Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You would have to show me that. I've never heard it before. These days $35 bucks is fast food for two, not meaning much to most, especially if dropped in at 3 different times, of $10, $10 and $15. It is not like he was given a custom Winnebago or had somebody paying for the place his mother lives or giving lavish vacations on luxury yachts, giving the appearance of being bought and paid for. Yes, you would have to show me the statute.Which is $35 more than he is allowed to give. It’s my understanding, judges are not supposed to give political donations.
Besides, it’s not what he gave, it’s to whom. To bidens campaign, to an organization called “stop republicans”.
I mean, it’s amazing how people just dismiss these things when it works in their favor. The left “got Trump” so they will ignore any and all hints of corruption, anything to not shine a light on some of the bs antics they have been pulling.
Will they be so approving if/when it’s one of their people in the spotlight?
And also explain why anyone should care or what bearing it has on the topic or the case.You would have to show me that. I've never heard it before. These days $35 bucks is fast food for two, not meaning much to most, especially if dropped in at 3 different times, of $10, $10 and $15. It is not like he was given a custom Winnebago or had somebody paying for the place his mother lives or giving lavish vacations on luxury yachts, giving the appearance of being bought and paid for. Yes, you would have to show me the statute.
Welcome to the USMBAnd also explain why anyone should care or what bearing it has on the topic or the case.
Which is obviously zero, but I suspect we will get treated instead to 8 or 9 paragraphs of questions and innuendo.
You would have to show me that. I've never heard it before. These days $35 bucks is fast food for two, not meaning much to most, especially if dropped in at 3 different times, of $10, $10 and $15. It is not like he was given a custom Winnebago or had somebody paying for the place his mother lives or giving lavish vacations on luxury yachts, giving the appearance of being bought and paid for. Yes, you would have to show me the statute.
Except as permitted by law,* or by Rules 4.2, 4.3, and 4.4, a judge or a judicial candidate* shall not:
(1) act as a leader in, or hold an office in, a political organization;*
(2) make speeches on behalf of a political organization;
(3) publicly endorse or oppose a candidate for any public office;
(4) solicit funds for, pay an assessment to, or make a contribution* to a political organization or a candidate for public office;
Interesting, especially the part about:
You know this has already made it through due process twice?Interesting, especially the part about:
View attachment 958752
Your point is taken, but I have no idea how closely or how often it has been enforced. The Rule had a date on your page of July 15, 2020. I do not know if that is the date of the rule, whether it really only dates back to that election year, or when he made any of his donations totaling $35.00.
In light of how loosely the Supremes takes money and judgeships, I am not sure if that is a standard or kind of a "be attitude". Have judges ever been actioned in accordance with it, verdicts overturned?
Are you a member of the bar?
2 years house arrestI think 1 year is fair. Non violent offenses, first time offender.
Of course he will get zero jail time, in keeping with the coddling of the orange slob.
You still can't explain it, huh? Don't worry, none of the "legal scholars" in your loon media can either.
He was admonished by the state ethics panelInteresting, especially the part about:
View attachment 958752
Your point is taken, but I have no idea how closely or how often it has been enforced. The Rule had a date on your page of July 15, 2020. I do not know if that is the date of the rule, whether it really only dates back to that election year, or when he made any of his donations totaling $35.00.
What do the Supreme Court Justices have to do with this?In light of how loosely the Supremes takes money and judgeships, I am not sure if that is a standard or kind of a "be attitude". Have judges ever been actioned in accordance with it, verdicts overturned?
Are you a member of the bar?
I can't name a single other person who cheated to win an election by illegally paying off a porn star he rawdogged.People keep saying "anyone else" but this wouldnt have happened to anyone else. And you know it.
they want to unalive him badly. They can taste his unaliveness.Now is your time to put a verdict on Trump before your peep Merchan does
How long should Trump be in prison, or do you favor the death penalty?
Bill Clinton, you should look it up, 800k worth, pssst, Paula Jones. John Edwards, another one. Wow, you don't watch history. oh yeah, you're an ignorant demofk.I can't name a single other person who cheated to win an election by illegally paying off a porn star he rawdogged.
LIBERAL, INDEPENDENT. Will comment anyway.Now is your time to put a verdict on Trump before your peep Merchan does
How long should Trump be in prison, or do you favor the death penalty?
Must be getting close to end time, Fast food is getting to expensive!
who is one period?I also can't name another expresident who stole Top secret materials.
Or a president who illegally tried to overturned a free and fair election, in part by using a violent mob.
Or a president who tried to corrupt State officials by asking them to cheat the vote count.
So no, I don't see any of these indictments coming down on anyone else, anytime soon.
