Palestine Today

[Hollie]

Nadia Ben-Youssef: "A New Day? Organizing to Change US Policy on Israel and Palestine"

"I thought it was a Jewish State. You're right there. At the essence. How then can it be a Jewish State and still protect the rights of non-Jews? How can you on the one hand maintain a supremacist ideology and guarantee equality?"

She poses an excellent question. (Unfortunately, she only poses that question about the Jewish state, rather than posing it about every state.) If one was to be objective about that question, one would have to ask if equality can be achieved in ANY state where there is a minority population which is somehow "other" than the dominant culture.

She is essentially arguing that there can not be equality in populations which are not homogeneous.

I wonder how she would have other countries address that issue.

She is essentially arguing that there can not be equality in populations which are not homogeneous.

No she isn't.

Of course she was. Do you ever watch any of the silly youtube videos you dump into these forums?

 

[Hollie]

A new day?

No. Same old pathology of the Islamic Death Cult

 

[Hollie]

Oh, my. Arabs-Moslems have lost a vehicle to promote the Death Cult.

 

[P F Tinmore]

A Soul's Odyssey - Performed and Composed by Dana Rizek from the album 'Letters to Palestine',

 

[P F Tinmore]

Dana Dajani

 

[P F Tinmore]

Noor Daoud!! O Drift no Feminino na Palestina!!

 

[P F Tinmore]

PALESTINIAN RIGHT OF RETURN Lamis Deek

 

[P F Tinmore]

People for Palestine: Rania Elhilou

 

[Hollie]

Lamis Deem. Just another Jooooooo hater.

 

[Hollie]

Hitler Youth

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[RoccoR]

RE: Palestine Today
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

This entire issue of "Juvenile Delinquency" and the "Incarceration of Minors" is nothing more than the exploitation of emotion which is a means of propaganda and fallacy often used in place

✪ Appeal to Emotion

Appeal to emotion that is a logical fallacy characterized by the manipulation of the recipient's emotions in order to win an argument, especially in the absence of factual evidence.

• (Apache2 Ubuntu Default Page: It works.fallacyfiles.org/emotiona.html)
• (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_emotion)

In addition to the spreading of "disinformation" the propagandist attempts to shift the weight of the specific topic (the non-adult minor Ahed Tamimi) away from that which is based on the content of ideas and opinions on promoting the rule of law ⇒ towards the twin seductions of a non-exist right to use "violence" and the non-exist right to "incitement to violence.".

EXCERPT: Media clips removed:

George Galloway : "Ahed Tamimi has every legal never mind just moral right to slap that soldier"
​

(COMMENT)

Understanding that the concepts outlined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR → 1948) now replaced by International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (CCPR → 1976)(1967), which by the way, never made it into law, does not stipulate any "right to violence." And the UN does not advocate anything other than the Arab Palestinians comply fully and in good faith with their obligations to live in peace. The very idea that some pretender to leadership would suggest that Arab Palestinians, which attempted to establish a regime twenty years (1988) after Israel established "effective control" (at a time after the Kingdom of Jordan openly abandon the territory into the hands of the Israelis) through the use of violence as a first option is a hint as to the mental acuity of the Arab Palestinians.

HR Article 43: (1907)

The authority of the legitimate power having in fact passed into the hands of the occupant, the latter shall take all the measures in his power to restore, and ensure, as far as possible, public order and safety, while respecting, unless absolutely prevented, the laws in force in the country.​

UDHR Article 20: (1948)

1. Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and association.
2. No one may be compelled to belong to an association.​

CCPR Article 21: (1976)

The right of peaceful assembly shall be recognized. No restrictions may be placed on the exercise of this right other than those imposed in conformity with the law and which are necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security or public safety, public order (ordre public), the protection of public health or morals or the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.​

There is no legal right or moral right to the parental incitement → hostile approach → and subsequent escalation to violence. That is simply not the intent of the Declaration of Principles or customary/traditional practice in the application of post-conflict reparation made after a war by the vanquished to the victors.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: Palestine Today
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

This entire issue of "Juvenile Delinquency" and the "Incarceration of Minors" is nothing more than the exploitation of emotion which is a means of propaganda and fallacy often used in place

✪ Appeal to Emotion

Appeal to emotion that is a logical fallacy characterized by the manipulation of the recipient's emotions in order to win an argument, especially in the absence of factual evidence.

• (Apache2 Ubuntu Default Page: It works.fallacyfiles.org/emotiona.html)
• (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_emotion)

In addition to the spreading of "disinformation" the propagandist attempts to shift the weight of the specific topic (the non-adult minor Ahed Tamimi) away from that which is based on the content of ideas and opinions on promoting the rule of law ⇒ towards the twin seductions of a non-exist right to use "violence" and the non-exist right to "incitement to violence.".

EXCERPT: Media clips removed:

George Galloway : "Ahed Tamimi has every legal never mind just moral right to slap that soldier"
​

(COMMENT)

Understanding that the concepts outlined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR → 1948) now replaced by International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (CCPR → 1976)(1967), which by the way, never made it into law, does not stipulate any "right to violence." And the UN does not advocate anything other than the Arab Palestinians comply fully and in good faith with their obligations to live in peace. The very idea that some pretender to leadership would suggest that Arab Palestinians, which attempted to establish a regime twenty years (1988) after Israel established "effective control" (at a time after the Kingdom of Jordan openly abandon the territory into the hands of the Israelis) through the use of violence as a first option is a hint as to the mental acuity of the Arab Palestinians.

