OnePercenter
Gold Member
- Apr 10, 2013
- 23,667
- 1,880
Clear as water with tons of sediment. Depends on if his retirement pay is based on his standing when he was fired.
A good Attorney will get him career pay plus damages. Millions.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Clear as water with tons of sediment. Depends on if his retirement pay is based on his standing when he was fired.
a good district attorney will get him 5 years in the penClear as water with tons of sediment. Depends on if his retirement pay is based on his standing when he was fired.
A good Attorney will get him career pay plus damages. Millions.
Twaticus II, the Sheriff isn't disclosing what policy Fields violated. He's already been asked. If you missed the press conference, that's your own damn fault.I dont have the sherrifs number. Someone posted a link where you can email him though.Is there a standard of what distance to throw somebody when putting them down to the ground to arrest them? How many feet? Gimme a number.Why would anyone make that consideration if the person that fired the feral chimp said this?....Exactly. What policy did he violate since ......he-didn't-execute-the-drag-the-desk-maneuver..... isn't the correct answer?
I have no knowledge of the Richland County Sheriff policies. There is someone who does.
Pay attention, Twaticus. If he wouldn't answer the media on that topic, he certainly isn't going to answer me.
If you weren't such an astronomical hack, you might have already considered the possibility that there is no policy that was violated. Think.
"The fact that he picked the student up and he threw the student across the room -- that is not a proper technique, and should not be used in law enforcement,"
The attorney would have to be more than good for this to occur. He would have to be god on steroids.Clear as water with tons of sediment. Depends on if his retirement pay is based on his standing when he was fired.
A good Attorney will get him career pay plus damages. Millions.
How stupid are you? (rhetorical) He's purposely withholding that information no matter how many times he's asked. He won't be able to withhold it during the lawsuit when he's subpoena'd to testify.No dummy, the sheriff said he was fired for a policy violation. He then went on to explain that it was the throwing if the girl that did it. Obviously then it's a policy regarding physical interaction.Idiot. It's violating no policy that makes him in the right. The burden of proof is on you and the cowardly sheriff with shiny bric a brac all over his costume.so are you going to post up the police standards with the procedure in it? Let's see the video
None of you idiots have any idea what that department's standards, training or procedures are. The sheriff on the other hand knows them very well. He probably even wrote some of them. So when he tells us that his officer did not follow them correctly, I tend to believe him especially since he took the steps to dismiss the officer. Obviously he felt justified in doing so.
Good enough for me. You morons however believe you know better. A sure sign of low intelligence.
Of course it's good enough for you. Intelligent people want to know exactly what procedure he violated and the question can't be ducked forever, especially with the upcoming lawsuit.
Apparently you know the procedure he allegedly violated if you feel he was in the right.
There is no burden on me at all. The sheriff hasn't released the specific information you require but if you need it so badly I do have his email.
How?So he blamed the girl but fired the feral chimp? Amazing. Kinda puts a hole in SMD's politician theory doesnt it?from rawstory:
Sheriff Leon Lott blames flipped teen for police assault: She started this whole incident
excerpt:
"Sheriff Leon Lott blames flipped teen for police assault: She started this whole incident"
Sounds like life is going to suck for you, Buc, and JC then if thats the case. I'm content with him explaining the feral chimp was fired for the following.....Twaticus II, the Sheriff isn't disclosing what policy Fields violated. He's already been asked. If you missed the press conference, that's your own damn fault.I dont have the sherrifs number. Someone posted a link where you can email him though.Is there a standard of what distance to throw somebody when putting them down to the ground to arrest them? How many feet? Gimme a number.Why would anyone make that consideration if the person that fired the feral chimp said this?....I have no knowledge of the Richland County Sheriff policies. There is someone who does.
Pay attention, Twaticus. If he wouldn't answer the media on that topic, he certainly isn't going to answer me.
If you weren't such an astronomical hack, you might have already considered the possibility that there is no policy that was violated. Think.
"The fact that he picked the student up and he threw the student across the room -- that is not a proper technique, and should not be used in law enforcement,"
Now you want to claim your NA heritage?How?So he blamed the girl but fired the feral chimp? Amazing. Kinda puts a hole in SMD's politician theory doesnt it?from rawstory:
Sheriff Leon Lott blames flipped teen for police assault: She started this whole incident
excerpt:
"Sheriff Leon Lott blames flipped teen for police assault: She started this whole incident"
The pivotal question here is how did she know what was coming?Girl arrested during Spring Valley incident says she told classmates to film
BREAKING. THE BITCH PLANNED IT.
Told friends to "get your phones out, something is about to happen".
SHE was determined to MAKE SOMETHING HAPPEN. And....she won.
I want to make it clear that I am not sympathetic toward this troublemaker. But I do believe Fields behaved stupidly, possibly driven by steroidal rage. What I saw is not the kind of behavior by a uniformed police officer that either I or the average peaceful citizen (the racism factor aside) approves of.
When an ordinary citizen sees something like this, while he/she might superficially approve of the punishment imposed on the troublemaker he/she is subliminally concerned with something else: What if this cop stops me for some bs traffic offense and he is pissed off at my attitude? If the response to that thought is, be very careful about your attitude, the suggestion of oppression then arises.
The simple fact is no one but the authoritarian/submissive personality likes imposed authority. Even (most) cops dislike their bosses leaning on them, regardless of how routine and appropriate.
