Palestine Today

[P F Tinmore]

As usual it is Israeli goontards attacking unarmed civilians.

 

[Hollie]

As usual it is Israeli goontards attacking unarmed civilians.

That's funny. Another Pallywood style staged confrontation.

Al-fake protest.

 

[Hollie]

Islamic terrorist acting school.

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[P F Tinmore]

Israel is always the aggressor.

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[RoccoR]

RE: Palestine Today
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

For those people, whether individually or collectively, want to make self/group improvements, it is not an easy task. This is especially true if those who always evaluate that the problems and obstacles are always someone else’s fault.

In the case of the Arab Palestinians, especially demonstrated in the last few videos, them to project “a grandiose sense of self-importance" → coupled with the "always someone else’s fault" (Israel or the UK or the UN) excuse' and very reactive to any real criticism.

Israel is always the aggressor.

(COMMENT)

Yes , the phrase "Israel is always the aggressor" is one such Narcissistic characteristic. And in the case of the Arab Palestinian, no conversation for more than half a minute without the Arab Palestinian claim and sense of entitlement for one "right" or another.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: Palestine Today
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

For those people, whether individually or collectively, want to make self/group improvements, it is not an easy task. This is especially true if those who always evaluate that the problems and obstacles are always someone else’s fault.

In the case of the Arab Palestinians, especially demonstrated in the last few videos, them to project “a grandiose sense of self-importance" → coupled with the "always someone else’s fault" (Israel or the UK or the UN) excuse' and very reactive to any real criticism.

Israel is always the aggressor.

(COMMENT)

Yes , the phrase "Israel is always the aggressor" is one such Narcissistic characteristic. And in the case of the Arab Palestinian, no conversation for more than half a minute without the Arab Palestinian claim and sense of entitlement for one "right" or another.

Most Respectfully,
R

Yes , the phrase "Israel is always the aggressor" is one such Narcissistic characteristic.

Stupid statement.

The Zionist goal has always been all of Palestine without the Palestinians. They still pursue that goal today. That cannot happen without violence. It is impossible. You can't get people to leave their homes, farms, and businesses by saying please.

BTW, what did you think about Hanan Ashrawi's press conference?

 

[Hollie]

You can't get people to leave their homes, farms, and businesses by saying please.

Arab-Moslem conquest and colonialism has been achieved through war and belligerent acts. Those tactics have not been effective against Israel. Acts of Islamic terrorism will not force Israelis to leave their homes, farms, and businesses.

 

[Hollie]

Israel is always the aggressor.

Link?

 

[Shusha]

The Zionist goal has always been all of Palestine without the Palestinians. They still pursue that goal today.

Right. Sure. Because if you take a look at all the nations of the ME which used to have mixed ethnic populations of both Jews and Arabs only Israel has been successfully cleansed of all of the other ethnic group.

Oh. Wait.

 

[Hollie]

The Zionist goal has always been all of Palestine without the Palestinians. They still pursue that goal today.

Being fact-averse makes your comments truly inane.

Isreal has a demonstrated history of returning / trading land in exchange for peace effectively redefining its borders. The State of Israel has returned and withdrawn from captured territory greater than the size of Israel itself-- the Sinai, land east of the Golan, southern Lebanon, Gaza, etc. let's remember that the lands Israel has captured were the result of Arab-islamist wars of aggression in which the Islamist aggressors suffered humiliating losses.

 

[P F Tinmore]

The Role of Palestinian Liberation Theology: A Conversation with Reverend Naim Ateek

 

[Hollie]

Tribal wars of liberation.

 

[RoccoR]

RE: Palestine Today
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

The Palestinian Hanan Ashrawi is a political legislator, Hostile Abar Palestinian activist, supporting a terrorist state. She is not a staff officer of the UN.

Stupid statement.

The Zionist goal has always been all of Palestine without the Palestinians. They still pursue that goal today. That cannot happen without violence. It is impossible. You can't get people to leave their homes, farms, and businesses by saying please.

BTW, what did you think about Hanan Ashrawi's press conference?

(COMMENT)

She talks about many things, packed and compressed, and attempting to relate it to violations of the War Crime Article in the ICC Statute; and accusing America of being complicit For Reference, the topic on annexation of territory is addressed in "Article 8 Bis"(latin abbreviation meaning "twice" --- or an addition).

✪ NOTE: The Court could not add it as a separate Article 9 because Artice is use for "Elements of an Offense."​

Even if Israel was in violation (which it is not) it would not be a "War Crime;" (emotional wording in a plea for sympathy) it would fall under the "Crimes of Aggression."

