Payback! Barr assigns prosecuter!

Barr Assigns U.S. Attorney in Connecticut to Review Origins of Russia Inquiry

Ask me how big a smile broke out on my face a few minutes ago?:113::113:

@www.whosnotwinning.com


:hello77::hello77::hello77:

So great.....long time coming. Political eye poking is such a hoot to watch!
Payback is not the AG's job.

That you think it is proves you don't understand US government.
Payback for losing the election isnt the FBI's job.
When did the FBI lose an election?
What the hell kind of question is that? The FBI cant run for office. Democrats however used the FBI to go after Trump, so as i said, "payback isnt the job of the FBI".
How did the Democrats use the FBI?
Obama used the FBI to illegally spy on the trump Campaign. At this point we don't know how deeply the CIA, Brennan and Crapper were involved.
We do know that Comey, as head of the FBI, sign most of the illegal spying applications.

A January 2018 memo that has not gotten nearly enough attention, written by Judiciary Committee Senators Charles Grassley (R., Iowa) and Lindsey Graham (R., S.C.), recounts then-director Comey’s concession that there was no meaningful corroboration of the dossier. Rather, the FBI and Justice Department included it in the “VERIFIED APPLICATION”.

Moreover, FBI and Justice Department procedures require that information be vetted for factual accuracy before it is submitted to the FISC. The rules of the FISC require the Justice Department to notify the court promptly if misstatements or inaccuracies have been discovered. Far from alerting the FISC that information in what it boldly labeled the “VERIFIED APPLICATION” was actually unverified, the Justice Department and the FBI kept reaffirming the dossier allegations to the court — in January, April, and June of 2017.

This week, a dispute between the camps of Comey and Obama CIA director John Brennan broke out into the open — a dispute over which of them tried to force the dossier findings into the aforementioned intelligence-community assessment (ICA). This is a remarkable rift given that the dossier allegations in fact were not included in the ICA (though, again, the infamous “pee tape” claim was included in the briefing of then-president-elect Trump).

Behold how radioactive the dossier has become: Former officials now fight over which of them deserves credit for failing to further inflate its importance.

Former congressman Trey Gowdy, who was privy to some of the underlying classified record, indicates that Comey has the better of the argument. There is, it is suggested, an email trail in which the former FBI director relates that Brennan was advocating the dossier’s inclusion in the ICA.

That also makes logical sense. There is good reason to believe Brennan, though he has tried to distance himself from the dossier, pushed it on congressional leaders in the late summer of 2016 — at around the same time Steele and his Fusion GPS collaborators were pushing it on select media outlets, hoping it would blow a Moscow-size hole in the Trump campaign.
 
No, it proves what Republicans believe that government is for...to serve them and their interests...all else be damned.

They all do, from the peons like the USMB far rightwingers, right up to their Presidents, Bush II, Bush I, Nixon, Reagan and Trump, and everyone else in between.
Lol, coming from someone who supported a bogus investigation that tried to impeach a president. Just because you lost the election.
Bogus investigations do not get guilty pleas and indictments. Please stop repeating this lie.

But the dims are after the king, and came up with nothing. Investigate any member of government, no matter what their affiliation and you will find dirt. Maybe a lot more dirt than on members of the public that are convicted of crime. It is time to see where all this nonsense got started.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I bet ole crepus couldn't get by a week of investigation Trump did for over two years.
And they found him guilty of campaign finance violations, charitable contribution violations, collusion, and obstruction. And tax evasion, tax fraud, bank fraud, money laundering, emoluments violations are next.
Please post the proof, or shut up.
 
No, it proves what Republicans believe that government is for...to serve them and their interests...all else be damned.

They all do, from the peons like the USMB far rightwingers, right up to their Presidents, Bush II, Bush I, Nixon, Reagan and Trump, and everyone else in between.
Lol, coming from someone who supported a bogus investigation that tried to impeach a president. Just because you lost the election.
Bogus investigations do not get guilty pleas and indictments. Please stop repeating this lie.

But the dims are after the king, and came up with nothing. Investigate any member of government, no matter what their affiliation and you will find dirt. Maybe a lot more dirt than on members of the public that are convicted of crime. It is time to see where all this nonsense got started.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I bet ole crepus couldn't get by a week of investigation Trump did for over two years.
And they found him guilty of campaign finance violations, charitable contribution violations, collusion, and obstruction. And tax evasion, tax fraud, bank fraud, money laundering, emoluments violations are next.

