Pacific Ocean waters absorbing heat 15 times faster over past 60 years than in past 1

[PMZ]

You might be on to something if there wasn't the manipulation of the data.

Here's your chance to present some evidence.

Bone up on the leaked emails, dude. Just google it....

This passes for evidence in your circles?

 

[daveman]

Your vendetta is the moral and intellectual equivalent of an old fashioned book burning.

Destroy that knowledge because it's counter to what authorities want people to believe.

IT'S HERESY I TELL YOU AND THOSE WHO BELIEVE IT ARE HERETICTS!

What a streaming, stinking pile.

Indeed it is.
Blog: Academic warmists celebrate book burning at San Jose State University

Global-warming skeptics are sick and must be treated, says prof

?Execute? Skeptics! Shock Call To Action: ?At what point do we jail or execute global warming deniers? ? ?Shouldn?t we start punishing them now?? | Climate Depot

Howard Dean on climate change deniers: ?Run ?em over?

Blog: Al Gore compares global warming skeptics with racists, apartheid supporters, and homophobes

Columnist says that global warming skeptics 'should have their houses burnt down' | Mail Online

The AGW cult is scary. Dangerous.

 

[daveman]

Here's your chance to present some evidence.

Bone up on the leaked emails, dude. Just google it....

This passes for evidence in your circles?

When the manipulators are admitting they're manipulating the data, yes, that's evidence here in reality.

 

[Abraham3]

Of course they manipulate data. It's necessary. That's why the world's scientists weren't flipped out by the stolen emails. They fully understood that the parties involved weren't doing anything they weren't supposed to do; that they didn't have to do, to make their conclusions as accurate as possible.

Remember the ARGO floats. Your side of the camp was very happy with their initial results. They seemed to show that the ocean wasn't warming at all. That didn't jibe with a lot of other observations, but that didn't seem to make much difference to a number of denier pundits. Then it was finally figured out that the floats had a significant bias in their temperature readings. What did they do about it? They began MANIPULATING the data to bring their readings back to accurate values.

The same is true almost everywhere. Data gets manipulated to make it MORE accurate, not to achieve some proprietary goal.

 

[PMZ]

Your vendetta is the moral and intellectual equivalent of an old fashioned book burning.

Destroy that knowledge because it's counter to what authorities want people to believe.

IT'S HERESY I TELL YOU AND THOSE WHO BELIEVE IT ARE HERETICTS!

What a streaming, stinking pile.

Indeed it is.
Blog: Academic warmists celebrate book burning at San Jose State University

Global-warming skeptics are sick and must be treated, says prof

?Execute? Skeptics! Shock Call To Action: ?At what point do we jail or execute global warming deniers? ? ?Shouldn?t we start punishing them now?? | Climate Depot

Howard Dean on climate change deniers: ?Run ?em over?

Blog: Al Gore compares global warming skeptics with racists, apartheid supporters, and homophobes

Columnist says that global warming skeptics 'should have their houses burnt down' | Mail Online

The AGW cult is scary. Dangerous.

If you are afraid of science but comfortable with mythology, that means that you are what's called a primitive.

 

[PMZ]

Of course they manipulate data. It's necessary. That's why the world's scientists weren't flipped out by the stolen emails. They fully understood that the parties involved weren't doing anything they weren't supposed to do; that they didn't have to do, to make their conclusions as accurate as possible.

Remember the ARGO floats. Your side of the camp was very happy with their initial results. They seemed to show that the ocean wasn't warming at all. That didn't jibe with a lot of other observations, but that didn't seem to make much difference to a number of denier pundits. Then it was finally figured out that the floats had a significant bias in their temperature readings. What did they do about it? They began MANIPULATING the data to bring their readings back to accurate values.

The same is true almost everywhere. Data gets manipulated to make it MORE accurate, not to achieve some proprietary goal.

Denialists have no use for data. It almost always conflicts with their mythology. It's just too inflexible.

 

[westwall]

A good example is the recent grossly fatal Philippines typhoon. The worst storm ever there.

How much energy was consumed by it?

None. It's all still here. It was merely moving from where it was to where it is.

"worst storm ever" What a laugh. While this most recent storm was terrible it is far, far from the worst ever.

You're a poor excuse for a propagandist, that's all I can say.

That's why I said worst storm ever THERE, which it was.

No, no it's not. And by a fairly long way.

