Poland Shows the World How to Handle Little Punk Antifa Members

[JimBowie1958]

I just love Poland.



They bust these cowards for every infraction of the law they commit and take them to jail promptly. They do not give them any room to bloviate.

 

[mamooth]

Fascists = bad buys

Antifa = good guys.

It's not a difficult concept, for those who aren't Nazis.

 

[Desperado]

Antifa = good guys.

And what color is the sky in your world?

 

[martybegan]

Fascists = bad buys

Antifa = good guys.

It's not a difficult concept, for those who aren't Nazis.

Antifa are the fascists, despite their protests to the contrary.

 

[mamooth]

In every spot where the Trump cult tries to hold a white supremacist rally, antifa now runs their Nazi asses out of town, to the cheers of the locals.

That's reality, which triggers the Trumpflakes badly. People don't like Nazis, and they do like people who oppose Nazis.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

Fascists = bad buys

Antifa = good guys.

It's not a difficult concept, for those who aren't Nazis.

Fascists = Good guys.

ANTIFA = Bad guys.

 

[Desperado]

In every spot where the Trump cult tries to hold a white supremacist rally, antifa now runs their Nazi asses out of town, to the cheers of the locals.

That's reality, which triggers the Trumpflakes badly. People don't like Nazis, and they do like people who oppose Nazis.

So you agree that antifa hates the 1st amendment, which makes them Anti-American

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

ANTIFA countries I'd describe as Germany, Britain, Sweden, and even Russia, countries which support ethnic cleansing of the indigenous White people in those countries by Islamists., and which crack down on the freedom of speech on those who fight back.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

In every spot where the Trump cult tries to hold a white supremacist rally, antifa now runs their Nazi asses out of town, to the cheers of the locals.

That's reality, which triggers the Trumpflakes badly. People don't like Nazis, and they do like people who oppose Nazis.

Most who support Trump are Paleo-Conservatives, not Nazis.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

 

[JimBowie1958]

Antifa = good guys.

And what color is the sky in your world?

Likely poop brown as her shit content overfloweth.

 

[JimBowie1958]

Most who support Trump are Paleo-Conservatives, not Nazis.

To morons like Mamootha, paleo-conservative = Nazi.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

 

[JimBowie1958]

ANTIFA countries I'd describe as Germany, Britain, Sweden, and even Russia, countries which support ethnic cleansing of the indigenous White people in those countries by Islamists., and which crack down on the freedom of speech on those who fight back.

Who do you think Russia supports ethnic cleansing of whites?

I would say it is quite the opposite of that

 

[Rustic]

Fascists = bad buys

Antifa = good guys.

It's not a difficult concept, for those who aren't Nazis.

Antifa is just another hate group, shoot first ask questions later.

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

ANTIFA countries I'd describe as Germany, Britain, Sweden, and even Russia, countries which support ethnic cleansing of the indigenous White people in those countries by Islamists., and which crack down on the freedom of speech on those who fight back.

Who do you think Russia supports ethnic cleansing of whites?

I would say it is quite the opposite of that

uNet, hate crime and soft targets: how Russia enforces its anti-extremism law
NATALIA YUDINA 30 October 2012

The internet is a tool that can be used for good, but it can also be manipulated by fanatics preaching violent hate propaganda. Policing is never going to be easy, but the Russian police inflate their statistics by choosing soft targets and ignoring the truly dangerous criminals, says Natalia Yudina

The internet is becoming ever more accessible in Russia, offering unlimited possibilities for the distribution of every kind of content. Cyberspace is also censored very minimally. This gives everyone an opportunity to speak their minds and cyber-antagonism is widespread in the Russian internet community.

However, the number of savvy internet users among law enforcement officials has increased as well; since 2006 their control over the Russian segment of the internet (RuNet) has become much more noticeable, and the Russian judiciary has now accumulated substantial experience in the ‘war on internet extremism.’ Its campaign has, however, been waged not only against truly dangerous criminals, such as those inciting racial hatred, but also against many people whose so-called criminal activity is questionable, or even non-existent.

Criminal convictions: Articles 280 and 282
Before 2008, the number of convictions for specifically internet propaganda was in single digits:

• - in 2007 we knew of only 3 cases (out of a total of 28) of online public provocation to extremist activity and/or incitement to racial or other hatred;
• - in 2008 the number of internet-related convictions had already increased to 14 (out of 45);
• - in 2009 it grew to 17 (out of 56);
• - in 2010 there were 26 (out of 72);
• - in 2011 convictions had doubled: there were at least 52 (out of 78 in total). In other words, the majority of ‘extremist propaganda’ cases resulted from online activity;
• - this trend continues in 2012: in the first half of the year there were at least 18 convictions (out of 32).

The graph below shows the dynamics of this process (the data for 2012 are a projection, assuming that the second half will be the same as the first one):

These figures give the lie to the assertion that Russia lacks the legal framework for prosecuting ‘cyber-hatred,’ and confirm that existing articles of the Criminal Code are being successfully applied in cases of illegal online propaganda.

The key ‘anti-propaganda’ article of the Criminal Code in the public mind (and probably in the minds of law enforcement agencies too) is Article 282(‘incitement of national, racial, or religious enmity). Article 280 (‘Public incitement to extremist activity’) is used far less often.

The first known criminal conviction, under Article 280, for propaganda via the internet was in March 2005. Another conviction took place at almost the same time in Syktyvkar [capital of the Komi Republic, Russian Federation], this time under Article 282, for publishing xenophobic materials on the internet.

'The first known criminal conviction, under Article 280, for propaganda via the internet was in March 2005.'

RuNet, hate crime and soft targets: how Russia enforces its anti-extremism law

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]

 

[SobieskiSavedEurope]