Organized Leftist Mobs

[easyt65]

So you are comfortable with the mass murderer representing you. whoa.

WHAT mass murderer?

You mean like Obama, who is responsible for the deaths of hundreds after arming Mexican Drug Cartels? Who is responsible for the deaths of HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS and the genocide of Christians after arming and aiding Al Qaeida and ISIS?

You talking about Hillary, a failed SoS who is partially responsible for aiding Al Qaeida in Libya and for the needless deaths of 4 Americans because she was playing partisan politics to cover Obama's lying ass about Al Qaeida being on the run and the war on terror being over?

 

[JimBowie1958]

It's called civil disobedience. Conservatives ONLY object to it when they don't like the causes behind it.

Pot meet kettle.

Civil Disobedience isn't a liberal thug charging the stage trying to get to Trump. I kinda wished the Secret Service would have just shot his ass as a threat, sending a message to liberals thugs / criminals that this shite won't be tolerated.

It's called civil disobedience. Conservatives ONLY object to it when they don't like the causes behind it.

Pot meet kettle.

Civil Disobedience isn't a liberal thug charging the stage trying to get to Trump. I kinda wished the Secret Service would have just shot his ass as a threat, sending a message to liberals thugs / criminals that this shite won't be tolerated.

You people have this ONE guy to represent all liberals.

Fine. Can we go back to the ONE guy who shot black people at the church, the self-identified rightwinger,

and claim he represents all conservatives?

Can we play by the same rules you're playing by?

That is us playing by the rules yo libtards play by, dude.

So you are comfortable with the mass murderer representing you. whoa.

I never said that liar.

 

[NYcarbineer]

So you are comfortable with the mass murderer representing you. whoa.

WHAT mass murderer?

You mean like Obama, who is responsible for the deaths of hundreds after arming Mexican Drug Cartels? Who is responsible for the deaths of HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS and the genocide of Christians after arming and aiding Al Qaeida and ISIS?

You talking about Hillary, a failed SoS who is partially responsible for aiding Al Qaeida in Libya and for the needless deaths of 4 Americans because she was playing partisan politics to cover Obama's lying ass about Al Qaeida being on the run and the war on terror being over?

Learn to read, Ivan.

 

[NYcarbineer]

It's called civil disobedience. Conservatives ONLY object to it when they don't like the causes behind it.

Pot meet kettle.

Civil Disobedience isn't a liberal thug charging the stage trying to get to Trump. I kinda wished the Secret Service would have just shot his ass as a threat, sending a message to liberals thugs / criminals that this shite won't be tolerated.

It's called civil disobedience. Conservatives ONLY object to it when they don't like the causes behind it.

Pot meet kettle.

Civil Disobedience isn't a liberal thug charging the stage trying to get to Trump. I kinda wished the Secret Service would have just shot his ass as a threat, sending a message to liberals thugs / criminals that this shite won't be tolerated.

You people have this ONE guy to represent all liberals.

Fine. Can we go back to the ONE guy who shot black people at the church, the self-identified rightwinger,

and claim he represents all conservatives?

Can we play by the same rules you're playing by?

That is us playing by the rules yo libtards play by, dude.

So you are comfortable with the mass murderer representing you. whoa.

I never said that liar.

You said you were playing by that rule.

 

[NYcarbineer]

It's called civil disobedience. Conservatives ONLY object to it when they don't like the causes behind it.

Pot meet kettle.

Civil Disobedience isn't a liberal thug charging the stage trying to get to Trump. I kinda wished the Secret Service would have just shot his ass as a threat, sending a message to liberals thugs / criminals that this shite won't be tolerated.

It's called civil disobedience. Conservatives ONLY object to it when they don't like the causes behind it.

Pot meet kettle.

Civil Disobedience isn't a liberal thug charging the stage trying to get to Trump. I kinda wished the Secret Service would have just shot his ass as a threat, sending a message to liberals thugs / criminals that this shite won't be tolerated.

You people have this ONE guy to represent all liberals.

Fine. Can we go back to the ONE guy who shot black people at the church, the self-identified rightwinger,

and claim he represents all conservatives?

Can we play by the same rules you're playing by?

That is us playing by the rules yo libtards play by, dude.

So you are comfortable with the mass murderer representing you. whoa.

I never said that liar.

Ok, then, so now you want to flip flop back to conceding that one guy rushing the Trump stage in no way represents liberalism.

 

[Stephanie]

These are organized all right by The Progressive/dem/commie party of the United States. and their leaders are Hillary, Bernie and OBAMA

 

[easyt65]

More Liberal '1st Amendment Right / Freedom of Expression':

Local Trump supporter says she’s facing harassment, vandalism

"WASHINGTON — Someone has stolen the Donald Trump signs from her yard, spray-painted her house with messages and a motorcyclist stopped to threaten her life."

Theft, Vandalism, Death Threats, and Terrorism....

