JQPublic1
Gold Member
- Aug 10, 2012
- 14,220
- 1,543
According to statistics, you are six times more likely to get murdered by a black than a white. Yes, per capita tells the real story.
Who is 6 times more likely to be killed by a black than a white? A black or a white? You don't provide links so I have little confidence in what you say. Here is a link that contradicts most of what you believe. Can you debunk anything herein:
* Only about 1 percent of African Americans — and no more than 2 percent of black males — will commit a violent crime in a given year;
* Even though there are more black-on-white interracial crimes than white-on-black interracial crimes, this fact is not evidence of anti-white racial targeting by black offenders. Rather, it is completely explained by two factors having nothing to do with anti-white bias: namely, the general differences in rates of criminal offending, and the rates at which whites and blacks encounter one another (and thus, have the opportunity to victimize one another). Once these two factors are “controlled for” in social science terms, the actual rates of black-on-white crime are lower than random chance would predict;
* No more than 0.7 percent (seven-tenths of one percent) of African Americans will commit a violent crime against a white person in a given year, and fewer than 0.3 (three-tenths of one percent) of whites will be victimized by a black person in a given year;
* Whites are 6 times as likely to be murdered by another white person as by a black person; and overall, the percentage of white Americans who will be murdered by a black offender in a given year is only 2/10,000ths of 1 percent (0.0002). This means that only 1 in every 500,000 white people will be murdered by a black person in a given year. Although the numbers of black-on-white homicides are higher than the reverse (447 to 218 in 2010), the 218 black victims of white murderers is actually a higher percentage of the black population interracially killed than the 447 white victims of black murderers as a percentage of the white population. In fact, any given black person is 2.75 times as likely to be murdered by a white person as any given white person is to be murdered by an African American.
Your use of the word "probably" indicates you are not sure. That uncertainty is a glaring sign that you just don't know what you are talking about. If the peak of Stop and Frisk was 700,000 people with most of them being innocent minorities the justification for continuing that pattern was gone long before half that many people were stopped and frisked. How many times do I have to repeat that 90% of the minorities stopped were innocent Are we to disregard the Constitutional rights of the many for the transgressions of a few? Thankfully, reasonable men refused to let that happenSo why did officers stop and frisk minorities? Probably because minorities are the most likely to be carrying a gun illegally. Probably because before stop and frisk, minorities were the primary groups that were doing the murders in NYC.
When you stop and think of all the innocent black lives that were saved when the program was in operation, it's a shame that blacks don't understand what's been keeping them safe. The 10% that cops busted and took off the street really helped the situation. Now those 10% or more are right back out there. I BTW, what's 10% of 1,000?
Whites are 6 times more likely to be killed by Whites than by a black. That is nothing to sneeze at. Who was keeping those white victims safe? Frankly, I am a bit surprised at your complete disregard for the Constitution when it applies to the illegal searching of Blacks and Hispanics but you would be the first to scream discrimination if the roles were reversed and whites were the objects of police overreach!