I hear libs all the time talking about how much they hate him. You get the distinct feeling that your job would be at risk if you admitted to being a Trump supporter.

Well, I can see where that would be the case if your work involves anything more complex than flipping burgers. I don't think that Bripat has anything to worry about.

The burger flippers are all supporting Hillary. That's how you must know.

Not exactly. I was watching the comment on the Trump rally earlier and there were several from Burger Kings cheering him on that gave there city and state.