Is this in another dimension?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
But the dims are after the king, and came up with nothing. Investigate any member of government, no matter what their affiliation and you will find dirt. Maybe a lot more dirt than on members of the public that are convicted of crime. It is time to see where all this nonsense got started.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I bet ole crepus couldn't get by a week of investigation Trump did for over two years.
That's a moronic comment. You should read the report, and I'm not a public figure.
Yes, we will be reading the report of democrats illegally trying to impeach a legally elected president. Thanks for keeping a Republican president in office for a LONG time!
Trump was not legally elected. He is guilty of using finance campaign funds by paying off pornstars that Cohen is in jail for, he is guilty of using Kris Kobach to illegally purge millions of voters that swung the count in his favor, and Republicans swung the vote in the south by closing down 868 polls in mostly minority areas. That's how Trump won. He won it illegally, and you have zero evidence that what I just presented is false.
You mean the porn star that paid him?
No such thing happened and you cannot prove that. You are a liar. Cohen is in jail for using his money to pay Stormy, then Jr. and Trump wrote checks to Cohen for the hush money Cohen paid.
 
Lol, coming from someone who supported a bogus investigation that tried to impeach a president. Just because you lost the election.
Bogus investigations do not get guilty pleas and indictments. Please stop repeating this lie.

But the dims are after the king, and came up with nothing. Investigate any member of government, no matter what their affiliation and you will find dirt. Maybe a lot more dirt than on members of the public that are convicted of crime. It is time to see where all this nonsense got started.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I bet ole crepus couldn't get by a week of investigation Trump did for over two years.
And they found him guilty of campaign finance violations, charitable contribution violations, collusion, and obstruction. And tax evasion, tax fraud, bank fraud, money laundering, emoluments violations are next.
Please post the proof, or shut up.
Cohen is in jail for the crime Trump orchestrated. That is an established fact. Prosecutors have a court filing proving it.
 
But the dims are after the king, and came up with nothing. Investigate any member of government, no matter what their affiliation and you will find dirt. Maybe a lot more dirt than on members of the public that are convicted of crime. It is time to see where all this nonsense got started.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I bet ole crepus couldn't get by a week of investigation Trump did for over two years.
That's a moronic comment. You should read the report, and I'm not a public figure.
Yes, we will be reading the report of democrats illegally trying to impeach a legally elected president. Thanks for keeping a Republican president in office for a LONG time!
Trump was not legally elected. He is guilty of using finance campaign funds by paying off pornstars that Cohen is in jail for, he is guilty of using Kris Kobach to illegally purge millions of voters that swung the count in his favor, and Republicans swung the vote in the south by closing down 868 polls in mostly minority areas. That's how Trump won. He won it illegally, and you have zero evidence that what I just presented is false.
You mean the porn star that paid him?

Yes. After she lost her suit and had to pay his legal fees. And her attorney is going to be in jail for life.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
But the dims are after the king, and came up with nothing. Investigate any member of government, no matter what their affiliation and you will find dirt. Maybe a lot more dirt than on members of the public that are convicted of crime. It is time to see where all this nonsense got started.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I bet ole crepus couldn't get by a week of investigation Trump did for over two years.
That's a moronic comment. You should read the report, and I'm not a public figure.
Yes, we will be reading the report of democrats illegally trying to impeach a legally elected president. Thanks for keeping a Republican president in office for a LONG time!
Trump was not legally elected. He is guilty of using finance campaign funds by paying off pornstars that Cohen is in jail for, he is guilty of using Kris Kobach to illegally purge millions of voters that swung the count in his favor, and Republicans swung the vote in the south by closing down 868 polls in mostly minority areas. That's how Trump won. He won it illegally, and you have zero evidence that what I just presented is false.

[emoji1787]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You don't have a rebuttal. Thanks! You are a loser.
 
Bogus investigations do not get guilty pleas and indictments. Please stop repeating this lie.