Introduction

1. It is understood that any of the acts referred to in article 8 bis, paragraph 2, qualify as an act of aggression.

2. There is no requirement to prove that the perpetrator has made a legal evaluation as to whether the use of armed force was inconsistent with the Charter of the United Nations.

3. The term “manifest” is an objective qualification.

4. There is no requirement to prove that the perpetrator has made a legal evaluation as to the “manifest” nature of the violation of the Charter of the United Nations.​

Elements

1. The perpetrator planned, prepared, initiated or executed an act of aggression.

2. The perpetrator was a person in a position effectively to exercise control over or to direct the political or military action of the State which committed the act of aggression.

3. The act of aggression – the use of armed force by a State against the sovereignty, territorial integrity or political independence of another State, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Charter of the United Nations – was committed.

4. The perpetrator was aware of the factual circumstances that established that such a use of armed force was inconsistent with the Charter of the United Nations.

5. The act of aggression, by its character, gravity and scale, constituted a manifest violation of the Charter of the United Nations.

6. The perpetrator was aware of the factual circumstances that established such a manifest violation of the Charter of the United Nations.​

✪ Kinga Tibori Szabó (22 August 2011). Anticipatory Action in Self-Defence: Essence and Limits under International Law. Springer Science & Business Media. pp. 147, 148. ISBN 978-90-6704-796-8. (p. 147) The sequence of events that led to the Israeli pre-emptive strike did indeed create a situation where an armed attack seemed unavoidable. (p. 148 ) Many commentators treat it (the six-day war) as the locus classicus of anticipatory action in self defence."

✪ John Quigley (17 December 2012). The Six-Day War and Israeli Self-Defense: Questioning the Legal Basis for Preventive War. Cambridge University Press. pp. 135–. ISBN 978-1-139-62049-9. Terence Taylor…wrote in 2004…that "many scholars" considered Israel to have "conducted the (1967) action in anticipatory of self-defense."

​

There is no question in my mind that Posting #3647 Palestine Today speaks directly to people like Hanan Ashrawi and her press conference. Some people might listen to her more if she did not make these "I'm a victim" plea every five minutes, the cry --- we are being beaten, whipped, shot and killed in situations where the Hostile Arab Palestinian was blameless.

(Application of Palestinian Narcissism)

Palestinian Narcissistic Disorder (PND) are those that a lack of empathy for other people (Human Shields), and a need for the world to see them as heroic freedom fighters. People with this condition are frequently described as arrogant, self-centered (Palestinian want all of the 1922 Palestine), manipulative (just like in Hanan Ashrawi Press Conference), and demanding (Pre-Conditions for Peace Talks). They may also concentrate on grandiose fantasies (e.g. their own success, beauty, brilliance) and may be convinced that they deserve special treatment -- they are free to use terrorist tactist and are exempt from the IHL Rule 97. These characteristics typically begin in early adulthood and must be consistently evident in multiple contexts, such as at work and in relationships.

Palestinians with narcissistic personality disorder believe they are superior or special (indigenous with inalienable rights), and often try to assemble idealist follower that believe they are unique or gifted in some way. This process (Televison and Radio appearances, YouTube Videos (improving their self-esteem), all of which is a plea for sympathy the surface. with difficulty tolerating suggested political shifts, criticism or defeat; much like P F Tinmore's insistence that the Palestinians have not lost anything (especially territory).

​

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[P F Tinmore]

Political Zionism and the Roots of Palestinian Dispossession

 

[Hollie]

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: Palestine Today
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

The Palestinian Hanan Ashrawi is a political legislator, Hostile Abar Palestinian activist, supporting a terrorist state. She is not a staff officer of the UN.

Stupid statement.

The Zionist goal has always been all of Palestine without the Palestinians. They still pursue that goal today. That cannot happen without violence. It is impossible. You can't get people to leave their homes, farms, and businesses by saying please.

BTW, what did you think about Hanan Ashrawi's press conference?

(COMMENT)

She talks about many things, packed and compressed, and attempting to relate it to violations of the War Crime Article in the ICC Statute; and accusing America of being complicit For Reference, the topic on annexation of territory is addressed in "Article 8 Bis"(latin abbreviation meaning "twice" --- or an addition).

✪ NOTE: The Court could not add it as a separate Article 9 because Artice is use for "Elements of an Offense."​

Even if Israel was in violation (which it is not) it would not be a "War Crime;" (emotional wording in a plea for sympathy) it would fall under the "Crimes of Aggression."

