Palestine Today

[RoccoR]

RE: Palestine Today
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

Popularity (by the cowards together with the anti-Jewish bias in the UN) and the application of selective justice (under the color of law) are not productive paths towards peace. This was the path of violence → fueled by the three major interlocking energies of the Arab Palestinian terrorism-oriented facet government

✪ The thirst for power disguised as national liberation movement;
✪ The use of violence and threats to coerce a people and leadership;
✪ The Intimidation of a population → or → acts which compel a government to do or to abstain from doing any act,​

REMEMBER: The UN security council considered the defense against terrorism as [S/RES/1566 (2004) SECURITY COUNCIL ACTS CONDEMNING TERRORISM AS ONE OF MOST SERIOUS THREATS] as “Acting under Chapter VII of the Charter of the United Nations."

Holy smokescreen, Batman! WTF is with all the slime? You did hit on the root of the problem though.

3. The act of aggression – the use of armed force by a State against the sovereignty, territorial integrity or political independence of another State, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Charter of the United Nations – was committed.​

Of course, this involves the rights that the UN has reaffirmed belong to the Palestinians. There are no parallel resolutions for the Israelis.

The Palestinians (all civilians) are attacked by a foreign military, land was stolen, assets stolen or destroyed, and if they complain they are arrested or killed. There are some other issues but this is the main problem.

(COMMENT)

I read in the International Review of the Red Cross (Volume 88 Number 864 December 2006) that there are:

"nearly fifty offences, including some ten crimes against civil aviation, some sixteen crimes against shipping or continental platforms, a dozen crimes against the person, seven crimes involving the use, possession or threatened use of ‘‘bombs’’ or nuclear materials, and two crimes concerning the financing of terrorism. There is a tendency to consider these treaties as establishing a sort of evolving code of terrorist offences."​

The Security Council "By the unanimous adoption of resolution 1566 (2004), the Council recalled that criminal acts, including against civilians, committed with the intent to cause death or serious bodily injury, or taking of hostages, with the purpose to provoke a state of terror, or compel a government or international organization to do or to abstain from doing any act which contravened terrorism-related conventions and protocols, were not justifiable for any reason –- whether of a political, philosophical ideological, racial, ethnic or religious nature." This concept has a very long history, but most resemble Article 68 of the Fourth Geneva Convention.

Part of this is about the Hostile Arab Palestinians trying desperately to make a link between Israel taking something from the Arab Palestinians (as an act of aggression). However, as they fail to disclose (not in good faith) the Israelis already had control of the entirety of the two territories and Jerusalem before the State of Palestine was recognized in A/RES/67/19 Status of Palestine in the United Nations:

Reaffirms the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination and to independence in their State of Palestine on the Palestinian territory occupied since 1967;

Decides to accord to Palestine non-member observer State status in the United Nations, without prejudice to the acquired rights, privileges and role of the Palestine Liberation Organization in the United Nations as the representative of the Palestinian people, in accordance with the relevant resolutions and practice;
​

ψ BUT, the question here is: When did the State of Israel take away any territory under the Sovereignty of the State of Palestine?

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: Palestine Today
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

Popularity (by the cowards together with the anti-Jewish bias in the UN) and the application of selective justice (under the color of law) are not productive paths towards peace. This was the path of violence → fueled by the three major interlocking energies of the Arab Palestinian terrorism-oriented facet government

✪ The thirst for power disguised as national liberation movement;
✪ The use of violence and threats to coerce a people and leadership;
✪ The Intimidation of a population → or → acts which compel a government to do or to abstain from doing any act,​

REMEMBER: The UN security council considered the defense against terrorism as [S/RES/1566 (2004) SECURITY COUNCIL ACTS CONDEMNING TERRORISM AS ONE OF MOST SERIOUS THREATS] as “Acting under Chapter VII of the Charter of the United Nations."

Holy smokescreen, Batman! WTF is with all the slime? You did hit on the root of the problem though.

3. The act of aggression – the use of armed force by a State against the sovereignty, territorial integrity or political independence of another State, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Charter of the United Nations – was committed.​

Of course, this involves the rights that the UN has reaffirmed belong to the Palestinians. There are no parallel resolutions for the Israelis.

The Palestinians (all civilians) are attacked by a foreign military, land was stolen, assets stolen or destroyed, and if they complain they are arrested or killed. There are some other issues but this is the main problem.

(COMMENT)

I read in the International Review of the Red Cross (Volume 88 Number 864 December 2006) that there are:

"nearly fifty offences, including some ten crimes against civil aviation, some sixteen crimes against shipping or continental platforms, a dozen crimes against the person, seven crimes involving the use, possession or threatened use of ‘‘bombs’’ or nuclear materials, and two crimes concerning the financing of terrorism. There is a tendency to consider these treaties as establishing a sort of evolving code of terrorist offences."​

The Security Council "By the unanimous adoption of resolution 1566 (2004), the Council recalled that criminal acts, including against civilians, committed with the intent to cause death or serious bodily injury, or taking of hostages, with the purpose to provoke a state of terror, or compel a government or international organization to do or to abstain from doing any act which contravened terrorism-related conventions and protocols, were not justifiable for any reason –- whether of a political, philosophical ideological, racial, ethnic or religious nature." This concept has a very long history, but most resemble Article 68 of the Fourth Geneva Convention.

