Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This dopey, very OLD notion was already refuted by me in this thread. Guess where ? In the post you quoted. Here it is again.>>>again- only have a problem with that "belief system" because we keep sticking our dicks in their hornet's nest. That's when we aren't specifically nurturing a bigger, meaner hornet that turns around and stings us. Saddam, Bin Laden, the rebels in Libya, these are all bigger hornets we helped and then they turned on us. Maybe we need to stop sticking our dicks in their hornet's nest. That's a kooky idea.
But, no, it's because their belief in a magic sky pixie is worse than YOUR belief in a magic sky fairy.
EARTH TO JOE: Muslim loons have been sticking their swords into peaceful non-Muslims' backs for 1400 years, killing 270 million of them. It's what they do. Get it ? it comes from their nasty book of hate (the Koran)
Now we live in a NUCLEAR weapon world. To defend ourselves from these deranged lunatics, we HAVE TO go to their part of the world, AND EXTERMINATE THEM, to prevent them from doing that to us. Welcome to the real world.
If we hadn't kept fucking around in their "part of the world" - this mess wouldn't be happening.
Wrong....If we hadn't kept fucking around in their "part of the world" - this mess wouldn't be happening.
Agreed. Love it when those ISIS guys get vaporized, from coalition airstrikes..
Can't get up when a bunch of racists get their asses kicked for their bad behavior.
No, actually, our resident Muslim Apologist (Joe) is correct, in large part...Nice try Mohammed, but there wasn't even ONE year of Christian savagery. The only part that maybe could be called that was the Spanish Inquistion, and that was a small group of loose-brained fanatics, not "Christianity"Yes, Joe, we realize that you hate Christianity, and make excuses for Islam... we get it.
Naw, man, I just find it hilarious that you guys want to paint Islam as savage while ignoring 2000 years of Christian Savagery.
No, that's called being a jihadist.I'm not offering money to insult them to start with. Nor am I doing it in a public forum and endangering a lot of bystanders...
That's called "Being considerate".
Nice try, Mohammed. Your posts are getting shorter, and dumber.You mean you don't believe in enforcing the law because you're an ignorant savage.
Actually, inciting a riot is against the law. Someone needs to lock Geller up.
We already know they got you programmed all the way. No need to repeat. Except that maybe you ARE "THEY".No, dumb is going over to their countries and giving them a REASON to want to behead you.
The problem is you think this is about religion. It isn't.
It's about our policies of supporting the Zionists, who stole their land, propping up dictators who make their lives fairly miserable, and waging wars to keep the flow of oil going.
Again- we stick our dicks in a hornet's nest and wonder why we get stung.
I could respond to all of these, but I'm running short on time, so I'll just take 2.No, actually, our resident Muslim Apologist (Joe) is correct, in large part...Nice try Mohammed, but there wasn't even ONE year of Christian savagery. The only part that maybe could be called that was the Spanish Inquistion, and that was a small group of loose-brained fanatics, not "Christianity"Yes, Joe, we realize that you hate Christianity, and make excuses for Islam... we get it.
Naw, man, I just find it hilarious that you guys want to paint Islam as savage while ignoring 2000 years of Christian Savagery.
Christianity has a long, bloody and savage history associated with it, stretching back into Late Roman Imperial times, once Christianity had been allowed to come out into the light of day by Constantine in the 300s...
As Christians began shutting down pagan and Jewish worship-places and schools and communities, and, in later centuries, after the Fall of the Western Empire, as European warlords began using the excuse of converting local populations to Christianity, as an excuse to make war on their neighbor tribes and early feudal polities...
And, later, as Christendom rallied against Islamic aggression to launch the Crusades, and then, of course, the sheer madness of the Reformation Wars (the Thirty Years War and similar catastrophes)...
As well as some of the early Conquistador activity in the New World, and in penetrating the Indian and Chinese and Arabian territories, in order to carve-out Euro-Imperial holdings.
The trouble with the comparison is, that when Christian-leaning warlords and leaders and nations did such things, they did them in violation of the core teachings of Jesus of Nazareth (Love Thy Neighbor, Turn the Other Cheek, etc.) - inventing juicy rationalizations like 'Just War' as smokescreens, to sucker their populations into supporting them.