Introduction

1. It is understood that any of the acts referred to in article 8 bis, paragraph 2, qualify as an act of aggression.

2. There is no requirement to prove that the perpetrator has made a legal evaluation as to whether the use of armed force was inconsistent with the Charter of the United Nations.

3. The term “manifest” is an objective qualification.

4. There is no requirement to prove that the perpetrator has made a legal evaluation as to the “manifest” nature of the violation of the Charter of the United Nations.​

Elements

1. The perpetrator planned, prepared, initiated or executed an act of aggression.

2. The perpetrator was a person in a position effectively to exercise control over or to direct the political or military action of the State which committed the act of aggression.

3. The act of aggression – the use of armed force by a State against the sovereignty, territorial integrity or political independence of another State, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Charter of the United Nations – was committed.

4. The perpetrator was aware of the factual circumstances that established that such a use of armed force was inconsistent with the Charter of the United Nations.

5. The act of aggression, by its character, gravity and scale, constituted a manifest violation of the Charter of the United Nations.

6. The perpetrator was aware of the factual circumstances that established such a manifest violation of the Charter of the United Nations.​

✪ Kinga Tibori Szabó (22 August 2011). Anticipatory Action in Self-Defence: Essence and Limits under International Law. Springer Science & Business Media. pp. 147, 148. ISBN 978-90-6704-796-8. (p. 147) The sequence of events that led to the Israeli pre-emptive strike did indeed create a situation where an armed attack seemed unavoidable. (p. 148 ) Many commentators treat it (the six-day war) as the locus classicus of anticipatory action in self defence."

✪ John Quigley (17 December 2012). The Six-Day War and Israeli Self-Defense: Questioning the Legal Basis for Preventive War. Cambridge University Press. pp. 135–. ISBN 978-1-139-62049-9. Terence Taylor…wrote in 2004…that "many scholars" considered Israel to have "conducted the (1967) action in anticipatory of self-defense."

​

There is no question in my mind that Posting #3647 Palestine Today speaks directly to people like Hanan Ashrawi and her press conference. Some people might listen to her more if she did not make these "I'm a victim" plea every five minutes, the cry --- we are being beaten, whipped, shot and killed in situations where the Hostile Arab Palestinian was blameless.

(Application of Palestinian Narcissism)

Palestinian Narcissistic Disorder (PND) are those that a lack of empathy for other people (Human Shields), and a need for the world to see them as heroic freedom fighters. People with this condition are frequently described as arrogant, self-centered (Palestinian want all of the 1922 Palestine), manipulative (just like in Hanan Ashrawi Press Conference), and demanding (Pre-Conditions for Peace Talks). They may also concentrate on grandiose fantasies (e.g. their own success, beauty, brilliance) and may be convinced that they deserve special treatment -- they are free to use terrorist tactist and are exempt from the IHL Rule 97. These characteristics typically begin in early adulthood and must be consistently evident in multiple contexts, such as at work and in relationships.

Palestinians with narcissistic personality disorder believe they are superior or special (indigenous with inalienable rights), and often try to assemble idealist follower that believe they are unique or gifted in some way. This process (Televison and Radio appearances, YouTube Videos (improving their self-esteem), all of which is a plea for sympathy the surface. with difficulty tolerating suggested political shifts, criticism or defeat; much like P F Tinmore's insistence that the Palestinians have not lost anything (especially territory).

​

Most Respectfully,
R

Holy smokescreen, Batman! WTF is with all the slime? You did hit on the root of the problem though.

3. The act of aggression – the use of armed force by a State against the sovereignty, territorial integrity or political independence of another State, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Charter of the United Nations – was committed.​

Of course this involves the rights that the UN has reaffirmed belong to the Palestinians. There are no parallel resolutions for the Israelis.

The Palestinians (all civilians) are attacked by a foreign military, land stolen, assets stolen or destroyed, and if they complain they are arrested or killed. There are some other issues but this is the main problem.

 

[theliq]

I, for one, am sick and tired of the nauseating Palestinian cries for help.

Muslims want to wage Jihad and conquer non-Muslims- claiming that Allah has endowed them with the capabilities to do so.

So then, why exactly do you cry and cry and cry more when your efforts to conquer are to no avail? The Arabs aren't capable of defeating the Israeli Jews so instead they try and whine their way into an international settlement?

Pathetic cretins. Man up and put your money where your obnoxious mouths are.

Your Avie says it all.....TOSSER

 

[P F Tinmore]

Dr.Mustafa Barghouti says relying on the US has failed completely