....and jackasses like NYC are trying to compare these liberal criminals/thugs/terrorists to the original tea party.



Again, finding themselves mentally 'out-gunned' and unable to counter the opposition's message, progressive liberals engage in criminal activity to try to shut down the opposition.

THIS is all you have to know about Liberals supporting Hillary and Bernie Sanders. Obama, Hillary, Bill Ayers, and George Soros much be SO proud!

 

[JimBowie1958]

It's called civil disobedience. Conservatives ONLY object to it when they don't like the causes behind it.

Pot meet kettle.

Civil Disobedience isn't a liberal thug charging the stage trying to get to Trump. I kinda wished the Secret Service would have just shot his ass as a threat, sending a message to liberals thugs / criminals that this shite won't be tolerated.

Pot meet kettle.

Civil Disobedience isn't a liberal thug charging the stage trying to get to Trump. I kinda wished the Secret Service would have just shot his ass as a threat, sending a message to liberals thugs / criminals that this shite won't be tolerated.

You people have this ONE guy to represent all liberals.

Fine. Can we go back to the ONE guy who shot black people at the church, the self-identified rightwinger,

and claim he represents all conservatives?

Can we play by the same rules you're playing by?

That is us playing by the rules yo libtards play by, dude.

So you are comfortable with the mass murderer representing you. whoa.

I never said that liar.

You said you were playing by that rule.

Wrong rule, doofus

 

[JimBowie1958]

It's called civil disobedience. Conservatives ONLY object to it when they don't like the causes behind it.

Pot meet kettle.

Civil Disobedience isn't a liberal thug charging the stage trying to get to Trump. I kinda wished the Secret Service would have just shot his ass as a threat, sending a message to liberals thugs / criminals that this shite won't be tolerated.

Pot meet kettle.

Civil Disobedience isn't a liberal thug charging the stage trying to get to Trump. I kinda wished the Secret Service would have just shot his ass as a threat, sending a message to liberals thugs / criminals that this shite won't be tolerated.

You people have this ONE guy to represent all liberals.

Fine. Can we go back to the ONE guy who shot black people at the church, the self-identified rightwinger,

and claim he represents all conservatives?

Can we play by the same rules you're playing by?

That is us playing by the rules yo libtards play by, dude.

So you are comfortable with the mass murderer representing you. whoa.

I never said that liar.

Ok, then, so now you want to flip flop back to conceding that one guy rushing the Trump stage in no way represents liberalism.

Libtard leaders are encouraging it, paying for it and praising it, like MoveOn, BLM, Soros and Ayers.

 

[Stephanie]

here ya go

snip:

• 
  
  

Bernie Sanders Supporters Brag About Disrupting DONALD TRUMP RALLY IN CHICAGO
March 12, 2016

Left wing radicals shut down the Donald Trump rally in Chicago last night. Jim Hoft provided extensive coverage of the event at The Gateway Pundit.

But who was behind the violent protests? Bernie Sanders supporters.

They openly bragged about it on Twitter.

Here’s a screenshot in case they delete their tweet:

more tweets and all of it here:
Bernie Sanders Supporters Brag About Disrupting DONALD TRUMP RALLY IN CHICAGO - Progressives Today

 

[Papageorgio]

It's called civil disobedience. Conservatives ONLY object to it when they don't like the causes behind it.

Pot meet kettle.

Civil Disobedience isn't a liberal thug charging the stage trying to get to Trump. I kinda wished the Secret Service would have just shot his ass as a threat, sending a message to liberals thugs / criminals that this shite won't be tolerated.

You people have this ONE guy to represent all liberals.

Fine. Can we go back to the ONE guy who shot black people at the church, the self-identified rightwinger,

and claim he represents all conservatives?

Can we play by the same rules you're playing by?

That is us playing by the rules yo libtards play by, dude.

So you are comfortable with the mass murderer representing you. whoa.

I never said that liar.

Ok, then, so now you want to flip flop back to conceding that one guy rushing the Trump stage in no way represents liberalism.

Libtard leaders are encouraging it, paying for it and praising it, like MoveOn, BLM, Soros and Ayers.

Funny how the left embraces a known terrorist who had a part in a violent attack on the US, yet doesn't like Trump who condemns the actions of a terrorist.

The embrace a man that helped the Hitler round up Jews, yet call Trump, Hitler.

They embrace BLM and claim their rhetoric does not increase violence towards police officers and then claim that Trump's rhetoric has increased violence of his supporters.

The hypocrisy of the liberal nutters is amusing.

 

[JimBowie1958]

Funny how the left embraces a known terrorist who had a part in a violent attack on the US, yet doesn't like Trump who condemns the actions of a terrorist.

Are you kidding me? The left loves Ayers and his ilk BECAUSE he attacked the US government and our military.

 

[Stephanie]

how that Obama isn't he the greatest Uniter ever? people voted to put in American haters when they put in Obama and he put in more of them in EVERY government agency. starting with ERIC Holder. Now look where our country is?