When Muslim-leaning warlords and leaders and nations did such things, they did them IN COMPLIANCE WITH and IN ACCORDANCE WITH the core teachings of Muhammed ( "Slay the Polytheists" and "Smite the Unbelievers" and "Kill the Infidel", etc) - requiring no juicy rationalizations but their Holy Scripture, which imposes such things upon them.
And, of course, Christianity has not been subverted and intentionally misinterpreted and rationalized in order to conjure-up such mischief in a very great many years.
Islam - requiring no subversion or misinterpretation or rationalizations in order to conjure-up such mischief, is doing it as we speak, and has been, for quite some years now.
So, I give Ol' Joe props for the accuracy of his observation...
While throwing rocks at his position for omitting such important distinguishing background and history and context, as a highly partisan and pertinent omission of fact.
Or so it seems, to this observer.
It would be the mess it's started to turn into now, due to European liberal PC idiocy.If it were not for Christians Europe would most likely be totally Muslim today. The Crusades drove them out. Gawd can you imagine how backwards Europe would be?
I could respond to all of these, but I'm running short on time, so I'll just take 2.No, actually, our resident Muslim Apologist (Joe) is correct, in large part...Nice try Mohammed, but there wasn't even ONE year of Christian savagery. The only part that maybe could be called that was the Spanish Inquistion, and that was a small group of loose-brained fanatics, not "Christianity"Yes, Joe, we realize that you hate Christianity, and make excuses for Islam... we get it.
Naw, man, I just find it hilarious that you guys want to paint Islam as savage while ignoring 2000 years of Christian Savagery.
Christianity has a long, bloody and savage history associated with it, stretching back into Late Roman Imperial times, once Christianity had been allowed to come out into the light of day by Constantine in the 300s...
As Christians began shutting down pagan and Jewish worship-places and schools and communities, and, in later centuries, after the Fall of the Western Empire, as European warlords began using the excuse of converting local populations to Christianity, as an excuse to make war on their neighbor tribes and early feudal polities...
And, later, as Christendom rallied against Islamic aggression to launch the Crusades, and then, of course, the sheer madness of the Reformation Wars (the Thirty Years War and similar catastrophes)...
As well as some of the early Conquistador activity in the New World, and in penetrating the Indian and Chinese and Arabian territories, in order to carve-out Euro-Imperial holdings.
The trouble with the comparison is, that when Christian-leaning warlords and leaders and nations did such things, they did them in violation of the core teachings of Jesus of Nazareth (Love Thy Neighbor, Turn the Other Cheek, etc.) - inventing juicy rationalizations like 'Just War' as smokescreens, to sucker their populations into supporting them.
When Muslim-leaning warlords and leaders and nations did such things, they did them IN COMPLIANCE WITH and IN ACCORDANCE WITH the core teachings of Muhammed ( "Slay the Polytheists" and "Smite the Unbelievers" and "Kill the Infidel", etc) - requiring no juicy rationalizations but their Holy Scripture, which imposes such things upon them.
And, of course, Christianity has not been subverted and intentionally misinterpreted and rationalized in order to conjure-up such mischief in a very great many years.
Islam - requiring no subversion or misinterpretation or rationalizations in order to conjure-up such mischief, is doing it as we speak, and has been, for quite some years now.
So, I give Ol' Joe props for the accuracy of his observation...
While throwing rocks at his position for omitting such important distinguishing background and history and context, as a highly partisan and pertinent omission of fact.
Or so it seems, to this observer.
1. The Crusades was a RESPONSE to 477 years of Muslim genocide all over southern Europe, Asia Minor, and North Africa. Only question might be what took the Crusaders to finally act against the savages ?
2. The conquistadors were not connected with religion. Their goals were gold, silver, art, and other fine things, plus political egotism. There indeed were missionaries who came to the western hemisphere. They were not conquistadors, they didn't have the protection of the soldiers, and they often wound up being tortured and killed by the aborigial American inhabitants.
This dopey, very OLD notion was already refuted by me in this thread. Guess where ? In the post you quoted. Here it is again.>>>again- only have a problem with that "belief system" because we keep sticking our dicks in their hornet's nest. That's when we aren't specifically nurturing a bigger, meaner hornet that turns around and stings us. Saddam, Bin Laden, the rebels in Libya, these are all bigger hornets we helped and then they turned on us. Maybe we need to stop sticking our dicks in their hornet's nest. That's a kooky idea.