HR Article 43: (1907)

The authority of the legitimate power having in fact passed into the hands of the occupant, the latter shall take all the measures in his power to restore, and ensure, as far as possible, public order and safety, while respecting, unless absolutely prevented, the laws in force in the country.​

UDHR Article 20: (1948)

1. Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and association.
2. No one may be compelled to belong to an association.​

CCPR Article 21: (1976)

The right of peaceful assembly shall be recognized. No restrictions may be placed on the exercise of this right other than those imposed in conformity with the law and which are necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security or public safety, public order (ordre public), the protection of public health or morals or the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.​

There is no legal right or moral right to the parental incitement → hostile approach → and subsequent escalation to violence. That is simply not the intent of the Declaration of Principles or customary/traditional practice in the application of post-conflict reparation made after a war by the vanquished to the victors.

Most Respectfully,
R

So Israel has the right to shoot her cousin in the face but she is not allowed to slap one of their goontards?

You is one fucked up dude, Rocco.

 

[Hollie]

Oh, my. Arab-Moslem Death Cultists feel slighted.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Defining and Defeating the Opioid Crisis | Manal Fakhoury

 

[Hollie]

FORMER TOP PA SECURITY CHIEF MOHAMMED DAHLAN CRITICIZES "CORRUPT" PALESTINIAN AUTHORITY: THE PA IS PUNISHING ITS OWN PEOPLE

 

[Hollie]

Al (Dead Islamic Terrorist Walking) Brigades

 

[P F Tinmore]

Leila Farsakh: Mandatory Palestine prior to 1939 Opposition to British policy and Zionist

 

[RoccoR]

RE: Palestine Today
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

This entire issue of "Juvenile Delinquency" and the "Incarceration of Minors" is nothing more than the exploitation of emotion which is a means of propaganda and fallacy often used in place a subsantive fact.

✪ Appeal to Emotion

Appeal to emotion that is a logical fallacy characterized by the manipulation of the recipient's emotions in order to win an argument, especially in the absence of factual evidence.

• (Apache2 Ubuntu Default Page: It works.fallacyfiles.org/emotiona.html)
• (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appeal_to_emotion)

In addition to the spreading of "disinformation" the propagandist attempts to shift the weight of the specific topic (the non-adult minor Ahed Tamimi) away from that which is based on the content of ideas and opinions on promoting the rule of law ⇒ towards the twin seductions of a non-exist right to use "violence" and the non-exist right to "incitement to violence.".

EXCERPT: Media clips removed:

George Galloway : "Ahed Tamimi has every legal never mind just moral right to slap that soldier"​

(COMMENT)

Understanding that the concepts outlined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR → 1948) now replaced by International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (CCPR → 1976)(1967), which by the way, never made it into law, does not stipulate any "right to violence." And the UN does not advocate anything other than the Arab Palestinians comply fully and in good faith with their obligations to live in peace. The very idea that some pretender to leadership would suggest that Arab Palestinians, which attempted to establish a regime twenty years (1988) after Israel established "effective control" (at a time after the Kingdom of Jordan openly abandon the territory into the hands of the Israelis) through the use of violence as a first option is a hint as to the mental acuity of the Arab Palestinians.

HR Article 43: (1907)

The authority of the legitimate power having in fact passed into the hands of the occupant, the latter shall take all the measures in his power to restore, and ensure, as far as possible, public order and safety, while respecting, unless absolutely prevented, the laws in force in the country.​

UDHR Article 20: (1948)

1. Everyone has the right to freedom of peaceful assembly and association.
2. No one may be compelled to belong to an association.
​

CCPR Article 21: (1976)

The right of peaceful assembly shall be recognized. No restrictions may be placed on the exercise of this right other than those imposed in conformity with the law and which are necessary in a democratic society in the interests of national security or public safety, public order (ordre public), the protection of public health or morals or the protection of the rights and freedoms of others.​

There is no legal right or moral right to the parental incitement → hostile approach → and subsequent escalation to violence. That is simply not the intent of the Declaration of Principles or customary/traditional practice in the application of post-conflict reparation made after a war by the vanquished to the victors.

So Israel has the right to shoot her cousin in the face but she is not allowed to slap one of their goontards?

You is one fucked up dude, Rocco.

(COMMENT)

In addition to the contemprary19 Counter-Terrorism Conventions that exist today, the Customary Law, such as the Convention for the Prevention and Punishment of Terrorism, which was adopted by 24 member states of the League of Nations on November 16, 1937, still has meaning as a source of International Law. It also prevents the incitement and encouragement.

​

There is no law that allows that actions of either Ms Ahed Tamimi or her mother. It does not matter what dispute there is, including occupation. The occupation was established well before the State of Palestine was established.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[USAF 2023]

PALESTINIAN RIGHT OF RETURN Lamis Deek

I like this! Because “ Right of Return” will never happen. Hope they keep insisting on it.