Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If that was true you'd have a link. But this is as provable as the existence of ghost farts
democrats demand it is your right to engage in fraud
The overwhelming majority of fraud is voting under the name of another - either a dead or fictitious voter.
Strawman fallacy. Textbok case.
Since voter fraud has continued unabated in Voter ID states, one can't help but wonder if the Voter ID pupper masters are the ones who rely on fraud.
And here we have a person who clearly did not spend the ten seconds to figure out why impersonation fraud is extremely rare, and cannot figure out why such fraud is impossible on a scale large enough to swing elections undetected.
In short, a moron.
He is also ignorant of the fact that Voter ID does nothing to stop multiple precinct voting!
CROOK: Hi. I'm Joe Schmuckatelli. I'm here to vote.
OLD LADY VOLUNTEER: [checks voter registration list] Oh, yes. Here you are. [checks name off list] And here is your ballot.
CROOK: Har de har har! [votes for Muslim Kenyan marxist]
[ten minutes later...]
JOE SCHMUCKATELLI: Hi. I'm Joe Schmuckatelli. I'm here to vote.
OLD LADY VOLUNTEER:[checks voter registration list] Oh goodness! You've already voted!
And THAT, you morons, is why impersonation fraud is so rare, and why it cannot be perpetrated undetected on a large scale.
And that is why we do not need another government hurdle like Voter ID to vote, you liberal-minded rubes.
It does not affect only minorities. It affects low income and seniors most.
Strawman fallacy. Textbok case.
Complete fact. You view fraud as your sacred right, a legacy not to be disturbed.
Since voter fraud has continued unabated in Voter ID states, one can't help but wonder if the Voter ID pupper masters are the ones who rely on fraud.
Now THERE is a straw man...
Voter ID is completely ineffective. It does not stop the vast majority of the kinds of fraud which occur.
Period.
Fake what? Registering at another precinct?? Actually quite hard 0_o
It does not affect only minorities. It affects low income and seniors most.
Yeah, the low income people who HAVE TO HAVE ID TO USE EBT and the seniors who HAVE TO HAVE ID TO USE Social Security and Medicare...
Voter ID is completely ineffective. It does not stop the vast majority of the kinds of fraud which occur.
Period.
If that were true, you and your shameful party wouldn't fight it.
Fake what? Registering at another precinct?? Actually quite hard 0_o
Voting for a dead person.
Not very hard at all, the democrats do it a million times every election.
And here we see the same tired apples and oranges comparison fallacy again. Christ, I even pre-emptively addressed the alcohol one but you went ahead and tripped over yourself with it anyway.
Is there a better way to sell someone a drink and ensure they are over 21 besides asking them for an ID?
Nope.
Is buying a drink and hoping the guy doesn't know you are under 21 the same as someone impersonating someone else at the voting booth?
Nope.
The same fallacy is at work in all your bogus comparisons.
It turns out the claims of 953 votes by dead people actually involved not one election but 74 elections over a seven-year period.
So SLED’s investigation centered on 207 votes that allegedly were made by dead people in the Nov. 2, 2010 election — when a total of 1,365,480 votes were cast — after officials concluded that that batch constituted a “representative sampling” of the alleged voting irregularities. (Note that the number of alleged dead votes was less than 2/10,000th of all of the votes cast in that election.)
The report confirms what the State Election Commission had found after preliminarily examining some of the allegations: The so-called votes by dead people were the result of clerical errors or mistaken identities.
For instance, sometimes a son had the same name as a deceased father, and poll workers mixed up a dead father with a living son. (This happened 92 times in the initial probe, and then further investigation found seven more examples.)
In 56 cases, there was “bad data matching,” in which the DMV records had the Social Security of a dead person associated with a living voter. The living voter — with a different name and birth date — properly cast a ballot. Thirty-two votes attributed to dead people were simply the result of too-sensitive scanners.
In one case, someone cast an absentee ballot before dying; their vote still counts under the law. In two other cases, people requested an absentee ballot, but died before returning it, so no harm was done. In other cases, the wrong voter was marked as having cast a vote, and then the marks were not completely erased. There were several other types of clerical errors, too numerous to mention. In the end, just five votes remained unresolved after extensive investigation.
In other words, there were not “hundreds” of zombie voters — just egg on the face of the politicians who promoted these “facts” across national television. So do they have any regrets?
This is a lie. You destroy your integrity when you make shit up.
Fact is, you not only support fraud, you DEMAND fraud.
I don't recall you ever proving the overwhelming majority of fraud is voting under the name of another - either a dead or fictitious voter.
That is what is known as in-person fraud, and it has been proven many times that it is extremely rare.
And the reason it is extremely rare has been explained very carefully in this topic.
