Palestine Today

[RoccoR]

RE: Palestine Today
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

This is one of those "Feel Good" presentations. At the point 25:31 You see the speaker suggest that Palestine, although stateless, way able to make good law - then - she rattles off a couple with a pause and noted 3379 (as an example)(meaning A/RES/3379 (XXX)] first suggestion it was a law, THEN saying zionism is a form of racism and racial discrimination, not mentioning that it had no real standing, was unenforceable and then was revoked by A/RES/46/86.

The Struggle for Palestinian Rights: Revisiting US Policy and International Law

(COMMENT)

This is just another example of the Arab Palestinian Propaganda that, while sprinkled with some truths, they convey a falsehood.

While the Addition Protocols [Article 1(4) provides that armed conflicts in which peoples are fighting against colonial domination, alien occupation or racist regimes are to be considered international conflicts.] suggest that there is some legitimacy in armed struggle, it still does not negate the Arab Palestinians to comply with the Customary and International Humanitarian Law. It does not negate the authority to prosecute Arab Palestinians under Article 68 of the Geneva Convention.

Don't be fooled. This presentation is riddled with misinformation.

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: Palestine Today
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

This is one of those "Feel Good" presentations. At the point 25:31 You see the speaker suggest that Palestine, although stateless, way able to make good law - then - she rattles off a couple with a pause and noted 3379 (as an example)(meaning A/RES/3379 (XXX)] first suggestion it was a law, THEN saying zionism is a form of racism and racial discrimination, not mentioning that it had no real standing, was unenforceable and then was revoked by A/RES/46/86.

The Struggle for Palestinian Rights: Revisiting US Policy and International Law

(COMMENT)

This is just another example of the Arab Palestinian Propaganda that, while sprinkled with some truths, they convey a falsehood.

While the Addition Protocols [Article 1(4) provides that armed conflicts in which peoples are fighting against colonial domination, alien occupation or racist regimes are to be considered international conflicts.] suggest that there is some legitimacy in armed struggle, it still does not negate the Arab Palestinians to comply with the Customary and International Humanitarian Law. It does not negate the authority to prosecute Arab Palestinians under Article 68 of the Geneva Convention.

Don't be fooled. This presentation is riddled with misinformation.

Most Respectfully,
R

Specifically, what international laws are the Palestinians violating? (Not just a data dump.)

 

[member]

RE: Palestine Today
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

This is one of those "Feel Good" presentations. At the point 25:31 You see the speaker suggest that Palestine, although stateless, way able to make good law - then - she rattles off a couple with a pause and noted 3379 (as an example)(meaning A/RES/3379 (XXX)] first suggestion it was a law, THEN saying zionism is a form of racism and racial discrimination, not mentioning that it had no real standing, was unenforceable and then was revoked by A/RES/46/86.

The Struggle for Palestinian Rights: Revisiting US Policy and International Law

(COMMENT)

This is just another example of the Arab Palestinian Propaganda that, while sprinkled with some truths, they convey a falsehood.

While the Addition Protocols [Article 1(4) provides that armed conflicts in which peoples are fighting against colonial domination, alien occupation or racist regimes are to be considered international conflicts.] suggest that there is some legitimacy in armed struggle, it still does not negate the Arab Palestinians to comply with the Customary and International Humanitarian Law. It does not negate the authority to prosecute Arab Palestinians under Article 68 of the Geneva Convention.

Don't be fooled. This presentation is riddled with misinformation.

Most Respectfully,
R

Specifically, what international laws are the Palestinians violating? (Not just a data dump.)

"Specifically, what international laws are the Palestinians violating?"




whattt?






"Specifically, what international laws are the Palestinians violating?"










i can't anymore wiff you

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[P F Tinmore]

Gigi Hadid’s brother releases music video filmed in Palestine
The younger brother of supermodel Gigi Hadid released a music video on Instagram about his recent visit to the occupied Palestinian territories

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[RoccoR]

RE: Palestine Today
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

You are a very poor investigator.

Further, in the case of the Arab Palestinians, we are talking about a period of over seventy years. Your entire position is based on the objective that the Arab Palestinian has the right to do any damn thing they want. Target any civilian, groups of civilians or even uninvolved men, women and children.

Specifically, what international laws are the Palestinians violating? (Not just a data dump.)

(COMMENT)

I have listed these over and over again.

Article 2 • International Convention for the Suppression of Terrorist Bombings, which parallels the Prosecutorial authority of Article 68, Fourth Geneva Convention, with parallels to Article 1, Convention for the Prevention and Punishment of Terrorism (1938),

1. Any person commits an offence within the meaning of this Convention if that person unlawfully and intentionally delivers, places, discharges or detonates an explosive or other lethal device in, into or againsta place of public use, a State or government facility, a public transportation system or an infrastructurefacility:

(a) With the intent to cause death or serious bodily injury; or

(b) With the intent to cause extensive destruction of such a place, facility or system, where suchdestruction results in or is likely to result in major economic loss./...A/RES/52/164​

2. Any person also commits an offence if that person attempts to commit an offence as set forth inparagraph 1 of the present article.3.Any person also commits an offence if that person:

(a) Participates as an accomplice in an offence as set forth in paragraph 1 or 2 of the present article;or

(b) Organizes or directs others to commit an offence as set forth in paragraph 1 or 2 of the presentarticle; or

(c) In any other way contributes to the commission of one or more offences as set forth in paragraph 1or 2 of the present article by a group of persons acting with a common purpose; such contribution shall beintentional and either be made with the aim of furthering the general criminal activity or purpose of the groupor be made in the knowledge of the intention of the group to commit the offence or offences concerned.​

Every single time that Arab Palestinians assault, or engage Israeli Civil Administration Officials or Police, Security and Intelligence resources they with the intent to do harm to the Occupation Force, they are open to prosecution under the authority of Article 68 of the Geneva Convention.