But the dims are after the king, and came up with nothing. Investigate any member of government, no matter what their affiliation and you will find dirt. Maybe a lot more dirt than on members of the public that are convicted of crime. It is time to see where all this nonsense got started.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I bet ole crepus couldn't get by a week of investigation Trump did for over two years.
That's a moronic comment. You should read the report, and I'm not a public figure.
Yes, we will be reading the report of democrats illegally trying to impeach a legally elected president. Thanks for keeping a Republican president in office for a LONG time!
Yeah, no.

That's a whole lotta wishful thinking and hope my friend.
Your representatives are already accusing everyone but themselves. The Democratic party will suffer for years on this one. Maybe after that, We Can Make America Sane Again!
 
Bogus investigations do not get guilty pleas and indictments. Please stop repeating this lie.

But the dims are after the king, and came up with nothing. Investigate any member of government, no matter what their affiliation and you will find dirt. Maybe a lot more dirt than on members of the public that are convicted of crime. It is time to see where all this nonsense got started.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I bet ole crepus couldn't get by a week of investigation Trump did for over two years.
And they found him guilty of campaign finance violations, charitable contribution violations, collusion, and obstruction. And tax evasion, tax fraud, bank fraud, money laundering, emoluments violations are next.
Please post the proof, or shut up.
Cohen is in jail for the crime Trump orchestrated. That is an established fact. Prosecutors have a court filing proving it.

[emoji2957]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I bet ole crepus couldn't get by a week of investigation Trump did for over two years.
That's a moronic comment. You should read the report, and I'm not a public figure.
Yes, we will be reading the report of democrats illegally trying to impeach a legally elected president. Thanks for keeping a Republican president in office for a LONG time!
Trump was not legally elected. He is guilty of using finance campaign funds by paying off pornstars that Cohen is in jail for, he is guilty of using Kris Kobach to illegally purge millions of voters that swung the count in his favor, and Republicans swung the vote in the south by closing down 868 polls in mostly minority areas. That's how Trump won. He won it illegally, and you have zero evidence that what I just presented is false.
You mean the porn star that paid him?

Yes. After she lost her suit and had to pay his legal fees. And her attorney is going to be in jail for life.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Irrelevant argument! Cohen is in jail for Trump orchestrating hush money payments. Trump has been implicated. Other lawsuits are other lawsuits. Ultimate fail again. You lose.
 
“REMEMBERING NOTHING, LEARNING NOTHING:” How the FBI Broke the Rules Using Christopher Steele.

Attorney General Bill Barr recently asked a question that all Americans should be asking: “How did we get to the point where . . . the evidence is now that the president was falsely accused of colluding with the Russians and accused of being treasonous and accused of being a Russian Agent?” Barr added that the evidence now shows the accusations were “without a basis” and that “two years of his administration have been dominated by allegations that have now been proven false.”

To answer that question, we have to go back and look at two dysfunctional relationships the FBI had with confidential informants. In both cases, the FBI was duped into working for the informant rather than the other way around.

The FBI should have learned its lesson from the spectacular scandal surrounding Whitey Bulger, the kingpin of the notorious Winter Hill gang in Boston whose work as an FBI informant allowed him to expand his criminal empire. As we are now seeing with Christopher Steele, of “Steele dossier” infamy, the FBI learned nothing from the Bulger case and failed to follow the guidelines put in place to prevent what happened with Bulger from happening again.

Connolly went to prison for using federal government resources to abet Bulger’s crimes. But justice wasn’t served. Then-U.S. Attorney Robert Mueller prevented the release of evidence that would eventually lead to the exoneration and release of the wrongly convicted targets of the Connolly-Bulger conspiracy. Howie Carr of the Boston Herald has been warning Americans for some time that Mueller perpetuated the framing of four innocent men. Two of them died in prison. The other two were released from prison after 35 years for crimes they did not commit.

Carr credits Mueller with prolonging the cover-up of the Connolly-Bulger framing of these men, causing one judge to describe as “chilling” the FBI’s defense of its reputation over the interests of justice.

“This is a case about . . . informant abuse, about the failure to disclose exculpatory evidence bearing on the innocence of the four plaintiffs . . . about . . . not disclosing critical information that would have exonerated the plaintiffs, and not doing so, for 40 years,” wrote Federal District Judge Nancy Gertner.

Steele was also known to be politically biased against Trump and, “desperate that Trump not be elected.” Solomon has also reported that the FBI withheld (or at least significantly downplayed) those derogatory facts from the FISA court in much the same way Connolly used to paper over the record to make Bulger appear more credible than he really was.