But, no, it's because their belief in a magic sky pixie is worse than YOUR belief in a magic sky fairy.
EARTH TO JOE: Muslim loons have been sticking their swords into peaceful non-Muslims' backs for 1400 years, killing 270 million of them. It's what they do. Get it ? it comes from their nasty book of hate (the Koran)
Now we live in a NUCLEAR weapon world. To defend ourselves from these deranged lunatics, we HAVE TO go to their part of the world, AND EXTERMINATE THEM, to prevent them from doing that to us. Welcome to the real world.
If we hadn't kept fucking around in their "part of the world" - this mess wouldn't be happening.
Muslim loons have been sticking their swords into peaceful non-Muslims' backs for 1400 years, killing 270 million of them. It's what they do. Get it ? it comes from their nasty book of hate (the Koran) They do it NO MATTER WHAT WE DO.
Take your own advice, scanner.Have you ever considered seeing a psychiatrist ?How I wish that were true, but ISIS is very human, unfortunately, and it's doing exactly as expected for something made up of the Children of God, slaughtering other Children of God.
The point being, that there was more accuracy than inaccuracy in his macro-level observation.I could respond to all of these, but I'm running short on time, so I'll just take 2.No, actually, our resident Muslim Apologist (Joe) is correct, in large part...Nice try Mohammed, but there wasn't even ONE year of Christian savagery. The only part that maybe could be called that was the Spanish Inquistion, and that was a small group of loose-brained fanatics, not "Christianity"Yes, Joe, we realize that you hate Christianity, and make excuses for Islam... we get it.
Naw, man, I just find it hilarious that you guys want to paint Islam as savage while ignoring 2000 years of Christian Savagery.
Christianity has a long, bloody and savage history associated with it, stretching back into Late Roman Imperial times, once Christianity had been allowed to come out into the light of day by Constantine in the 300s...
As Christians began shutting down pagan and Jewish worship-places and schools and communities, and, in later centuries, after the Fall of the Western Empire, as European warlords began using the excuse of converting local populations to Christianity, as an excuse to make war on their neighbor tribes and early feudal polities...
And, later, as Christendom rallied against Islamic aggression to launch the Crusades, and then, of course, the sheer madness of the Reformation Wars (the Thirty Years War and similar catastrophes)...
As well as some of the early Conquistador activity in the New World, and in penetrating the Indian and Chinese and Arabian territories, in order to carve-out Euro-Imperial holdings.
The trouble with the comparison is, that when Christian-leaning warlords and leaders and nations did such things, they did them in violation of the core teachings of Jesus of Nazareth (Love Thy Neighbor, Turn the Other Cheek, etc.) - inventing juicy rationalizations like 'Just War' as smokescreens, to sucker their populations into supporting them.
When Muslim-leaning warlords and leaders and nations did such things, they did them IN COMPLIANCE WITH and IN ACCORDANCE WITH the core teachings of Muhammed ( "Slay the Polytheists" and "Smite the Unbelievers" and "Kill the Infidel", etc) - requiring no juicy rationalizations but their Holy Scripture, which imposes such things upon them.
And, of course, Christianity has not been subverted and intentionally misinterpreted and rationalized in order to conjure-up such mischief in a very great many years.
Islam - requiring no subversion or misinterpretation or rationalizations in order to conjure-up such mischief, is doing it as we speak, and has been, for quite some years now.
So, I give Ol' Joe props for the accuracy of his observation...
While throwing rocks at his position for omitting such important distinguishing background and history and context, as a highly partisan and pertinent omission of fact.
Or so it seems, to this observer.
1. The Crusades was a RESPONSE to 477 years of Muslim genocide all over southern Europe, Asia Minor, and North Africa. Only question might be what took the Crusaders to finally act against the savages ?
2. The conquistadors were not connected with religion. Their goals were gold, silver, art, and other fine things, plus political egotism. There indeed were missionaries who came to the western hemisphere. They were not conquistadors, they didn't have the protection of the soldiers, and they often wound up being tortured and killed by the aborigial American inhabitants.
