- Moderator
- #81
Just how FUCKED UP MENTALLY, can Liberals get...read about it in the N.Y. SLIMES!!!
Daily Caller ^
The nation’s tough anti-pedophilia laws are unfair to pedophiles, according to an op-ed published by The New York Times’ editors. “One can live with pedophilia and not act on it,” says Margo Kaplan, an entrepreneurial assistant law professor at Rutgers University, and a former lawyer for the American Civil Liberties Union. Tragically, the roughly 1 percent of “people who are sexually attracted to children] must hide their disorder from everyone they know — or risk losing educational and job opportunities, and face the prospect of harassment and even violence,” she wrote.....
Statistically, most child-attracted adults eventually act on their desires. Claiming you can be pedophile but not act on it is like claiming priests will stay celibate because they swore to God they will. If that doesn't happen, what restraint is on a non-priest?
There is though a difference between pedophiles and what most are thinking of. A pedophile isn't also then a child rapist or molestor. It's simply someone with the orientation and attraction. Be like saying all heterosexuals are rapists. Just because some are doesn't mean heterosexuality is synonomous with being a rapist. If pedophilic-aged relationships were still legal as they used to be in the US when the age-of-consent was 10, it'd be much ado about nothing. Only reason it's a thing now is because the laws changed making such relationships criminal acts.
I understand what you are saying in the first part: Pedophilia is not neessarily synonymous with a child rapist or molester. If a pedophile never acts on his desire, he has done nothing wrong.
But I do have an issue with the last part.
You say that the only reason it's a thing now is because the laws changed making such relationships criminal acts.
That's not entirely "the only reason". It's what went into making that a criminal act - that children of that age do not have the ability to consent to what is being done to them and that sexual acts in prepubescent children can be very damaging. Not simply a random desire to raise the age of consent but a recognition that is not in the best interests of the child to allow it.
It's kind of like saying the only reason there's a big to-do about slavery or rape is that it is now illegal.