 

[westwall]

Of course they manipulate data. It's necessary. That's why the world's scientists weren't flipped out by the stolen emails. They fully understood that the parties involved weren't doing anything they weren't supposed to do; that they didn't have to do, to make their conclusions as accurate as possible.

Remember the ARGO floats. Your side of the camp was very happy with their initial results. They seemed to show that the ocean wasn't warming at all. That didn't jibe with a lot of other observations, but that didn't seem to make much difference to a number of denier pundits. Then it was finally figured out that the floats had a significant bias in their temperature readings. What did they do about it? They began MANIPULATING the data to bring their readings back to accurate values.

The same is true almost everywhere. Data gets manipulated to make it MORE accurate, not to achieve some proprietary goal.

Yes, fraudsters will rationalize every facet of their falsification of data to support their pre-determined PROPRIETARY GOAL.

 

[daveman]

Of course they manipulate data. It's necessary. That's why the world's scientists weren't flipped out by the stolen emails. They fully understood that the parties involved weren't doing anything they weren't supposed to do; that they didn't have to do, to make their conclusions as accurate as possible.

Remember the ARGO floats. Your side of the camp was very happy with their initial results. They seemed to show that the ocean wasn't warming at all. That didn't jibe with a lot of other observations, but that didn't seem to make much difference to a number of denier pundits. Then it was finally figured out that the floats had a significant bias in their temperature readings. What did they do about it? They began MANIPULATING the data to bring their readings back to accurate values.

The same is true almost everywhere. Data gets manipulated to make it MORE accurate, not to achieve some proprietary goal.

Wow. Just...wow.

 

[daveman]

Your vendetta is the moral and intellectual equivalent of an old fashioned book burning.

Destroy that knowledge because it's counter to what authorities want people to believe.

IT'S HERESY I TELL YOU AND THOSE WHO BELIEVE IT ARE HERETICTS!

What a streaming, stinking pile.

Indeed it is.
Blog: Academic warmists celebrate book burning at San Jose State University

Global-warming skeptics are sick and must be treated, says prof

?Execute? Skeptics! Shock Call To Action: ?At what point do we jail or execute global warming deniers? ? ?Shouldn?t we start punishing them now?? | Climate Depot

Howard Dean on climate change deniers: ?Run ?em over?

Blog: Al Gore compares global warming skeptics with racists, apartheid supporters, and homophobes

Columnist says that global warming skeptics 'should have their houses burnt down' | Mail Online

The AGW cult is scary. Dangerous.

If you are afraid of science but comfortable with mythology, that means that you are what's called a primitive.

I love science. I'm uncomfortable with your mythology.

Because some of you cultists are insane. And violent.

 

[PMZ]

"worst storm ever" What a laugh. While this most recent storm was terrible it is far, far from the worst ever.

You're a poor excuse for a propagandist, that's all I can say.

That's why I said worst storm ever THERE, which it was.

No, no it's not. And by a fairly long way.

The strongest tropical cyclones in world history
Super TyphoonYearWinds, mphmbLandfall?
Nancy1961215882Made landfall as a Cat 2 in Japan, killing 191 people
Violet1961205886Made landfall in Japan as a tropical storm, killing 2 people
Ida1958200877Made landfall as a Cat 1 in Japan, killing 1269 people

Haiyan2013195895Made landfall in the Philippines at peak strength.

Kit1966195880Did not make landfall.
Sally1964195895 Made landfall as a Cat 4 in the Philippines.

From http://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2013/nov/08/typhoon-haiyan-philippines-tropical-cyclones

 

[PMZ]

Indeed it is.
Blog: Academic warmists celebrate book burning at San Jose State University

Global-warming skeptics are sick and must be treated, says prof

?Execute? Skeptics! Shock Call To Action: ?At what point do we jail or execute global warming deniers? ? ?Shouldn?t we start punishing them now?? | Climate Depot

Howard Dean on climate change deniers: ?Run ?em over?

Blog: Al Gore compares global warming skeptics with racists, apartheid supporters, and homophobes

Columnist says that global warming skeptics 'should have their houses burnt down' | Mail Online

The AGW cult is scary. Dangerous.

If you are afraid of science but comfortable with mythology, that means that you are what's called a primitive.

I love science. I'm uncomfortable with your mythology.

Because some of you cultists are insane. And violent.

You love science but don't believe it??

We keep asking for some little shred of science that supports what you wish was true. So far, nothing.

Will this be your big revelation?

Start with GHGs. Why are they called that?