The real history? Yes, we already have that, it's called........................................wait for it..............................................history. And in that history the Christians got down on their knees to thank their God, for his help in the slaughter of men, women, children, and infants they just committed. Just the Children of God hard at work, slaughtering other Children of God.I could respond to all of these, but I'm running short on time, so I'll just take 2.No, actually, our resident Muslim Apologist (Joe) is correct, in large part...Nice try Mohammed, but there wasn't even ONE year of Christian savagery. The only part that maybe could be called that was the Spanish Inquistion, and that was a small group of loose-brained fanatics, not "Christianity"Yes, Joe, we realize that you hate Christianity, and make excuses for Islam... we get it.
Naw, man, I just find it hilarious that you guys want to paint Islam as savage while ignoring 2000 years of Christian Savagery.
Christianity has a long, bloody and savage history associated with it, stretching back into Late Roman Imperial times, once Christianity had been allowed to come out into the light of day by Constantine in the 300s...
As Christians began shutting down pagan and Jewish worship-places and schools and communities, and, in later centuries, after the Fall of the Western Empire, as European warlords began using the excuse of converting local populations to Christianity, as an excuse to make war on their neighbor tribes and early feudal polities...
And, later, as Christendom rallied against Islamic aggression to launch the Crusades, and then, of course, the sheer madness of the Reformation Wars (the Thirty Years War and similar catastrophes)...
As well as some of the early Conquistador activity in the New World, and in penetrating the Indian and Chinese and Arabian territories, in order to carve-out Euro-Imperial holdings.
The trouble with the comparison is, that when Christian-leaning warlords and leaders and nations did such things, they did them in violation of the core teachings of Jesus of Nazareth (Love Thy Neighbor, Turn the Other Cheek, etc.) - inventing juicy rationalizations like 'Just War' as smokescreens, to sucker their populations into supporting them.
When Muslim-leaning warlords and leaders and nations did such things, they did them IN COMPLIANCE WITH and IN ACCORDANCE WITH the core teachings of Muhammed ( "Slay the Polytheists" and "Smite the Unbelievers" and "Kill the Infidel", etc) - requiring no juicy rationalizations but their Holy Scripture, which imposes such things upon them.
And, of course, Christianity has not been subverted and intentionally misinterpreted and rationalized in order to conjure-up such mischief in a very great many years.
Islam - requiring no subversion or misinterpretation or rationalizations in order to conjure-up such mischief, is doing it as we speak, and has been, for quite some years now.
So, I give Ol' Joe props for the accuracy of his observation...
While throwing rocks at his position for omitting such important distinguishing background and history and context, as a highly partisan and pertinent omission of fact.
Or so it seems, to this observer.
1. The Crusades was a RESPONSE to 477 years of Muslim genocide all over southern Europe, Asia Minor, and North Africa. Only question might be what took the Crusaders to finally act against the savages ?
2. The conquistadors were not connected with religion. Their goals were gold, silver, art, and other fine things, plus political egotism. There indeed were missionaries who came to the western hemisphere. They were not conquistadors, they didn't have the protection of the soldiers, and they often wound up being tortured and killed by the aborigial American inhabitants.
This explains the Crusades very well.
History of the Crusades
You mean you don't believe in enforcing the law because you're an ignorant savage.
Actually, inciting a riot is against the law. Someone needs to lock Geller up.
As bad as it was during the Dark Ages you mean? When the Muslims were the keepers of all the knowledge up to that point that mattered?If it were not for Christians Europe would most likely be totally Muslim today. The Crusades drove them out. Gawd can you imagine how backwards Europe would be?
And what is the point of making a Graven Image? Oh right, to insult the religion of 1.6 billion people since there is absolutely no other reason for doing so.You mean you don't believe in enforcing the law because you're an ignorant savage.
Actually, inciting a riot is against the law. Someone needs to lock Geller up.
Drawing a picture of Muhammed doesn't qualify as "inciting a riot," any more than a bunch of black people waking down the streets of Selma Alabama in 1960 doesn't qualify. If pissing a bunch of imbecile savages off by spouting ideas they don't like qualified as a justification for rioting or murdering people, then it would be legal for me to run around shooting people who support Obama or Hillary because that sure pisses me off.