Second, the post-Bulger guidelines also warn the FBI that the information obtained from the confidential informant “must be truthful.” And we now know Steele’s desperation, or perhaps his love of money, led him to pass on information that he would later admit could be untrue or even “deliberately false.”

Third, the guidelines require that the confidential informant must “abide by the instructions of the [FBI].” Steele was “suspended and then terminated” as an FBI source for what the bureau defined “as the most serious of violations”—an “unauthorized disclosure to the media of his relationship with the FBI.” The FBI would later cite a news report sourced to Steele as a way of corroborating Steele—an echo chamber effect that further corrupted the investigation.

Thus, Steele not only helped trigger FBI-sponsored surveillance against his client’s political enemy, he also interfered in the ongoing presidential election by smearing candidate Trump with a public disclosure of the investigation.

Perhaps Donald Trump’s greatest unwitting accomplishment has been to shine public attention on the two-tiered justice system that, at its very center, seems to have become an instrument of political power over and against the people it is meant to serve.
Your first paragraph explains Barr lying to the American public. How do you square with that?
You made that up.

All of this will be sorted out now that Attorney General Bill Barr has appointed John Durham, the excellent U.S. attorney for Connecticut, to investigate the investigation.

For now, though, the telling thing is that no one wants to be associated with the dossier. Even if former director Comey is right that it was Brennan, not he, who was trying to slide the dossier into the ICA, Comey’s FBI still used it in the FISC. Plus, Comey himself did agree to brief Trump on it, though in a very incomplete way — alerting the president-elect to the lurid story about prostitutes in a Moscow hotel, but studiously omitting the tiny detail about how the FBI had used the “salacious and unverified” dossier in the FISC to contend that Trump’s campaign was in a conspiracy with Russia to undermine the election.

The urge to run from the dossier is understandable. In Washington, about ten days before the FISC authorized surveillance of Page, Steele was interviewed by the State Department official Kathleen Kavalec, who took notes that were passed along to the FBI. With very little effort (probably two minutes on Google), Kavalec was able to figure out that one of Steele’s major allegations was an invention.

Specifically, Steele claimed that the Trump-Russia conspiracy involved exploitation of the Russian consulate in Miami to transfer money and information. But there is no Russian consulate in Miami. As the Twitter investigative wiz Undercover Huber details, Steele’s source for this allegation (unidentified Source E) is also the source for the pee-tape story, as well as the foundational allegation that Donald Trump and the Kremlin were in a “well-developed conspiracy of cooperation.”

None of these allegations has ever been verified, and the Mueller report rejects the claim of a Trump-Russia conspiracy.

In the “VERIFIED APPLICATION” that the Obama Justice Department and the FBI submitted, the FISC was led to believe Steele was reliable and that there was no known “derogatory information pertaining to” him — no mention was made of the known errors in his dossier reporting. The first VERIFIED APPLICATION included a laborious footnote (here, pages 15 to 16) vaguely “speculating” that Steele “likely” had a political motivation to discredit Trump’s campaign; the FBI and Justice Department concealed from the court that, far from speculation, they had certain knowledge — from Steele himself — that he was passionately opposed to Trump’s election, and they further failed to disclose that the dossier allegations had been sponsored by the campaign of the opposition candidate (Hillary Clinton). Moreover, the court was told that the FBI did not believe Steele was the “direct” source of dossier information leaked to the media. Yet it not only seemed highly likely Steele was a direct media source; Steele had told Kavalec that he was managing relationships with media outlets, some of which “have” his information (he mentioned “NYT and WP” — the New York Times and the Washington Post)

Steele Dossier: The ‘Verified Application’ That Wasn’t | National Review
 
Last edited:
Payback is not the AG's job.

That you think it is proves you don't understand US government.
No, it proves what Republicans believe that government is for...to serve them and their interests...all else be damned.

They all do, from the peons like the USMB far rightwingers, right up to their Presidents, Bush II, Bush I, Nixon, Reagan and Trump, and everyone else in between.
Lol, coming from someone who supported a bogus investigation that tried to impeach a president. Just because you lost the election.
Bogus investigations do not get guilty pleas and indictments. Please stop repeating this lie.