Part of this is about the Hostile Arab Palestinians trying desperately to make a link between Israel taking something from the Arab Palestinians (as an act of aggression). However, as they fail to disclose (not in good faith) the Israelis already had control of the entirety of the two territories and Jerusalem before the State of Palestine was recognized in A/RES/67/19 Status of Palestine in the United Nations:

Reaffirms the right of the Palestinian people to self-determination and to independence in their State of Palestine on the Palestinian territory occupied since 1967;

Decides to accord to Palestine non-member observer State status in the United Nations, without prejudice to the acquired rights, privileges and role of the Palestine Liberation Organization in the United Nations as the representative of the Palestinian people, in accordance with the relevant resolutions and practice;
​

ψ BUT, the question here is: When did the State of Israel take away any territory under the Sovereignty of the State of Palestine?

Most Respectfully,
R

OK, so now are you going to address my post?

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[theliq]

Dr.Mustafa Barghouti says relying on the US has failed completely

Of course it has,but I for one are not surprised Tinnie and neither are you,friend…..being as Trump and the US are now Officially ISRAELS DOORMAT

 

[theliq]

RE: Palestine Today
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

The Palestinian Hanan Ashrawi is a political legislator, Hostile Abar Palestinian activist, supporting a terrorist state. She is not a staff officer of the UN.

Stupid statement.

The Zionist goal has always been all of Palestine without the Palestinians. They still pursue that goal today. That cannot happen without violence. It is impossible. You can't get people to leave their homes, farms, and businesses by saying please.

BTW, what did you think about Hanan Ashrawi's press conference?

(COMMENT)

She talks about many things, packed and compressed, and attempting to relate it to violations of the War Crime Article in the ICC Statute; and accusing America of being complicit For Reference, the topic on annexation of territory is addressed in "Article 8 Bis"(latin abbreviation meaning "twice" --- or an addition).

✪ NOTE: The Court could not add it as a separate Article 9 because Artice is use for "Elements of an Offense."​

Even if Israel was in violation (which it is not) it would not be a "War Crime;" (emotional wording in a plea for sympathy) it would fall under the "Crimes of Aggression."

Introduction

1. It is understood that any of the acts referred to in article 8 bis, paragraph 2, qualify as an act of aggression.

2. There is no requirement to prove that the perpetrator has made a legal evaluation as to whether the use of armed force was inconsistent with the Charter of the United Nations.

3. The term “manifest” is an objective qualification.

4. There is no requirement to prove that the perpetrator has made a legal evaluation as to the “manifest” nature of the violation of the Charter of the United Nations.​

Elements

1. The perpetrator planned, prepared, initiated or executed an act of aggression.

2. The perpetrator was a person in a position effectively to exercise control over or to direct the political or military action of the State which committed the act of aggression.

3. The act of aggression – the use of armed force by a State against the sovereignty, territorial integrity or political independence of another State, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Charter of the United Nations – was committed.

4. The perpetrator was aware of the factual circumstances that established that such a use of armed force was inconsistent with the Charter of the United Nations.

5. The act of aggression, by its character, gravity and scale, constituted a manifest violation of the Charter of the United Nations.

6. The perpetrator was aware of the factual circumstances that established such a manifest violation of the Charter of the United Nations.​

✪ Kinga Tibori Szabó (22 August 2011). Anticipatory Action in Self-Defence: Essence and Limits under International Law. Springer Science & Business Media. pp. 147, 148. ISBN 978-90-6704-796-8. (p. 147) The sequence of events that led to the Israeli pre-emptive strike did indeed create a situation where an armed attack seemed unavoidable. (p. 148 ) Many commentators treat it (the six-day war) as the locus classicus of anticipatory action in self defence."

✪ John Quigley (17 December 2012). The Six-Day War and Israeli Self-Defense: Questioning the Legal Basis for Preventive War. Cambridge University Press. pp. 135–. ISBN 978-1-139-62049-9. Terence Taylor…wrote in 2004…that "many scholars" considered Israel to have "conducted the (1967) action in anticipatory of self-defense."

​

There is no question in my mind that Posting #3647 Palestine Today speaks directly to people like Hanan Ashrawi and her press conference. Some people might listen to her more if she did not make these "I'm a victim" plea every five minutes, the cry --- we are being beaten, whipped, shot and killed in situations where the Hostile Arab Palestinian was blameless.

(Application of Palestinian Narcissism)

Palestinian Narcissistic Disorder (PND) are those that a lack of empathy for other people (Human Shields), and a need for the world to see them as heroic freedom fighters. People with this condition are frequently described as arrogant, self-centered (Palestinian want all of the 1922 Palestine), manipulative (just like in Hanan Ashrawi Press Conference), and demanding (Pre-Conditions for Peace Talks). They may also concentrate on grandiose fantasies (e.g. their own success, beauty, brilliance) and may be convinced that they deserve special treatment -- they are free to use terrorist tactist and are exempt from the IHL Rule 97. These characteristics typically begin in early adulthood and must be consistently evident in multiple contexts, such as at work and in relationships.

Palestinians with narcissistic personality disorder believe they are superior or special (indigenous with inalienable rights), and often try to assemble idealist follower that believe they are unique or gifted in some way. This process (Televison and Radio appearances, YouTube Videos (improving their self-esteem), all of which is a plea for sympathy the surface. with difficulty tolerating suggested political shifts, criticism or defeat; much like P F Tinmore's insistence that the Palestinians have not lost anything (especially territory).

​

Most Respectfully,
R

What mindless lies and rubbish you spew,without respect...theliquidator

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[Hollie]

Fun and games in the Death Cult.

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[Hollie]

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[Hollie]

The Death Cult we know.

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[Hollie]

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[P F Tinmore]