Palestinian Talks, lectures, & interviews.

RE: Israel and Palestine • Palestinian Talks, lectures, & interviews.
SUBTOPIC: The Consequences
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

(HAMAS Official Position)

"Jihad and the armed resistance is the right and real method for the liberation of Palestine, and the restoration of all the rights, together with, of course, all forms of political and diplomatic struggle including in the media, public and legal [spheres]; with the need to mobilize all the energies of the nation in the battle."

"Justification of the current nature of the struggle to liberate Palestine, that is, the armed struggle, while granting legitimacy to the existence and activity of the “struggle organizations” – namely, the Palestinian terror organizations and their activity."

See Post #4745 For the applicable Customary Rules.

Starving people is an act of genocide.
(COMMENT)

Yes, this is just another case of the Hostile Arab Palestinian (HoAP) trying to use big words without understanding of the application and proper use. Genocide is defined by Article 6 of the Rome Statues.

Israel is NOT involved in the "Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part" - "with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group," of the people of Gaza. The actions of the Israelis are about the consequences to the act of aggression by the HoAP. The Israeli Response is NOT a matter of "ethnic cleansing."

In this case, the HoAP have demonstrated a depraved indifference for the life of the People of Gaza, and the HoAP are desperately trying to shift the blame on the Israels. It is a schoolyard trick where a bullying student opens a fight up with an unsuspecting student. And when the unsuspecting students gets the upper hand, the bullying student runs to the teacher because the HoAP bully is being beaten.

1689667735356.png

Most Respectfully,
R
 
RE: Israel and Palestine • Palestinian Talks, lectures, & interviews.
SUBTOPIC: The Consequences
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

(HAMAS Official Position)

"Jihad and the armed resistance is the right and real method for the liberation of Palestine, and the restoration of all the rights, together with, of course, all forms of political and diplomatic struggle including in the media, public and legal [spheres]; with the need to mobilize all the energies of the nation in the battle."

"Justification of the current nature of the struggle to liberate Palestine, that is, the armed struggle, while granting legitimacy to the existence and activity of the “struggle organizations” – namely, the Palestinian terror organizations and their activity."

See Post #4745 For the applicable Customary Rules.


(COMMENT)

Yes, this is just another case of the Hostile Arab Palestinian (HoAP) trying to use big words without understanding of the application and proper use. Genocide is defined by Article 6 of the Rome Statues.

Israel is NOT involved in the "Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part" - "with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group," of the people of Gaza. The actions of the Israelis are about the consequences to the act of aggression by the HoAP. The Israeli Response is NOT a matter of "ethnic cleansing."

In this case, the HoAP have demonstrated a depraved indifference for the life of the People of Gaza, and the HoAP are desperately trying to shift the blame on the Israels. It is a schoolyard trick where a bullying student opens a fight up with an unsuspecting student. And when the unsuspecting students gets the upper hand, the bullying student runs to the teacher because the HoAP bully is being beaten.

1689667735356.png

Most Respectfully,
R
Rules 54–56 are a corollary to the prohibition of starvation of civilians as a method of warfare. This means that attacking objects indispensable to the survival of the civilian population (see Rule 54) and denying access of humanitarian aid intended for civilians in need, including deliberately impeding humanitarian aid (see Rule 55) or restricting the freedom of movement of humanitarian relief personnel (see Rule 56) may constitute violations of the prohibition of starvation. Practice in respect of Rules 54–56 further reinforces this rule’s status as a norm of customary international law.

 
Rules 54–56 are a corollary to the prohibition of starvation of civilians as a method of warfare. This means that attacking objects indispensable to the survival of the civilian population (see Rule 54) and denying access of humanitarian aid intended for civilians in need, including deliberately impeding humanitarian aid (see Rule 55) or restricting the freedom of movement of humanitarian relief personnel (see Rule 56) may constitute violations of the prohibition of starvation. Practice in respect of Rules 54–56 further reinforces this rule’s status as a norm of customary international law.

🥱
 
RE: Israel and Palestine • Palestinian Talks, lectures, & interviews.
SUBTOPIC: The Consequences
※→ P F Tinmore, USAF 2023, et al,

Our friend "USAF 2023" → being a contributor of few words → has hit the nail on the head.

Rules 54–56 are a corollary to the prohibition of starvation of civilians as a method of warfare. This means that attacking objects indispensable to the survival of the civilian population (see Rule 54) and denying access of humanitarian aid intended for civilians in need, including deliberately impeding humanitarian aid (see Rule 55) or restricting the freedom of movement of humanitarian relief personnel (see Rule 56) may constitute violations of the prohibition of starvation. Practice in respect of Rules 54–56 further reinforces this rule’s status as a norm of customary international law.

(COMMENT)

Israel is NOT using "starvation" as a weapon of "war." Cutting off the supply routes of the enemy is an accepted practice in warfare.

Israel is not under any obligation to make-up for the short sightedness of HAMAS in the matter of supply and resupply.

1689667735356.png

Most Respectfully,
R
 
RE: Israel and Palestine • Palestinian Talks, lectures, & interviews.
SUBTOPIC: The Consequences
※→ P F Tinmore, USAF 2023, et al,

Our friend "USAF 2023" → being a contributor of few words → has hit the nail on the head.



(COMMENT)

Israel is NOT using "starvation" as a weapon of "war." Cutting off the supply routes of the enemy is an accepted practice in warfare.

Israel is not under any obligation to make-up for the short sightedness of HAMAS in the matter of supply and resupply.

1689667735356.png

Most Respectfully,
R
Israel bombs or bulldozes those supplies.

There is the difference.
 

Israel’s Genocide in Gaza at Fever Pitch & Potential for Regional War w/ Ali Abunimah & Rania Khalek​


 

Palestinians have a legal right to armed resistance against Israeli colonialism​


 

Breaking news and analysis on day 12 of Gaza's Al-Aqsa Flood | The Electronic Intifada​


 

Forum List

Back
Top