• Firing Rockets is a violation;
• Indiscriminate Fire is a violation;
• Assualt on any one of the officials, is a violation;
• Incendiary Devices is actually a violation;
• When the Arab Palestinians attacked the Olympic Team, it was a violation;
• When the Arab Palestinians attacked the Commerical Bus (Dalal al-Maghribi Coastal Road massacre) it was multiple violation;
• When the Arab Palestinians attacked the The Achille Lauro multiple violation;​

And since you don't want a "data dump" you can see a list of illegal events Global Terrorism Database is a database of incidents of terrorism from 1970 to July 2017. You can filter out listings pertaining to Hostile Arab Palestinian terrorist acts.

Additionally, there is Customary Law that deals with (but not limited to) Customary Rules 20 thru 24 → and → 96 and 97.

Don't play innocent → don't even suggest → you don't understand that the border incidents for the past year demonstrate more than daily criminal activity. You cannot launch incendiary devices and not understand that it constitutes indiscriminate attacks against the civilian community. Nor can you ignore that the Arab Palestinian participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the acts mentioned under various international conventions.

• War Crimes: Violations of the laws or customs of war which include, but are not limited to, murder, and killing of hostages, targeting of public or private property, wanton destruction justified by Arab Palestinity.

• Crimes against humanity: Murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation and other inhumane acts done against any civilian population, or persecutions on political, racial, or religious grounds, when such acts are done or such persecutions are carried on in execution of or in connection with any crime against peace or any war crime.
​

There have been very few groups and organizations that have had a less of a connection to terrorism in the last half century then that of the Arab Palestinians that double as Jihadist, Fedayeen Activist, Hostile Insurgents, Radicalized Islamic Followers, and Asymmetric Fighters.

​

Most Respectfully,
R

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: Palestine Today
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

You are a very poor investigator.

Further, in the case of the Arab Palestinians, we are talking about a period of over seventy years. Your entire position is based on the objective that the Arab Palestinian has the right to do any damn thing they want. Target any civilian, groups of civilians or even uninvolved men, women and children.

Specifically, what international laws are the Palestinians violating? (Not just a data dump.)

(COMMENT)

I have listed these over and over again.

Article 2 • International Convention for the Suppression of Terrorist Bombings, which parallels the Prosecutorial authority of Article 68, Fourth Geneva Convention, with parallels to Article 1, Convention for the Prevention and Punishment of Terrorism (1938),

1. Any person commits an offence within the meaning of this Convention if that person unlawfully and intentionally delivers, places, discharges or detonates an explosive or other lethal device in, into or againsta place of public use, a State or government facility, a public transportation system or an infrastructurefacility:

(a) With the intent to cause death or serious bodily injury; or

(b) With the intent to cause extensive destruction of such a place, facility or system, where suchdestruction results in or is likely to result in major economic loss./...A/RES/52/164​

2. Any person also commits an offence if that person attempts to commit an offence as set forth inparagraph 1 of the present article.3.Any person also commits an offence if that person:

(a) Participates as an accomplice in an offence as set forth in paragraph 1 or 2 of the present article;or

(b) Organizes or directs others to commit an offence as set forth in paragraph 1 or 2 of the presentarticle; or

(c) In any other way contributes to the commission of one or more offences as set forth in paragraph 1or 2 of the present article by a group of persons acting with a common purpose; such contribution shall beintentional and either be made with the aim of furthering the general criminal activity or purpose of the groupor be made in the knowledge of the intention of the group to commit the offence or offences concerned.​

Every single time that Arab Palestinians assault, or engage Israeli Civil Administration Officials or Police, Security and Intelligence resources they with the intent to do harm to the Occupation Force, they are open to prosecution under the authority of Article 68 of the Geneva Convention.

• Firing Rockets is a violation;
• Indiscriminate Fire is a violation;
• Assualt on any one of the officials, is a violation;
• Incendiary Devices is actually a violation;
• When the Arab Palestinians attacked the Olympic Team, it was a violation;
• When the Arab Palestinians attacked the Commerical Bus (Dalal al-Maghribi Coastal Road massacre) it was multiple violation;
• When the Arab Palestinians attacked the The Achille Lauro multiple violation;​

And since you don't want a "data dump" you can see a list of illegal events Global Terrorism Database is a database of incidents of terrorism from 1970 to July 2017. You can filter out listings pertaining to Hostile Arab Palestinian terrorist acts.

Additionally, there is Customary Law that deals with (but not limited to) Customary Rules 20 thru 24 → and → 96 and 97.

Don't play innocent → don't even suggest → you don't understand that the border incidents for the past year demonstrate more than daily criminal activity. You cannot launch incendiary devices and not understand that it constitutes indiscriminate attacks against the civilian community. Nor can you ignore that the Arab Palestinian participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the acts mentioned under various international conventions.

• War Crimes: Violations of the laws or customs of war which include, but are not limited to, murder, and killing of hostages, targeting of public or private property, wanton destruction justified by Arab Palestinity.

• Crimes against humanity: Murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation and other inhumane acts done against any civilian population, or persecutions on political, racial, or religious grounds, when such acts are done or such persecutions are carried on in execution of or in connection with any crime against peace or any war crime.
​

There have been very few groups and organizations that have had a less of a connection to terrorism in the last half century then that of the Arab Palestinians that double as Jihadist, Fedayeen Activist, Hostile Insurgents, Radicalized Islamic Followers, and Asymmetric Fighters.

​

Most Respectfully,
R

Chickenfeed, What else you got?

 

[P F Tinmore]