But the dims are after the king, and came up with nothing. Investigate any member of government, no matter what their affiliation and you will find dirt. Maybe a lot more dirt than on members of the public that are convicted of crime. It is time to see where all this nonsense got started.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
See post #72, then let's see your rebuttal hot shot.
Muller came up with nothing. Get over it!
 
But the dims are after the king, and came up with nothing. Investigate any member of government, no matter what their affiliation and you will find dirt. Maybe a lot more dirt than on members of the public that are convicted of crime. It is time to see where all this nonsense got started.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I bet ole crepus couldn't get by a week of investigation Trump did for over two years.
And they found him guilty of campaign finance violations, charitable contribution violations, collusion, and obstruction. And tax evasion, tax fraud, bank fraud, money laundering, emoluments violations are next.
Please post the proof, or shut up.
Cohen is in jail for the crime Trump orchestrated. That is an established fact. Prosecutors have a court filing proving it.

[emoji2957]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You aren't saying or posting anything. Take a hike if you can't intelligently debate. The iphone nonsense is worth shit.
 
I bet ole crepus couldn't get by a week of investigation Trump did for over two years.
That's a moronic comment. You should read the report, and I'm not a public figure.
Yes, we will be reading the report of democrats illegally trying to impeach a legally elected president. Thanks for keeping a Republican president in office for a LONG time!
Trump was not legally elected. He is guilty of using finance campaign funds by paying off pornstars that Cohen is in jail for, he is guilty of using Kris Kobach to illegally purge millions of voters that swung the count in his favor, and Republicans swung the vote in the south by closing down 868 polls in mostly minority areas. That's how Trump won. He won it illegally, and you have zero evidence that what I just presented is false.

[emoji1787]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You don't have a rebuttal. Thanks! You are a loser.

No you are a loser. But in good company of losers. Hillary, all the dims, etc. Trump=Winners.
 
Bogus investigations do not get guilty pleas and indictments. Please stop repeating this lie.

But the dims are after the king, and came up with nothing. Investigate any member of government, no matter what their affiliation and you will find dirt. Maybe a lot more dirt than on members of the public that are convicted of crime. It is time to see where all this nonsense got started.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I bet ole crepus couldn't get by a week of investigation Trump did for over two years.
And they found him guilty of campaign finance violations, charitable contribution violations, collusion, and obstruction. And tax evasion, tax fraud, bank fraud, money laundering, emoluments violations are next.
Please post the proof, or shut up.
Cohen is in jail for the crime Trump orchestrated. That is an established fact. Prosecutors have a court filing proving it.
For a crime committed before he knew Trump? Hillary is screwed by that logic.
 
“REMEMBERING NOTHING, LEARNING NOTHING:” How the FBI Broke the Rules Using Christopher Steele.

Attorney General Bill Barr recently asked a question that all Americans should be asking: “How did we get to the point where . . . the evidence is now that the president was falsely accused of colluding with the Russians and accused of being treasonous and accused of being a Russian Agent?” Barr added that the evidence now shows the accusations were “without a basis” and that “two years of his administration have been dominated by allegations that have now been proven false.”

To answer that question, we have to go back and look at two dysfunctional relationships the FBI had with confidential informants. In both cases, the FBI was duped into working for the informant rather than the other way around.

The FBI should have learned its lesson from the spectacular scandal surrounding Whitey Bulger, the kingpin of the notorious Winter Hill gang in Boston whose work as an FBI informant allowed him to expand his criminal empire. As we are now seeing with Christopher Steele, of “Steele dossier” infamy, the FBI learned nothing from the Bulger case and failed to follow the guidelines put in place to prevent what happened with Bulger from happening again.

Connolly went to prison for using federal government resources to abet Bulger’s crimes. But justice wasn’t served. Then-U.S. Attorney Robert Mueller prevented the release of evidence that would eventually lead to the exoneration and release of the wrongly convicted targets of the Connolly-Bulger conspiracy. Howie Carr of the Boston Herald has been warning Americans for some time that Mueller perpetuated the framing of four innocent men. Two of them died in prison. The other two were released from prison after 35 years for crimes they did not commit.

Carr credits Mueller with prolonging the cover-up of the Connolly-Bulger framing of these men, causing one judge to describe as “chilling” the FBI’s defense of its reputation over the interests of justice.