 

[Meister]

Here's your chance to present some evidence.

Bone up on the leaked emails, dude. Just google it....

This passes for evidence in your circles?

Do your homework, I'm not going to do it for you. Your post is just deflection from something you don't want to admit as true.

 

[freedombecki]

Your vendetta is the moral and intellectual equivalent of an old fashioned book burning.

Destroy that knowledge because it's counter to what authorities want people to believe.

IT'S HERESY I TELL YOU AND THOSE WHO BELIEVE IT ARE HERETICTS!

What a streaming, stinking pile.

Indeed it is.
Blog: Academic warmists celebrate book burning at San Jose State University

Global-warming skeptics are sick and must be treated, says prof

?Execute? Skeptics! Shock Call To Action: ?At what point do we jail or execute global warming deniers? ? ?Shouldn?t we start punishing them now?? | Climate Depot

Howard Dean on climate change deniers: ?Run ?em over?

Blog: Al Gore compares global warming skeptics with racists, apartheid supporters, and homophobes

Columnist says that global warming skeptics 'should have their houses burnt down' | Mail Online

The AGW cult is scary. Dangerous.

Excellent links, Daveman. Isn't it funny how the very person who screams "prove it" etc. does not understand what is known and continues on as though the truth does not exist anywhere but on his talking points sheet from a corrupt group of fact-jumpers.

 

[Abraham3]

Do you believe the vast majority of the world's active climate scientists make up or are involved in a cult?

Do you think that thousands of PhDs have an interest in physically punishing those who disagree with them?

[Just saw your response to my last post to you. Not much of a response, but it was something]

 

[westwall]

That's why I said worst storm ever THERE, which it was.

No, no it's not. And by a fairly long way.

The strongest tropical cyclones in world history
Super TyphoonYearWinds, mphmbLandfall?
Nancy1961215882Made landfall as a Cat 2 in Japan, killing 191 people
Violet1961205886Made landfall in Japan as a tropical storm, killing 2 people
Ida1958200877Made landfall as a Cat 1 in Japan, killing 1269 people

Haiyan2013195895Made landfall in the Philippines at peak strength.

Kit1966195880Did not make landfall.
Sally1964195895 Made landfall as a Cat 4 in the Philippines.

From Typhoon Haiyan: how does it compare with other tropical cyclones? | World news | theguardian.com

Not even close monkey boy....

http://www.typhoon2000.ph/stormstats/PhilippineTyphoons1566-1900.pdf


The Selga Chronology, 1348-1900

 

[westwall]

Do you believe the vast majority of the world's active climate scientists make up or are involved in a cult?

Do you think that thousands of PhDs have an interest in physically punishing those who disagree with them?

[Just saw your response to my last post to you. Not much of a response, but it was something]

No, I believe that 74 climatologists are so dependent on public largesse that they will lie through their teeth to keep the gravy train running. They are merely lazy criminals. You though, and your fellow clones, you are either just as dependent, or you are religious cultists...or you're just plain crazy.

 

[flacaltenn]

When you have a MAJOR climate scientist writing colleagues suggesting that they need to radiacalize the ipcc process even more........ Its time to admit ..... its an extortionion ring. Not a scientific venture.

 

[orogenicman]

You might be on to something if there wasn't the manipulation of the data.

Here's your chance to present some evidence.

Bone up on the leaked emails, dude. Just google it....

But of course, you have no problem with the real crime that was committed - the hacking of secure government servers.

 

[orogenicman]

Of course they manipulate data. It's necessary. That's why the world's scientists weren't flipped out by the stolen emails. They fully understood that the parties involved weren't doing anything they weren't supposed to do; that they didn't have to do, to make their conclusions as accurate as possible.

Remember the ARGO floats. Your side of the camp was very happy with their initial results. They seemed to show that the ocean wasn't warming at all. That didn't jibe with a lot of other observations, but that didn't seem to make much difference to a number of denier pundits. Then it was finally figured out that the floats had a significant bias in their temperature readings. What did they do about it? They began MANIPULATING the data to bring their readings back to accurate values.

The same is true almost everywhere. Data gets manipulated to make it MORE accurate, not to achieve some proprietary goal.

Yes, fraudsters will rationalize every facet of their falsification of data to support their pre-determined PROPRIETARY GOAL.

Of course, never having calibrated or used a scientific instrument in your life, you are well informed to come to that conclusion - IF you want to be seen as a friggin idiot.