Why would he withhold it and when is the lawsuit?How stupid are you? (rhetorical) He's purposely withholding that information no matter how many times he's asked. He won't be able to withhold it during the lawsuit when he's subpoena'd to testify.No dummy, the sheriff said he was fired for a policy violation. He then went on to explain that it was the throwing if the girl that did it. Obviously then it's a policy regarding physical interaction.Idiot. It's violating no policy that makes him in the right. The burden of proof is on you and the cowardly sheriff with shiny bric a brac all over his costume.None of you idiots have any idea what that department's standards, training or procedures are. The sheriff on the other hand knows them very well. He probably even wrote some of them. So when he tells us that his officer did not follow them correctly, I tend to believe him especially since he took the steps to dismiss the officer. Obviously he felt justified in doing so.
Good enough for me. You morons however believe you know better. A sure sign of low intelligence.
Of course it's good enough for you. Intelligent people want to know exactly what procedure he violated and the question can't be ducked forever, especially with the upcoming lawsuit.
Apparently you know the procedure he allegedly violated if you feel he was in the right.
There is no burden on me at all. The sheriff hasn't released the specific information you require but if you need it so badly I do have his email.
Don't care what you believe. You could be some highly disturbed white dude pretending to be black.Now you want to claim your NA heritage?How?So he blamed the girl but fired the feral chimp? Amazing. Kinda puts a hole in SMD's politician theory doesnt it?from rawstory:
Sheriff Leon Lott blames flipped teen for police assault: She started this whole incident
excerpt:
"Sheriff Leon Lott blames flipped teen for police assault: She started this whole incident"![]()
Why would he withhold it and when is the lawsuit?How stupid are you? (rhetorical) He's purposely withholding that information no matter how many times he's asked. He won't be able to withhold it during the lawsuit when he's subpoena'd to testify.No dummy, the sheriff said he was fired for a policy violation. He then went on to explain that it was the throwing if the girl that did it. Obviously then it's a policy regarding physical interaction.Idiot. It's violating no policy that makes him in the right. The burden of proof is on you and the cowardly sheriff with shiny bric a brac all over his costume.Of course it's good enough for you. Intelligent people want to know exactly what procedure he violated and the question can't be ducked forever, especially with the upcoming lawsuit.
Apparently you know the procedure he allegedly violated if you feel he was in the right.
There is no burden on me at all. The sheriff hasn't released the specific information you require but if you need it so badly I do have his email.
Why would you care what I believe? I could be a white dude. That still doesnt explain your stupidity.Don't care what you believe. You could be some highly disturbed white dude pretending to be black.Now you want to claim your NA heritage?How?So he blamed the girl but fired the feral chimp? Amazing. Kinda puts a hole in SMD's politician theory doesnt it?from rawstory:
Sheriff Leon Lott blames flipped teen for police assault: She started this whole incident
excerpt:
"Sheriff Leon Lott blames flipped teen for police assault: She started this whole incident"![]()
So basically youre just guessing even though nothing you say is going to happen has happened?Why would he withhold it and when is the lawsuit?How stupid are you? (rhetorical) He's purposely withholding that information no matter how many times he's asked. He won't be able to withhold it during the lawsuit when he's subpoena'd to testify.No dummy, the sheriff said he was fired for a policy violation. He then went on to explain that it was the throwing if the girl that did it. Obviously then it's a policy regarding physical interaction.Idiot. It's violating no policy that makes him in the right. The burden of proof is on you and the cowardly sheriff with shiny bric a brac all over his costume.Apparently you know the procedure he allegedly violated if you feel he was in the right.
There is no burden on me at all. The sheriff hasn't released the specific information you require but if you need it so badly I do have his email.
He withheld it because there is no policy that was violated and the lawsuit takes time. He was just fired yesterday, Bucky.
The attorney would have to be more than good for this to occur. He would have to be god on steroids.Clear as water with tons of sediment. Depends on if his retirement pay is based on his standing when he was fired.
A good Attorney will get him career pay plus damages. Millions.
How stupid are you? (rhetorical) He's purposely withholding that information no matter how many times he's asked. He won't be able to withhold it during the lawsuit when he's subpoena'd to testify.No dummy, the sheriff said he was fired for a policy violation. He then went on to explain that it was the throwing if the girl that did it. Obviously then it's a policy regarding physical interaction.Idiot. It's violating no policy that makes him in the right. The burden of proof is on you and the cowardly sheriff with shiny bric a brac all over his costume.None of you idiots have any idea what that department's standards, training or procedures are. The sheriff on the other hand knows them very well. He probably even wrote some of them. So when he tells us that his officer did not follow them correctly, I tend to believe him especially since he took the steps to dismiss the officer. Obviously he felt justified in doing so.
Good enough for me. You morons however believe you know better. A sure sign of low intelligence.
Of course it's good enough for you. Intelligent people want to know exactly what procedure he violated and the question can't be ducked forever, especially with the upcoming lawsuit.
Apparently you know the procedure he allegedly violated if you feel he was in the right.
There is no burden on me at all. The sheriff hasn't released the specific information you require but if you need it so badly I do have his email.
What if he just hands the attorney a written policy that has the portion the feral chimp violated highlighted? Are you playing make believe again?The attorney would have to be more than good for this to occur. He would have to be god on steroids.Clear as water with tons of sediment. Depends on if his retirement pay is based on his standing when he was fired.
A good Attorney will get him career pay plus damages. Millions.
Not really. He just needs to get Sheriff Lott on the stand with his shiny cop costume and get him to start stuttering when asked what policy Fields actually violated.
The attorney would have to be more than good for this to occur. He would have to be god on steroids.Clear as water with tons of sediment. Depends on if his retirement pay is based on his standing when he was fired.
A good Attorney will get him career pay plus damages. Millions.
Not really. He just needs to get Sheriff Lott on the stand with his shiny cop costume and get him to start stuttering when asked what policy Fields actually violated.