“This is a case about . . . informant abuse, about the failure to disclose exculpatory evidence bearing on the innocence of the four plaintiffs . . . about . . . not disclosing critical information that would have exonerated the plaintiffs, and not doing so, for 40 years,” wrote Federal District Judge Nancy Gertner.

Steele was also known to be politically biased against Trump and, “desperate that Trump not be elected.” Solomon has also reported that the FBI withheld (or at least significantly downplayed) those derogatory facts from the FISA court in much the same way Connolly used to paper over the record to make Bulger appear more credible than he really was.

Second, the post-Bulger guidelines also warn the FBI that the information obtained from the confidential informant “must be truthful.” And we now know Steele’s desperation, or perhaps his love of money, led him to pass on information that he would later admit could be untrue or even “deliberately false.”

Third, the guidelines require that the confidential informant must “abide by the instructions of the [FBI].” Steele was “suspended and then terminated” as an FBI source for what the bureau defined “as the most serious of violations”—an “unauthorized disclosure to the media of his relationship with the FBI.” The FBI would later cite a news report sourced to Steele as a way of corroborating Steele—an echo chamber effect that further corrupted the investigation.

Thus, Steele not only helped trigger FBI-sponsored surveillance against his client’s political enemy, he also interfered in the ongoing presidential election by smearing candidate Trump with a public disclosure of the investigation.

Perhaps Donald Trump’s greatest unwitting accomplishment has been to shine public attention on the two-tiered justice system that, at its very center, seems to have become an instrument of political power over and against the people it is meant to serve.
Your first paragraph explains Barr lying to the American public. How do you square with that?
You made that up.

All of this will be sorted out now that Attorney General Bill Barr has appointed John Durham, the excellent U.S. attorney for Connecticut, to investigate the investigation.

For now, though, the telling thing is that no one wants to be associated with the dossier. Even if former director Comey is right that it was Brennan, not he, who was trying to slide the dossier into the ICA, Comey’s FBI still used it in the FISC. Plus, Comey himself did agree to brief Trump on it, though in a very incomplete way — alerting the president-elect to the lurid story about prostitutes in a Moscow hotel, but studiously omitting the tiny detail about how the FBI had used the “salacious and unverified” dossier in the FISC to contend that Trump’s campaign was in a conspiracy with Russia to undermine the election.

The urge to run from the dossier is understandable. In Washington, about ten days before the FISC authorized surveillance of Page, Steele was interviewed by the State Department official Kathleen Kavalec, who took notes that were passed along to the FBI. With very little effort (probably two minutes on Google), Kavalec was able to figure out that one of Steele’s major allegations was an invention.

Specifically, Steele claimed that the Trump-Russia conspiracy involved exploitation of the Russian consulate in Miami to transfer money and information. But there is no Russian consulate in Miami. As the Twitter investigative wiz Undercover Huber details, Steele’s source for this allegation (unidentified Source E) is also the source for the pee-tape story, as well as the foundational allegation that Donald Trump and the Kremlin were in a “well-developed conspiracy of cooperation.”

None of these allegations has ever been verified, and the Mueller report rejects the claim of a Trump-Russia conspiracy.

In the “VERIFIED APPLICATION” that the Obama Justice Department and the FBI submitted, the FISC was led to believe Steele was reliable and that there was no known “derogatory information pertaining to” him — no mention was made of the known errors in his dossier reporting. The first VERIFIED APPLICATION included a laborious footnote (here, pages 15 to 16) vaguely “speculating” that Steele “likely” had a political motivation to discredit Trump’s campaign; the FBI and Justice Department concealed from the court that, far from speculation, they had certain knowledge — from Steele himself — that he was passionately opposed to Trump’s election, and they further failed to disclose that the dossier allegations had been sponsored by the campaign of the opposition candidate (Hillary Clinton). Moreover, the court was told that the FBI did not believe Steele was the “direct” source of dossier information leaked to the media. Yet it not only seemed highly likely Steele was a direct media source; Steele had told Kavalec that he was managing relationships with media outlets, some of which “have” his information (he mentioned “NYT and WP” — the New York Times and the Washington Post).
It's in the public record about Barr lying to the American people. I'm not the one saying it.
 
No, it proves what Republicans believe that government is for...to serve them and their interests...all else be damned.