Obama is associated with many of the American haters starting with Bill Ayers, Rev. Wright, and on down.
As college student, EricHolder participated in 'armed ...

EricHolderInvolvedin ArmedTakeover of ROTC...

 

[Stephanie]

Beware the Stalker is back preying on you all since they are free on here to stalk people

Funny x 1
The VOR

 

[The VOR]

Beware the Stalker is back preying on you all since they are free on here to stalk people

Funny x 1
The VOR

AW GAWD look what THEY do to us these DEMOCRAT/progressive/commie/socialist/MUSLIM/gays; THEY do it to US….WAKE UP people before they do us to AW GAWD…….;;

 

[NYcarbineer]

Pot meet kettle.

Civil Disobedience isn't a liberal thug charging the stage trying to get to Trump. I kinda wished the Secret Service would have just shot his ass as a threat, sending a message to liberals thugs / criminals that this shite won't be tolerated.

That is us playing by the rules yo libtards play by, dude.

So you are comfortable with the mass murderer representing you. whoa.

I never said that liar.

Ok, then, so now you want to flip flop back to conceding that one guy rushing the Trump stage in no way represents liberalism.

Libtard leaders are encouraging it, paying for it and praising it, like MoveOn, BLM, Soros and Ayers.

Funny how the left embraces a known terrorist who had a part in a violent attack on the US, yet doesn't like Trump who condemns the actions of a terrorist.

The embrace a man that helped the Hitler round up Jews, yet call Trump, Hitler.

They embrace BLM and claim their rhetoric does not increase violence towards police officers and then claim that Trump's rhetoric has increased violence of his supporters.

The hypocrisy of the liberal nutters is amusing.

I do all that? Prove it or shut up.

I take it then that we can fairly say that all Trump supporters embrace the guy who at a rally the other day told someone to go to Auschwitz.

Eh? Fair enough?

 

[Papageorgio]

So you are comfortable with the mass murderer representing you. whoa.

I never said that liar.

Ok, then, so now you want to flip flop back to conceding that one guy rushing the Trump stage in no way represents liberalism.

Libtard leaders are encouraging it, paying for it and praising it, like MoveOn, BLM, Soros and Ayers.

Funny how the left embraces a known terrorist who had a part in a violent attack on the US, yet doesn't like Trump who condemns the actions of a terrorist.

The embrace a man that helped the Hitler round up Jews, yet call Trump, Hitler.

They embrace BLM and claim their rhetoric does not increase violence towards police officers and then claim that Trump's rhetoric has increased violence of his supporters.

The hypocrisy of the liberal nutters is amusing.

I do all that? Prove it or shut up.

I take it then that we can fairly say that all Trump supporters embrace the guy who at a rally the other day told someone to go to Auschwitz.

Eh? Fair enough?

I was responding to Jim about liberal nutters. I don't know that you are a liberal nutter or not.

 

[NYcarbineer]

I never said that liar.

Ok, then, so now you want to flip flop back to conceding that one guy rushing the Trump stage in no way represents liberalism.

Libtard leaders are encouraging it, paying for it and praising it, like MoveOn, BLM, Soros and Ayers.

Funny how the left embraces a known terrorist who had a part in a violent attack on the US, yet doesn't like Trump who condemns the actions of a terrorist.

The embrace a man that helped the Hitler round up Jews, yet call Trump, Hitler.

They embrace BLM and claim their rhetoric does not increase violence towards police officers and then claim that Trump's rhetoric has increased violence of his supporters.

The hypocrisy of the liberal nutters is amusing.

I do all that? Prove it or shut up.

I take it then that we can fairly say that all Trump supporters embrace the guy who at a rally the other day told someone to go to Auschwitz.

Eh? Fair enough?

I was responding to Jim about liberal nutters. I don't know that you are a liberal nutter or not.

Since your statement began 'Funny how the left..."

I think you're lying.

 

[Papageorgio]

Ok, then, so now you want to flip flop back to conceding that one guy rushing the Trump stage in no way represents liberalism.

Libtard leaders are encouraging it, paying for it and praising it, like MoveOn, BLM, Soros and Ayers.

Funny how the left embraces a known terrorist who had a part in a violent attack on the US, yet doesn't like Trump who condemns the actions of a terrorist.

The embrace a man that helped the Hitler round up Jews, yet call Trump, Hitler.

They embrace BLM and claim their rhetoric does not increase violence towards police officers and then claim that Trump's rhetoric has increased violence of his supporters.

The hypocrisy of the liberal nutters is amusing.

I do all that? Prove it or shut up.

I take it then that we can fairly say that all Trump supporters embrace the guy who at a rally the other day told someone to go to Auschwitz.

Eh? Fair enough?

I was responding to Jim about liberal nutters. I don't know that you are a liberal nutter or not.

Since your statement began 'Funny how the left..."

I think you're lying.

Sorry guy, I didn't read your post, I rarely do.