Pelosi already wanting more gun laws

[CrusaderFrank]

Imagine...the very idea of checking who is buying guns!

Any nutjob should be able to get as many as they want any time they want with NO ID or anything...ever.

Sure

We need to check people before they vote too

 

[Claudette]

They already do background checks on anyone purchasing a gun. -

 

[BULLDOG]

They already do background checks on anyone purchasing a gun. -

No they don't. You know better than that.

 

[Claudette]

They already do background checks on anyone purchasing a gun. -

No they don't. You know better than that.

Well when I bought mine they did a background check.

 

[Flash]

Imagine...the very idea of checking who is buying guns!

Any nutjob should be able to get as many as they want any time they want with NO ID or anything...ever.

Sure

Imagine a Moon Bat being confused about Constitutional Rights.

There are several things wrong with a UBC. Since you are unable to figure it out for yourself I will educate you.

UBC don't do anything to stop crime. Just like a driver's license doesn't stop people from driving irresponsibly. The great majority of the gun crime in this country takes place among a demographics that couldn't pass a background check under any circumstances. Doing more background checks won't change anything among the criminal elements that do most of the gun crime in this country. In addition, passing a background check is not a guarantee that the person won't commit a crime in the future. Several of the recent high profile shootings that have been done by people that passed a background check like that asshole that shot up the Republican congressmen.

It is against our Constitutional Rights. The Bill of Rights enumerates rights that can't be infringed by the government. If we have to get permission from the government to enjoy that right then it is really not a right at all, is it? Background checks gives the government the ability to say who can have a right and who can't. That is not what the Bill of Rights is all about, is it? We don't have to pass background checks to enjoy the freedom of religion or the freedom of speech or any other liberty guaranteed in the Bill of Rights, do we? Why should the right to keep and bear arms be any different?

A background check is an assumption of guilty until being proved innocence and that is against everything Americans believe in.

Background checks will do nothing to stop future crimes but it takes away liberty from Americans. We should all oppose it.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

UBC for voting!

 

[CrusaderFrank]

UBC Questions the democrat Party adamantly opposes as an "existential threat"

1. Are you alive
2. Are you a Citizen
3. Are you a real person
4. How many times have you voted so far today

 

[BULLDOG]

They already do background checks on anyone purchasing a gun. -

No they don't. You know better than that.

Well when I bought mine they did a background check.

I suppose a few states might have their own laws, but generally, you can buy all the guns you want from an individual, and never even give your name. Money is the only requirement for that kind of sale.

 

[danielpalos]

The asshole Democrats are hell bent to destroy our Civil Rights by having a UBC for firearms.

Despicable.

Not only do the assholes want UBC but also a gun registry.

The men that stood their ground at Lexington when the fucking government wanted to take away their arms would be turning over in their graves, wouldn't they?

House Democrats' Gun Control Unenforceable Without Firearm Registry

House Democrats’ Gun Control Unenforceable Without Firearm Registry

The gun control currently being pushed by House Democrats is unenforceable without a national firearm registry.

On January 8, 2019, Breitbart News reported that House Democrats introduced legislation to criminalize private gun sales. They are using universal background checks as a means of criminalizing the sales, and they do not mention such checks are unenforceable without firearm registration.

Instead, the Democrats keep talking of how their bill will “prevent” or reduce “gun violence.”

Politico quoted Rep. Mike Thompson (D-CA) saying:

Since the shooting at Sandy Hook, the Gun Violence Prevention Task Force has been fighting for a chance to pass legislation that will help save lives. Finally, with our new majority that ran on helping to prevent gun violence, we will introduce a bipartisan, universal background checks bill. We will hold hearings, we will have a vote, and this legislation will finally pass the House.

But the reality is that universal background checks open the door to a gun registry inasmuch as the government has to know every gun owners’ name and the guns he or she owns in order for the checks to work.

Think about it — universal background checks require that Americans get permission from the government before buying a gun in any setting, retail or private. This means the government knows every time a gun changes hands, and this includes knowing the name of the buyer and the seller, of the make and caliber of the gun, etc. But the only way the government can know these things is to know exactly who owns guns — and what guns he or she owns — at every moment of every day.

We have a Second Amendment and should have no security problems in our free States.

The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.

 

[Crixus]

You know we will eventually have universal background checks. You can fight it if you want, but we both know that in the end you will lose.

Specifically, what IS a “universal background check”? It’s always tossed out there but never defined. What will the “universal background check” do that Brady don’t?

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Now that's funny. I don't care who you are.

It will be completely hysterical watching the melt when it happens.

.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Specifically, what IS a “universal background check”? It’s always tossed out there but never defined. What will the “universal background check” do that Brady don’t?

You've got to understand the REAL objective. Once you do, you will know why they do ANYTHING. UBC legislation will be laced with a bunch of disqualifies that will limit most people from purchasing a firearm.

The objective is to stop all firearm purchases and ownership.

You'll see them crow about NOT wanting to take away guns, but they are liars.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Imagine...the very idea of checking who is buying guns!

Any nutjob should be able to get as many as they want any time they want with NO ID or anything...ever.

Sure

Works for voting.

.

 

[Crixus]

Specifically, what IS a “universal background check”? It’s always tossed out there but never defined. What will the “universal background check” do that Brady don’t?

You've got to understand the REAL objective. Once you do, you will know why they do ANYTHING. UBC legislation will be laced with a bunch of disqualifies that will limit most people from purchasing a firearm.

The objective is to stop all firearm purchases and ownership.

You'll see them crow about NOT wanting to take away guns, but they are liars.

Honestly I don’t agree. Pay attention to anyone who says “universal background check”. They can’t say what it is, really “universal background check” is nothing but sentence filler for polititions. It would be nice if someone can elaborate on what EXACTLY it involves that isn’t being done already.

 

[RDD_1210]

They already do background checks on anyone purchasing a gun. -

No they don't. You know better than that.

Well when I bought mine they did a background check.

That settles it then. Nothing left to discuss here.

 

[Claudette]

They already do background checks on anyone purchasing a gun. -

No they don't. You know better than that.

Well when I bought mine they did a background check.

I suppose a few states might have their own laws, but generally, you can buy all the guns you want from an individual, and never even give your name. Money is the only requirement for that kind of sale.

I don't have a problem with background checks for those who buy guns. Its a damned good idea.

 

[RDD_1210]

Anyone against UBC and a gun registry are people who shouldn't be allowed to have a gun in the first place.

 

[Claudette]

They already do background checks on anyone purchasing a gun. -

No they don't. You know better than that.

Well when I bought mine they did a background check.

That settles it then. Nothing left to discuss here.

You're right. There isn't.

 

[Flash]

Specifically, what IS a “universal background check”? It’s always tossed out there but never defined. What will the “universal background check” do that Brady don’t?

You've got to understand the REAL objective. Once you do, you will know why they do ANYTHING. UBC legislation will be laced with a bunch of disqualifies that will limit most people from purchasing a firearm.

The objective is to stop all firearm purchases and ownership.

You'll see them crow about NOT wanting to take away guns, but they are liars.

Honestly I don’t agree. Pay attention to anyone who says “universal background check”. They can’t say what it is, really “universal background check” is nothing but sentence filler for polititions. It would be nice if someone can elaborate on what EXACTLY it involves that isn’t being done already.

It means that you have to get permission from the government to enjoy a right that is enumerated in the Bill of Rights.

 

[Slyhunter]

We need UBC for immigrants first.