They all do, from the peons like the USMB far rightwingers, right up to their Presidents, Bush II, Bush I, Nixon, Reagan and Trump, and everyone else in between.
Lol, coming from someone who supported a bogus investigation that tried to impeach a president. Just because you lost the election.
Bogus investigations do not get guilty pleas and indictments. Please stop repeating this lie.

But the dims are after the king, and came up with nothing. Investigate any member of government, no matter what their affiliation and you will find dirt. Maybe a lot more dirt than on members of the public that are convicted of crime. It is time to see where all this nonsense got started.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
See post #72, then let's see your rebuttal hot shot.
Muller came up with nothing. Get over it!
Wrong! He found collusion and obstruction, and left it to Congress to decide the appropriate action. You are lying again to cover for a criminal.
 
A.G. Barr is Getting ‘Inadequate’ Answers.

“I’ve been trying to get answers to the questions and I’ve found that a lot of the answers have been inadequate and some of the explanations I’ve gotten don’t hang together, in a sense I have more questions today than when I first started.”​
So, if he has questions, then why did he lie in his tweet that there was spying?
You made that up.

A State Department employee interviewed Steele long before his garbage was used to illegally spy on a Presidential campaign, and with about 2 minutes research on a key Steele claim was able to conclusively show that a key claim of Steele's was am obvious fabrication.

No mention of Steele’s State Department interview was made to the FISA court. In fact, the court was informed that the only government agency to which Steele had provided information was the FBI (here, page 23). The State Department interview was withheld out of fear that wounds to Steele’s credibility would doom the “VERIFIED APPLICATION.”

Steele identified two of his sources for Kavalec: Russia’s former spy chief Vyacheslav Trubnikov and top Kremlin adviser Vladislav Surkov. This underscores the possibility that Steele was duped, and that the dossier is a Russian disinformation operation that U.S. intelligence agencies fell for. And there’s more: Trubnikov has intriguing ties to Stefan Halper, whom the FBI used as a confidential informant to approach Trump campaign figures Page, George Papadopoulos, and Sam Clovis.

Oh, and did I mention that Steele himself did private-eye work for Oleg Deripaska, the aluminum oligarch known to be a close Putin confidant? And wouldn’t you know it: Steele was also pushing his U.S. government contacts — such as Justice Department official Bruce Ohr — to accommodate Deripaska’s desire to travel to the U.S. The idea was that Deripaska could be a valuable informant. Evidently, the FBI lost interest when Deripaska told agents that Steele’s Trump-Russia conspiracy theory was preposterous.

Steele Dossier: The ‘Verified Application’ That Wasn’t | National Review
 
Last edited:
That's a moronic comment. You should read the report, and I'm not a public figure.
Yes, we will be reading the report of democrats illegally trying to impeach a legally elected president. Thanks for keeping a Republican president in office for a LONG time!
Trump was not legally elected. He is guilty of using finance campaign funds by paying off pornstars that Cohen is in jail for, he is guilty of using Kris Kobach to illegally purge millions of voters that swung the count in his favor, and Republicans swung the vote in the south by closing down 868 polls in mostly minority areas. That's how Trump won. He won it illegally, and you have zero evidence that what I just presented is false.

[emoji1787]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
You don't have a rebuttal. Thanks! You are a loser.

No you are a loser. But in good company of losers. Hillary, all the dims, etc. Trump=Winners.
You say and debate nothing. Scram!
 
That's a moronic comment. You should read the report, and I'm not a public figure.
Yes, we will be reading the report of democrats illegally trying to impeach a legally elected president. Thanks for keeping a Republican president in office for a LONG time!
Trump was not legally elected. He is guilty of using finance campaign funds by paying off pornstars that Cohen is in jail for, he is guilty of using Kris Kobach to illegally purge millions of voters that swung the count in his favor, and Republicans swung the vote in the south by closing down 868 polls in mostly minority areas. That's how Trump won. He won it illegally, and you have zero evidence that what I just presented is false.
You mean the porn star that paid him?

Yes. After she lost her suit and had to pay his legal fees. And her attorney is going to be in jail for life.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Irrelevant argument! Cohen is in jail for Trump orchestrating hush money payments. Trump has been implicated. Other lawsuits are other lawsuits. Ultimate fail again. You lose.
He is in jail for lying under oath. The same bill Clinton should be in jail for.
 

Forum List

Back
Top