Pocahontas Warren's pathetic treatment of Chief Justice John Roberts, and his dignified response

[basquebromance]

Warren's question to Chief Justice Roberts was truly ridiculous.

"At a time when large majorities of Americans have lost faith in government, does the fact that the chief justice is presiding over an impeachment trial in which Republican senators have thus far refused to allow witnesses or evidence contribute to the loss of legitimacy of the chief justice, the Supreme Court, and the Constitution?"

Roberts's calm response showed him for the far superior public servant he is. To his credit, Adam Schiff rebuked his fellow Democrat by answering her question with a defense of Roberts's honest presiding. our loss of faith in government isn't a consequence of men and women like Roberts, but of Warren. Of partisans who shred the truth for narrow political expediency. Of politicians who pretend to have all the answers. Of people who use positions of power to score cheap points at the expense of our institutions and public servants. Does Trump sometimes engage in this action? You bet. But Warren's attack on a dedicated public servant wasn't just intellectually pathetic, it was cowardly.

Warren knows that Roberts cannot allow himself to be swept up in the partisan excrement show. He must strive to sit above it. Rightly determined to maintain the judiciary's integrity as an objective force for the law and the people, the chief justice would surely wish to be anywhere else but in the center of this political melee. But Roberts knows his duty is to be there and to put the nation first. It's duty, stupid.

If only Warren could find it within herself to serve the people so nobly.

 

[Jackson]

Warren's question to Chief Justice Roberts was truly ridiculous.

"At a time when large majorities of Americans have lost faith in government, does the fact that the chief justice is presiding over an impeachment trial in which Republican senators have thus far refused to allow witnesses or evidence contribute to the loss of legitimacy of the chief justice, the Supreme Court, and the Constitution?"

Roberts's calm response showed him for the far superior public servant he is. To his credit, Adam Schiff rebuked his fellow Democrat by answering her question with a defense of Roberts's honest presiding. our loss of faith in government isn't a consequence of men and women like Roberts, but of Warren. Of partisans who shred the truth for narrow political expediency. Of politicians who pretend to have all the answers. Of people who use positions of power to score cheap points at the expense of our institutions and public servants. Does Trump sometimes engage in this action? You bet. But Warren's attack on a dedicated public servant wasn't just intellectually pathetic, it was cowardly.

Warren knows that Roberts cannot allow himself to be swept up in the partisan excrement show. He must strive to sit above it. Rightly determined to maintain the judiciary's integrity as an objective force for the law and the people, the chief justice would surely wish to be anywhere else but in the center of this political melee. But Roberts knows his duty is to be there and to put the nation first. It's duty, stupid.

If only Warren could find it within herself to serve the people so nobly.

If only Warren could find it within herself to serve the people so nobly.

Warren hasn't a clue what noble means.

 

[Sunni Man]

Lie-a-watha Warren felt she had to ask a question, no matter how moronic, just to get her name mentioned during the trial. ..

 

[Mac-7]

Warren's question to Chief Justice Roberts was truly ridiculous.

"At a time when large majorities of Americans have lost faith in government, does the fact that the chief justice is presiding over an impeachment trial in which Republican senators have thus far refused to allow witnesses or evidence contribute to the loss of legitimacy of the chief justice, the Supreme Court, and the Constitution?"

Roberts's calm response showed him for the far superior public servant he is. To his credit, Adam Schiff rebuked his fellow Democrat by answering her question with a defense of Roberts's honest presiding. our loss of faith in government isn't a consequence of men and women like Roberts, but of Warren. Of partisans who shred the truth for narrow political expediency. Of politicians who pretend to have all the answers. Of people who use positions of power to score cheap points at the expense of our institutions and public servants. Does Trump sometimes engage in this action? You bet. But Warren's attack on a dedicated public servant wasn't just intellectually pathetic, it was cowardly.

Warren knows that Roberts cannot allow himself to be swept up in the partisan excrement show. He must strive to sit above it. Rightly determined to maintain the judiciary's integrity as an objective force for the law and the people, the chief justice would surely wish to be anywhere else but in the center of this political melee. But Roberts knows his duty is to be there and to put the nation first. It's duty, stupid.

If only Warren could find it within herself to serve the people so nobly.

If only Warren could find it within herself to serve the people so nobly.

Warren hasn't a clue what noble means.

Neither does roberts

 

[pknopp]

Congress sets the rules in an impeachment hearing. That's the way it is.

That noted, yes, while right here, Roberts is a part of the problem also........his twisting of the Affordable Care Act to make it legal is something that caused a lot of people to distrust the government.

 

[basquebromance]

"my job isn't to write the laws, it's to apply the laws" - Rowdy John Roberts

 

[two_iron]

Screeching Cheeks has gone batshit loco which wasn't much of a trip. I marvel at the fact that I am exponentially superior to that injun shitstain in every way possible. THAT should be scraping the bugs off my windshield at the carwash.... or washing the racing stripes out of my underwear.... anything but screeching at me on camera.

 

[keepitreal]

Warren's question to Chief Justice Roberts was truly ridiculous.

"At a time when large majorities of Americans have lost faith in government, does the fact that the chief justice is presiding over an impeachment trial in which Republican senators have thus far refused to allow witnesses or evidence contribute to the loss of legitimacy of the chief justice, the Supreme Court, and the Constitution?"

Roberts's calm response showed him for the far superior public servant he is. To his credit, Adam Schiff rebuked his fellow Democrat by answering her question with a defense of Roberts's honest presiding. our loss of faith in government isn't a consequence of men and women like Roberts, but of Warren. Of partisans who shred the truth for narrow political expediency. Of politicians who pretend to have all the answers. Of people who use positions of power to score cheap points at the expense of our institutions and public servants. Does Trump sometimes engage in this action? You bet. But Warren's attack on a dedicated public servant wasn't just intellectually pathetic, it was cowardly.

Warren knows that Roberts cannot allow himself to be swept up in the partisan excrement show. He must strive to sit above it. Rightly determined to maintain the judiciary's integrity as an objective force for the law and the people, the chief justice would surely wish to be anywhere else but in the center of this political melee. But Roberts knows his duty is to be there and to put the nation first. It's duty, stupid.

If only Warren could find it within herself to serve the people so nobly.

OMG...I can not stand listening to that lying, hypocrite

 

[keepitreal]

Warren's question to Chief Justice Roberts was truly ridiculous.

"At a time when large majorities of Americans have lost faith in government, does the fact that the chief justice is presiding over an impeachment trial in which Republican senators have thus far refused to allow witnesses or evidence contribute to the loss of legitimacy of the chief justice, the Supreme Court, and the Constitution?"

Roberts's calm response showed him for the far superior public servant he is. To his credit, Adam Schiff rebuked his fellow Democrat by answering her question with a defense of Roberts's honest presiding. our loss of faith in government isn't a consequence of men and women like Roberts, but of Warren. Of partisans who shred the truth for narrow political expediency. Of politicians who pretend to have all the answers. Of people who use positions of power to score cheap points at the expense of our institutions and public servants. Does Trump sometimes engage in this action? You bet. But Warren's attack on a dedicated public servant wasn't just intellectually pathetic, it was cowardly.

Warren knows that Roberts cannot allow himself to be swept up in the partisan excrement show. He must strive to sit above it. Rightly determined to maintain the judiciary's integrity as an objective force for the law and the people, the chief justice would surely wish to be anywhere else but in the center of this political melee. But Roberts knows his duty is to be there and to put the nation first. It's duty, stupid.

If only Warren could find it within herself to serve the people so nobly.

Judiciary integrity does not exist anymore than
a system of checks and balances or a government
of the people, by the people and for the people does.

The employees have become the employers
They do not work for us, we work for them

 

[Likkmee]

A mere squaw should never insult The Chief

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

"my job isn't to write the laws, it's to apply the laws" - Rowdy John Roberts

Did he say this before he argued for the Affordable Care Act by showing Obama and his lawyers that the individual mandate would be treated as a tax even though none of them thought it was?